TCR_Public/171009.mbx          T R O U B L E D   C O M P A N Y   R E P O R T E R

              Monday, October 9, 2017, Vol. 21, No. 281

                            Headlines

190 SOUTH STREET: Sale of Morristown Property for $3.2M Approved
4 C'S RENTALS: Hires Elite Residential as Real Estate Broker
470 W 42 STREET: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
488-486 LEFFERTS: TBD Buying Brooklyn Property for $2.1 Million
760 LONG POND ROAD: Hires HUNT as Real Estate Broker

A&B LODGING THREE: Hires Eubanks Law as Attorney
ACHQ INC: Hires McIntyre Thanasides Bringgold as Counsel
ACHQ INC: Wants to Use Cash Collateral to Maintain Business
AIAD SAMUEL: Trustee's Sale of Personal Property by Auction Okayed
AJUBEO LLC: Has Final OK to Use Bank's Cash Collateral

ALL PEOPLE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
ALLY FINANCIAL: Mid-Cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test 2017
AMERICAN TANK: U.S. Trustee Forms 2-Member Committee
AMIGO PAT TEXAS: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Oct. 20
APPVION INC: Hires Prime Clerk as Claims and Noticing Agent

APPVION INC: Proposes $325.2 Million of Financing From PJT
AUTHENTIC GELATO: Hires Bryan Cave as Bankruptcy Counsel
AUTHENTIC GELATO: Hires Resurgence Financial as Investment Banker
B & B METALS: Oct. 31 Disclosure Statement Hearing
B N EMPIRE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee

BAITY'S PRECISION: Hires Gardner as Attorney Replacing Knight Law
BARBARA MAGNUSSON: Trustee Selling Spring Lake Property for $2.9M
BCL ONE: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
BINDER & BINDER: Sale of Interests in SSA Cases to Advocator Okayed
BLUE MOON HOTEL: Hires Avrach & Company as Accountant

BOEGEL FARMS: Proposes Auction of Kearney Properties
BRAZILIAN BUFFET: Hires Avram D. White as Counsel
BREITBURN ENERGY: Equity Committee Wants Exclusivity Terminated
BRONX MIRACLE GOSPEL: Hires Colasanti & Iurato as Accountant
C&C ALCOSER: Hires Johnny W. Thomas as Counsel

CAMPBELLTON-GRACEVILLE: Committee Hires Investigative Assistant
CAPITAL ONE: Fitch Affirms 'BB' Preferred Stock Rating
CAPITOL SUPPLY: Hires Shraiberg Landaue as Bankruptcy Counsel
CHARLES SILLER: Spiller Entitled to Contingent Fee, 9th Cir. Says
CITIZENS FINANCIAL: Fitch Affirms BB- Preferred Stock Rating

CITY WIDE INVESTMENTS: Wins Clawback Suit vs City of Milwaukee
COCOA SERVICES: Sale of All Assets JB Cocoa for $8.4M Approved
COLUMBIA LAWRENCE: Columbia Buying All Assets of Tower 1 for $23M
COMSTOCK MINING: Tonogold Plans $20M Investment for Lucerne Project
COOLTRADE INC: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary

COPSYNC INC: Hires Jones Walker as Special Counsel
CRS REPROCESSING: Triangle Buying All Assets for $25M Credit Bid
CS360 TOWERS: Trustee's $475K Sale of Condo Unit Okayed
CYTORI THERAPEUTICS: Amends Units Subscription Rights Prospectus
DAVID CHAMBERLAIN: 374 Amory Buying Amory Property for $30K

DAVID LUTHER: Sale of Keller Property to Peabody for $492K Approved
DIAMOND CONTRACT: Hires McDowell Posternock as Counsel
DIAMOND SHINE: L.C. Nixon Buying Allegany Property for $210K
DIAMOND SHINE: L.C. Nixon Buying Allegany Property for $567K
DIAMOND SHINE: Wallses Buying La Vale Property for $575K

DIGITILITI INC: Names Mark Miller as New President and CEO
DIOCESE OF NEW ULM: Wants Plan Exclusivity Extended to Feb. 26
E&E LANDSCAPING: Hires Brian W. Hofmeister as Attorney
EDUARDO HERRERA: Creditors Seek Appointment of Ch. 11 Trustee
ELENA DELGADILLO: Trustee's $370K Sale of Oakland Property Okayed

ENERGY TRANSFER: Fitch Assigns BB+ Rating to New Secured Notes
ENERGY3 LLC: Hires Ring & Ring as Accountant
EVIO INC: Now Trading Under Ticker Symbol "EVIO"
EXCO RESOURCES: Restructures Incentive Plans to Retain Key Workers
FAMILY CHILD CARE: Kennamer Buying Two 2008 Chevy Buses for $16K

FITNESS UNLIMITED: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
FREESEAS INC: Appoints New Chief Financial Officer and Director
GARBER BROS: Hires Zeisler & Zeisler as Litigation Counsel
GARDA WORLD: Fitch Affirms B+ Long-Term IDR; Outlook Stable
GENON ENERGY: Disclosures Approved; Nov. 13 Plan Hearing Set

GENON ENERGY: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to April 12
GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT: Taps CBRE Inc. as Appraiser
GOLDEN DAY SCHOOLS: Taps Leslie Cohen Law as Bankruptcy Counsel
GOODRICH PETROLEUM: 5 Parties Realigned as Additional Plaintiffs
GRANDPARENTS.COM INC: Liquidating Trustee Taps Akerman as Counsel

GREAT FALLS DIOCESE: Hires Moulton Bellingham as Special Counsel
GREEN TERRACE: Wants Davenport to Continue as Property Manager
GROUP 701: Del Lago Buying Dallas Commercial Building for $1.8M
GST AUTOLEATHER: Oct. 13 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
GST AUTOLEATHER: Wants to Obtain $25M in Financing From Royal Bank

GUIDO DIMITRI: 2450, LLC Buying Winchester Property for $304K
GULFMARK OFFSHORE: Expects to Emerge from Chapter 11 in 30 Days
HAGHIGHI FAMILY: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
HAMPSHIRE GROUP: Liquidation Plan Declared Effective
HANSELL/MITZEL: Sale of Mount Vernon Property for $145K Approved

HHGREGG INC: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Nov. 6
HILTZ WASTE: Trustee's Sale of All Assets to Hometown for $3M OK'd
HOUSTON AMERICAN: Unveils Recent Developments in Reeves County
I-LIGHTING LLC: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Dec. 12
IRONCLAD PERFORMANCE: Committee Objects to DIP Financing Motion

IRONCLAD PERFORMANCE: Hires Craig-Hallum as Financial Advisor
JOHN BATISTA: Dermotta Buying Sewickley Property for $260K
JOHNNY CHIMPO II: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
KEYCORP: Fitch Affirms 'BB' Preferred Stock Rating
KY LUBE: Hires Seiller Waterman as Counsel

LARKIN EXCAVATING: Sale of All Assets to Flat Land for $2M Approved
LEVERETTE TILE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
LIBERTY ASSET: Sale of Arcadia Property to South Lake for $10M OK'd
LITTLE SAIGON: Sale of All Assets to Lucky Taro for $600K Approved
LUVU BRANDS: Posts $203,000 Net Income in Fiscal 2017

LW RETAIL: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
M&T BANK: Fitch Affirms BB+ Preferred Stock Rating
MARINA BIOTECH: Appoints Amit Shah as Chief Financial Officer
MCCLATCHY CO: Chatham Funds Hold 7.5% of Shares as of Aug. 31
MERIDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS: Court Denies K. Carr's Second Appeal

MONTCO OFFSHORE: Breach of Contract Suit vs. Black Elk Dismissed
MRI INTERVENTIONS: AIGH Investment Has 4.9% Stake as of Oct. 3
MRI INTERVENTIONS: May Issue 1.8M Shares Under 2013 Incentive Plan
MRI INTERVENTIONS: Seven Directors Elected by Stockholders
NATIONAL TRUCK: Gear & Axel, Bollier Appointed to Committee

NET ELEMENT: All Seven Proposals Approved at Annual Meeting
NET ELEMENT: Effects Stock Split to Regain Nasdaq Compliance
NEW COVENANT PAINTING: Hires Smith & Taylor as Accountant
NOLES PARTNERS: Wants to Use D McClain's Cash Collateral
NUTRITION RUSH: Sale of Retail Stores Inventory for $19K Approved

PAC ANCHOR TRANSPORTATION: Hires Trojan and Company as Accountant
PARADISE WINE: Hires Joseph Striegel as Accountant
PARALLAX HEALTH: Incurs $2.02M Net Loss in June 30 2016 Quarter
PARAMOUNT BUILDING: U.S. Trustee Forms Three-Member Committee
PARSLEY ENERGY: Moody's Rates $600MM Senior Unsecured Notes B2

PARSLEY ENERGY: S&P Rates New $60MM Sr. Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
PATIO MARKET: Hires Robert Bassel as Bankruptcy Counsel
PEEKAY BOUTIQUES: Files Joint Plan and Disclosure Statement
PERFUMANIA HOLDINGS: No Longer Obliged to File Periodic Reports
PFO GLOBAL: Trustee Seeks Approval of Plan Support Agreement

PREMIER MARINE: Wants Plan Filing Period Extended to Dec. 8
QUADRANT 4: Court Approves Key Employee Incentive Program
QUEST SOLUTION: Inks One-Year Employment Agreement with CFO
REGIONS FINANCIAL: Fitch Raises Preferred Stock Rating to BB-
RITE AID: Moody's Confirms B2 Corporate Family Rating

ROCKY PINE: Sale of 2015 Ford Super Duty Truck for $39K Approved
ROOT9B HOLDINGS: Nasdaq Appeal Hearing Set for Nov. 16
RUBY TUESDAY: Amends Fiscal 2017 Annual Report to Add Part III
RUE21 INC: Court Lifts Stay as to Garrison in J.Trujillo Suit
SCPD GRAMERCY: MW Capital Buying Project Assets for $110K

SEADRILL LIMITED: Hires Conyers Dill as Special Bermuda Counsel
SEADRILL LIMITED: Hires Jackson Walker as Co-Counsel
SEADRILL LIMITED: Hires Thommessen as Special Norwegian Counsel
SEADRILL LIMITED: Seeks to Hire Ordinary Course Professionals
SEANERGY MARITIME: Vessel Refinancing Results in $11.4-M Gain

SEARS CANADA: CCAA Stay Period Extended to Nov. 7
SEARS HOLDINGS: Borrows Additional $100 Million from Lenders
SED INTERNATIONAL: Wants Plan Filing Deadline Moved to March 9
SEMLER SCIENTIFIC: Stockholders Elect Sole Class II Director
SHEET METAL AIR: Hires John Leeper as Special Tax Counsel

SHIRAZ HOLDINGS: Hires Miles Goldstein as Real Estate Broker
SHOOT THE MOON: Ch. 11 Trustee Hires Cotner as Special Counsel
SOCO REAL ESTATE: Proposed Sale of Austin Property for $1.5M Denied
SOUTHERN TV: Sale of TV Licenses to Winemiller for $1.2M Approved
SPI ENERGY: Appointed Lu Qing as Director

STOLLINGS TRUCKING: $40K Sale of 2005 Caterpillar Bulldozer OK'dd
STW RESOURCES: Bid to Dismiss Power Up Suit Denied
SUNEDISON INC: Court Approves Bid Procedures for Sherman Property
SUNSET PARTNERS: Chapter 11 Trustee Hires Casner as Counsel
TALOOK ENTERTAINMENT: Hires Kerney Law as Chapter 11 Counsel

THO VAN PHAN: Sale of Fountain Valley Property for $865K Approved
TIMOTHY MCCLINCY: Sale of Federal Way Property for $420K Approved
TRUE RELIGION: Reorganization Plan Wins Confirmation
UNI-PIXEL INC: Hires McNutt Law as Bankruptcy Counsel
UNION COUNTY TRANSPORT: Hires Berger as Bankruptcy Counsel

UPLIFT RX: Hires Nelson Mullins as Special Counsel
US COAL: Prepetition Collateral Subject to Carve-Out for Prof. Fees
VANITY SHOP: Media Options, Maurices Sign Deal to Buy IP Assets
VERACRUZ INVESTMENTS: Hires Kenny and Associates as Appraiser
WALTER INVESTMENT: Barclays Hikes Ditech Facility $250 Million

WASHINGTON MCLAUGHLIN: Wants Plan Filing Extended by 90 Days
WAYNE T. HEATH: Hires Roussos Glanzer as Counsel
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC: Seeks Up to $8.3-Mil. in Incentive Bonuses
WILLIAM WILLIS: Sale of Marina Property to Brawner for $3.8M Okayed
WILLIAMS FINANCIAL: Claims Filing Deadline Set for November 27

[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from October 2 to 6, 2017

                            *********

190 SOUTH STREET: Sale of Morristown Property for $3.2M Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Vincent F. Papalia of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey authorized 190 South Street Realty Holdings,
L.P.'s private sale of real property identified on the tax maps of
the Town of Morristown, Morris County, New Jersey as Block 4601,
Lot 11, more commonly referred to as 190 South Street, Morristown,
New Jersey, to 190 South Street, LLC, for $3,200,000.

The Contract has been modified on the record at the hearing by the
Purchaser agreeing to waive due diligence and any contingencies
with closing to occur on Oct. 15, 2017, time of the essence.

The transfer of the Property to the Purchaser will be free and
clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances.

At Closing on the sale, the Debtor will remit to TLR-V the amount
due to TLR-V, which is the allowed proof of claim in the amount of
$909,619 (comprised of the judgment amount of $894,727, and
post-judgment interest of $14,892) plus interest accruing at the
rate of 2.25% per annum on the $894,727 portion of the TLR-V Claim
from the petition date to the date of the Closing.

In addition, at Closing, any and all other liens on Property will
be paid from the closing proceeds; provided, however,
notwithstanding these payments, the Debtor will retain the right to
contest these claims or liens.

Michele Andre Laracy-Bowen of Weichert Commercial Brokerage, Inc.'s
commission for broker services in the amount of $75,000 be and is
approved and will be paid at the Closing from the closing
proceeds.

In the event that Purchaser does not close on Oct. 15, 2017, then
Pendant Capital, LLC will have, in its sole discretion, the right
to purchase the Property, "as is" with no contingencies or due
diligence, for a purchase price of $3,200,000 with the closing to
take place on Oct. 19, 2017, time of the essence.  In such
instance, the Purchaser is directed to provide Pendant with the
Purchaser's title work and survey relating to the Property.

The Order is a final order in accordance with Rule 8001(a) of the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

Notwithstanding the provisions of Rule 6004(h) of the Federal Rules
of Bankruptcy Procedure, the Order will be effective immediately
and will not be stayed for any reason.  The Debtor may proceed with
a closing with Purchaser or Pendant, as the case may be,
immediately subsequent to the entry of the Order.

                 About 190 South Street Realty

190 South Street Realty Holdings, L.P., filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 15-14558) on March 16, 2015, estimating
assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  The petition
was signed by Lawrence S. Berger, president of general partner.

Judge Vincent F. Papalia presides over the case.  

Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, PA, is the Debtor's bankruptcy
counsel.

On Oct. 21, 2015, the court approved the Debtor's First Modified
Plan of Reorganization and First Modified Disclosure Statement and
authorized the Debtor to proceed with the solicitation of
acceptances.  The confirmation hearing set for Dec. 10, 2015 had
been adjourned because of settlement discussions between the Debtor
and TLR-V, the largest secured creditor.


4 C'S RENTALS: Hires Elite Residential as Real Estate Broker
------------------------------------------------------------
4 C's Rentals, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of New York to employ Elite Residential
Brokerage, as real estate broker to the Debtor.

4 C's Rentals requires Elite Residential to market and locate a
tenant for the Debtor's real property located at, and known as, 31
West Suffolk Avenue, Central Islip, New York 11722.

Elite Residential has agreed to accept as a commission fee the sum
of one (1) month's rent, which is approximately $5,900.

Leonard Saburro, a member of Elite Residential Brokerage, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Elite Residential can be reached at:

     Leonard Saburro
     ELITE RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE
     116 Gerard Road
     Yapank, NY 11980
     Tel: (877) 538-3300

                About 4 C's Rentals, Inc.

4 C's Rentals, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
E.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-75728) on September 19, 2017, disclosing under
$1 million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is
represented by Joseph S. Maniscalco, Esq., at Lamonica Herbst
Maniscalco.


470 W 42 STREET: Case Summary & 20 Largest Unsecured Creditors
--------------------------------------------------------------
Debtor: 470 W 42 Street Gourmet Food, Inc.
           dba Treehaus
        470 W. 42 Street
        New York, NY 10036

Type of Business: 470 W 42 Street Gourmet Food Inc. (doing
                  business as Treehaus) is a retail food store
                  licensed by New York State Department of
                  Agriculture and Markets.  The Debtor's
                  substantial assets are located at 470 W.
                  47th Street, New York, New York 10036.
                  470 W 42 Street Gourmet filed the Chapter 11
                  case due to its pending lawsuits.  The
                  Company has one secured creditor: Newbank,
                  c/o Meyer, Souzzi, English & Klein P.C., 990
                  Stewart Ave., Suite 300, Garden City, New
                  York 11530.

Case No.: 17-12801

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2017

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Southern District of New York (Manhattan)

Judge: Hon. Sean H. Lane

Debtor's Counsel: Rosemarie E. Matera, Esq.
                  KURTZMAN MATERA, PC
                  664 Chestnut Ridge Road
                  Spring Valley, NY 10977
                  Tel: (845) 352-8800
                  Fax: (845) 352-8865
                  E-mail: law@kmpclaw.com

Total Assets: $70,000

Total Liabilities: $3.82 million

The petition was signed by Michael C. Park, the Debtor's senior
manager, president and 60% shareholder.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, along with a list of
20 largest unsecured creditors, is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/nysb17-12801.pdf


488-486 LEFFERTS: TBD Buying Brooklyn Property for $2.1 Million
---------------------------------------------------------------
488-486 Lefferts, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of New York to authorize the private sale of two
adjacent parcels of undeveloped land located at 488-486 Lefferts
Avenue, Brooklyn, New York to TBD, LLC for $2,100,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Nov. 6, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.

The Debtor purchased the Property in 2008.  As a result of the
financial crisis, it was unable to develop the Property and, as a
result, it was unable to pay its lender Madison Park Investors, LLC
("Bank") which claimed to hold a mortgage against the Property.

In 2009 the Bank sued on the loan note in New York State Supreme
Court, Richmond County and obtained a money judgment in the amount
of $835,640.  In 2013, the Bank, based on the Richmond County
Judgment and the Mortgage, sought to foreclose on the property in
New York State Supreme Court, Kings County .   Thereafter, the
Mortgage and the Foreclosure Action were assigned to Vintage
Equities Corp.

With great assistance from the Court, the Debtor and Vintage
Equities, and Fay Capital Corp. (which claimed a contract to
purchase the Property for $1.375 million), entered into a formal
Settlement Agreement, which they executed on May 25, 2017, and
which was approved by the Court following the Debtor's Rule 9019
motion for such approval.

Pursuant to the 9019 Settlement: (i) Vintage's claim, designated as
Claim Number 7 was deemed modified to an allowed secured claim in
the sum of $1,399,804; and (ii) in the event the Allowed Secured
Claim is not fully paid by Nov. 10, 2017, the Debtor and each of
its members, hereby irrevocably agreed to not oppose any motion by
Vintage for relief from the automatic stay to complete the
Foreclosure Action, except that it was also expressly agreed that
under no circumstances will a foreclosure sale take place prior to
May 10, 2018.

By order of the Court dated Aug. 1, 2016, the Court approved the
retention Ariel Property Advisors, LLC.  Ariel marketed the
Property and brought the Buyer, who is willing to pay $2.1 million
with a time of the essence closing date of Nov. 30, 2017.  The
Buyer has deposited $105,000 in escrow with the Debtor's attorney
as a deposit on the proposed contract.  The Proposed Sale will
generate sufficient funds to satisfy all the creditors and provide
payment to equity holders.

The material terms of the Sale Agreement are:

     a. Purchase Price: $2,100,000

     b. Payment: (i) $105,000 will be paid to and held in escrow
concurrent with entering into the Proposed Purchase Agreement

     c. Time of the Essence Closing Date of Nov. 30, 2017.

     d. Court Authorization and Approval: The Court authorizes and
approves the sale, transfer and conveyance of the Premises to
Purchaser free and clear of all Liens, Claims and Encumbrances of
any kind or nature, with all Liens, Clams and Encumbrances to
attach to the proceeds of the sale of the Premises.

     e. Finding of bona fide Purchaser (Section 363(m)): The Court
finds and determines that the Purchaser is a bona fide purchaser
for value entitled to the protections of Section 363(m) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

     f. Waver of Stay: The Order provides that any stay that would
otherwise be applicable pursuant to Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) or
otherwise under the Bankruptcy Code will be waived to the extent
necessary to permit a Closing as soon as possible after entry of
the Sale Order.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/488-486_Lefferts_87_Sales.pdf

The Debtor filed a second Disclosure Statement filed on Aug. 1,
2017.  On Oct. 2, 2017, the Disclosure Statement Hearing was held
and the Court approved of the Disclosure Statement.  A formal order
approving the Disclosure Statement is pending, and a hearing on
approval of the Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan is to be held on Nov. 6,
2017 at 10:30 a.m.

The Disclosure Statement and Plan contemplate a 100% payout to all
creditors, and a sales price of $2.1 million would enable Debtor to
make such a payout, with hundreds of thousands of dollars left over
for equity holders, all of whom have approved of the sale.

As demonstrated, the Debtor submits that the private sale is
appropriate, as the proceeds of the sale will be more than ample to
satisfy all creditors in full and leave a several hundred thousand
dollars to equity.  Thus, the only parties that could possibly be
prejudiced in any manner from the private sale would be the equity
holders, who unanimously support the sale.  Moreover, as the Court
is aware, the 9019 Stipulation places time constraints on the time
to close which are inconsistent with a bidding process.
Accordingly, the Debtor asks the Court to approve the relief
sought.

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Avi Weisel, Esq.
          THE LAW OFFICES OF
          ABRAHAM WEISEL ESQ. PLLC
          4309 13th Ave.
          Brooklyn, NY 11219
          Telephone: (718) 437-6900
          E-mail: av.weisel@gmail.com
                  legal@weisellaw.com

                   About 488-486 Lefferts LLC

Headquartered in Richmond Hill, New York, 488-486 Lefferts LLC
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case
No. 15-42716) on June 10, 2015, estimating its assets and
liabilities at between $1 million and $10 million.  The petition
was signed by Nir Zeer, managing member.

Edward N. Gewirtz, Esq., at Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.  Jay Gelbein and Company
is the Debtor's accountant and financial advisor.

On Sept. 9, 2016, the Debtor filed a disclosure statement and
proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.

On Aug. 1, 2016, Ariel Property Advisors, LLC was appointed as Real
Estate Broker.

The Debtor filed a second disclosure statement filed on Aug. 1,
2017.  Approval of the Plan is set for Nov. 6, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.


760 LONG POND ROAD: Hires HUNT as Real Estate Broker
----------------------------------------------------
760 Long Pond Road, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Western District of New York to employ HUNT Real
Estate ERA, as real estate broker to the Debtor.

760 Long Pond requires HUNT Real to market and sell the Debtor's
property located at 760 Long Pond Road, Town of Greece, New York.

HUNT Real will be paid a commission of 6% of the purchase price.

Catherine A. Peters, associate of HUNT Real Estate ERA, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

HUNT Real can be reached at:

     Catherine A. Peters
     HUNT REAL ESTATE ERA
     1100 Long Pond Road, Suite 111
     Rochester, NY 14626
     Tel: (585) 672-1660

                About 760 Long Pond Road, LLC

760 Long Pond Road, LLC sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-20746) on July 10,
2017.  Richard M. Orczyk, its member, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of less than $1 million and liabilities of less
than $500,000.


A&B LODGING THREE: Hires Eubanks Law as Attorney
------------------------------------------------
A&B Lodging Three, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee to employ Eubanks Law
Firm, PC, as counsel to the Debtor.

A&B Lodging requires Eubanks Law to:

   a. prepare and file bankruptcy statements and schedules,
      negotiate cash collateral orders;

   b. prepare disclosure statements and plan of reorganization;

   c. negotiate with creditors regarding claims; and

   d. appear in the Bankruptcy Court, and provide general legal
      and bankruptcy advice and representation.

Eubanks Law will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                    $250
     Paralegals                   $65

Eubanks Law received a retainer of $7,533, including the filing
fees, paid by Anjuben Patel and Sunilkumar Patel.

Eubanks Law will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Barry W. Eubanks, its member of Eubanks Law Firm, PC, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Eubanks Law can be reached at:

     Barry W. Eubanks, Esq.
     EUBANKS LAW FIRM, PC
     209 Chilhowee School Road, Suite 16
     Seymour, TN 37865
     Tel: (865) 299-4023

              About A&B Lodging Three, LLC

A&B Lodging Three, LLC owns in fee simple interest a motel & living
quarters located in Dandridge, Tennessee, valued by the Company at
$2.07 million. It generated gross revenue of $467,673 in 2016 and
gross revenue of $468,968 in 2015.

A&B Lodging Three, LLC, based in Dandridge, Tenn., filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-32968) on September 27,
2017.  The Hon. Suzanne H. Bauknight presides over the case.  Barry
W. Eubanks, Esq., at Eubanks Law Firm, PC., serves as bankruptcy
counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $2.27 million in assets and
$1.98 million in liabilities. The petition was signed by Ajay
Khatri, member.


ACHQ INC: Hires McIntyre Thanasides Bringgold as Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
ACHQ, Inc. seeks authority from the US Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division, to employ McIntyre
Thanasides Bringgold Elliott Grimaldi & Guito, P.A. as counsel.

Professional services to be rendered by McIntyre:

     a. render legal advice with respect to the Debtor's powers
        and duties as debtor-in-possession, the continued
        operation of its business and/or the management of its
        property;

     b. prepare on behalf of the Debtor any necessary petitions,
        motions, applications, answers, orders, reports, and
        other legal papers;

     c. appear before the Bankruptcy Court and the United States
        Trustee to represent and protect the interests of the
        Debtor;

     d. take all necessary legal steps to confirm a plan of
        reorganization;

     e. represent the Debtor in all adversary suits, contested
        matters and matters involving administration of this
        case;

     f. represent the Debtor in any negotiations with potential
        financing sources and preparing contracts, security
        instruments, or other documents necessary to obtain
        financing;

     g. take any necessary action to recover any voidable
        transfers and to avoid any liens against the Debtor's
        property obtained within 90 days of the filing of the
        petition in Chapter 11 and at a time when the Debtor
        was insolvent;

     h. enjoin or stay any and all suits against the Debtor
        affecting the debtor-in-possession's ability to continue
        in business or affecting property in which the Debtor has
        equity;

     i. perform all other legal services that may be necessary
        for the proper preservation and  administration of this
        Chapter 11 case.

The Debtor has agreed to pay McIntyre fees and costs on a monthly
basis subject to counsel filing interim applications for payment of
such fees and costs, and subject to court approval.

James W. Elliott, member of McIntyre Thanasides Bringgold Elliott
Grimaldi & Guito, P.A., attests that neither he nor any member of
the MT Firm has any connection with the Debtor, its creditors, the
United States Trustee, or any other party with an actual or
potential interest in this Chapter 11 case or their respective
attorneys or accountants.

The Firm can be reached through:

     James W. Elliott, Esq.
     MCINTYRE THANASIDES BRINGGOLD
     ELLIOTT GRIMALDI & GUITO, P.A.
     500 E. Kennedy Blvd., Ste. 200
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Tel: 813-223-0000
     Fax: 813-899-6069
     Email: james@mcintyrefirm.com

                         About ACHQ, Inc.

ACHQ, Inc. provides electronic check and payment processing
solutions to Fortune 500 companies and small businesses. ACHQ, Inc.
filed a chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-08043) on
September 18, 2017. James W. Elliott at McIntyre Thanasides
Bringgold Elliott Grimaldi & Guito, P.A. represents the Debtor as
counsel. The Debtor estimates less than $1 million in assets and
liabilities.


ACHQ INC: Wants to Use Cash Collateral to Maintain Business
-----------------------------------------------------------
ACHQ, Inc., seeks permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Middle District of Florida to use cash collateral, nunc pro tunc to
the Petition Date.

The Debtor believes that Strategic Funding Source Inc., claims a
perfected security interest and liens on, among other assets, the
Debtor's account and accounts receivables, contracts, and other
forms of obligations, which constitute the Secured Creditors' cash
collateral pursuant to UCC-1 financing statement 201701455143 filed
with the Florida Department of State's Secured Transactional
Registry.  

The Debtor further believes that Kabbage Inc. claims a perfected
security interest and liens on, among other assets, the Debtor's
proceeds and future receivables pursuant to a UCC-1 financing
statement 201702234892 filed with the Florida Department of State's
Secured Transactional Registry.

The Debtor intends to provide Strategic Funding and Kabbage
("Secured Creditors") with replacement liens to the same extent and
validity as held by Secured Creditors prepetition and other terms
as set forth in the proposed Interim court order authorizing use of
cash collateral.

The Debtor proposes to use cash collateral for the continued
operation of the business and for the care, maintenance and
preservation of the Debtor's assets.  Except as specifically
authorized by law, court order, or an agreement by and between the
Secured Creditors and the Debtor, the Debtor will not use cash
collateral to pay prepetition obligations.

The Debtor requests authority to use cash collateral immediately to
fund the operating expenses necessary to continue the operation of
the business and to maintain the estate, to maximize the return on
its assets, and to otherwise avoid irreparable harm and injury to
its business and the estate.

The interest of the Secured Creditors will be adequately protected
by the Debtor's continued operation.  The Debtor further alleges
that all conditions precedent to the use of the Cash Collateral
have been performed or have occurred.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb17-08043-15.pdf

Headquartered in Palmetto, Florida, ACHQ, Inc., filed for Chapter
11 bankruptcy proteciton (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-08043) on
Sept. 18, 2017, estimating its assets at between $50,001 and
$100,000 and its liabilities at between $500,001 and $1 million.
James W Elliott, Esq., at McIntyre Thanasides Bringgold, et al.,
serves as the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


AIAD SAMUEL: Trustee's Sale of Personal Property by Auction Okayed
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Michael S. McManus of the bankruptcy case of Aiad and Hoda
Samuel, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court Eastern District of
California authorized Scott M. Sackett, the duly-appointed Chapter
11 trustee for the Debtors, to sell personal property located at
the shopping center at 944, 946, and 970-998 Oak Lane, Rio Linda,
California by public auction to be conducted by Tranzon Asset
Strategies.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Sept. 25, 2017.

The Auctioneer may be compensated through the "Buyer's Premium," to
be paid by the ultimate buyer(s) of the property, and not through
sale proceeds.  The Trustee is authorized to pay the Auctioneer's
expenses for labor (not to exceed $4,500), marketing (not to exceed
$2,500), and other miscellaneous expenses out of the sale
proceeds.

To facilitate a prompt sale of the Personal Property on Oct. 10,
2017, the provisions of Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure
6004(h) are waived so that the Order will be effective and
enforceable immediately upon entry.

                       About the Samuels

Aiad Samuel and Hoda Samuel filed a voluntary petition under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case No.
16-21585) on March 15, 2016.

The Debtors' principal business enterprise is real estate
management and leasing.

On May 10, 2016, the Court approved the appointment of Scott M.
Sackett as the Chapter 11 Trustee for the Debtors' Estate.

Attorneys for the Chapter 11 Trustee:

         Donald W. Fitzgerald
         Jason E. Rios, Esq.
         FELDERSTEIN FITZGERALD WILLOUGHBY & PASCUZZI LLP
         400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1750
         Sacramento, CA 95814
         Telephone: (916) 329-7400
         Facsimile: (916) 329-7435
         E-mail: dfitzgerald@ffwplaw.com
                 jrios@ffwplaw.com


AJUBEO LLC: Has Final OK to Use Bank's Cash Collateral
------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Joseph G. Rosania, Jr., of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Colorado has entered a stipulated final order
authorizing Ajubeo, LLC, to use cash collateral of Silicon Valley
Bank.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 22, 2017, the
Debtor filed a motion seeking permission to use cash collateral to
fund its ordinary course operations, and to fund the payment of
administrative expenses in accordance with the Budget.

The Debtor may use the Lender's cash and non-cash collateral solely
to pay its ordinary and necessary business expenses, as well as
costs and expenses to be incurred in connection with the Debtor's
asset sale, all as set forth in the budget.  The Debtor warrants
and represents that the Budget includes all reasonable, necessary,
and foreseeable expenses to be incurred in connection with the
Chapter 11 case and the operation of the Debtor's business for the
period set forth in the Budget, including, without limitation, all
costs and expenses to be incurred in connection with the Debtor's
asset sale.

In no event shall the Debtor use any of the Lender's cash
collateral to pay any items: (i) not contained in the Budget,
except as approved by the Court after written notice to the Lender
and a hearing or after written request to the Lender and the
Lender's written consent; (ii) in excess of 115% of the amount set
forth in the Budget, in the aggregate, cumulative from the Petition
Date; and (iii) in advance of the week in which the expense is
scheduled to be paid under the Budget, except as approved by the
Court after written notice to the Lender and a hearing or after
written request to the Lender and the Lender's written consent.

The Debtor agrees not to knowingly or intentionally incur any
administrative expenses other than as set forth in the Budget,
exclusive of professional fees approved by the Court pursuant to 11
U.S.C. Section 330, 331, or 503(b) and fees payable pursuant to 28
U.S.C. §1930, without the prior written consent of the Lender or
approval by the Court after notice to the Lender and a hearing.  In
the event that the PrePetition Indebtedness is not repaid in full
on or before Nov. 10, 2017, Lender and Debtor may, without further
order of the Court, agree to an extended Budget governing the
Debtor's use of cash and non-cash collateral until the pre-petition
indebtedness has been repaid in full.  The Debtor's use of cash and
non-cash collateral during the extended Budget period will in all
respects by governed by the terms of the court order.

Upon the indefeasible repayment in full in cash of all obligations
under the loan documents, the Lender's liens and security interests
on the collateral will be automatically terminated.

The Lender and Integrity Capital Income Fund, Inc., are each
granted security interests to the extent of any diminution in the
value of their cash and non-cash collateral in all of the Debtor's
postpetition assets, including, but not limited to, accounts,
inventory, equipment, general intangibles, and goods, motor
vehicles, real estate, leases, and leasehold interests as well as
all products and proceeds thereof.  

The liens granted to the Lender and Integrity herein may not be
primed by any other lien or encumbrance, whether by order of the
Court or the passage of time.  The liens and security interests
granted herein will be deemed valid and perfected notwithstanding
the requirements of non-bankruptcy law with respect to perfection,
and although not required of the Lender or Integrity, the automatic
stay imposed by Section 362 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code is hereby
modified to the extent necessary for the Lender to perfect the
security interest granted herein.  The post-petition grant of the
security interest will be supplemental of, and in addition to, the
security interests which the Lender and Integrity possess pursuant
to the Loan Documents and the Integrity Loan Documents,
respectively.  

The post-petition collateral will not include any cause of action
or proceeds thereof recovered pursuant to Chapter 5 of the
Bankruptcy Code.  In addition to, and without limiting, the
foregoing, the Lender is granted a perfected security interest in
all deposit accounts and cash held in the Debtor's name, including
without limitation, at Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.  The Lender will be
automatically deemed to have control over all the accounts and the
cash therein, and the security interest granted will be perfected,
valid and enforceable in favor of the Lender without a deposit
account control agreement among the Debtor, the Lender, and any
depository institution.

The Debtor and any depository institution holding a deposit account
in the name of the Debtor will promptly enter into a deposit
account control agreement with the Lender upon Lender's request.
The liens and security interests granted to Lender and Integrity
will attach to the post-petition collateral in the same relative
priority as their respectively liens and security interests in the
collateral.

Starting on Sept. 11, 2017, and continuing on the first business
day of each month thereafter, the Debtor will pay all interest
accrued (at the non-default rate) on the outstanding principal
balance of the prepetition indebtedness.

The Debtor will make one principal payment to the Lender in the
amount of $51,683, as and when set forth in the Budget.

The Debtor's right to use its assets and use the Lender's and
Integrity's cash and non-cash collateral will terminate upon the
earliest of: (i) the Court does not approve and enter this
Stipulated Final Order as a final order of this Court on or before
Oct. 2, 2017; (ii) the Debtor's failure to maintain all necessary
insurance as required, or (iii) at the Lender's option, upon the
occurrence of any Termination Event.

The occurrence of any one or more of the following will constitute
a termination event under this Stipulated Final Order:

     (a) the material breach by the Debtor of any of the terms,
conditions, or covenants of this Stipulated Final Order, which is
not cured to the reasonable satisfaction of the Lender within five
business days of receipt by the Debtor of written notice of breach
from the Lender;

     (b) the filing by the Debtor of an objection to the Lender's
claim or a complaint against the Lender concerning the prepetition
indebtedness in the Court;

     (c) the Debtor's failure to close a sale of all or
substantially all of the Debtor's assets on or before Nov. 10,
2017;

     (d) if the Debtor's actual monthly sales on a cumulative basis
are less than 75% of the projected monthly sales on a cumulative
basis, as set forth in the Budget for the period;

     (e) the Debtor's failure to repay all Pre-Petition
Indebtedness in full by 4:00 p.m. (Denver, Colorado time) Nov. 10,
2017;

     (f) the appointment of a trustee for the Debtor pursuant to
Section 1104 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code;

     (g) the conversion of this case to a case under Chapter 7 of
the Bankruptcy Code;

     (h) the dismissal of this case;

     (i) the appointment of an examiner with any of the powers of a
trustee for the Debtor; or

     (j) the allowance of a motion for relief from the automatic
stay allowing a creditor of the Debtor to foreclose upon any
material asset of the Debtor.

A copy of the Order is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/cob17-17924-125.pdf

                       About Ajubeo, LLC

Ajubeo, LLC -- https://www.ajubeo.com/ -- is a privately held
provider of internet infrastructure software and equipment.
Founded in 2011 and headquartered in Greater Denver Area in
Boulder, Colorado, Ajubeo serves clients all over the world with
datacenter hubs in Denver, New Jersey, Frankfurt, and Dusseldorf
Germany.

Ajubeo, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Col. Case No.
17-17924) on Aug. 25, 2017.  The petition was signed by Jeff Kuo,
chairman of the Board of Managers.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10
million in assets and liabilities.

Joshua M. Hantman, Esq., at Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP,
serves as counsel to the Debtor.


ALL PEOPLE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------
An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of All People International
Church, Inc. as of Oct. 4, according to a court docket.

All People is represented by:

     Gerald B Stewart, Esq.
     Law Office of Gerald B. Stewart
     24 North Market Street, Suite 402
     Jacksonville, FL 32202
     Tel: (904) 353-8876
     Fax: (904) 356-2776
     Email: stewartlaw7272@gmail.com

             About All People International Church

All People International Church, Inc. --
http://www.allpeopleint.org-- owns the All People International
Church located in Jacksonville, Florida.  It previously sought
bankruptcy protection on Oct. 31, 2016 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
16-03994).

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-03003) on August 16, 2017.
Arthur T. Jones, bishop, signed the petition.  

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed that it had
estimated assets of $1 million to $10 million and liabilities of
less than $50,000.  

Judge Paul M. Glenn presides over the case.  Law Office of Gerald
B. Stewart represents the Debtor as bankruptcy counsel.


ALLY FINANCIAL: Mid-Cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test 2017
---------------------------------------------------------
Ally Financial Inc. furnished with the Securities and Exchange
Commission the Company's Mid-Cycle Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test 2017
- Estimates in the Severely Adverse Scenario.

As required under the rules published by the Federal Reserve to
address the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test requirements, Ally Financial
Inc. is providing a summary of 2017 mid-cycle stress test results
under the Severely Adverse scenario.  The stress test results were
submitted to the Federal Reserve on Oct. 5, 2017, and cover a
nine-quarter planning horizon beginning in the third quarter of
2017 and continuing through the third quarter of 2019. The Severely
Adverse scenario considers a recession that has a level of severity
comparable to the most severe post-war U.S. recession and also
includes multiple idiosyncratic operational risk events that
directly impact Ally's operations.

As demonstrated through numerous stress tests over the past several
years, Ally's business model is adequately positioned to withstand
the effects of a severely stressed macroeconomic environment.  The
following summary of projected impacts to profitability, loss
rates, and capital position reflects the assumptions and severity
of the 2017 scenario developed by Ally. It is important to note
that this scenario is not a forecast of Ally's business operations
or financial condition, but rather a hypothetical scenario designed
to assess the strength of Ally and its resilience to severely
adverse economic conditions should they occur.  The results suggest
that Ally's performance would deteriorate in the Severely Adverse
scenario due to increased provision for credit losses, reduced
business volumes, net interest margin compression, and market and
operational risk related losses.  However, Ally would continue to
meet all contractual obligations to creditors, counterparties, and
bondholders and would exceed all regulatory capital requirements.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                      https://is.gd/7sgslM
  
                    About Ally Financial Inc.

Ally Financial Inc. (NYSE: ALLY), formerly GMAC Inc., is a digital
financial services company and a top 25 U.S. financial holding
company offering financial products for consumers, businesses,
automotive dealers and corporate clients.  Ally's legacy dates back
to 1919, and the company was redesigned in 2009 with a distinctive
brand, innovative approach and relentless focus on its customers.
Ally has an award-winning online bank (Ally Bank Member FDIC and
Equal Housing Lender), which offers deposit, mortgage and credit
card products, one of the largest full service auto finance
operations in the country, a complementary auto-focused insurance
business, a growing digital wealth management and online brokerage
platform, and a trusted corporate finance business offering capital
for equity sponsors and middle-market companies.

GMAC obtained a $17 billion bailout from the U.S. government in
exchange for a 56.3 percent stake.  Private equity firm Cerberus
Capital Management LP keeps 14.9 percent, while General Motors Co.
owns 6.7 percent.  

Ally reported net income of $1.1 billion for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016, compared to net income of $1.28 billion for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015.

                          *     *     *

As reported by the TCR on Oct. 14, 2016, S&P Global Ratings said it
revised its outlook on Ally Financial to stable from positive and
affirmed the 'BB+' long-term issuer credit rating.  "The revised
outlook reflects weakening credit conditions in the vehicle finance
industry, in our view, which represents the majority of Ally's
business," said S&P Global Ratings credit analyst Matthew Carroll.

As reported by the TCR on Oct. 3, 2016, Fitch Ratings has affirmed
Ally Financial's Long-Term Issuer Default Rating at 'BB+',
Viability Rating (VR) and 'bb+' and Short-Term IDR at 'B'.  The
Rating Outlook is Stable.  The rating actions have been taken as
part of Fitch's periodic peer review of U.S. consumer
lending-focused internet banks, which comprises four publicly rated
firms.


AMERICAN TANK: U.S. Trustee Forms 2-Member Committee
----------------------------------------------------
Henry Hobbs, Jr., acting U.S. trustee for Region 5, on Oct. 4
appointed two creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case of American Tank
Company, Inc.

The committee members are:

     (1) Kelley Construction, Inc.
         William Roberts
         12550 Lake Station Place
         Louisville, KY 40299
         Phone: (502) 239-2848
         Email: wroberts@kelleyconstruction.com

     (2) L.F. Manufacturing, Inc.
         P.O. Box 578
         Giddings, TX 78942

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense. They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs. Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

                About American Tank Company Inc.

American Tank Company, Inc. specializes in fabrication, design,
erection, disassembly, inspection and maintenance of API 12B and
AWWA D103 Bolted Tanks.  The Debtor, based in New Iberia,
Louisiana, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D. La. Case No.
17-51160) on September 5, 2017.  The Debtor is a small business
debtor as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section 101(51D).

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1.76 million in assets and
$1.83 million in liabilities. The petition was signed by Larry J.
Romero, its president.

Judge Robert Summerhays presides over the case.  William C.
Vidrine, Esq., at Vidrine & Vidrine, PLLC, serves as bankruptcy
counsel.  The Debtor hired Fran R. Henderson, as its accountant.


AMIGO PAT TEXAS: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Oct. 20
----------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Jeff Bohm of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Texas has further extended, at the behest of Amigo PAT
Texas LLC, the exclusive period for the Debtor to file a plan of
reorganization through and including Oct. 20, 2017, and the
exclusive period for the Debtor to obtain acceptances of a plan
through and including Dec. 29, 2017.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 15, 2017, the
Court further extended, at the behest of the Debtor, the exclusive
period for the Debtor to file a plan through and including Sept.
29, and the exclusive period for the Debtor to obtain acceptances
of a plan through and including Dec. 8.

                      About Amigo PAT Texas

Amigo PAT Texas LLC, based in Houston, Texas, provides industrial
and municipal cleaning services, along with video and sonar
inspection services.

Amigo PAT Texas filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Case
No. 17-32169) on April 7, 2017.  The Debtor estimated $1 million to
$10 million in both assets and liabilities as of the bankruptcy
filing.  Charles L. McDaniel, sole member and manager, signed the
petition.

The Hon. Jeff Bohm presides over the case.

Aaron J. Power, Esq., at Porter Hedges LLP, serves as bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.


APPVION INC: Hires Prime Clerk as Claims and Noticing Agent
-----------------------------------------------------------
Appvion, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to employ Prime
Clerk LLC, as claims and noticing agent to the Debtors.

Appvion, Inc. requires Prime Clerk to:

   a. prepare and serve required notices and documents in the
      bankruptcy case in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code and
      the Bankruptcy Rules in the form and manner directed by the
      Debtor and the Court, including (i) notice of the
      commencement of the case and the Chapter 11 case and the
      initial meeting of creditors under the Bankruptcy Code,
      (ii) notice of any claims bar date, (iii) notices of
      transfer of claims, (iv) notices of objections to claims
      and objections to transfers of claims, (v) notices of any
      hearings on a disclosure statement and confirmation of the
      Debtor's plan or plans of reorganization, including under
      Bankruptcy Rule 3017(d), (vi) notice of the effective date
      of any plan and (vii) all other notices, orders, pleadings,
      publications and other documents as the Debtor or Court may
      deem necessary or appropriate for an orderly administration
      of the Chapter 11 case;

   b. maintain an official copy of the Debtor's schedules of
      assets and liabilities and statement of financial affairs,
      listing the Debtor's known creditors and the amounts owed
      thereto;

   c. maintain (i) a list of all potential creditors, equity
      holders and other parties-in-interest and (ii) a core
      mailing list consisting of all parties described in
      sections 2002(i), (j) and (k) and those parties that have
      filed a notice of appearance pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule
      9010; updated said lists and make said lists available upon
      request by a party-in-interest or the Clerk;

   d. furnish a notice to all potential creditors of the last
      date for the filing of proofs of claim and a form for the
      filing of a proof of claim, after such notice and form are
      approved by the bankruptcy Court, and notify said potential
      creditors of the existence, amount and classification of
      their respective claims as set forth in the Schedules,
      which may be effected by inclusion of such information on a
      customized proof of claim form provided to potential
      creditors;

   e. maintain a post office box or address for the purpose of
      receiving claims and returned mail, and process all mail
      received;

   f. for all notices, motions, orders or other pleadings or
      documents served, prepare and file or caused to be filed
      with the Clerk an affidavit or certificate of service
      within seven (7) business days of service which includes
      (i) either a copy of the notice served or the docket number
      and title of the pleading served, (ii) a list of persons to
      whom it was mailed, in alphabetical order, with their
      addresses, (iii) the manner of service ,and (iv) the date
      served;

   g. process all proofs of claim received, including those
      received by the Clerk's Office, and check said processing
      for accuracy, and maintain the original proofs of claim in
      a secure area;

   h. maintain the official claims register for the Debtor on
      behalf of the Clerk; upon the Clerk's request, provide the
      Clerk with certified, duplicate unofficial Claims Register;
      and specify in the Claims Registers the following
      information for each claim docketed (i) the claim number
      assigned, (ii) the date received, (iii) the name and
      address of the claimant and agent, if applicable, who filed
      the claim, (iv) the amount asserted, (v) the asserted
      classifications of the claim, (vi) the applicable Debtor,
      and (vii) any disposition of the claim;

   i. provide public access to the Claims Registers, including
      complete proofs of claim with attachments, if any, without
      charge;

   j. implement necessary security measures to ensure the
      completeness and integrity of the Claims Registers and the
      safekeeping of the original claims;

   k. record all transfers of claims and provide any notices of
      such transfers as required by Bankruptcy Rule 3001(e);

   l. relocate, by messenger or overnight delivery, all of the
      court-filed proofs of claim to the offices of Kurtzman, not
      less than weekly;

   m. upon completion of the docketing process for all claims
      received to date for each case, turn over to the Clerk
      copies of the claims register for the Clerk's review;

   n. monitor the Court's docket for all notices of appearance,
      address changes, and claims-related pleadings and orders
      filed and make necessary notations on and changes to the
      claims register;

   o. identify and correct any incomplete or incorrect addresses
      in any mailing or service lists;

   p. assist in the dissemination of information to the public
      and respond to requests for administrative information
      regarding the case as directed by the Debtor or the Court,
      including through the use of a case website and call
      center;

   q. monitor the Court's docket in the Chapter 11 case and, when
      filings are made in error or containing errors, alert the
      filing party of such error and work with them to correct
      any such error;

   r. if the Chapter 11 case is converted to Chapter 7 of the
      Bankruptcy Code, contact the Clerk's Office within three
      (3) days of the notice to Prime Clerk of entry of the order
      converting the case;

   s. thirty days prior to the close of the bankruptcy case,
      request the Debtor submits to the Court a proposed Order
      dismissing Prime Clerk as Claims and Noticing Agent and
      terminating the services in such capacity upon completion
      of its duties and responsibilities and upon the closing of
      the Chapter 11 case;

   t. within seven days of notice to Prime Clerk of entry of
      an order closing the Chapter 11 case, provide to the
      bankruptcy Court the final version of the claims register
      as of the date immediately before the close of the case;
      and

   u. at the close of the Chapter 11 case, (i) box and transport
      all original documents, in proper format, as provided by
      the Clerk's Office, to (A) the Philadelphia Federal Records
      Center, 14700 Townsend Road, Philadelphia, PA 19154 or (B)
      any other location requested by the Clerk's Office; and
      (ii) docket a completed SF-135 Form indicating the
      accession and location numbers of the archived claims.

Prime Clerk will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Director of Solicitation                  $210
     Solicitation Consultant                   $190
     COO and Executive VP                      No charge
     Director                                  $175-$195
     Consultant/Senior Consultant              $65-$165
     Technology Consultant                     $33-$95
     Analyst                                   $30-$50

Prime Clerk will be paid a retainer in the amount of $50,000. The
firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred.

Benjamin P.D. Schrag, chief business development officer of Prime
Clerk LLC, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and (a) is not creditors, equity security holders or insiders
of the Debtors; (b) has not been, within two years before the date
of the filing of the Debtors' chapter 11 petition, directors,
officers or employees of the Debtors; and (c) does not have an
interest materially adverse to the interest of the estate or of any
class of creditors or equity security holders, by reason of any
direct or indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest
in, the Debtors, or for any other reason.

Prime Clerk can be reached at:

     Benjamin P.D. Schrag
     PRIME CLERK LLC
     830 3rd Avenue, 9th Floor
     New York, NY 10022
     Tel: (212) 257-5450

                        About Appvion, Inc.

Appvion, Inc. -- http://www.appvion.com/-- produces thermal,
carbonless, security, inkjet, digital specialty, and colored
papers. The Company is the largest manufacturer of direct thermal
paper in North America.  Headquartered in Appleton, Wisconsin,
Appvion operates coating and converting plants there and in West
Carrollton, Ohio and a pulp and paper mill in Roaring Spring,
Pennsylvania.  The Company employs approximately 1,400 people and
is 100% employee-owned.

On Oct. 1, 2017, Appvion, Inc. and 5 affiliated debtors each filed
a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12082).  The cases are
pending before the Honorable Kevin J. Carey.

Appvion Inc. disclosed total assets of $413,430,904 and total
liabilities of $714,758,194 as of Aug. 31, 2017.

DLA Piper is serving as legal counsel to Appvion, Guggenheim
Securities LLC is serving as the Company's investment banker, and
Alan Holtz of AlixPartners is serving as the Company's Chief
Restructuring Officer. Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing
agent.


APPVION INC: Proposes $325.2 Million of Financing From PJT
----------------------------------------------------------
Appvion, Inc., and certain of its subsidiaries ask the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware for permission to
obtain secured postpetition financing from PJT Partners LP, as sole
lead arranger, and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as
administrative agent and collateral agent, and to use cash
collateral.

The Debtors want to use funds under the DIP Facility in an
aggregate principal amount of up to $325.2 million, pursuant to the
terms and conditions of the DIP Facility Documents, with up to $65
million available on an interim basis.

The DIP Facility comprises a term loan in an aggregate principal
amount of up to $325.2 million consisting of: (i) new money
commitments in the aggregate principal amount of $85 million and
(ii) a roll-up of existing loans under the Prepetition First Lien
Facility in the aggregate principal amount of $240.2 million.  The
New Money Loans may be drawn in multiple installments, with up to
$65 million of the New Money Loans available upon entry of the
interim court order, subject to a budget agreed upon by the Loan
Parties and the Required Lenders and minimum funding requirements
consistent with the Prepetition First Lien Facility.  Amounts
repaid or prepaid in respect of DIP Loans may not be re-borrowed.


On the Closing Date, each NM Lender having a NM Commitment as of
the date and each Related Lender thereof will be deemed to have
made Roll-Up Loans and the proceeds of the Roll-Up Loans will be
used to pay the obligations owing under such NM Lenders' and
Related Parties' Prepetition First Lien Loans; provided that the
aggregate amount of Roll-Up Loans made on the Closing Date will not
exceed the aggregate amount of Prepetition First Lien Loans
multiplied by the Interim Availability Percentage.  On the date of
the entry of the Final Financing Order, the balance of the
Prepetition First Lien Obligations will be rolled up with the
proceeds of Roll-Up Loans.

On the Closing Date, the Debtors shall use the proceeds of the New
Money Loans to pay in full the obligations owing under the
Receivables Facility, cash collateralize outstanding letters of
credit, pay certain fees, costs and expenses incurred in connection
with the DIP Facility and other administration costs incurred with
the cases, pay certain prepetition obligations authorized by the
Court, provide working capital to the Debtors and for general
corporate purposes of the Loan Parties consistent with the approved
budget.

With respect to the Roll-Up Loans, the Loans will bear interest at
the same rate as under the Prepetition First Lien Credit Agreement.


With respect to the New Money Loans, the Loans will bear interest
at: (a) the applicable rate plus the base rate, payable monthly in
arrears; or (b) the applicable rate plus the Eurodollar Rate as
quoted by the Administrative Agent, adjusted for reserve
requirements, if any, and subject to customary change of
circumstance provisions, for interest periods of one, three or six
months, payable at the end of the relevant interest period, but in
any event at least quarterly; provided that in no event will the
Adjusted Eurodollar Rate be less than 1.00% per annum.  The
applicable rate means (i) 8.25% per annum in the case of Base Rate
Loans and (ii) 9.25% per annum in the case of Eurodollar Rate
Loans.  The base rate means for any day, the prime rate published
in The Wall Street Journal for the day; provided that the base rate
will be no less than 2.00% per annum.  During the continuance of an
event of default, as defined in the DIP Facility Documents, Loans
will bear interest at an additional 2.0% per annum.

The Debtors agree to pay to the Administrative Agent these fees:

     (a) from and after the Closing Date, a nonrefundable unused
commitment fee at the rate of 0.5% per annum will accrue as a
percentage of the daily average unused portion of the New Money
Commitments (whether or not then available), payable monthly in
arrears and on the Termination Date;

     (b) for the account of each Lender in respect of the DIP
Facility, an upfront fee equal to 2.0% of the Lender's New Money
Commitment under the DIP Facility as set forth in the DIP Facility
Documents on the Closing Date, such fee earned and due and payable
on the Closing Date;

     (c) for the account of the Majority Lender, a nonrefundable
backstop fee in the amount of 2.675% of the applicable percentages
(as determined under the Prepetition First Lien Credit Agreement)
of all Prepetition Lenders other than the Majority Lender of the
New Money Commitments under the DIP Facility as set forth in the
DIP Facility Documents on the Closing Date, the fee earned and due
and payable on the Closing Date;

     (d) for the account of Arranger, a non-refundable arranger fee
in the amount of 0.4875% of the New Money Commitments under the DIP
Facility as set forth in the DIP Facility Documents on the Closing
Date, the fee earned and due and payable on the Closing Date;

     (e) for the account of each Lender in respect of the DIP
Facility, an exit fee equal to 1.5% of the Lender's New Money
Commitment under the DIP Facility as set forth in the DIP Facility
Documents on the Closing Date, the fee earned and due and payable
on the earlier of the Termination Date or repayment in full of the
DIP Facility; and

     (f) for the account of the Administrative Agent, customary
fees and expenses in amounts to be agreed.

Scheduled termination date means nine months following the Closing
Date.  Termination date means the earliest of (a) the Scheduled
Termination Date, (b) 45 days after the entry of the interim court
order, if the final court order has not been entered prior to the
expiration of such period, (c) the substantial consummation of a
plan of reorganization that is confirmed pursuant to a court order,
(d) the consummation of a sale of substantially all assets of the
Loan Parties, and (e) the acceleration of the Loans and the
termination of all New Money Commitments in accordance with the DIP
Facility Documents.

Pursuant to the DIP Facility Documents, as security for the full
and timely payment and performance of all of the Obligations, each
of the Loan Parties assigns, pledges and grants to the
Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the DIP Secured Parties, a
valid, perfected, continuing, enforceable, non-avoidable first
priority security interest in, and lien on, all of the property of
the Loan Parties, now owned or hereafter acquired.

Upon the entry of the final court order, collateral will include
claims and causes of action under Sections 502(d), 544, 545, 547,
548 and 550 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

The Loan Parties will be permitted to continue to use cash
collateral in the ordinary course of business, including, without
limitation, for the purchase and sale of raw materials and
work-in-process and finished goods inventory from affiliates,
subject to the Approved Budget and the terms of the interim court
order and final court order, as applicable.  

The Prepetition First Lien Agent and Prepetition First Lien Parties
will receive adequate protection in the form of (i) solely to the
extent any portion of the Prepetition First Lien Obligations remain
outstanding, ongoing payment of interest and other amounts due
under the Prepetition First Lien Documents; (ii) current cash
reimbursement of actual and documented fees and expenses and other
disbursements of the majority lender under the Prepetition First
Lien Credit Agreement, including, without limitation, the
reasonable documented fees and expenses of PJT Partners LP,
O'Melveny & Myers LLP, and Richards Layton & Finger, P.A., whether
incurred before or after the Petition Date; and (iii) subject to
the priorities set forth in the DIP Facility Documents, the senior
adequate protection liens and superpriority claims.

The Prepetition Second Lien Parties will receive adequate
protection in the form of (i) current cash payment of actual and
documented fees and expenses of the Prepetition Second Lien
Trustee, including actual and documented fees and expenses of the
Prepetition Second Lien Trustee's professional advisors, Houlihan
Lokey, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, and Delaware local counsel to
be named, not to exceed, in the aggregate, the amounts set forth
with respect to such fees and expenses in the Approved Budget, and
(ii) subject to the priorities set forth in the DIP Facility
Documents, the Junior Adequate Protection Lien and the Junior
Adequate Protection Superpriority Claim.

Milestones culminating in the confirmation of a plan of
reorganization, including, without limitation:

     (i) not later than 120 days following the Petition Date, the
Debtors will file with the Court an acceptable Plan of
Reorganization and a disclosure statement reasonably satisfactory
to the Required Lenders with respect thereto;

    (ii) not later than the date that is 180 days following the
Petition Date, the Court will enter an order approving a disclosure
statement reasonably satisfactory to the Required Lenders with
respect to an Acceptable Plan of Reorganization;

   (iii) not later than the date that is 240 days following the
Petition Date, the Court will enter an order confirming an
acceptable Plan, which order will be in form and substance
satisfactory to the Administrative Agent and the Required Lenders;
and

    (iv) not later than the date that is 270 days following the
Petition Date, the acceptable Plan of Reorganization will become
effective.

A copy of the Debtor's Motion is available at:

             http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-12082-17.pdf

                       About Appvion, Inc.

Appvion, Inc. -- http://www.appvion.com/-- produces thermal,
carbonless, security, inkjet, digital specialty, and colored
papers.  The Company is the largest manufacturer of direct thermal
paper in North America.  Headquartered in Appleton, Wisconsin,
Appvion operates coating and converting plants there and in West
Carrollton, Ohio and a pulp and paper mill in Roaring Spring,
Pennsylvania.  The Company employs approximately 1,400 people and
is 100% employee-owned.

On Oct. 1, 2017, Appvion, Inc., and five affiliated debtors each
filed a voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12082).  The cases
are pending before the Honorable Kevin J. Carey, and the Debtors
have requested joint administration of the cases under Case No.
17-12082.

Appvion Inc. disclosed total assets of $413,430,904 and total
liabilities of $714,758,194 as of Aug. 31, 2017.

DLA Piper is serving as legal counsel to Appvion, Guggenheim
Securities LLC is serving as the Company's investment banker, and
Alan Holtz of AlixPartners is serving as the Company's Chief
Restructuring Officer.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing
agent.


AUTHENTIC GELATO: Hires Bryan Cave as Bankruptcy Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------
Authentic Gelato, LLC, and its affiliated debtors, seek authority
from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District
of Texas, Dallas Division, to employ Bryan Cave LLP as bankruptcy
counsel.

Legal services to be rendered by Bryan Cave are:

     a. take all necessary actions to protect and preserve the
        Debtors' estates, including, if required by the facts and
        circumstances, the prosecution of adversary proceedings
        and other actions and matters on the Debtors' behalf, the
        defense of any actions commenced against the Debtor, the
        negotiation of disputes, including litigation, in which
        the Debtors are involved, and the preparation of
        objections to, or motions to estimate, claims filed
        against the Debtors' estates where appropriate;

     b. provide legal advice with respect to the Debtors' rights,
        powers, and duties as debtors in possession in the
        continued operation of their businesses and the
        management of their property;

     c. prepare on behalf of the Debtors all necessary motions,
        applications, complaints, answers, orders, reports,
        notices, schedules, and any other pleadings and legal
        documents in connection with matters effecting the
        administration of the Debtors and their bankruptcy
        estates, and the prosecution of these cases;

     d. assist the Debtors in connection with any disposition
        of the Debtors' assets, whether by sale or otherwise;

     e. assist the Debtors in the negotiation, preparation,
        confirmation and consummation of any plan of
        reorganization or liquidation, the preparation of a
        disclosure statement in respect thereof, and in the
        preparation and execution of all related documents and
        transactions;

     f. appear before the Court, any appellate courts and the
        United States Trustee to protect the interests of the
        Debtors and their bankruptcy estates before such courts
        and the United States Trustee; and

     g. perform all other necessary legal services that the
        Debtors may request in connection with these cases and
        pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code.

Hourly rates of the professionals who will be principally engaged
in this matter are:

     Keith M. Aurzada   Partner    $660
     Michael P. Cooley  Counsel    $625
     Lisa Marshall      Associate  $410
     Marzale Fosdick    Paralegal  $240

Keith M. Aurzada, partner at the law firm of Bryan Cave LLP,
assures the Court that his firm does not hold or represent any
interest adverse to any Debtor or to the estates with respect to
the matter on which Bryan Cave is to be employed, nor fails to meet
the "disinterestedness" test, so as to render Bryan Cave ineligible
to serve as counsel for the Debtors under Section 327(a) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

The Counsel can be reached through:

     Michael P. Cooley, Esq.
     Keith M. Aurzada, Esq.
     Lisa M. Marshall, Esq.
     BRYAN CAVE, LLP
     2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 3300
     Dallas, TX 75201
     Tel: (214) 721-8000
     Fax: (214) 721-8100
     Email: keith.aurzada@bryancave.com
            michael.cooley@bryancave.com
            lisa.marshall@bryancave.com

                      About Authentic Gelato

Authentic Gelato, LLC, together with its affiliates, is in the ice
cream and frozen desserts business.

Authentic Gelato and other related entities sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Tex., Lead Case No. 17-33532) on Sept. 19,
2017.  The petition was signed by Ugo Ginatta, director.  Hon.
Harlin DeWayne Hale is the presiding judge.

Keith Miles Aurzada, Esq. and Michael P. Cooley, Esq. of Bryan Cave
LLP serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

Authentic Gelato has estimated assets and debts of $1 million to
$10 million.


AUTHENTIC GELATO: Hires Resurgence Financial as Investment Banker
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Authentic Gelato, LLC, and its affiliated debtors seek authority
from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District
of Texas, Dallas Division, to employ Resurgence Financial Services,
LLC as investment banker.

By this chapter 11 filing, the Debtors propose to sell their assets
and business operations to JxP Capital, LLC or such other party
that submits a higher or better offer. As an integral part of their
strategy in these cases, therefore, the Debtors propose to employ
Resurgence Financial to assist them in soliciting additional bids
and, if any are received, to conduct a competitive auction for the
purpose of identifying the highest and best offer for the Debtors'
assets and business operations.

Resurgence Financial's compensation will be based on:

     (a) Transaction Fee.  As compensation for the additional
         services rendered by RFS, RFS will earn a fee based on
         the enterprise value if a stock transaction, the total
         purchase price under an asset sale and/or the amount of
         debt restructured or replaced. The Transaction Fee will
         be calculated based on the Transaction Amount at the
         following rates:

         -- 5% of the first $1,000,000 of the Transaction Amount,
            plus

         -- 4% on any additional Transaction Amount up to
            $2,000,000, plus

         -- 3% on any additional Transaction Amount up to
            $3,000,000, plus

         -- 2% on any additional Transaction Amount above
            $3,000,000.

         Any Transaction Fee will be payable by the Debtors from
         the gross proceeds of the Transaction Amount.
         Importantly, Resurgence Financial has agreed to waive
         any Transaction Fee that would otherwise be due in
         connection with JxP's Stalking Horse Bid; provided,
         however, that if JxP raises its offer and is ultimately
         the successful purchaser, Resurgence Financial will be
         entitled to a Transaction Fee of $50,000.

     (b) Expenses. In addition, the Company will reimburse
         Resurgence Financial for all out-of-pocket expenses.

Gary Murphey, managing director at Resurgence Financial Services,
LLC, attests that Resurgence Financial does not hold or represent
an interest that is adverse to the Debtors or their estates.

The Firm can be reached through:

     Gary Murphey
     Resurgence Financial Services, LLC
     3330 Cumberland Blvd., Suite 500
     Atlanta, GA 30339
     Phone: (770) 933-6855

                      About Authentic Gelato

Authentic Gelato, LLC, together with its affiliates, is in the ice
cream and frozen desserts business.

Authentic Gelato and other related entities sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Tex., Lead Case No. 17-33532) on Sept. 19,
2017.  The petition was signed by Ugo Ginatta, director.  The Hon.
Harlin DeWayne Hale is the presiding judge.

Keith Miles Aurzada, Esq. and Michael P. Cooley, Esq. of Bryan Cave
LLP serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.

Authentic Gelato has estimated assets and debts of $1 million to
$10 million.


B & B METALS: Oct. 31 Disclosure Statement Hearing
--------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas L. Perkins of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of Illinois will convene a hearing on Oct. 31,
2017, to consider approval of B & B Metals, Inc.'s disclosure
statement describing its plan of reorganization filed on Sept. 20,
2017.

Oct. 25, 2017, is fixed as the last day for filing and serving
written objections to the Disclosure Statement.

                      About B & B Metals

B & B Metals, Inc., sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Ill.
Case No. 17-80859) on June 9, 2017.  The petition was signed by
Larry Beam, President.  The Debtor estimated assets of less than
$100,000 and liabilities of less than $500,000.  The Debtor tapped
Justin Raver, Esq., at Barash & Everett, LLC, as counsel.

Since 2012, the Debtor has been in the business of scrapping semi
trailers, selling various parts including the tires, rims, and
suspension equipment as well as refrigeration units and then
scrapping the remaining metals and selling to regional scrap yards.


B N EMPIRE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------
An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of B N Empire, LLC.

                   About B N Empire, LLC

B N Empire, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-07841) on Sept. 5, 2017.  Johnson Pope Bokor
Ruppel & Burns, LLP, represents the Debtor as counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  The petition
was signed by Rajesh Bahl, its manager.


BAITY'S PRECISION: Hires Gardner as Attorney Replacing Knight Law
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Baity's Precision Machining, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of North Carolina to
employ Gardner Law Offices, PLLC, as attorney to the Debtor,
replacing Knight Law Office, PC.

Gardner Law requires Gardner to:

   a. represent the Debtor in the Chapter 11 case;

   b. advise the Debtor as to its rights, duties and powers as
      debtor in possession;

   c. prepare and file all necessary statements, schedules and
      other documents;

   d. negotiate and prepare one or more plans of reorganization;

   e. represent the Debtor at all hearings, meetings of
      creditors, conferences, trials and other proceedings;

   f. perform other legal services as may be necessary in
      connection with the case.

Gardner will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly billing
rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

William S. Gardner, member of Gardner Law Offices, PLLC, assured
the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Gardner can be reached at:

     William S. Gardner
     GARDNER LAW OFFICES, PLLC
     320-1 E. Graham Street
     Shelby, NC 28150
     Tel: (704) 600-6113
     Fax: (888) 870-1644
     E-mail: billgardner@gardnerlawoffices.com

              About Baity's Precision Machining, Inc.

Baity's Precision Machining, Inc., is a machining business located
in Asheville, Buncombe County, North Carolina. It has been in
business for more than 35 years. It specializes in precision,
high-tech machining of new and replacement parts for a variety of
industries, including high speed packaging, medical device
components, transportation, machinery builders, polymer textiles,
chemicals, and gas and flow control valves. The equipment it uses
is unique and requires technical expertise to operate.

Baity's Precision Machining was formed by Bill and Carolyn Baity in
1981. The current principal, Mark Shepherd, acquired the debtor
through a purchase agreement in 2008.

Baity's Precision Machining filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy
protection (Bankr. W.D.N.C. Case No. 17-10397) on Sept. 15, 2017.

Judge George Hodges presides over the case. The Debtor hired the
Gardner Law Offices, PLLC, as attorney, replacing Rodney Knight,
Jr. of Knight Law Office, PC.


BARBARA MAGNUSSON: Trustee Selling Spring Lake Property for $2.9M
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Christine M. Gravelle of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of New Jersey will convene a hearing on Oct. 31, 2017, at
10:00 a.m., to consider the sale by Barry W. Frost, Chapter 11
Trustee for the estate of Debtor Barbara Magnusson, of the Debtor's
interest in the real property located at 14 Newark Avenue, Spring
Lake, New Jersey to 14 Newark Avenue Enterprises, LLC for
$2,850,000, subject to overbid.

Objections, if any, must be filed no later than seven days before
the return date of the Motion.

On Schedule "A/B" of her Petition, the Debtor lists an ownership
interest in the Spring Lake Property with a value of $2,700,000 for
the Spring Lake Property.  On Schedule "C" of her Petition, the
Debtor asserted an exemption in the amount of $19,600.  

The Debtor lists on Schedule "D," US Bank National Assoc. as
holding a mortgage on the Spring Lake Property in the amount of
$1,900,000 ("First Mortgage").  Based upon information and belief,
the current holder of the First Mortgage is Ocwen Loan Servicing,
LLC as servicer for U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for
GSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-ARI, mortgage pass-through
certificates series 2006-AR1 ("First Mortgage Holder").  The First
Mortgage Holder asserts the current balance of the First Mortgage
is approximately $2,550,000.

The Debtor also lists on Schedule "D," Amboy Bank holding a "second
lien" on the Spring Lake Property in the amount of $270,871.  Based
upon information and belief, the current holder of the Second
Mortgage is 14 Newark Ave - SL, LLC ("Second Mortgage Holder").  

The Second Mortgage Holder asserts the current balance of the
Second Mortgage is approximately $340,000.  The Trustee is in the
process of finalizing his negotiations with the secured creditors
which is projected to allow for a 15% discount on their respective
loans so approximately $2,167,500 would be projected to be paid to
the First Mortgage Holder and approximately $289,000 would be
projected to be to the Second Mortgage Holder at the closing on the
Spring Lake Property.

As the Court is aware, the case involved various issues that
increased the cost of the administration of the estate to the point
where it is insolvent.  Based upon information and belief, the
total projected amounts owed administrative creditors is
approximately $488,200.  Based upon further information and belief,
the administrative creditors have agreed to voluntarily accept a
discount of approximately 30% on the amounts they are due and
owed.

As the Court is aware the Trustee faced significant issues in his
initially attempts to market and sell the property due to the
Debtor's interference.  On March 8, 2017, the Trustee filed his
Motion to Vacate, seeking among other things, an order of the Court
to compelling the Debtor to vacate the Spring Lake Property.  On
April 5, 2017, the Court entered an order granting the relief
sought in the Trustee's Motion to Vacate and ordered the Debtor to
vacate the Spring Lake Property on May 1, 2017.

On April 6, 2017, the Trustee filed an application to employ
McDonnell Crowley, LLC, as special real estate counsel to the
Trustee, and on April 18, 2017, the Court entered an order
approving the retention of McDonnell Crowley as counsel to the
Trustee.

On May 22, 2017, the Trustee filed his application to retain
Ruggeri Realty, LLC, as his real estate broker to market and sell
the estate's interest in the Spring Lake Property.  On May 31,
2017, the Court entered an order granting the retention of
Ruggeri.

With further effort by the Trustee, the Debtor eventually vacated
the Spring Lake Property.  The Trustee and McDonnell Crowley have
sought to secure and aggressively market and sell the Spring Lake
Property after a long process of securing the Debtor's removal from
the property.  

The Trustee has reviewed the proposed sale and consulted with his
realtor, and believes the sale price of $2,850,000 for the Spring
Lake Property, to the Buyer, free and clear of any liens, claims,
interests, and encumbrances, is reasonable and the most judicious
way to sell the Spring Lake Property for the benefit of creditors.

The Trustee further engaged in arm's-length negotiations with the
Buyer, pursuant to which they agreed to sell the Spring Lake
Property to the Buyer based upon the terms of the proposed
agreement of sale and related documents.  The Buyer has been the
only party to be forthcoming with a firm offer of at least the
proposed amount.

After carefully evaluating the Buyer's offer and the potential for
additional offers, the Trustee, in his business judgment, has
determined that the price offered by the Buyer is the highest and
best price the Trustee can obtain for the estate’s interest in
the Spring Lake Property under the circumstances.  Based upon
information and belief, the sale of the Spring Lake Property, the
largest
and only remaining asset of the estate, should help allow for
moving this case towards closure.

The salient terms of the Agreement of Sale are:

     a. The Parties: The Seller under the Agreement of Sale is the
Trustee, not individually or personally, but on behalf of the
Debtor's bankruptcy estate, and the Buyer is 14 Newark Avenue
Enterprises, LLC.

     b. The Property: The land, together with the buildings,
structures, and improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereto,
situated at Block 95, Lot 18 on the tax map for County of Monmouth
and State of New Jersey and more commonly known as 14 Newark
Avenue, Spring Lake, New Jersey 07762.

     c. The Purchase Price: $2,850,000

     d. The Deposit: Initial deposit of $1,000 and an additional
deposit of $50,000.  The deposited funds are to be held in Trust by
counsel for the Buyer.

     e. "As Is, Where Is": The Buyer agrees to accept the Spring
Lake Property in its "as is" condition.  The Trustee makes no
representations and or warranties whatsoever.

     f. Bankruptcy Court Approval: The sale of the estate's
interest in the Spring Lake Property is subject to Court approval.

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

    http://bankrupt.com/misc/Barbara_Magnusson_338_Sales.pdf

The Trustee will consider all higher and better offers on the
estate's interest in the Spring Lake Property up to and including
the hearing date.  All bidders must have $285,000 in certified
funds on the hearing date in order to bid.

The Trustee asks the Court to waive the 14-day stay under
Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) to permit the Trustee to minimize these
costs by closing the proposed sale transaction as soon as possible
after the entry of the Sale Order.

Barbara Magnusson sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D.N.J. Case
No. 13-31122) on Sept. 27, 2013.  The Debtor tapped Bunce Atkinson,
Esq., at Atkinson & DeBartolo as counsel.  On May 31, 2017, the
Court appointed Ruggeri Realty, LLC, as the Trustee's real estate
broker.


BCL ONE: Case Summary & 2 Unsecured Creditors
---------------------------------------------
Debtor: BCL One, LLC
        P.O. Box 4124
        Salisbury, NC 28145

Type of Business: BCL One, LLC listed its business as a Single
                  Asset Real Estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C.
                  Section 101(51B)).  The Company owns in fee
                  simple interest a real property located at 120
                  E. Council Street, Salisbury, NC 28144, Suites
                  100 and 300, valued by the Company at $1.92
                  million.  It is an affiliate of Esby Corporation

                  and Summit Investment Co., Inc., both of which
                  sought bankruptcy protection on March 2, 2017
                  (Bankr. M.D.N.C. Case Nos. 17-50228 and 17-
                  50230, respectively).

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 6, 2017

Case No.: 17-51061

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Middle District of North Carolina (Winston-Salem)

Judge: Hon. Lena M. James

Debtor's Counsel: Samantha K. Brumbaugh, Esq.
                  IVEY, MCCLELLAN, GATTON & SIEGMUND, LLP
                  100 S. Elm Street, Suite 500
                  PO Box 3324
                  Greensboro, NC 27402
                  Tel: 336-274-4658
                  Fax: 336-274-4540
                  E-mail: skb@iveymcclellan.com
                         skb@imgt-law.com

Total Assets: $1.93 million

Total Debts: $1.72 million

The petition was signed by Clay B. Lindsay, Jr., member/manager.

A full-text copy of the petition containing, along with a list of
two unsecured creditors, is available for free at
http://bankrupt.com/misc/ncmb17-51061.pdf


BINDER & BINDER: Sale of Interests in SSA Cases to Advocator Okayed
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert D. Drain of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York authorized Binder & Binder - The National
Social Security Disability Advocates, LLC and SSDI Holdings, Inc.
to sell the servicing rights with respect to and any other
interests in, of their existing disability cases under programs
operated by the Social Security Administration, along with all
electronic records related to the acquired cases, to Advocator
Group, LLC in exchange for an earn-out payment to be paid in
monthly installments commencing Dec. 4, 2017.

The Response, in unredacted form, will remain under seal and
confidential and will not be made available to anyone without the
consent of the Reorganized Debtors and Advocator or further order
of the Court.

The Reorganized Debtors will either direct the Clerk of the Court
to dispose of, or unseal with the consent of Advocator, the
confidential information at the conclusion of these Chapter 11
cases.

The Reorganized Debtors are authorized to take all actions
necessary to effectuate the relief granted pursuant to the Order.

The Order is entered without prejudice to the rights of any party
in interest, or the United States Trustee, to seek to unseal the
Sale Motion, the Agreement, or any portion thereof, subject to the
rights of the Reorganized Debtors and/or Advocator to oppose any
such request.

The terms and conditions of the Order will be immediately effective
and enforceable upon its entry.

                     About Binder & Binder

Founded in 1979 by brothers Harry and Charles Binder, Binder &
Binder is the nation's largest provider of social security
disability and veterans' benefits advocacy services, with operating
scale and efficiencies unrivaled by its competitors in the highly
fragmented advocacy market.  The Company has more than 950
employees in 35 offices across the United States.  In 2010, H.I.G.
Capital, LLC, acquired a controlling equity interest in the
Company.  Since 1979, the Company has handled over 300,000
disability cases under programs operated by the SSA and the VA.

Binder & Binder - The National Social Security Disability Advocates
(NY), LLC, et al., sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 14-23728) in White Plains, New York on Dec.
18, 2014.  The cases are assigned to Judge Robert D. Drain.  The
Debtors have tapped Kenneth A. Rosen, Cassandra Porter, Esq., and
Nicholas B. Vislocky, Esq., at Lowenstein Sandler as counsel.

The Debtors have engaged Development Specialists, Inc., as
financial advisor, and BMC Group Inc. as claims and notice agent.

The U.S. Trustee appointed an Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors in the Debtors' cases.  The Committee is now comprised of
(i) United Service Workers Union, Local 455 IUJAT & Related Funds,
(ii) T&G Industries, Inc., (iii) WB Mason Co., and (iv)
Teaktronics, Inc.  The Committee tapped Klestadt Winters Jureller
Southard & Stevens, LLP, as attorneys.

                          *     *     *

The Debtors originally arranged from existing lenders DIP financing
of $26 million, which provided for the payment in full, or roll-up,
of the $23 million of prepetition indebtedness and an additional
commitment of up to $3 million to fund the Debtors' operations
during the Chapter 11 cases.  On Jan. 26, 2015, the Initial DIP
Lenders issued a notice that events of default had occurred.

In March 2015, the Debtors won approval to obtain a new $6 million
term loan from Stellus Capital Investment Corporation secured by a
first-priority priming lien on all of the Debtors' assets.

On Oct. 29, 2015, the Court entered an order granting Stellus'
motion for termination of the Debtors' exclusive plan filing and
solicitation periods pursuant to Section 1121(d) of the Bankruptcy
Code.

On Nov. 18, 2015, Stellus Capital and the Creditors Committee filed
a Joint Plan of Liquidation for the Debtors, and on Jan. 15, 2016,
they filed a First Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization.  The
original hearing on the Proponents' Disclosure Statement has been
further adjourned for April 22, 2016.

On Oct. 3, 2016, the Court the Debtors' Second Amended Chapter 11
Plan which, among other things, confirmed the Plan and approved the
appointment of Development Specialists, Inc. as the Plan
Administrator.


BLUE MOON HOTEL: Hires Avrach & Company as Accountant
-----------------------------------------------------
Blue Moon Hotel & Swim Club, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to employ
Avrach & Company, P.C., as accountant to the Debtor.

Blue Moon Hotel requires Avrach & Company to file and the Debtor's
tax returns for the year 2016, and provide related accounting
services.

Avrach & Company will be paid based upon its normal and usual
hourly billing rates. The firm will be paid a retainer in the
amount of $3,000.  It will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Barry Avrach, a partner of Avrach & Company, P.C., assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Avrach & Company can be reached at:

     Barry Avrach
     AVRACH & COMPANY, P.C.
     1716 Locust St.
     Philadelphia, PA 19103
     Tel: (215) 546-2600

              About Blue Moon Hotel & Swim Club, Inc.

Blue Moon Hotel & Swim Club, Inc. sought protection under Chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 17-13938) on
June 5, 2017.  Reina G. Williams, its president, signed the
petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities of less than $100,000.

Judge Jean K. Fitzsimon presides over the case.  The Law Office of
Jonathan H. Stanwood, LLC represents the Debtor as bankruptcy
counsel.


BOEGEL FARMS: Proposes Auction of Kearney Properties
----------------------------------------------------
Warren L. Boegel and the Warren L. Boegel Trust UTA 2-07-07
(Revocable Trust), Warren Boegel, Trustee; Boegel Farms, LLC; and
Three Bo's, Inc.; ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Kansas to authorize the sale of (i) real property in Kearney
County, Kansas, and consisting of four out of six quarters pledged
to Security State Bank ("SSB"); and (ii) real property located in
Kearney County, Kansas currently pledged to RABO AgriFinance, LLC,
and consisting of approximately 3,600 acres, at auction.

The Debtors believe that it is in the best interest of their
bankruptcy estate and their creditors to sell their real property
located in Kearney County, Kansas, pledged to SSB, free and clear
of liens and encumbrances.  The proceeds from the auction will
first be applied to ordinary costs of sale, closing costs, and pro
rata real property taxes, and any remaining funds will be paid
directly to SSB.

The Description of said real property to be auctioned is as
follows: (i) Southwest Quarter of Section 17-21-36, Kearney County,
Kansas; (ii) Northwest Quarter of Section 15-22-36, Kearney County,
Kansas; (iii) Northeast Quarter of Section 11-24-37, Kearney
County, Kansas; and (iv) Southwest Quarter of Section 2-24-37,
Kearney County, Kansas.

In addition, the Debtors believe that it is in the best interest of
their bankruptcy estate and their creditors to sell their real
property located in Kearney County, Kansas currently pledged to
RABO, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. The proceeds
from the auction will first be applied to ordinary costs of sale,
closing costs, and pro rata real property taxes, and any remaining
funds will be paid directly to Rabo.

The Description of said real property to be auctioned is as
follows: (i) All of Section 22-25-36, Kearney County, Kansas; (ii)
All of Section 28-35-36, Kearney County, Kansas; (iii) All of
Section 27-25-36, Kearney County, Kansas; (iv) All of Section
21-25-36, Kearney County, Kansas, Laying North of US Highway 25;
(v) All of Section 24-25-36, Kearney County, Kansas; (vi) 1.4 Acres
in Section 23-25-36, Kearney County, Kansas; (vii) South Half of
Section 15-25-36, Kearney County, Kansas; (viii) 141 Acres in the
East half of Section 20-25-36, Kearney County, Kansas; and (ix) 71
Acres in Section 29-25-36, Kearney County, Kansas.

The Debtors ask the Court's approval to hold a public auction in
order to sell the Property.  The proposed auction will be conducted
by Hutcheson Real Estate & Auction Co., Inc. (a separate employment
application has been filed concurrently with the Motion).  The
proposed auction will be conducted not later than Nov. 15, 2017,
with closing to occur not later than Jan. 31, 2018 for the portion
of the Property pledged to Rabo and Dec. 15, 2017 for the portion
of the Property pledged to SSB.

The auction will have no reserve.  There are no other liens against
the Property other than those held by Rabo and SSB.

Rabo will conduct an appraisal of the properties listed prior to
any auction, and will provide the Debtors with a credit bid at that
time (which will be confidential and not disclosed to any third
parties until after the auction).  In the event of a successful
credit bid, Rabo will be responsible for any auction fees, but may
add such costs to the balance of its claims.

The Proceeds from the sale of the properties listed paid to Rabo
will be first applied to the smaller note (as reflected on Claim
No. 7 in Case No. 17-10224), and then to the larger note (as
reflected on Claim No. 8 in Case No. 17-10224).

The Debtors believe it is in the best interests of the bankruptcy
estate and their creditors to sell the Property free and clear of
all liens and encumbrances pursuant to the Auction listed.

                       About Boegel Farms

Boegel Farms, LLC, and Three Bo's, Inc., sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 17-10222
and 17-10221) on Feb. 23, 2017.  The petitions were signed by Jack
Boegel, president.

Boegel Farms estimated its assets and debt at $10 million to $50
million.  

The cases are assigned to Judge Robert E. Nugent.  

Boegel Farms tapped David Prelle Eron, Esq., at Eron Law, P.A., as
counsel.  It engaged Roger Schulz and Cathleen Mueller of Schulz
and Leonard, P.C., as its accountant.

No trustee has been appointed in the Debtors' cases.


BRAZILIAN BUFFET: Hires Avram D. White as Counsel
-------------------------------------------------
Brazilian Buffet LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of New Jersey to employ the Law Office of
Avram D. White, as counsel to the Debtor.

Brazilian Buffet requires Avram D. White to:

   a. represent the Debtor, appear in the Bankruptcy Court,
      and negotiate with creditors;

   b. file and prosecute any and all necessary Motions; and

   c. handle any and all other legal matters related to the
      bankruptcy proceeding.

Avram D. White will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                       $220
     Paralegals/Staffs               $90

Avram D. White received the amount of $2,000 as pre-petition
retainer, and $3,500 to be held in Trustee as post-petition
retainer.

Avram D. White will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Avram D. White, member of Law Office of Avram D. White, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Avram D. White can be reached at:

     Avram D. White, Esq.
     LAW OFFICE OF AVRAM D. WHITE
     66 Hampton Terrace
     Orange, New Jersey 07050
     Tel: (973) 669-0857
     Fax: (888) 481-1709
     E-mail: avram.randr@gmail.com

              About Brazilian Buffet LLC

Brazilian Buffet LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 17-26028) on August 8, 2017, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is
represented by Avram D. White, Esq., at the Law Office of Avram D.
White.


BREITBURN ENERGY: Equity Committee Wants Exclusivity Terminated
---------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Breitburn Energy Partners'
statutory committee of equity security holders filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court an objection to the Company's motion for further
extension of the exclusivity exclusive periods. The committee
asserts, "While the Equity Committee does not adopt the unsecured
creditors' committee's views as to where the fulcrum class lies,
the Equity Committee believes that a competitive and robust sale
process for the Debtors' assets will provide the clearest and most
accurate view of the value of their assets, thereby eliminating the
uncertainty imposed by the competing views of valuation that
continue to divide these chapter 11 cases. The Equity Committee
understands the situation, the Debtors have a proposal from a
select group of bondholders to purchase the Debtors' 'crown jewel'
Permian assets and 7% of their legacy assets for $775 million
without any opportunity for higher and better bids, and an
unsolicited section 363 stalking horse offer, subject to higher and
better bids, from a very credible third-party outside the existing
capital structure to acquire the Permian assets for $725 million,
which party [recently] bid against itself and increased its offer
by an additional $50 million over and above its original offer
without any due diligence or engagement from the Debtors. The
Equity Committee is concerned that the Debtors' fatigue with these
chapter 11 cases may cause them to pursue a plan of convenience and
expediency with the bondholders, while allowing competitive offers
to lapse, thereby depriving those unsecured claimholders and
preferred and common unitholders prejudiced by the bondholder
proposal the opportunity to realize potentially value-maximizing
alternatives through a Court approved sale and auction process. The
Debtors cannot dispute that each of the bondholder proposal and the
stalking horse offer seeks to consummate a sale of the Debtors'
assets. Indeed, a termination of exclusivity now will foster this
competitive dynamic, which will only hasten, not impede, the
successful resolution of these chapter 11 cases."

                      About Breitburn Energy

Breitburn Energy Partners LP is engaged in the acquisition,
exploitation and development of oil and natural gas properties,
Midstream Assets, and a combination of ethane, propane, butane and
natural gasoline that when removed from natural gas become liquid
under various levels of higher pressure and lower temperature, in
the United States.  Operations are conducted through Breitburn
Parent's wholly-owned subsidiary, Breitburn Operating LP, and
BOLP's general partner, Breitburn Operating GP LLC.

Breitburn Energy Partners LP and 21 of its affiliates filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Lead Case No. 16-11390) on May 15, 2016,
listing assets of $4.71 billion and liabilities of $3.41 billion.
The petitions were signed by James G. Jackson, executive vice
president and chief financial officer.

The Debtors tapped Ray C Schrock, Esq., and Stephen Karotkin, Esq.,
at Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, as bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtors
hired Steven J. Reisman, Esq., and Cindi M. Giglio, Esq., at
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle LLP as their conflicts
counsel. The Debtors tapped Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, as
financial advisor; Lazard Freres & Co. LLC as investment banker;
and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.

An Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors been formed in the
case.  The Creditors Committee is currently comprised of Ares
Special Situations Fund IV, L.P. C/O Ares Management LLC; BPC UKI
LP C/O Beach Point Capital Management; and Wexford Spectrum
Investors, LLC.  The Creditors Committee retained
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP as counsel.

A Statutory Committee of Equity Security Holders was also formed in
the case.  The Equity Committee is currently composed of seven
individual holders.  The Equity Committee retained Proskauer Rose
LLP as counsel.


BRONX MIRACLE GOSPEL: Hires Colasanti & Iurato as Accountant
------------------------------------------------------------
Bronx Miracle Gospel Tabernacle Word of Faith Ministries, Inc.,
seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of New York to employ Colasanti & Iurato, as accountant to
the Debtor.

Bronx Miracle Gospel requires Colasanti & Iurato to:

   (a) prepare and review the monthly Debtor-in-Possession's
       operating reports and statements of cash receipts and
       disbursements including notes as to the status of
       tax liabilities and other indebtedness;

   (b) prepare the compiled financial statements as of the date
       of filing of the respective Chapter 11 petitions;

   (c) review existing accounting systems and procedures and
       establish new systems and procedures, if necessary;

   (d) assist in the preparation of the Debtor's schedules;

   (e) assist the Debtor in the development of a plan of
       reorganization;

   (f) assist the Debtor in the preparation of a liquidation
       analysis;

   (g) appear at creditors' committee meetings, 341(a) meetings,
       And Court hearings, if required;

   (h) assist the Debtor in the preparation of cash flow
       projections;

   (i) consult with counsel for the Debtor in connection with
       operating, financial and other business matters related
       to the ongoing activities of the Debtor;

   (k) prepare and file income tax filings and any amendments
       to tax filings for prior years; and

   (l) perform such other duties as are normally required of an
       accountant, including, but not limited to, the preparation
       of all financial statements required in the Debtor's
       reorganization.

Colasanti & Iurato will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Principals                      $300
     Staff Accountants               $95

Colasanti & Iurato will be paid a retainer in the amount of $5,000.
The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Glen Iuarato, partner of Colasanti & Iurato, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Colasanti & Iurato can be reached at:

     Glen Iuarato
     COLASANTI & IURATO
     399 Knollwood Road, Suite 216
     White Plains, NY 10603
     Tel: (914) 923-5400

              About Bronx Miracle Gospel Tabernacle
                   Word of Faith Ministries, Inc.

Bronx Miracle Gospel Tabernacle Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-11395) on May 22, 2017,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The
petition was filed pro se.


C&C ALCOSER: Hires Johnny W. Thomas as Counsel
----------------------------------------------
C&C Alcoser Trucking, Inc. has filed an amended application seeking
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District
of Texas to employ Johnny W. Thomas as Chapter 11 counsel.

Services required of Johnny W. Thomas are:

     a. advise the Debtor as to its rights, duties and powers as
        a debtor in possession;

     b. prepare and file any statements, schedules, plans and
        other documents or pleadings to be filed by the Debtor
        in this case;

     c. represent the Debtor at all hearings, meeting of
        creditors, conferences, trials, and other proceedings in
        this case; and

     d. perform other legal services as may be necessary in
        connection with this case.

The Debtor proposes to compensate the counsel at the rate of
$310.00 per hour to be applied against a retainer of $20,000.

Johnny W. Thomas assures the Court that he has no business or
professional connections with the Debtors, Creditors, any other
party-in-interest, their respective attorneys and accountants, the
United States Trustee, or any person employed in the Office of the
United States Trustee.

The Firm can be reached through:

     Johnny W. Thomas
     JOHNNY W. THOMAS, LAW OFFICE, P.C.
     1153 E. Commerce
     San Antonio, TX 78205
     Tel: (210) 226-5888
     Fax: (210) 226-6085

                    About C&C Alcoser Trucking

C&C Alcoser Trucking, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr.
W.D. Tex. Case No. 17-52008) on Aug. 28, 2017.  The petition was
signed by Cristoval Alcoser, president.  The Debtor is represented
by Johnny W. Thomas, Esq. at Johnny W. Thomas, Law Offices, P.C.
At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated both assets and
liabilities ranging from $100,000 to $500,000.


CAMPBELLTON-GRACEVILLE: Committee Hires Investigative Assistant
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Official Committee of General Unsecured Creditors of
Campbellton-Graceville Hospital Corporation seeks authorization
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Florida
to retain Wayne Black and Associates, Inc., as investigative
assistant to the Committee.

The Committee requires Wayne Black to:

   (a) locate former and present employees, directors, officers,
       consultants of the Debtor;

   (b) locate former and present employees, directors, officers,
       consultants of certain management companies and
       laboratories that provided or received services from the
       Debtor pre-petition;

   (c) locate and provide imaging services as to certain servers,
       hard drives and additional ESI of the Debtor using Encase
       Forensic Software. The imaging services shall be completed
       by Jesus Pena, another employee of Wayne Black, as it
       requires additional certifications and licensing; and

   (d) locate and interview potential witnesses related to the
       Debtor's pre-petition clinical laboratory reference
       program.

Wayne Black will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates.  Wayne Black will be paid a retainer in the amount
of $5,000. It will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Wayne B. Black, owner and founder of Wayne Black and Associates,
Inc., assured the Court the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a)
is not creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the
Debtor; (b) has not been, within two years before the date of the
filing of the Debtor' chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or
employees of the Debtor; and (c) does not have an interest
materially adverse to the interest of the estate or of any class of
creditors or equity security holders, by reason of any direct or
indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the
Debtor, or for any other reason.

Wayne Black can be reached at:

     Wayne B. Black
     WAYNE BLACK AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
     801 Brickell Avenue, Suite 900
     Miami, FL 33131
     Tel: (305) 372-3748

                About Campbellton-Graceville
                    Hospital Corporation

Campbellton-Graceville Hospital Corporation is a non-profit
corporation established pursuant to the laws of the State of
Florida in 1961 and operates as a not-for-profit 25-bed critical
access hospital serving northern Florida, as well as surrounding
areas in Georgia and Alabama, and had approximately 100 employees.
It offered comprehensive medical care, including emergency
services, general hospitalization, laboratory services, swing bed,
and physical therapy.

Campbellton-Graceville Hospital filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. N.D.Fla. Case No. 17-40185) on April 17, 2017.
The Hon. Karen K. Specie presides over the case.  Berger Singerman
LLP represents the Debtor as counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
assets and $1 million to $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities.

The petition was signed by Marwill Glade of GlassRatner Advisory &
Capital Group, LLC, chief restructuring officer.

Guy G. Gebhardt, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 21, on June 8
appointed six creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 case.  The Committee has
retained Broad and Cassel LLP as counsel.

Judge Karen K. Specie of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Florida in June entered an Order finding that the
appointment of a patient care ombudsman for Campbellton-Graceville
Hospital is not necessary.


CAPITAL ONE: Fitch Affirms 'BB' Preferred Stock Rating
------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Capital One Financial's (COF) Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (LT IDR) and Viability Rating (VR) at
'A-/a-'. The Outlook remains Stable. At the same time, Fitch
affirmed COF's Short-Term IDR at 'F2'.  

The rating action follows a periodic review of the large regional
banking group, which includes BB&T Corporation (BBT), Capital One
Finance Corporation (COF), Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG),
Comerica Incorporated (CMA), Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB), Huntington
Bancshares Inc. (HBAN), Keycorp (KEY), M&T Bank Corporation (MTB),
MUFG Americas Holding Corporation (MUAH), PNC Financial Services
Group (PNC), Regions Financial Corporation (RF), SunTrust Banks
Inc. (STI), US Bancorp (USB), and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC).

Company-specific rating rationales for the other banks are
published separately, and for further discussion of the large
regional bank sector in general, refer to the special report titled
'Large Regional Bank Periodic Review,' to be published shortly.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

IDRS, VR AND SENIOR DEBT

COF's rating reflects its strong banking franchise, its solid
funding position and reasonable capital levels relative to its
rating level. COF's ratings also reflect its efficient, scalable
business model that has supported its earnings performance as
credit quality reverts toward longer-term norms. Offsetting these
rating strengths is COF's high proportion of consumer-related
assets and more specifically its exposure to the near-and-subprime
lending space. Fitch views this exposure as a rating constraint for
COF and limits its upward rating potential over time.

The affirmation is supported by good earnings performance and cost
controls. COF has generally outperformed its peer group, largely
driven by COF's comparatively higher net interest margin, given its
proportionately larger mix of higher yielding credit card
receivables and auto loans. Further supporting earnings performance
is COF's strong efficiency ratio relative to peer banks. Going
forward Fitch expects COF to continue to have a strong efficiency
ratio given its significant investments in becoming digital in its
operations and customer interfaces. Fitch continues to believe
these investments have the potential to more meaningfully increase
scale benefits for COF relative to peer institutions over time.

Still, COF's earnings outperformance on a return on average assets
(ROA) basis relative to peers has shrunk over recent periods
primarily due to credit card asset quality deterioration.
Consistent with industry trends, COF's level of credit card net
charge-offs (NCOs) has increased over the last year. Much of the
deterioration is related to COF's more recent origination vintages
continuing to season within its domestic card book.

The action reflects Fitch's expectation that credit deterioration
within COF's consumer-focused portfolio will be manageable over the
rating time horizon. NCOs within domestic credit cards increased to
5.1% through the first half of 2017 versus 4.1% in the first half
of 2016. The company has indicated that the NCO rate within
domestic cards would be around 5% for the full year 2017, pointing
to moderating credit losses during the second half of the year.
Monthly data disclosed by COF support its guidance as NCOs during
July and August 2017 were both below 4.8%.

Meanwhile, asset quality within COF's growing auto book remains
solid. While NCOs have ticked up modestly, trends are consistent
with the industry and in-line with Fitch's expectations. COFs auto
loan portfolio has a higher proportion of loans to non-prime
customers compared to auto portfolios of other peer institutions.
As a result, Fitch believes COF's auto loan portfolio will exhibit
higher delinquency trends and loss rates on a going forward
relative to most other peer banks that have been more focused on
originating only prime auto loans. Fitch generally expects the
potential auto loan credit deterioration to be manageable through
COF's quarterly earnings, but credit performance is expected to be
slightly worse than its peers. This expectation is incorporated
into rating affirmation and the Outlook Stable.

Fitch views COF's capital ratios as supportive to its rating,
particularly when taken in context of the company's ability to
accrete capital via growth in retained earnings more quickly than
some peers. However, Fitch continues to believe the strength of
COF's capital position is partially offset by its higher
concentration in consumer lending assets which carry higher loss
ratios through credit cycles. COF's common equity tier 1 (CET1)
ratio was 10.6% on a standardized, fully phased-in basis, down
20bps on a year-over-year basis. Given the uptick in
consumer-related credit costs, Fitch expects COF to keep CET1
levels at or above peer median levels over the rating time
horizon.

During 2Q17, the Fed released the results of its annual
Comprehensive Capital Adequacy Review. COF received a conditional
non-objection for qualitative reasons and will have to resubmit its
capital plan by the end of the year. The affirmation reflects
Fitch's expectation that COF will meet the requirements the Fed
laid out and that COF will resubmit its capital plan within the
required timeframe.

While funding remains solid, Fitch believes COF's rating is
constrained by its deposit profile over the long term. COF has
grown its deposit base significantly coming out of the crisis and
is much less dependent on wholesale funding relative to its past.
However, the company is still heavily reliant on internet-based
deposits relative to peers and has a loan-to-deposit ratio that
hovers around 100%.

These deposits have yet to go through a true rate tightening
period. Although deposit betas have been relatively modest to date,
Fitch expects additional rate hikes by the Fed to result in more
significant increases in deposit rates for online banks, including
COF. However, this should be at least partially offset by
increasing asset yields.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

COF's subordinated debt is notched one level below its VR for loss
severity. COF's preferred stock is notched five levels below its
VR, two times for loss severity and three times for
non-performance. These ratings are in accordance with Fitch's
criteria and assessment of the instruments non-performance and loss
severity risk profiles and have thus been affirmed due to the
affirmation of the VR.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

The uninsured deposit ratings of Capital One Bank (USA), National
Association (COBNA) and Capital One National Association (CONA) and
Chevy Chase Bank, FSB are rated one notch higher than the bank's
IDR and senior unsecured debt because U.S. uninsured deposits
benefit from depositor preference. U.S. depositor preference gives
deposit liabilities superior recovery prospects in the event of
default.

HOLDING COMPANY

COF's VR is equalized with those of its operating companies and
banks, reflecting its role as the bank holding company, which is
mandated in the U.S. to act as a source of strength for its bank
subsidiaries. Ratings are also equalized reflecting the very close
correlation between holding company and subsidiary failure and
default probabilities.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

COF has a Support Rating (SR) of '5' and Support Rating Floor (SRF)
of 'NF'. In Fitch's view, the probability of support is unlikely.
COF's IDRs and VRs do not incorporate any support.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDR VR, IDRs, AND SENIOR DEBT
Fitch sees limited upside to COF's rating over the near-to-medium
term given its exposure to the near-and-subprime consumer sector
and its funding profile. Moreover, COF's limited revenue diversity
relative to its peers is viewed as a rating constraint over time.

In 2Q18, COF along with its peers will be required to disclose its
full Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR). Fitch expects most banks tied
to the full LCR to operate with a ratio well-above the regulatory
minimum of 100%. Given COF's deposit and funding profile, Fitch
expects the company to manage its LCR ratio at-or-above peer median
levels. Pressure could be placed on COF's ratings should it manage
LCR consistently below the peer median.

COF's ratings are also sensitive its asset quality metrics. To be
clear, Fitch expects that there will be modest credit quality mean
reversion over the rating time horizon. However if credit quality,
particularly in the credit card and auto book (those asset classes
that have grown notably over recent years), deteriorates faster
than industry averages and is not manageable within the context of
quarterly earnings COF's ratings or Outlook could be adversely
impacted. Fitch would view well-below-median earnings performance
due to elevated credit costs over the course of multiple quarters
as a credit negative and a rating sensitivity.

Finally, as noted above, Fitch expects COF to manage regulatory
capital at or above peer median levels given its business model and
loan mix. Although not expected, accelerated capital distributions
or loan growth in excess of capital generation such that COF's CET1
ratio falls meaningfully below current levels would be viewed
negatively and could result in negative rating action.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

The ratings for COF and its operating companies' subordinated debt,
trust preferred securities, and preferred stock are sensitive to
any change to the VR.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

The long- and short-term deposit ratings are sensitive to any
change to COF's long- and short-term IDR.

HOLDING COMPANY

Should COF's holding company begin to exhibit signs of weakness,
demonstrate trouble accessing the capital markets, or have
inadequate cash flow coverage to meet near-term obligations, there
is potential that Fitch could notch the holding company VR from the
ratings of the operating companies.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

Since COF's Support and Support Rating Floors are '5' and 'NF',
respectively, there is limited likelihood that these ratings will
change over the foreseeable future.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Capital One Financial Corporation
-- Long-term IDR at 'A-'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-term IDR at 'F1';
-- Viability at 'a-';
-- Senior unsecured debt at 'A-';
-- Senior Shelf at 'A-'
-- Subordinated debt at 'BBB+';
-- Preferred stock at 'BB';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support Floor at 'NF'.

Capital One Bank (USA), National Association
-- Long-term IDR at 'A-'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-term IDR at 'F1';
-- Viability at 'a-';
-- Senior unsecured debt at 'A-';
-- Subordinated debt at 'BBB+';
-- Short-term debt at 'F1';
-- Long-term deposits at 'A';
-- Short-term deposit at 'F1';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support Floor at 'NF'.

Capital One National Association
-- Long-term IDR at 'A-'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-term IDR at 'F1';
-- Viability at 'a-';
-- Senior unsecured debt at 'A-';
-- Subordinated debt at 'BBB+';
-- Short-term debt at 'F1';
-- Long-term deposits at 'A';
-- Short-term deposit at 'F1';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support Floor at 'NF'.

Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B
-- Long-term deposits at 'A'.

Fitch has withdrawn the 'BBB+ 'subordinated debt rating of North
Fork Bancorporation as the bonds have been repaid and entity is no
longer issuing debt.


CAPITOL SUPPLY: Hires Shraiberg Landaue as Bankruptcy Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Capitol Supply, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ Shraiberg
Landaue & Page, P.A., as general bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.

Capitol Supply requires Shraiberg Landaue to:

   a. advise the Debtor generally regarding matters of bankruptcy
      law in connection with the Bankruptcy Case;

   b. advise the Debtor of the requirements of the Bankruptcy
      Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, applicable
      bankruptcy rules, including local rules, pertaining to the
      administration of the Bankruptcy Case and U.S. Trustee
      Guidelines related to the daily operation of its business
      and administration of the estate;

   c. represent the Debtor in all proceedings before the Court;

   d. prepare and review motions, pleadings, orders,
      applications, adversary proceedings, and other legal
      documents arising in the Case;

   e. negotiate with creditors, prepare and seek confirmation of
      a plan of reorganization and related documents, and assist
      the Debtor with implementation of any plan; and

   f. perform all other legal services for the Debtor, which may
      be necessary.

Shraiberg Landaue will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                   $225 - $500
     Legal Assistants            $125

Prior to the filing of the Debtor's petition, the Debtor provided
Shraiberg Landaue with a total of $98,283 as a retainer, and
$1,717.00 for filing fee.  Of the retainer, $22,445 has been
received by Shraiberg Landaue for outstanding legal fees and costs
incurred for services provided prepetition.

Shraiberg Landaue will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Bradley S. Shraiberg, a partner of Shraiberg Landaue & Page, P.A.,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Shraiberg Landaue can be reached at:

     Bradley S. Shraiberg, Esq.
     SHRAIBERG LANDAUE & PAGE, P.A.
     2385 NW Executive Center Drive, Suite 300
     Boca Raton, FL 33431
     Tel: (561) 443-0800

              About Capitol Supply, Inc.

Since 1983, Capitol Supply has provided the United States
Government, the US Military, State and local government agencies
and consumer and commercial customers worldwide various products
needed to operate their businesses.  Capitol Supply offers office
supply, office furniture, hardware, tools, auto parts, cleaning
supplies, dorms and quarters, package room, and GSA schedule needs.
Capitol Supply was formerly known as Capitol Furniture
Distributing Company and changed its name to Capitol Supply, Inc.
in March 2005.

Capitol Supply, Inc., based in Boca Raton, Florida, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-21544) on September 20,
2017.  The Hon. Erik P. Kimball presides over the case.  Bradley S.
Shraiberg, Esq., at Shraiberg Landaue & Page, P.A., serves as
bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities.  The petition was signed by Robert J.
Steinman, director and chief executive officer.


CHARLES SILLER: Spiller Entitled to Contingent Fee, 9th Cir. Says
-----------------------------------------------------------------
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirms
the judgment of the District Court granting the Spiller McProud law
firm the full amount of its claim as adjudicated.

Charles Siller has been litigating with his brothers over his
interest in the family business -- Siller Brothers, Inc. -- since
1982.  Mr. Siller owned 40% of the stock. By 2001, Siller Brothers,
Inc. had obtained a $10 million judgment against Mr. Siller, and it
was threatening to execute on his shares. To fight this litigation,
Mr. Siller retained several law firms at various times.

In 2001, Mr. Spiller hired the law firm Cotchett, Pitre & Simon to
represent him both in his lawsuit with his brothers and a legal
malpractice dispute with some of his former lawyers.

Two and a half years later, Mr. Siller retained the Spiller McProud
law firm, "not as additional trial attorneys, but to assist, advise
and discuss these legal matters personally" with Mr. Siller, and to
act as "an interface" for Mr. Siller "with the attorneys at the
Cotchett law firm." The Spiller firm was to work to ensure that Mr.
Siller could "fully understand and [be] in agreement with the
Cotchett law firm's trial strategy, trial preparation (including
selection of experts), and conduct of the trial itself." The
Spiller firm was to serve as Mr. Siller's "general counsel" and "to
communicate to the Cotchett law firm [Siller's] ideas, suggestions,
and requests."

Mr. Siller wanted the Spiller firm to convince the Cotchett firm to
pursue a theory that Mr. Siller's brother's death entitled Mr.
Siller to purchase his brother's shares for a small fraction of
what they were worth, under a separate contract Mr. Siller had with
his deceased brother.

The Spiller firm agreed, but Mr. Siller and the Spiller firm
expressly agreed that the contingent fee would not depend on the
success of this theory. The Spiller firm was to get 8% of the same
net amount from which the Cotchett firm's 28% contingent fee was to
be calculated. Mr. Siller and the Spiller firm also incorporated
the other terms of Mr. Siller's agreement with the Cotchett firm,
including the arbitration provision.

The Cotchett firm, consulting with the Spiller firm, won Mr.
Siller's case against Siller Brothers, Inc. After a failed
mediation and a stay of execution on Siller Brothers, Inc.'s $10
million judgment against Siller, the case went to trial in
California Superior Court. The judge issued a proposed judgment
valuing Siller's shares at over $56 million.

Pending appeal and cross appeal, the parties settled for $10
million cash to Mr. Siller and $20.5 million worth of real estate
in exchange for Siller's shares. Consistent with Mr. Siller's fee
agreements with the firms, the contingent fees were to be based
upon the $30.5 million value of the settlement. Documentation was
delayed while Mr. Siller's counsel, working with tax experts,
created for Mr. Siller a new corporate spinoff, CWS Enterprises,
Inc., so that Mr. Siller could mitigate the tax impact of his
lawyers' victory.

The firms also tried other cases that Mr. Siller insisted on. While
the dissolution case was ongoing, the Cotchett and Spiller firms
filed a separate action against Siller Brothers, Inc. and pursued
Mr. Siller's preferred theory (that Mr. Siller had acquired a right
to buy his deceased brothers' shares cheaply under a separate
contract). They lost that case. The two firms also lost a
malpractice case Mr. Siller brought against one of his previous
lawyers, and they negotiated a $41,000 settlement in another case
where Mr. Siller had refused to pay a different set of previous
lawyers. Mr. Siller then refused to pay even the $41,000
settlement, so those disputes remained pending after he moved on
from the Cotchett and Spiller firms.

Nor would Mr. Siller pay the 28% and 8% fees he had agreed to pay
the Cotchett and Spiller firms, respectively. Mr. Siller's failure
to pay the Spiller firm its 8% contingent fee is the subject of
this appeal.

As Mr. Siller's attorney presented his case during the arbitration,
(1) the real estate accounting for two thirds of the settlement had
declined in value since the settlement, so if a contingent fee
applied at all, it should be against much less than the $30.5
million; (2) the value of the legal services was far less than the
contingent fee would yield; (3) much of the work, including the
failed lawsuits against the deceased brother's estate and the
failed lawsuit against one of Mr. Siller's previous attorneys,
produced no value, so the attorneys should not be compensated for
it; (4) Mr.Spiller had participated actively in the successful
trial, but had only been retained as "general counsel" to consult,
so he ought not to be compensated for any of that time; and (5) the
money went to the spinoff created for Mr. Siller to avoid taxes,
not to Mr. Siller, and the spinoff had not signed the fee
agreement, so no fees were due.

The Cotchett and Spiller firms objected to all this evidence, which
was the bulk of Siller's case, on the theory that evidence as to
quantum meruit was not necessary in a breach of contract action.
But they conceded that Mr. Siller could "inquire about the amount
of time put into the matters... the time for their quantum meruit,"
because it was an issue the arbitrator could reach if he deemed the
contract void.

The arbitrator made findings of fact regarding the fee agreements,
that Mr. Spiller "worked... alongside [the Cotchett lawyers] on all
litigation." As for Mr. Siller's contention that Mr. Spiller was
not supposed to do that, just act as his "general counsel" to
advise and inform him and the Cotchett firm, the arbitrator found
otherwise. "Mr. Siller testified that he hired Mr. Spiller to 'help
Frank Pitre and not just to advise... although the Spiller firm did
provide Mr. Siller with extensive advice about the progress of the
litigation on an almost daily basis throughout three years of
representation." The arbitrator further found that Mr. Spiller
spent less than 5% of his time on the unsuccessful malpractice
litigation against one of Mr. Siller's previous lawyers and sought
no fees for that work.

As for not completing the contract, the arbitrator credited Mr.
Spiller's contention that Mr. Siller fired his lawyers "hoping to
avoid paying his now former counsel" by "actions clearly designed
to avoid payment of his legal obligations attendant to the
extraordinary result obtained," a $30.5 million settlement on a
$45.7 judgment obtained after years of representation in complex
litigation.

The transcripts show, and the arbitrator found, that Mr. Siller's
attorney "devoted most of his cross examination to a detailed
attack on how Mr. Pitre and Mr. Spiller spent their time on the
case, on the theory that the Arbitrator might find the contract to
be unconscionable (it is not) and that quantum meruit would be
relevant." The arbitrator concluded, though, that quantum meruit
was not relevant because the contingent fee agreement was a valid
contract. He expressly found that the contracted-for percentages
were "reasonable" based on the work put into the case, the risks,
and the need for counsel to finance the litigation.

Mr. Siller did not pay what the arbitrator concluded he owed, so
the Cotchett and Spiller firms sought and obtained confirmation of
the award in California Superior Court. The Superior Court entered
a money judgment in their favor for the amount of the award. But
Siller did not pay the judgment, either, but instead, he prevented
its execution by filing for chapter 11 bankruptcy.

The bankruptcy court took a fresh look at the "reasonable value" of
Mr. Spiller's services under section 502(b)(4). The bankruptcy
court concluded that Mr. Spiller's fee was unreasonably high and
should have been $440,250 (rather than the arbitrator's figure of
just under $2.5 million).

The district court, on the Spiller firm's appeal, reversed, and
noted that the bankruptcy court "did not consider the transcript of
the arbitration proceedings in determining what was before the
arbitrator."

The district court, based on the arbitration transcript and
arbitrator's decision, found that "the arbitrator determined that
Spiller's fees were not unconscionable applying a test equivalent
to the federal reasonableness test." The district court also held
that the California Superior Court judgment was entitled to
preclusive effect because the case required no further proceedings
in bankruptcy court once the amount of Mr. Spiller's claim was
liquidated, and also because that condition had already occurred.

The critical question for this appeal, as argued on Mr. Siller's
behalf, is whether the arbitrator resolved only the issue of
whether the contingent fee was unconscionable as applied to the
$30.5 million result, or whether the arbitrator also determined the
reasonable value of the legal services performed.

Two statutes are at issue in this case, the bankruptcy code's
provision on claims for pre-petition attorneys' fees, 11 U.S.C.
Section 502(b)(4), and the Full Faith and Credit Act, 28 U.S.C.
Section 1738.

Mr. Siller urges the Court to accept the bankruptcy court's use of
the lodestar method to determine the reasonableness of Spiller's
fee. The Ninth Circuit finds, however, that the bankruptcy court
performed its reasonableness analysis from scratch, using the
lodestar method, rather than treating it as a cap on the amount
allowed under state law. The Ninth Circuit, therefore, concludes
that the bankruptcy court's analysis was mistaken in this case
because a lodestar fee would be unreasonable in this case and could
not, for that reason, serve as a cap under section 502(b)(4).

The Ninth Circuit explains that no sensible attorney would
undertake to represent a client at his usual hourly rate in these
circumstances -- where the client had been litigating for decades,
had no money to pay, and had a history of declining to pay his
lawyers and suing them for malpractice, the case was likely to take
all or most of the lawyer's time for the next several years, and
the lawyer could get paid -- if at all -- only if he won. A
"reasonable" fee must be reasonable for the lawyer as well as the
client.

Under California law, one element of unconscionability is
reasonableness, and a contingent fee contract can be rejected as
unconscionable if it is sufficiently unreasonable in the
circumstances. The arbitrator rejected that conclusion in this case
-- after hearing Mr. Siller's arguments and extensive evidence to
show unreasonableness, the arbitrator not only concluded that
Spiller's 8% contingent fee ought to be enforced, he specifically
decided that it was "reasonable."

In this case, the Spiller firm's fee had been reduced to judgment
pursuant to state law in a California state court. It had also been
"deemed allowed" under Section 502(a) subject to Mr. Siller's
section 502(b)(4) objection. Mr. Siller had argued that because he
fired the Cotchett and Spiller firms before the settlement was
collected, he did not owe them their contingent fees. But the
arbitrator found that this attempt by Mr. Siller to evade the fees
should fail. The Superior Court judgment established that under
California law, the Spiller firm was entitled to $2,497,325 for his
fees and $800 for costs (plus 10% interest beginning November 25,
2008).

The Ninth Circuit sustains that although there might in some cases
be room for a reduction, under section 502(b)(4)'s reasonableness
cap, of a state court judgment confirming an arbitration award for
a contingent fee, but there is no room here in the instant case --
the performance in this case was difficult and demanding. And the
relationship between the contracted-for amount and the service
Spiller provided was not such as to make enforcement of the
contract or payment of the fee unreasonable. The Full Faith and
Credit Act requires, considering the circumstances of this case,
that the judgment of the state court confirming Spiller's
arbitration award for his fee be given full faith and credit in Mr.
Siller's bankruptcy proceeding.

The appealed case is IN RE CWS ENTERPRISES, INC., Debtor, SPILLER
McPROUD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHARLES W. SILLER,
Defendant-Appellant, and DAVID D. FLEMMER, Chapter 11 Trustee; CWS
ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendants. IN RE CWS ENTERPRISES, INC., Debtor,
SPILLER McPROUD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CWS ENTERPRISES, INC.;
CHARLES W. SILLER, Defendants, and DAVID D. FLEMMER, Chapter 11,
Trustee, Defendant-Appellant, Case Nos. 14-17045 and 14-17046, (9th
Cir.).

A full-text copy of Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld's Opinion dated
September 14, 2017, is available at https://is.gd/ayC61Z from
Leagle.com.

David D. Flemmer is represented by:

           Bradley A. Benbrook, Esq.
           Stephen M. Duvernay, Esq.
           Benbrook Law Group PC
           400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1610
           Sacramento, CA 95814
           Telephone:916.447.4900
           Facsimile:916.447.4904
           Email: brad@benbrooklawgroup.com
                  steve@benbrooklawgroup.com

           -- and --

           David A. Cheit, Esq.
           DLA Piper LLP (US)
           400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2400
           Sacramento,California 95814-4428
           Tel: 916 930 3205
           Email: david.cheit@dlapiper.com

Charles W. Siller is represented by:

           Randy Michelson, Esq.
           Michelson Law Group
           220 Montgomery St, Suite 2100
           San Francisco, California 94104
           Telephone: 15.512.8600
           Facsimile: 415.512.8601
           Email: randy.michelson@michelsonlawgroup.com

Spiller McProud is represented by:

           Steven T. Spiller, Esq.
           Spiller McProud
           Nevada City, California

           -- and --

           Walter R. Dahl, Esq.
           Dahl Law
           Sacramento, California

                      About Charles W. Siller

Charles W. Siller sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E. D. Calif. Case No. 09-26168) on April 2,
2009.  Michael S. McManus presides over the case. At the time of
filing, the Debtor disclosed assets and liabilities estimated
between $10 million to $50 million each. The Debtor is represented
by Randy Michelson, Esq. at Michelson Law Group.


CITIZENS FINANCIAL: Fitch Affirms BB- Preferred Stock Rating
------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long-term and Short-term
Issuer-Default Ratings (IDRs) of Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
(CFG) and its subsidiaries at 'BBB+' and 'F2', respectively.  

The rating action follows a periodic review of the large regional
banking group, which includes BB&T Corporation (BBT), Capital One
Finance Corporation (COF), Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG),
Comerica Incorporated (CMA), Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB), Huntington
Bancshares Inc. (HBAN), Keycorp (KEY), M&T Bank Corporation (MTB),
MUFG Americas Holding Corporation (MUAH), PNC Financial Services
Group (PNC), Regions Financial Corporation (RF), SunTrust Banks
Inc. (STI), US Bancorp (USB), and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC).

Company-specific rating rationales for the other banks are
published separately, and for further discussion of the large
regional bank sector in general, refer to the special report titled
'Large Regional Bank Periodic Review,' to be published shortly.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

IDRs, VRs, AND SENIOR DEBT

The affirmation of CFG's IDR and VR is supported by its solid
capital profile, execution on its well-articulated strategy, and
generally improving earnings profile.

CFG's ratings also incorporate the company's clearly articulated
and well-defined strategy, originally laid out in 2014. The bank
continues to make progress towards meeting these initiatives.
Related to this, Fitch has revised upwards Fitch assessments of the
company's management and strategy, which encompasses Fitch views of
CFG's ability to meet its stated business and financial
objectives.

At June 30, 2017, CFG's Common Equity Tier 1 ratio under Basel III
was 11.2%, around 50bps better than the large regional peer median.
CFG's Fitch Core Capital ratio is also on the high end of the peer
group. Fitch expects CFG's capital ratios will decrease over time
but believes the company will remain appropriately capitalized for
its risk profile.

Despite CFG's operating performance improvement, CFG's earnings
profile remains a key ratings constraint. CFG's reported ROA in
1H17 was 86bps, below the large regional peer average and median
(excluding CFG) of approximately 105bps. CFG's profitability lags
its large regional peers primarily due to lower loan yields, albeit
improving from a year ago, as well as a higher reliance on spread
income than virtually all of its large regional peers.

Upwards ratings movement is also currently constrained by
relatively higher loan growth than all of its peers. During the
last 12 months ending June 30, 2017, CFG grew loans higher than all
of its peers (excluding KEY and HBAN that benefitted from large
acquisitions), particularly in education loans, residential
mortgages, and CRE loans. CFG has also grown its unsecured consumer
portfolio considerably over last two years, though this portfolio
remains only 2% of total loans. CFG's level of nonaccrual loans is
also higher than the peer median as of June 30, 2017.

Some of CFG's higher level of nonaccrual loan balances is due to
its home equity portfolio, which is larger than peers. Home equity
reset risk appears to be manageable to date with the majority of
the loans resetting to a fully amortizing loan in 2020 and beyond.
Nonetheless, prior vintages that have reset do have relatively high
levels of charges-offs, modifications and delinquencies. For
example, these categories together totaled 12%, 8%, and 6% for the
2014, 2015 and 2016 vintages, respectively, as of year-end 2016.
Assuming home prices continue their generally favorable trends,
this should help to mitigate the payment shock risk for these
borrowers given their ability to refinance.

Education lending continues to be an area of growth management
intends to focus on, and it now comprises a more meaningful
percentage of total loans at approximately 7% of June 30, 2017. CFG
offers both undergraduate financing, almost entirely
parent-guaranteed, and graduate loan refinancing products. Credit
risk remains manageable in this portfolio with net charge-offs
averaging 68bps over the past five quarters. Fitch expects that
loan losses will increase from their unsustainably low levels for
CFG, and for the industry.

Some of the CRE loan growth is attributed to restrictions on CRE
lending placed on the company in the past by its former parent, The
Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc. However, with 37% growth in CRE
loans over the past two years as of June 30, 2017, this level of
loan growth outpaced peers, though that CFG still has a lower
concentration of CRE than the peer median. To date, credit quality
in the CRE book remains manageable only 34bps nonperforming at June
30, 2017 but warrants monitoring, given its growth.

CFG's funding profile is roughly in line with peers, though does
include the second highest loan-to-deposit ratio. Given the make-up
of the large regional bank balance sheets, all 15 of the banks have
relatively high liquidity subcomponents ratings, with an implied
midpoint floor of 'a-' for these institutions. In addition to
strong deposit market shares in their operating footprints, CFG,
along with its peers, has multiple sources of funding, including
issuance in the capital markets, FHLB advances, and brokered
deposits.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

CFG's subordinated debt is notched one level below its VR for loss
severity. CFG's preferred stock is notched five levels below its
VR, two times for loss severity and three times for
non-performance. These ratings are in accordance with Fitch's
criteria and assessment of the instruments non-performance and loss
severity risk profiles and have thus been affirmed due to the
affirmation of the VR.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

The uninsured deposit ratings of Citizens Bank, N.A. and Citizens
Bank of Pennsylvania are rated one notch higher than the bank's IDR
and senior unsecured debt because U.S. uninsured deposits benefit
from depositor preference. U.S. depositor preference gives deposit
liabilities superior recovery prospects in the event of default.

HOLDING COMPANY

CFG's VR is equalized with those of its operating companies and
banks, reflecting its role as the bank holding company, which is
mandated in the U.S. to act as a source of strength for its bank
subsidiaries. Ratings are also equalized reflecting the very close
correlation between holding company and subsidiary failure and
default probabilities.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

CFG has a Support Rating (SR) of '5' and Support Rating Floor (SRF)
of 'NF'. In Fitch's view, the probability of support is unlikely.
IDRs and VRs do not incorporate any support.

RATING SENSITIVITIES
VR, IDRs, AND SENIOR DEBT

Fitch views limited downside ratings risk for CFG and its
subsidiary banks, though material, unexpected deterioration in
asset quality or aggressively managing down capital are factors
that could lead to negative ratings pressure.

Positive rating momentum would be predicated on CFG improving
profitability commensurate with higher-rated large regional peers,
while maintaining disciplined growth and consistent underwriting
standards.

CFG may also be upgraded with greater seasoning in its recent loan
growth without incurring outsized loan losses that exceed peer or
industry averages. While Fitch does not anticipate a material
downturn in the credit cycle over the near term, some variable-rate
borrowers may be tested under a higher rate environment.

Fitch does not anticipate that CFG will pursue a large bank M&A
transaction, but any individual transaction would be evaluated for
its impact on the company's capital, and risk profile.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

The ratings for CFG and its operating companies' subordinated debt
and preferred stock are sensitive to any change to the VR.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

The long- and short-term deposit ratings are sensitive to any
change to CFG's long- and short-term IDR.

HOLDING COMPANY

Should CFG's holding company begin to exhibit signs of weakness,
demonstrate trouble accessing the capital markets, or have
inadequate cash flow coverage to meet near-term obligations, there
is potential that Fitch could notch the holding company VR from the
ratings of the operating companies.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

Since CFG's Support and Support Rating Floors are '5' and 'NF',
respectively, there is limited likelihood that these ratings will
change over the foreseeable future.

The rating actions are as follows:

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Citizens Financial Group, Inc.
-- Long-Term IDR at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F2';
-- Viability rating at 'bbb+';
-- Subordinated debt at 'BBB';
-- Preferred stock at 'BB-';
-- Senior debt at 'BBB+';
-- Support rating at '5';
-- Support rating floor at 'NF.'

Citizens Bank, NA
-- Long-Term IDR at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F2';
-- Viability rating at 'bbb+';
-- Support rating at '5';
-- Long-term deposits at 'A-';
-- Senior unsecured at 'BBB+';
-- Short-term deposits at 'F2';
-- Support rating floor at 'NF.'

Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania
-- Long-Term IDR at 'BBB+'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F2';
-- Viability rating at 'bbb+';
-- Support rating at '5';
-- Long-term deposits at 'A-';
-- Short-term deposits at 'F2';
-- Support rating floor at 'NF'.


CITY WIDE INVESTMENTS: Wins Clawback Suit vs City of Milwaukee
--------------------------------------------------------------
On April 26, 2017, City Wide Investments, LLC, filed an adversary
complaint against the City of Milwaukee.  The complaint asserts
that the City's taking of an eight-unit rental property through in
rem tax foreclosure was a fraudulent transfer.  A trial was held on
Sept. 19, 2017.  There is no dispute that the Debtor was insolvent
at the time of the transfer or became insolvent as a result of the
transfer, and the transfer took place less than two years before
the petition date.  Thus, the question is whether the Debtor
received reasonably equivalent value for the transfer.

At the time of the transfer, the Debtor owed the City $49,105.44.
According to the testimony of John Nazario, the Debtor's sole
member, the Debtor had paid the base real estate taxes, and most of
the amount due to the City was for building code violations and
other fines added to the tax bill. The Debtor attempted to save the
property from the tax foreclosure but these efforts were
unsuccessful due to miscommunications with the Debtor's bank. The
City took title to the property on Jan. 4, 2016, and sold the
property for $150,000 on March 17, 2017. In the complaint, the
Debtor sought to recover the value of the property from the City,
less the consideration received in the amount of the unpaid fines
and fees.

Based on the testimony presented at the trial, Bankruptcy Judge
Susan V. Kelley cannot accept the City's Scope of Work in
determining the cost of repairs required to render the property
rentable. Subtracting the questionable entries, and crediting the
testimony of Nazario and contractor Neil Bliese, the Court
determines that the approximate cost to bring the property into
rentable condition was $20,000. Because Mr. Steven Stiloski's
appraisal already deducted $10,000 to account for deferred
maintenance, the Court will deduct another $10,000 from his
$340,000 opinion of value. Accordingly, the Court determines the
fair market value of the property at the time of the transfer was
$330,000. Subtracting the consideration the Debtor received, which
the parties agreed was $49,105.44, the City received a
constructively fraudulent transfer in the amount of $280,894.56.
Judgment on the Debtor's claim will be entered accordingly.

The adversary proceeding is City Wide Investments, LLC, Plaintiff,
v. City of Milwaukee, Defendant, Adversary No. 17-02115 (Bankr.
E.D. Wis.).

The bankruptcy case is in re: City Wide Investments, LLC, Chapter
11, Debtor, Case No. 17-22900-svk (Bankr. E.D. Wis.).

A full-text copy of Judge Kelley's Memorandum Decision dated Oct.
3, 2017, is available at https://is.gd/QhOfnZ from Leagle.com.

City Wide Investments, LLC, Plaintiff, represented by Leonard G.
Leverson -- lgl@levmetz.com -- Leverson Lucey & Metz S.C.

City Of Milwaukee, Defendant, represented by Hannah R. Jahn, City
of Milwaukee, Kevin P. Sullivan, Assistant City Attorney.

                 About City Wide Investments, LLC

City Wide Investments, LLC filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. E.D.Wis. Case No. 17-22900) on April 3, 2017. Leonard G.
Leverson, Esq., at Leverson Lucey & Metz SC serves as bankruptcy
counsel.  The Debtor's assets and liabilities are both below $1
million.  The Debtor hired Commercial Property Consultants, Inc.,
as appraiser.


COCOA SERVICES: Sale of All Assets JB Cocoa for $8.4M Approved
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge James L. Garrity, Jr., of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York authorized Cocoa Services, L.L.C. and
Morgan Drive Associates, L.L.C., to sell substantially all assets
to Carlyle Cocoa Co., LLC for $8,390,000.

Carlyle allocated $6,195,000 of its purchase price to the Cocoa
Services' assets and $2,195,000 to the Morgan Drive assets.

The Sale Hearing was conducted on Sept. 26, 2017.  

The Debtors conducted the Auction on Sept. 6, 2017 at the law
office of Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti, LLP in
Morristown, New Jersey.  The two Qualified Bidders at the Auction
were JB Cocoa Holding, Inc. and Carlyle.  JB Cocoa declined to bid
at the Auction.

Section 7.02(g) of the Winning Bidder APA, which requires the
Debtors to submit, prior to the Closing, an administrative
amendment to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection,
Division of Air Quality, concerning the transfer of a General
Permit to Carlyle, will be deemed stricken from the Winning Bidder
APA, as the applicable regulations require that the relevant
administrative amendment be filed by Carlyle within 120 days of the
Closing, rather than by the Debtors.

No later than Sept. 30, 2017, Alan Nisselson, in his capacity as
Chapter 7 Trustee of Transmar, will execute and deliver the
certificate required pursuant to Section3.03(a)(v) of the Winning
Bidder APA, whereby Transmar will certify, as the sole member of
Morgan Drive, that it is not a foreign person within the meaning of
Section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code.

Upon the Closing, the Purchased Assets will be sold, transferred or
otherwise assigned to Carlyle free and clear of all liens, claims
and encumbrances, with all such liens, claims and encumbrances to
attach to the proceeds of sale.

The Purchased Assets do not include the Third Party Inventory,
which includes, for the avoidance of any doubt, any and all
inventory owned by Transmar Commodity Group, Ltd. or and Icestar
B.V. located at Cocoa Services' warehouse located at 400 Eagle Ct.,
Swedesboro, New Jersey.

Carlyle will continue to store any Third Party Inventory owned by
Transmar, or in which Transmar has an interest, for up to 30 days
following the Closing without any storage charge to Transmar,
during which time Transmar or its authorized representatives will
use commercially reasonable efforts to sell or otherwise dispose of
such Third Party Inventory.  

Carlyle will provide Transmar or its authorized representatives and
any prospective purchasers of Transmar's Third Party Inventory with
reasonable access to Transmar's Third Party Inventory to allow
prospective purchasers to inspect and sample such Third Party
Inventory.  This access is by appointment only.  Carlyle will
reasonably cooperate with Transmar's efforts to sell or otherwise
dispose of Transmar's Third Party Inventory.  Transmar will be
charged a tailgate handling fee of $.33 per hundred pounds at the
time of shipment.

Carlyle will continue to store any Third Party Inventory owned by
Icestar, or in which Icestar has an interest, until and including
Oct. 31, 2017 without any charge to Icestar, and at a rate of $.15
per carton per month thereafter.  Storage time will not be
prorated.  Icestar (or its respective authorized representatives)
will use commercially reasonable efforts to sell or otherwise
dispose of Third Party Inventory owned by Icestar.

Carlyle will provide Icestar (orits authorized representatives) and
any prospective purchasers of Icestar's Third Party Inventory with
reasonable access to Icestar's Third Party Inventory to allow
prospective purchasers to inspect and sample such Third Party
Inventory.  This access is by appointment only.  Carlyle will
reasonably cooperate with Icestar's efforts to sell or otherwise
dispose of Icestar's Third Party Inventory.  Icestar will be
charged a tailgate handling fee of $.33 per hundred pounds at the
time of shipment for any of its Third Party Inventory shipped after
Oct. 1, 2017.

Upon Closing, Cocoa Services will segregate the sum of $5,308,526,
which is the amount the Debtors believe Cocoa Services owes to Bank
of the West as of the Petition Date.  If Transmar does not file a
Challenge by the expiration of the Challenge Period, Cocoa Services
will settle an order on seven days' notice to the Court seeking
authority to pay over such amount to Bank of the West.

If Bank of the West subsequently asserts that a sum greater than
$5,308,526 is due, to satisfy its claim, Bank of the West will
notify the Debtors in writing and provide an accounting of its
claim.  If the Debtors agree with such additional sums, the Cocoa
Services will settle an order on seven days' notice to the Court
authorizing the payment of such additional sums to Bank of the
West.

If the Debtors do not agree with such additional sums, Bank of the
West may file an appropriate motion with the Court to determine the
correct amount of its claim.  For the avoidance of doubt, until
Bank of the West's claim has been indefeasibly paid in full, any
and all liens and claims of Bank of the West against the Purchased
Assets will attach to the sale proceeds with the same validity,
enforceability, priority, force and effect that they now have.

Upon Closing with Carlyle, the Debtors will pay to JB Cocoa the
Transaction Expenses on a pro rata basis based on the purchase
price allocation set forth in the Allocation Schedule in the
Winning Bidder APA and will return JB Cocoa's Good Faith Deposit.  

Upon Closing, other than (i) the segregated funds and subsequent
payment to Bank of the West referenced and (ii) the payment of the
Transaction Expenses and JB Cocoa's Good Faith Deposit to JB Cocoa
referenced, the Debtors will segregate and hold the remainder of
the sale proceeds, including additional amounts which may be
payable to Bank of the West, pending a further order of the Court.

The sale of the Purchased Assets is exempt from any applicable
transfer taxes pursuant to N.J.S.A. 46:15-19(g).

The Debtors are authorized to assume and assign the Assigned
Contracts set forth on Section 2.01(c) of the Disclosure Schedules,
which Section 2.01(c) is amended to include: (i) an Oct. 27, 2016
Staffing Agreement between Infinity Staffing Solutions, LLC, doing
business as Lyneer Staffing Solutions and Cocoa Services; and (ii)
a Feb. 2, 2012 amendment to the Hershey Contract, but only to the
extent the 2012 Hershey Amendment modifies Section 13.1 of the
Hershey Contract so as to require six months' notice in order to
terminate the Hershey Contract.

To the extent there are any arrearages owed to subcontractors
relating to Cocoa Services' performance of services under the
Hershey Contract, Cocoa Services will cure such arrearages within
30 days after Closing.

Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d), and to any
extent necessary under Bankruptcy Rule 9014 and Rule 54(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (as made applicable by Bankruptcy
Rule 7054), the Order will be effective immediately upon entry and
the Debtors are authorized to close the sale immediately upon entry
of the Order.

Notwithstanding the possible applicability of Fed. R. Bankr. P.
6004(h), 6006(d), 7062 and 9014, the terms and conditions of the
Order will be effective immediately and enforceable upon its entry,
and no automatic stay of execution will apply to this Order.  The
Debtors and Carlyle are authorized to close immediately upon entry
of the Order.

                      About Cocoa Services

Cocoa Services, L.L.C., operates a cocoa liquor and cocoa butter
melting and deodorizing facility in Logan Township, Gloucester
County, New Jersey.  Morgan Drive Associates LLC is a real estate
holding company that owns the land and building at which Cocoa
Services operates.

Cocoa Services and Morgan Drive are affiliates of and wholly-owned
subsidiaries of Transmar Commodity Group, Ltd.  TCG filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 16-13625) on Dec. 31, 2016,
estimating assets and debt of $100 million and $500 million.  The
case is pending before the Honorable James L. Garrity, Jr.

Cocoa Services, L.L.C., and Morgan Drive Associates, L.L.C., sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 17-11936 and 17-11938) on
July 14, 2017.  The cases are also pending before Judge Garrity.

Cocoa Services disclosed total assets of $18.34 million and total
liabilities of $18.55 million as of July 11, 2017.

Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP is serving as counsel to
the Debtors.  Klestadt Winters Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP, is
local counsel.  Deloitte Transactions And Business Analytics LLP's
Robert Frezza is the chief restructuring officer.

Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent for Cocoa Services
and Morgan Drive.


COLUMBIA LAWRENCE: Columbia Buying All Assets of Tower 1 for $23M
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Columbia Lawrence Holdings 1, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of New York to authorize it (i) to use
property of the estate, its 100% membership interest in 126
Columbia Tower 1, LLC, outside the ordinary course business; and
(ii) to grant member approval to Tower 1 to sell substantially all
its assets, specifically, the real property it owns, to Columbia
International, LLC for $23 million.

The Debtor makes the application on an emergency basis to enable
the prompt closing of the sale, which, when combined with a sale by
126 Columbia Tower 2, LLC (the subject of a companion motion in the
related case of Columbia Lawrence Holdings 2, LLC), will generate
enough proceeds to pay both mortgage lender on the real property
and the sole secured creditor in the case, West 126th Street Mezz
Lender, LLC.

The Debtor is a holding company.  Its sole asset is a 100%
membership interest Tower 1, a New York limited liability company
which owns real property on West 126th Street in Manhattan, in
particular, Block 1966, Lots 77, 78, 80, 81, 82 and 83.  The Debtor
has a sister company, Columbia Lawrence Holdings 2, LLC, which is
also a debtor in the Court.  That debtor is also a holding company
whose sole asset is a 100% membership interest in 126 Columbia
Tower 2, LLC, a New York limited liability company which also owns
real property on West 126th Street (and West 127th Street) in
Manhattan, in particular, Block 1967, Lots 9, 10 and 12.

The two Debtor holding companies are joint borrowers from Mezz
Lender.  Mezz Lender is secured by a pledge of the 100% membership
in the two subsidiaries of the Debtors, which own the underlying
real property.  These subsidiaries, in turn, are joint mortgage
borrowers from Aristone 2015 126th Street Lender, LLC.  The
principal amount of the mortgage debt on the underlying real
property is $19 million.  The amount of the debt to Mezz Lender as
of the chapter 11 petition date is $3.6 million.  Consequently, the
amount necessary to satisfy both Aristone and Mezz Lender is
approximately $22.6 million.

Tower 1 has a contract to sell its real property for $23 million.
Tower 2 has a contract to sell its real property for $6.2 million.
Tower 1 had executed a prior contract, which was recorded on the
real property records.  The parties to the prior Tower 1 contract
have executed a termination agreement for the prior Tower 1
contract.  The termination agreement requires the payment of
$5,334,989, which represents the return of the down payment plus
interest.  The sum of the purchase prices for the two current
contracts is $29.2 million, which is more than enough to satisfy
both Aristone and Mezz Lender and fund the payment for the
termination of the prior Tower 1 contract.

Since neither Tower 1 nor Tower 2 is a Debtor in a case under the
Bankruptcy Code, these contracts do not require Court approval.
Nevertheless, since Tower 1 and Tower 2 are selling substantially
all their assets, they each need approval of their members, who are
Debtors in the Court.

The salient terms of the Tower 1 Contract are:

     a. Seller: 126 Columbia Tower 1, LLC, c/o William X. Zou, Law
Offices of Xian Feng Zou, 136-20 38 Ave., Suite 10D, Flushing, New
York 11354.

     b. Buyer: Columbia International, LLC, 36-26 Main St., Suite
3A, Flushing, New York 11354

     c. Price: $23,000,000

     d. Deposit: $1,800,000

     e. Broker: None

     f. Closing: The closing will take place at the office of Law
Offices of Xian Feng Zou, 136-20 38 Ave., Suite 10D, Flushing, New
York 11354, within 30 days from the date of execution of contract,
time being of essence against the Purchase, so long as title to the
Premises is cleared to close.

     g. The Assets are being sold on an "as is, where is" basis.

A copy of the Contracts attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/Columbia_Lawrence_26_Sales.pdf

Granting approval to the Tower entities to sell substantially all
their assets is a sound business decision.  Such sales will not
only satisfy the mortgage debt of the Tower entities and pay the
termination fee of the prior Tower 1 contract, it will also
generate sufficient proceeds to satisfy the secured debt of the
Debtor to Mezz Lender, with the remaining proceeds to fund the
bankruptcy case and make a distribution to the equity holder.
Accordingly, the Debtor asks the Court to approve the relief
sought.

                     About Columbia Lawrence

Columbia Lawrence Holdings 1, LLC and Columbia Lawrence Holdings 2,
LLC, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Case No.
17-43978 and 17-43979, respectively) on July 31, 2017.  The
petitions were signed by Bo Jin Zhu, sole member.  The Debtors each
estimated assets and liabilities in the range of $1 million to $10
million.

Judge Elizabeth S. Stong (17-43978) and Judge Carla E. Craig
(17-43979) are assigned to the cases.

The Debtors tapped William X Zou, Esq., at Law Offices of Xian Fend
Zou, as counsel.


COMSTOCK MINING: Tonogold Plans $20M Investment for Lucerne Project
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Comstock Mining Inc. has entered into an option agreement with
Tonogold Resources, Inc. for a mining joint venture on the
permitted, Lucerne Mine Project.

Strategic Option and Joint Venture Highlights

   * Accelerates drilling and development activities of $1 million
in the first six months;

   * Provides potentially $2.2 million to Comstock; $0.2 million
immediately and another $2 million within 6-months, in the event
that Tonogold elects to extend the option;

   * Subsidizes approximately $1.2 million in annual operating
expenses of the Company;

   * Invests $20 million in engineering, drilling, development and
test-work towards completing a technical and economic feasibility
assessment and re-commencing production in Lucerne;

       - Requires $7 million of investment in the first 18 months;

       - Requires $13 million in the second 18 months, or $20
million cumulatively over 3 years;

       - Establishes a technical oversight committee of mining
professionals for these activities;

  * Enables an "earn-in" of 51% of the Lucerne properties when all
prerequisites are completed; and

  * Grants a second option to acquire 51% of the Lucerne Mine
infrastructure, including the American Flat property, plant and
equipment for an additional $25 million.

Under the Agreement, when Tonogold completes its $20 million
investment, and other related prerequisites, for the evaluation and
mine development for Lucerne's economic feasibility and mine
production plans, Tonogold and Comstock would then effect a joint
venture for the future mining of mineral resources on the Lucerne.
The Agreement also provides up to $2.2 million in direct funding
for Comstock and approximately $1.2 million per annum in subsidized
costs.

By electing to enter the second phase of the arrangement, in
addition to paying Comstock $2 million, Tonogold is required to
spend a total of $7 million during the next 18-month period in
order to enter the third phase.  In the third and final phase of
the earn-in period, Tonogold is required to invest an additional
$13 million (cumulative investments of $20 million) with the goal
of completing an assessment that includes a commercially viable
mine plan, mine economics and production schedules.

When all obligations are met, Tonogold will have earned a 51%
interest in the entity that owns the Lucerne mine properties.  In
addition, Tonogold is granted an option under the Agreement to
acquire 51% of the Lucerne Mine infrastructure, including the
American Flat property, plant and equipment, for an additional $25
million.  If Tonogold does not elect to extend the option beyond
the initial 6-months, it will be required to make a further payment
to Comstock equal to $1 million less actual costs incurred on the
Lucerne Properties during the initial 6-month period.

Mr. Corrado De Gasperis, executive chairman and CEO of the Company
said, "We have been extremely diligent in establishing our first
collaborative agreement with a strategic mining partner with strong
technical expertise and well-aligned incentives to advance Lucerne
back into production.  The agreement immediately accelerates the
evaluation, drilling and development activities, without share
dilution, while lowering our annual costs by over one-third."

The evaluation program is currently directed at producing a robust
resource model for Lucerne as well as assessing a series of
geological targets in the Silver City Branch of the Comstock Lode,
including the Succor vein systems, the historic Woodville Bonanza
system and the PQ target.  These initial targets represent the core
of a broader geological corridor.  Previous surface drilling in the
area suggest more than 1,000 feet of mineralized strike in the
Succor zone, lying generally adjacent to and below the Lucerne Cut,
with good potential to yield high-grade gold and silver.  The
1,000-foot plus Succor Vein Target has an average true width of 15
feet and an average dip of 65 degrees.  The structure has reported
historic mining grades of approximately 0.54 ounces per ton of
"recovered" gold per ton and is open to the east and at depth,
along the entire structure.  The nearby Woodville Bonanza structure
includes the same supporting historical mappings with reported
historic mining grades of 0.749 ounces of gold per ton. The
Woodville has significant current drill data including 116
intercepts of at least 10 feet, grading over 0.22 ounces per ton
gold and 1.59 ounces per ton silver.

Mr. Mark Ashley, CEO of Tonogold commented, "Comstock Mining has
done an excellent job consolidating an historic, world-class mining
district and then entitling it for productive development. We see
an opportunity to develop a significant, profitable and sustainable
operation within the next three years."

Tonogold is a U.S.-based mining company that is focused on advanced
exploration properties in Nevada and Mexico.  Tonogold's team of
proven and successful mining executives and investors are working
to build a portfolio of mineral properties that will give its
investors a leveraged exposure to gold, silver and other minerals
and metals allowing them to benefit from its exploration, mining
and financial expertise.

Mr. De Gasperis, concluded, "We understand the Lucerne resource
much better since mining and processing over the past 5 years,
including excellent metallurgical yields.  This venture will focus
on developing a sustainably profitable mine from a smaller,
higher-grade resource than previously targeted.  We feel the
potential of Lucerne depends on this type of technical
collaboration, with the right partner and capital to enable it.
Ultimately, plans to invest almost $50 million for 51% speak for
themselves."

                      About Comstock Mining

Virginia City, Nev.-based Comstock Mining Inc. is a Nevada-based,
gold and silver mining company with extensive, contiguous property
in the historic Comstock district.  The Company began acquiring
properties in the Comstock District in 2003.  Since then, the
Company has consolidated a substantial portion of the Comstock
district, secured permits, built an infrastructure and brought the
exploration project into test mining production.  The Company
continues acquiring additional properties in the Comstock district,
expanding its footprint and creating opportunities for exploration
and mining.  The goal of the Company's strategic plan is to deliver
stockholder value by validating qualified resources (measured and
indicated) and reserves (probable and proven) of 3,250,000 gold
equivalent ounces by 2013, and commencing commercial mining and
processing operations by 2011, with annual production rates of
20,000 gold equivalent ounces.

Comstock Mining reported a net loss of $12.96 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016, a net loss of $10.45 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015, and a net loss of $9.63 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014.

The Company's balance sheet at June 30, 2017, showed $32.69 million
in total assets, $21.11 million in total liabilities and $11.57
million in total stockholders' equity.


COOLTRADE INC: Voluntary Chapter 11 Case Summary
------------------------------------------------
Debtor: Cooltrade, Inc.
        18940 N. Pima Road
        Scottsdale, AZ 85255

Type of Business: CoolTrade Inc. -- http://www.cool-trade.org/--  
                  is the creator of the CoolTrade system, a fully
                  robotic stock trading technology.  Released in
                  2004, CoolTrade has provided thousands with
                  technology that delivers the most relevant,
                  intuitive and powerful tools for online trading.

                  The CoolTrade Robotic Automated Trader executes
                  strategies 100% on its own.  The CoolTrade
                  platform was developed by former Microsoft
                  programmer, Ed Barsano.  The Company has
                  partnered with leading brokers such as TD
                  Ameritrade, E-Trade, AutoShares, and Interactive

                  Brokers.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 6, 2017

Case No.: 17-11886

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       District of Arizona (Phoenix)

Judge: Hon. Brenda K. Martin

Debtor's Counsel: James F Kahn, Esq.
                  KAHN & AHART, PLLC
                  Bankruptcy Legal Counsel
                  301 E. Bethany Home Rd., Ste C-195
                  Phoenix, AZ 85012
                  Tel: 602-266-1717
                  Fax: 602-266-2484
                  E-mail: James.Kahn@azbk.biz

Estimated Assets: $0 to $50,000

Estimated Liabilities: $500 million to $1 billion

The petition was signed by Edward Barsano, CEO.

The Debtor did not file a list of its 20 largest unsecured
creditors together with the petition.

A full-text copy of the petition is available for free at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/azb17-11886.pdf


COPSYNC INC: Hires Jones Walker as Special Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
COPsync, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Eastern District of Louisiana to employ Jones Walker, LLP, as
special counsel to the Debtor.

COPsync, Inc. requires Jones Walker to serve as special counsel in
coordination with Adams and Reese LLP.  Jones Walker will also
serve as conflicts counsel should any conflict arise for Debtor's
counsel, Adams and Reese.

Jones Walker will be paid at these hourly rates:

     R. Patrick Vance                 $495
     Mark Mintz                       $350
     Laura Ashley                     $300
     Law Clerks and Paralegals        $110-$210

Jones Walker received a retainer from the Debtor in the amount of
$15,000.  The Debtor agrees that $1,000 will serve as payment for
all prepetition services and $14,000 will serve as a post-petition
retainer.

Jones Walker will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

R. Patrick Vance, member of Jones Walker, LLP, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Jones Walker can be reached at:

     R. Patrick Vance, Esq.
     JONES WALKER, LLP
     201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite 4900
     New Orleans, LA 70170-5100
     Tel: (504) 582-8000

                    About Copsync, Inc.

COPsync, Inc., filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter
11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. E.D. La. Case No. 17-12625) on
Sept. 29, 2017.  The Debtor hired Robin B. Cheatham, Esq., Victoria
P. White, Esq., and Scott R. Cheatham, Esq., of Adams and Reese
LLP, as bankruptcy counsel; and Jones Walker, LLP, as special
counsel.

COPsync, Inc. was created in 2005 as a "software for a service" or
"SaaS" platform for law enforcement to share real-time information
amongst counties, agencies, and departments.  It was created in
response to the 2000 death of one of COPsync's co-founders'
colleagues and friends, Texas Department of Public Safety Trooper
Randy Vetter, who was killed making what he believed to be a
routine traffic stop for a seatbelt violation.

The company serves over 2,000 customers, including law enforcement
agencies and state, county and local law enforcement departments;
schools; and private sector companies that are hi-target
facilities.

The Company's products include nationally shared network of law
enforcement information COPsync Network, software-driven in-car HD
video system Vidtac, real-time threat alert system COPsync911, and
court buildings security provider COURTsync.

COPsync completed a $10.6 million equity financing capital raise in
November 2015 and became listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market
exchange (COYN).


CRS REPROCESSING: Triangle Buying All Assets for $25M Credit Bid
----------------------------------------------------------------
CRS Reprocessing, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Kentucky to authorize the bidding procedures in
connection with the sale of substantially all assets to Triangle
Capital Corp. for a purchase price consisting of (i) the assumption
at closing of certain liabilities and payment of all amounts
thereof; (ii) payment of cure costs in connection with the
assumption of contracts, (iii) an amount not less than $25 million
payable in the form of the exercise of credit bid rights with
respect to all of the aggregate obligations then outstanding under
the Triangle Facility, the THL Facility and the DIP Financing, and
(iv) a cash payment in the amount of $600,000, subject to overbid.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor had assets including accounts
receivable in the estimated face amount of $1,561,000,
approximately $319,000 in inventory, and approximately $3,325,000
in fixed assets and other personal property.  The Debtor's
liabilities include secured claims in the principal amount of
approximately $43 million and approximately $17 million in
unsecured claims, excluding the unsecured deficiency claims held by
the Debtor's lenders.  Of this $17 million, approximately $700,000
is unsecured non-insider accounts payable.

As of the Petition Date, the Debtor's financing was obtained
through four credit facilities.  Pursuant to the Triangle Credit
Facility, the Debtor received funds from a revolving line of credit
in the face principal amount of $5 million.  The Triangle Credit
Facility is secured by a first priority security interest in the
Debtor's accounts receivable, cash, cash equivalents and deposit
accounts, among other security, all as set forth in that Security
Agreement dated as of June 16, 2011, as amended ("Triangle Credit
Facility Collateral").

Pursuant to the Interim Credit Facility, the Debtor received funds
from a financing in which Triangle Capital Corp. was a Subordinated
Note Holder, among others, and served as agent for the Subordinated
Note Holders in the original maximum principal amount of $3.5
million.   The Interim Credit Facility is secured by a second
priority security interest in the Cash Collateral, among other
security, all as set forth in that certain Security Agreement dated
Oct. 15, 2014 by and between (among others) the Debtor, Triangle as
Collateral Agent for the Secured Parties defined therein, and the
Secured Parties defined therein, including Triangle.

Pursuant to the THL Credit Facility, the Debtor received
approximately $31 million from a financing provided by THL and
Triangle.  The THL Credit Facility is secured by a first priority
security interest in the Debtor's equipment, fixtures, inventory,
goods, instruments, intellectual property, all proceeds and all
other assets of the Debtor except that THL holds a third priority
lien on the Triangle Credit Facility Collateral.  On Sept. 11,
2017, Triangle purchased and was assigned all of THL's right, title
and interests in the THL Credit Facility, succeeding to all of
THL's rights and interests in the THL Credit Facility Collateral.

On June 30, 2017, both the Triangle Credit Facility and the THL
Credit Facility matured.  The Debtor made the interest payments on
both facilities that were due on June 30, 2017 but did not make the
interest payments due on July 31, 2017.

The Debtor's secured lender, Triangle, has agreed to provide
financing to the Debtor through DIP Financing to allow it to fund
ongoing operations, continue paying wages, and provide for the
expenses generally attendant to the bankruptcy process.  As a
condition to providing the DIP Financing, the Debtor is required to
pursue a sale of substantially all of its assets.

Due to the critical needs for capital and as a condition of the DIP
Financing, Triangle has required that substantially all of the
Debtor's assets be marketed for sale.  Accordingly, on July 17,
2017, the Debtor engaged the investment banking firm of Lincoln
Partners Advisors, LLC, to assist it in marketing its assets and
securing and closing a sale resulting from that marketing effort.

On July 28, 2017, Triangle proposed the Asset Purchase Term Sheet,
pursuant to which Triangle agreed to serve as the Stalking-Horse
Bidder for the purchase of substantially all of the Debtor's
assets.  As a result of this Asset Purchase Term Sheet and intense
negotiation, the parties agreed as to the form of an Asset Purchase
Agreement ("Original 363 APA").  As a result of delays attendant to
the finalization and court approval of the DIP Financing, the
Stalking-Horse Bidder terminated the Original 363 APA.  As a result
of further intense negotiations, the parties entered into another
Asset Purchase Agreement ("Stalking-Horse APA").

The Stalking-Horse APA provides that Triangle will pay a purchase
price consisting of (i) the assumption at closing of the Assumed
Liabilities and payment of all amounts thereof; (ii) payment of
Cure Costs in connection with the assumption of the Assumed
Contracts, (iii) an amount not less than $25 million payable in the
form of the exercise of credit bid rights with respect to all of
the aggregate obligations then outstanding under the Triangle
Facility, the THL Facility and the DIP Financing, and (iv) a cash
payment in the amount of $600,000.

The Stalking-Horse Bidder has agreed to notify all interested
parties of the anticipated dollar amount of the credit bid
component of the Purchase Price, including any additional amounts
anticipated to be provided pursuant to the DIP Financing after Oct.
22, 2017 but prior to the Auction, as of Nov. 1, 2017 no later than
five days prior to the Bid Deadline (proposed to be Oct. 27, 2017),
or Oct. 22, 2017 and the Debtor agrees to direct Lincoln to provide
email notice of such set amount for the Purchase Price to all
parties that have expressed an interest in purchasing the Assets
and the United States Trustee for Region 8.  For avoidance of
doubt, and except as set forth, the Purchase Price is not intended
and will not limit Triangle's ability to make a credit bid with any
and all remainder of its debt owed from the Debtor (pre- and
post-petition).

In exchange for the Stalking-Horse Bidder's willingness to serve in
such capacity, the Stalking-Horse APA also calls for (i) a Break-Up
Fee in the amount of $350,000; and (ii) an expense reimbursement of
up to $150,000 to reimburse the Stalking-Horse Bidder's actual
sale-related expenses to be paid to the Stalking-Horse Bidder in
the event that it is outbid at the Auction. The transactions
contemplated by the Stalking-Horse APA are subject, among other
things, to the Court's approval.

Notwithstanding the Debtor's selection of the Stalking-Horse Bidder
and execution of the Stalking-Horse APA, the Debtor, with the
assistance of Lincoln, is marketing the Purchased Assets
aggressively in order to ensure the Purchase Price is tested
through market forces and auction.

There has been adequate and reasonable notice of the Sale.  The
Motion was filed on Oct. 2, 2017, with a proposed Sale Procedures
Hearing to be held during the week of Oct. 15, 2017.  Lincoln has
and will continue to market the Purchased Assets during the period
preceding a hearing on the Motion.  The Debtor and Lincoln have
begun and intend to continue to run a robust and aggressive
marketing process to strategic and financial buyers, both located
domestically and internationally.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Bid Deadline: Oct. 27, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. (ET)

     b. Qualified Bid: No less than $550,000 more than the Purchase
Price

     c. Deposit: 5% of the value of Bid

     d. Auction: The Debtor contemplates holding the Auction at
Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, 500 West Jefferson Street, Suite 2000,
Louisville, Kentucky, on Nov. 1, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. (ET).

     e. Bid Increments: $250,000 in cash and/or assumed
liabilities

     f. Sale Hearing: Nov. 8, 2017

     g. Bidder Protections: (i) Break-Up Fee - $350,000 and (ii)
Expense Reimbursement - $150,000

     h. Closing: The closing of any sale of any of the Purchased
Assets will occur in accordance with the terms of the Successful
Bidder's APA, and will occur no later than five business days after
entry of the Sale Order unless extended by agreement of the
Purchaser and the Debtor.

The Debtor asks entry of an Order approving the assumption by the
Debtor and the assignment by the Debtor to any Successful Bidder of
the Contracts.

Except as may be otherwise provided in the Stalking-Horse APA, the
Purchased Assets will be sold without warranty or representation of
any kind or nature, and are being purchased by the Successful
Bidder "as is, where is" and "with all faults," and free and clear
of any and all liens, claims, interests and encumbrances.

A copy of the Stalking-Horse APA is attached to the proposed
Bidding Procedures is available for free at:

           
http://bankrupt.com/misc/CRS_Reprocessing_180_Sales.pdf

The Sale Procedures Order tendered with the Motion includes an
authorization for the Debtor to pay certain key employees amounts
necessary to retain and incentivize them through the contemplated
sale process.  A Key Employee Retention Plan ("KERP") and a Key
Employee Incentive Plan ("KEIP").  

The KERP provides for approximately $200,000 in retention bonuses
to be paid to the Debtor's employees not in senior management if
ethey stay through the sale and are employed by the buyer.  The
Debtor estimates that there will be approximately 40 eligible
mployees, each of whom would be paid between $1,000 and $15,000, as
determined by the Debtor's management.

The KEIP applies to the Debtor's senior management, providing for
approximately $150,000 to be paid to that group.  None of the
Debtor's current employees have been offered post-sale employment
by any bidder on the Debtor's assets, yet their continued services
and full commitment to the sale process are vital to the Debtor and
their availability is valuable to a buyer.  Absent the potential
for additional compensation they may have insufficient incentive
not to accept other positions during the sale process.  Further, to
the extent a purchaser does want the services of a key employee
after sale, the plans increase the likelihood they can get those
services.  The funds are payable at the closing of a sale.

SG&A and Payroll categories in the DIP Loan Facility Budget,
evidencing support of the DIP lender/Stalking-Horse bidder for such
expenditure.  Approval of such plans is common in chapter 11 cases.
These payments are appropriate.

The Debtor proposes to give notice of the Sale, the Sale Procedures
Order, the Auction and the Sale Hearing.  As set forth in the
proposed Sale Notice, objections, if ay, must be filed no later
than two business days prior to the date set by the Court for the
Sale Hearing.  It also proposes to file and serve upon all parties
to the Contracts that are or may be assumed and assigned in
connection with the Sale a Cure Claim Notice, within two business
days after the day on which the Sale Procedures Order is entered.
An objection to its scheduled Cure Amount or the assumption and
assignment of their Contract(s) must be filed no later than two
days prior to the date set by the Court for the Sale Hearing.

According to the Debtor, time is of the essence with respect to the
contemplated transaction, given the fact that the Debtor is
anticipated to have borrowed or incurred obligations for all funds
to which it is entitled under the DIP budget by Nov. 3, 2017, and
its right to borrow money under the DIP Financing will expire on
Jan. 31, 2018.  As such, the Debtor has every expectation that it
will choose to close the Sale as soon as possible after all closing
conditions have been met or waived.  Accordingly, the Debtor
respectfully asks that the Court waives the 14-day stay period
under Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d) in the instance.

The Purchaser:

          TRIANGLE CAPITAL CORP.
          9780 Ormsby Station Road
          Suite 2500
          Louisville, KY 40223
          Attn: Chief Executive Officer
          Telephone: (502) 778-3600
          Facsimile: (502) 778-3606

The Purchaser is represented by:

          STOLL KEENON OGDEN PLLC
          300 West Vine Street, Suite 2100
          Lexington, KY 40507-1801
          Attn: R. David Lester, Esq.
          Telephone: (859) 231-3082
          E-mail: David.Lester@skofirm.com

Lincoln can be reached at:

          Brent C. Williams
          Brendan J. Murphy
          LINCOLN INTERNATIONAL, LLC
          444 Madison Avenue, Suite 300
          New York, NY 10022

                     About CRS Reprocessing

CRS Reprocessing, LLC -- http://www.crs-reprocessing.com/-- is a
global partner in fluid reprocessing management, offering people,
technology and services to efficiently handle industrial fluids for
a variety of industries.  With 30 years of expertise and operations
in the U.S., Europe and Asia, its custom-built, on-site
reprocessing facilities economically transform used fluids back to
customer-specified performance levels, allowing high-yield waste
recovery and lower unit costs.

CRS Reprocessing, LLC, based in Louisville, KY, filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 17-32565) on Aug. 9, 2017.  The
petition was signed by Scott T. Massie, chief executive.  In its
petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in assets
and $50 million to $100 million in liabilities.  Lea Pauley Goff,
Esq., and Emily Pagorski, Esq., at Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, serve
as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


CS360 TOWERS: Trustee's $475K Sale of Condo Unit Okayed
-------------------------------------------------------
Judge Robert S. Bardwil of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Eastern District of California authorized Bradley Sharp, Chapter 11
Trustee of CS360 Towers, LLC, to sell the real property
colloquially known as Condominium Unit 808 in the building located
at 500 N Street, Sacramento, California, to James and Quincy
Roxburgh for $475,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Sept. 27, 2017.

The sale is free and clear of the liens, claims or interests.
Except as otherwise provided in the Motion, the Sale Assets will be
sold, transferred, and delivered to Buyer on an "as is, where is"
or "with all faults" basis.

The Trustee is authorized to pay the following claims at closing of
the sale: (a) Net Sale Proceeds (defined as the purchase price,
less less $120,000 ("Estate Reserve"), to Passi Realty, LLC in
partial satisfaction of the Passi note secured by a deed of trust
recorded against the Sale Assets; and (b) payment of (i) all
delinquent real property taxes and outstanding post-petition real
property taxes pro-rated as of the closing with respect to the real
property included among the purchased assets; and (ii) the closing
costs identified in Exhibit C to the Exhibit List submitted with
the Motion, including broker commissions.

Unless the holders of the liens, claims or interests identified
have agreed to other treatment, their liens, claims or interests
will attach to the Estate Reserve with the same force, effect,
validity and priority that previously existed against the Sale
Assets, without the need to file or execute any financing
statements or other documents, and the Estate Reserve will be held
pending further order of the Court.

The Order will be effective immediately upon entry.  No automatic
stay of execution, pursuant to Rule 62(a) of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, or Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) or 6006(d), applies
with respect to the Order.

Passi will retain any liens or deeds of trust on property other
than the Sale Assets and any deficiency claim that it may have.

                      About CS360 Towers

CS360 Towers, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Cal.
Case No. 17-20731) on Feb. 3, 2017.  Mark D. Chisick, manager,
signed the petition.  At the time of filing, the Debtor disclosed
total assets of $18.46 million and total liabilities of $5.72
million.

The case is assigned to Judge Robert S. Bardwil.  

The Debtor is represented by Stephan M. Brown, Esq., at the
Bankruptcy Group, P.C.

Bradley Sharp of Development Specialists, Inc., was appointed as
Chapter 11 trustee of the Debtor on March 27, 2017.  Downey Brand
LLP is the Trustee's legal counsel.  Coldwell Banker Residential
Brokerage; Cal Northern Realty Group; and Jones Lang LaSalle
Brokerage, Inc., have been retained by the Trustee as real estate
brokers, and Swicker & Associates Accountancy Corporation, as his
tax advisor.


CYTORI THERAPEUTICS: Amends Units Subscription Rights Prospectus
----------------------------------------------------------------
Cytori Therapeutics, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a first amendment to its registration statement on Form
S-1 relating to the distribution to holders of the Company's common
stock, at no charge, non-transferable subscription rights to
purchase up to 10,000 units.

Each unit consists of one share of Series B Preferred Stock and
1,250 warrants.  Each Warrant will be exercisable for one share of
the Company's common stock.  Holders will receive one subscription
right for every share of common stock owned at 5:00 p.m., Eastern
Time, on Oct. 27, 2017, the record date of the Rights Offering, or
the Record Date.  The Series B Preferred Stock and the Warrants
comprising the Units will separate upon the closing of the Rights
Offering and will be issued separately but may only be purchased as
a Unit, and the Units will not trade as a separate security. The
subscription rights will not be tradable.

Each subscription right will entitle holders to purchase one Unit
at a subscription price per Unit of $1,000.  Each Warrant entitles
the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise
price of $0.48 per share from the date of issuance through its
expiration 30 months from the date of issuance.  

The Subscription Rights will expire if they are not exercised by
5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Nov. 21, 2017, unless the Rights
Offering is extended or earlier terminated by the Company.  If the
Company elects to extend the Rights Offering, it will issue a press
release announcing the extension no later than 9:00 a.m., Eastern
Time, on the next business day after the most recently announced
expiration date of the Rights Offering.  The Company may extend the
Rights Offering for additional periods in its sole discretion.
Once made, all exercises of Subscription Rights are irrevocable.

The Company has not entered into any standby purchase agreement or
other similar arrangement in connection with the Rights Offering.
The Rights Offering is being conducted on a best-efforts basis and
there is no minimum amount of proceeds necessary to be received in
order for the Company to close the Rights Offering.

The Comopany has engaged Maxim Group LLC to act as dealer-manager
in the Rights Offering.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                      https://is.gd/qkfYnf

                         About Cytori

Cytori -- http://www.cytori.com/-- is a therapeutics company
developing regenerative and oncologic therapies from its
proprietary cell therapy and nanoparticle platforms for a variety
of medical conditions.  Data from preclinical studies and clinical
trials suggest that Cytori Cell Therapy acts principally by
improving blood flow, modulating the immune system, and
facilitating wound repair.  As a result, Cytori Cell Therapy may
provide benefits across multiple disease states and can be made
available to the physician and patient at the point-of-care through
Cytori's proprietary technologies and products.  Cytori
Nanomedicine is developing encapsulated therapies for regenerative
medicine and oncologic indications using technology that allows
Cytori to use the benefits of its encapsulation platform to develop
novel therapeutic strategies and reformulate other drugs to
optimize their clinical properties.

BDO USA, LLP, in San Diego, California, Cytori's independent
accounting firm, issued a "going concern" qualification on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
stating that the Company has suffered recurring losses and negative
cash flows from operations that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.

Cytori reported a net loss of $22.04 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a net loss of $18.74 million for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2015.

As of June 30, 2017, Cytori had $32.47 million in total assets,
$21.24 million in total liabilities and $11.23 million in total
stockholders' equity.  The Company has an accumulated deficit of
$392.7 million as of June 30, 2017.


DAVID CHAMBERLAIN: 374 Amory Buying Amory Property for $30K
-----------------------------------------------------------
David Tudor Chamberlain asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California to authorize the bidding procedures
and his Purchase and Sale Agreement with 374 Amory Street Realty
Trust in connection with the sale of the real property located at
274 Amory, Manchester, New Hampshire for $30,000, subject to
overbid.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 25, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

One of the properties owned by the Debtor is real property located
at 281-289 Merrimack & 274 Amory, Manchester, New Hampshire ("New
Hampshire Property").  The New Hampshire Property consists of three
six-unit apartment buildings built in 1920.  Collectively, the New
Hampshire Property has been valued by the Debtor at $1,000,000.
Only the 12 units located at the Merrimack Property are currently
rented.

The Amory Property is not rented and suffers from issues and damage
that has made occupancy and use of the property not possible to
date.  The New Hampshire Property is subject to a deed of trust
recorded on Nov. 18, 2004 as Instrument No. 4108398 in favor of
DFCU, securing an obligation in the amount of approximately
$378,485.

Upon purchasing the New Hampshire Property, the Debtor first
undertook the rehabilitation of the Merrimack buildings.  After
completing that process, he began work on the Amory Property.
While working on the Amory Property in 2007, the Debtor discovered
a growing separation in a large retaining wall between the Amory
Property, which sits on top of a hill, and the apartments below.  A
significant amount of dirt was falling to the property below.  As a
result, the Debtor hired an excavator to remove several commercial
truckloads of dirt to relieve the pressure.  By removing the dirt,
however, the parking for the Amory Property was eliminated, which
parking was required to obtain a certificate of occupancy.  The
Amory Property has remained vacant and not rentable for well over
10 years.

On May 26, 2017, a fire occurred at the Amory Property causing
damage to the building.  The estimated damage to the building was
in the amount of $174,022.  The Amory Property was covered against
loss by fire under an insurance policy.  The Debtor submitted a
claim under the policy to recover insurance proceeds for the damage
caused by the fire.  The insurer has agreed to cover the loss for a
cash value of $139,278, less a $2,500 deductible, for a total of
$136,778.

Approval of the Debtor's agreement with the insurer of the Amory
Property is the subject of the concurrently-filed Insurance Motion
and, as set forth therein, upon approval of the sale of the Amory
Property, the Insurance Proceeds will be utilized to pay-down the
loan held by Digital Federal Credit Union's ("DFCU") against the
New Hampshire Property in accordance with the terms of the Debtor's
Plan and DFCU will release its lien against the Amory Property in
connection with the sale of the Amory Property.

Prior to the fire, the Buyer and the Debtor had entered into
negotiations pursuant to which the Debtor verbally agreed to sell
the Amory Property to the Buyer for $100,000.  Following the fire,
and in light of the resulting condition of the Amory Property, the
Debtor agreed to sell the Property to the Buyer (subject to Court
approval) on an "as-is" basis for a purchase price of $30,000.  The
Debtor believes that, under the circumstances, the $30,000 purchase
price reflects the current fair market value of the Amory
Property.

The Purchase Agreement sets forth that the "Sellers" of the Amory
Property are the Debtor and his non-filing wife, Linda, Brian and
Nora Straight ("Straights") and David and Denise Lott.  The Debtor
and his wife purchased the interests of the Straights and the Lotts
many years ago, however, they are still formally reflected on the
title to the Amory Property.

In addition, the Purchase Agreement contains a typographical error
with respect to the address of the Amory Property (setting forth
374, instead of 274, Amory).
Further, the Purchase Agreement lists a closing date of Oct. 17,
2017, but that date has been extended based upon the hearing date
of the Motion.  An amended Purchase Agreement correcting these
errors will be submitted prior to the hearing on the Motion.

The Debtor anticipates that the Lotts and the Straights will file a
statement with the Court prior to the hearing on this Motion
indicating their consent to the sale but, in an abundance of
caution, the Debtor asks approval of the Sale in accordance with
the "co-owner sale provisions."  His wife has consented to the sale
of the Amory Property.

As set forth, the New Hampshire Property is subject to a deed of
trust recorded on Nov. 18, 2004 as Instrument No. 4108398 in favor
of DFCU, securing an obligation in the amount of approximately
$378,485.  In accordance with the agreed-to treatment with DFCU,
upon approval of the sale of the Amory Property and application of
the Insurance Proceeds to its claim, DFCU will release its lien on
the Amory Property.  There are no other encumbrances against the
New Hampshire Property.

As also discussed, notwithstanding that the Debtor previously had
bought out their interests, the Straights and the Lotts appear as
owners of record, along with the Debtor and his wife, on title of
the Amory Property.  The Debtor intends to submit a statement from
the Straights and the Lotts prior to approval of the Motion
indicating that they are no longer owners of the Amory Property
and/or otherwise indicating their consent to the sale and the
disposition of the proceeds to the Debtor's estate.  In an
abundance of caution, however, the Debtor seeks an order
authorizing the sale of the Amory Property free and clear of any
co-owner interests.

The Debtor has received an offer for the purchase of the Amory
Property from the Buyer pursuant to the terms and conditions set
forth in the Purchase Agreement.  Pursuant to the Purchase
Agreement, the Buyer will pay the sum of $30,000 as the purchase
price.  The Buyer will pay a deposit of $10,000, with the balance
($20,000) to be paid via cash, certified check or bank draft on the
date of transfer of title.  The sale is free and clear of all liens
and encumbrances.

The Purchase Agreement further provides the following additional
provisions: (i) the Amory Property is sold "as-is," in its present
condition, including substantial fire damage, substantial problems
with the retaining wall, and issues with respect to city permits;
(ii) the Buyer is advised to obtain professional inspections; (iii)
the seller makes no representations of condition or use; (iv) the
sale is subject to a lien release from DFCU; (v) the sale is
subject to Court approval; and (vi) the closing date of the sale is
stated as Oct. 17, 2017, but has been extended based upon the
hearing date of the Motion.

The Debtor proposes Bidding Procedures to allow for overbids prior
to the Court's approval of the sale of the Amory Property to ensure
that the Amory Property is sold for the best possible price.

The salient terms of the Bidding Procedures are:

     a. Qualifying Bid: $35,000 in cash

     b. Overbid Deposit: $10,000

     c. Bid Deadline: Oct. 24, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. (PST)

     d. Auction: At the hearing on the Motion (Oct. 25, 2017 at
10:00 a.m.), only the Buyer and any party who is deemed a
Qualifying Bidder will be entitled to bid.

     e. Bid Increments: $2,500

     f. Sale Hearing: Oct. 25, 2017, at 10:00 a.m.

     g. Overbids will be all cash and no credit will be given to
the purchaser or overbidder(s).

A copy of the Purchase Agreement attached to the Motion is
available for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/David_Chamberlain_242_Sales.pdf

The Buyer:

          374 AMORY STREET REALTY TRUST
          500 W Cummings Park, Suite 2400
          Woburn, MA 01801

Counsel for the Debtor:

          Jeffrey I. Golden, Esq.
          Alan J. Friedman, Esq.
          Beth E. Gaschen, Esq.
          LOBEL WEILAND GOLDEN FRIEDMAN LLP
          650 Town Center Drive, Suite 950
          Costa Mesa, CA 92626
          Telephone: (714) 966-1000
          Facsimile: (714) 966-1002
          E-mail: jgolden@lwgfllp.com
                  afriedman@lwgfllp.com
                  bgaschen@lwgfllp.com

David Tudor Chamberlain is a real estate agent with over 25 years
of experience in marketing and selling real properties.  He sought
Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-11370) on April
9, 2017.  The Debtor tapped Jeffrey I Golden, Esq., at Lobel
Weiland Golden Friedman LLP, as counsel.


DAVID LUTHER: Sale of Keller Property to Peabody for $492K Approved
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mark X. Mullin of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas authorized David H. Luther's sale of real
property located at 113 Audrey Drive, Keller, Texas to Ryan, Larry,
and Tyler Peabody for $492,000.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims and encumbrances.

At the closing of such sale, the Debtor (or any party acting at his
direction, such as a closing agent, a title company or an escrow
agent) is authorized and directed to pay the normal costs
associated with closing the sale of the Property including, but not
limited to, title insurance, processing fees, underwriting fees,
brokerage commissions owed to brokers or agents relating to the
sale of the Property, flood certifications, application fees,
escrow fees, abstract or title search fees, title examination fees,
document preparation fees, and notary fees ("Closing Costs").

Following the payment of the Closing Costs, at the closing of such
sale, the Debtor (or any party acting at his direction, such as a
closing agent, a title company or an escrow agent) is authorized
and directed to disburse the sale proceeds as follows:

     a. First, to any ad valorem taxing authority to fully satisfy
the ad valorem real property taxes for the tax periods 2016 and
prior (including all amounts allowed under 11 U.S.C. Section
506(b)) against the Property);

     b. Second, either (i) to any ad valorem taxing authority to
fully satisfy the ad valorem taxes for the tax period 2017,
provided the Purchasers pay their prorated share of the 2017 ad
valorem real property taxes to the Debtor at closing, or (ii) to
the Purchasers to pay prorated taxes for 2017, in which case the
Purchasers will be responsible for the payment of the 2017 ad
valorem real property taxes in full and the sale of the Property
will not be free and clear of 2017 ad valorem real property taxes;

     c. Third, in the amount of $150,000 to Fannie Mae as provided
under the Original Plan of Reorganization in accordance with wiring
instructions to be provided by Fannie Mae; and

     d. Fourth, to the Debtor in accordance with wiring
instructions to be provided by the Debtor.

Unless paid in full at closing, any lien of an ad valorem taxing
authority securing the payment of 2017 taxes relating to the
Property will be unaffected by the Order, and will continue to
secure the payment of 2017 ad valorem real property taxes.

Abstract of Judgment of Citibank, N.A. filed under instrument
number D212315638 in the Official Real Property Records of Tarrant
County, Texas does not encumber or constitute a lien or claim upon
the Property.

The Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h) will not apply to
the Order.

On Dec. 24, 2015, David H. Luther filed his voluntary petition
under Chapter 7 of Title 11 of the United States Code in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas.  On June 14,
2016, the case was converted to a Chapter 11 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case
No. 15-45098).  

The Debtor can be reached at:

          David H. Luther
          Telephone: (754) 224-7500
          E-mail: dluther@marcumillichap.com


DIAMOND CONTRACT: Hires McDowell Posternock as Counsel
------------------------------------------------------
Diamond Contract Flooring, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to employ
McDowell Posternock Apell & Detrick, P.C., as counsel to the
Debtor.

Diamond Contract requires McDowell Posternock to:

   (a) give the Debtor legal advice with respect to its powers
       and duties as Debtor- in-Possession;

   (b) prepare on behalf of the Debtor necessary applications,
       responses, orders, reports and other legal papers; and

   (c) perform all other legal services for the Debtor which
       may be necessary

McDowell Posternock will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Carrie J. Boyle, Esq.                   $275
     Ellen McDowell, Esq.                    $400
     Daniel Reinganum, Esq.                  $250
     Kristie Gresh, Paralegal                $125

Prior to the filing of the petition, McDowell Posternock received a
retainer of $20,000. The firm billed $8,703.75, leaving a retainer
of $11,296.25.

McDowell Posternock will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Carrie J. Boyle, a partner of McDowell Posternock Apell & Detrick,
P.C., assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person"
as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code
and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
estates.

McDowell Posternock can be reached at:

     Carrie J. Boyle, Esq.
     MCDOWELL POSTERNOCK APELL & DETRICK, P.C.
     42 West Main Street
     Maple Shade, NJ 08052
     Tel: (856) 482-5544
     Fax: (856) 482-5511
     E-mail: cboyle@mpadlaw.com

              About Diamond Contract Flooring, LLC

Diamond Contract Flooring, LLC is a privately held company in
Bensalem, Pennsylvania, and has been in the business of
wholesale-floor coverings since 2000.

Diamond Contract Flooring, LLC, based in Bensalem, PA, filed a
Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Pa. Case No. 17-16672) on
September 29, 2017.  The Hon. Eric L. Frank presides over the case.
Carrie J. Boyle, Esq., at McDowell Posternock Apell & Detrick,
P.C., serves as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $142,481 in assets and $1.32
million in liabilities. The petition was signed by Christopher
Diamond, president.


DIAMOND SHINE: L.C. Nixon Buying Allegany Property for $210K
------------------------------------------------------------
Diamond Shine, Inc., Steven E. Leydig, Sr., and Betty D. Leydig ask
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
to authorize the sale of their interest as the lessee of a
leasehold interest in real estate located at Industrial Boulevard,
Cumberland, Allegany County, Maryland, and all the personal
property located thereon, to L.C. Nixon Development Co., LLC, for
$210,000, subject to overbid.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Nov. 17, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.  The
objection deadline is Oct. 20, 2017.

Among the assets of the estate is the Debtors' Leasehold Interest
in real estate which is improved by a commercial building currently
used as a car wash.  Debtor Diamond Shine also owns personal
property and equipment used to operate the car wash.

The Debtors have agreed to sell the real estate and all the
personal property located as described, which is used as a car
wash, to the Buyer for $210,000.  The sale is subject to a
financing contingency.  The Buyer paid a good faith hand money
deposit of $21,000.  

The hand money was deposited in the IOLTA account of Donald R.
Calaiaro, Esq.  The Closing will take place within 90 days from the
execution of the Agreement or sooner at the office of the Debtors'
counsel.  The sale is subject to the approval of the Court.  

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Diamond_Shine_146_Sales.pdf

The lien creditors, named as Respondents, in the order of their
recorded priority, are:

   a. First United Bank and Trust holds two allowed claims against
the Debtors in the allowed amounts of $1,601,735 and $388,080,
respectively; which said claims are secured by the lien of a Deed
of Trust dated Aug. 9, 2004 against the property proposed to be
sold as recorded among the Land Records of Allegany County,
Maryland at Book 1079, Page 001; and are further secured by the
liens of two Financing Statements filed among the Financing Records
of the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation
("SDAT") on Aug. 17, 2004 (and duly continued in effect
thereafter), as well as a third Financing Statement recorded among
said records on April 24, 2009 (and duly continued in effect
thereafter);

   b. U.S. Bank, N.A. claims a security interest against certain
personal property of the Debtors in the amount of $184,554
evidenced by a Financing Statement filed among the said Financing
Records of SDAT on Nov. 5, 2015;

   c. Butler Capital Corp. claims a security interest in personal
property of the Debtor by virtue of two Financing Statements
recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on Nov. 2, 2007 and Nov.
6, 2008, respectively;

   d. Chessie Federal Credit Union claims a security interest in
personal property of the Debtor by virtue of a Financing Statement
recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on Nov. 5, 2012;

   e. On Deck Capital, Inc. claims a security interest in personal
property of the Debtor by virtue of a Financing Statement recorded
among the SDAT Financing Records on Oct. 9, 2015 in the name of
ASSN Company;

   f. CT Corp. System, as Representative claims a security interest
in personal property of the Debtor by virtue of a Financing
Statement recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on Dec. 17,
2015; and

   g. Avirett Trust is the lessor of the land lease.  The Buyer
will assume the land lease and cure it at time of closing.

In addition to the claimed recorded liens, the Respondent Madison
Funding claims a security interest in personal property of the
Debtor Diamond Shine pursuant to a 36-month term commercial
lease/purchase agreement.

Under the proposed sale, the Debtor will assume the Avirett Trust
lease and cure the arrears at closing.  The Lease will be assigned
to the Buyer.  The sale is an "as is, where is" sale, free and
clear of all liens and encumbrances and claims against the Debtors.
In order to convey good title, it will be necessary that all these
interests, mortgages, claims, and encumbrances be divested as liens
against the real property and shifted to the funds to be realized
from the sale.

This sale is to "bona fide" purchasers in accordance with the
holding of In re: Abbots Dairies of Pennsylvania, Inc., 788 F.2d
143 C.A.3 (Pa) 1986.  The purchaser is the daughter of the
Debtors.

The Debtors will serve all Respondents and all creditors in each
respective case with a copy of the Motion prior to a hearing on the
sale.

The Estate will accept higher and better offers at the time of sale
upon terms and conditions not less advantageous to the Debtors and
the Estates than those included in the Sales Agreement.  Any bidder
must pre-qualify prior to the hearing on the sale1 by: (i)
submission of an executed agreement of sale in substantially that
same form as the Sales Agreement; (ii) demonstrating to the
Debtors' counsel the ability of said bidder to close within 90 days
following Court approval of the proposed sale; and (iii) delivering
to Debtors' counsel a non-refundable deposit of $21,000 in
immediately available funds.  The Debtors ask that the Court allows
higher bids in $5,000 increments.

First United Bank and Trust will be permitted to credit bid upon
the proposed sale provided that if such credit bid is the highest
and best bid approved by the Court, said First United will be
required to pay all costs associated with closing including
adjusted real estate taxes.

The Debtors propose to pay through the settlement officer the
following: (i) all normal and ordinary settlement charges; (ii) pay
Calaiaro Valencik the fee of $3,000 for legal fees related to the
sale; (iii) pay Calaiaro Valencik for reimbursement for all costs
of mailing and copying, and advertising expense; (iv) any unpaid
real estate or other taxes constituting a lien against the property
to be sold; (v) the amount necessary to pay all unpaid U.S. Trustee
fees; (vi) $65,000 to U.S. Bank in full satisfaction of its secured
claim on the car wash equipment; (vii) any arrears to the land
lease to Avirett Trust; and (viii) the balance to First United.

The sale is in the best interest of all parties since it will help
the Debtors to fund their Chapter 11 Plan.

The Purchaser:

          L.C. NIXON DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC
          18209 Oldtown Road, SE
          Oldtown, MD 21555
          Telephone: (301) 722-1212

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Jayci Shaw Duncan, Esq.
          2 W. Main Street
          Frostburg, MD 21532

                       About Diamond Shine

Diamond Shine, Inc., which operates three car washes in Maryland,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-70154) on March 3, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Steven E. Leydig, Sr., authorized representative.  The
Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million.  The Debtor is represented by Donald R.
Calaiaro, Esq., at Calaiaro Valencik.


DIAMOND SHINE: L.C. Nixon Buying Allegany Property for $567K
------------------------------------------------------------
Diamond Shine, Inc., Steven E. Leydig, Sr., and Betty D. Leydig ask
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
to authorize the sale of their interest in the real estate located
on Route 36 near Corriganville, Allegany County, Maryland at Motor
City, and all personal property located thereon, to L.C. Nixon
Development Co., LLC, for $567,001, subject to overbid.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Nov. 17, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.  The
objection deadline is Oct. 20, 2017.

Among the assets of the estate is the real estate which is improved
by a commercial building currently used as a car wash.  Debtor
Diamond Shine also owns personal property and equipment used to
operate the car wash.

The Debtors have agreed to sell the real estate and all the
personal property located as described, which is used as a car
wash, to the Buyer for $567,001.  The sale is subject to a
financing contingency.  The Buyer paid a good faith hand money
deposit of $56,701.  

The hand money was deposited in the IOLTA account of Donald R.
Calaiaro, Esq.  The Closing will take place within 90 days from the
execution of the Agreement or sooner at the office of the Debtors'
counsel.  The sale is subject to the approval of the Court.  

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Diamond_Shine_146_Sales.pdf

The lien creditors, named as Respondents, in the order of their
recorded priority, are:

     a. First United Bank and Trust holds two allowed claims
against the Debtors in the allowed amounts of $1,601,735 and
$388,080, respectively; which said claims are secured by the lien
of a Deed of Trust dated Aug. 9, 2004 against the property proposed
to be sold as recorded among the Land Records of Allegany County,
Maryland at Book 1079, Page 001; and are further secured by the
liens of two Financing Statements filed among the Financing Records
of the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation
("SDAT") on Aug. 17, 2004 (and duly continued in effect
thereafter), as well as a third Financing Statement recorded among
said records on April 24, 2009 (and duly continued in effect
thereafter);

     b. U.S. Bank, N.A. claims a security interest against certain
personal property of the Debtors in the amount of $184,554
evidenced by a Financing Statement filed among the said Financing
Records of SDAT on Nov. 5, 2015;

     c. Butler Capital Corp. claims a security interest in personal
property of the Debtor by virtue of two Financing Statements
recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on Nov. 2, 2007 and Nov.
6, 2008, respectively;

     d. Chessie Federal Credit Union claims a security interest in
personal property of the Debtor by virtue of a Financing Statement
recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on Nov. 5, 2012;

     e. On Deck Capital, Inc. claims a security interest in
personal property of the Debtor by virtue of a Financing Statement
recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on Oct. 9, 2015 in the
name of ASSN Company; and

     f. CT Corp. System, as Representative claims a security
interest in personal property of the Debtor by virtue of a
Financing Statement recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on
Dec. 17, 2015.

In addition to the claimed recorded liens, the Respondent Madison
Funding claims a security interest in personal property of the
Debtor Diamond Shine pursuant to a 36-month term commercial
lease/purchase agreement.

The sale is an "as is, where is" sale, free and clear of all liens
and encumbrances and claims against the Debtors.  In order to
convey good title, it will be necessary that all these interests,
mortgages, claims, and encumbrances be divested as liens against
the real property and shifted to the funds to be realized from the
sale.

The sale is to "bona fide" purchasers in accordance with the
holding of In re: Abbots Dairies of Pennsylvania, Inc., 788 F.2d
143 C.A.3 (Pa) 1986.

The Respondent Frederick J. Timbrook is being joined as a party in
order to sell the described property free and clear of any alleged
interest he may claim therein.

The Debtors will serve all Respondents and all creditors in each
respective case with a copy of the Motion prior to a hearing on the
sale.

The Estate will accept higher and better offers at the time of sale
upon terms and conditions not less advantageous to the Debtors and
the Estates than those included in the Sales Agreement.  Any bidder
must pre-qualify prior to the hearing on the sale1 by: (i)
submission of an executed agreement of sale in substantially that
same form as the Sales Agreement; (ii) demonstrating to the
Debtors' counsel the ability of said bidder to close within 90 days
following Court approval of the proposed sale; and (iii) delivering
to Debtors' counsel a non-refundable deposit of $56,701 in
immediately available funds.  The Debtors ask that the Court allows
higher bids in $5,000 increments.

First United Bank and Trust will be permitted to credit bid upon
the proposed sale provided that if such credit bid is the highest
and best bid approved by the Court, said First United will be
required to pay all costs associated with closing including
adjusted real estate taxes.

The Debtors propose to pay through the settlement officer the
following: (i) all normal and ordinary settlement charges; (ii) pay
Calaiaro Valencik the fee of $3,000 for legal fees related to the
sale; (iii) pay Calaiaro Valencik for reimbursement for all costs
of mailing and copying, and advertising expense; (iv) any unpaid
real estate or other taxes constituting a lien against the property
to be sold; (v) the amount necessary to pay all unpaid U.S. Trustee
fees; (vi) $65,000 to U.S. Bank in full satisfaction of its secured
claim on the car wash equipment; and (vii) the balance to First
United.

The sale is in the best interest of all parties since it will help
the Debtors to fund  their Chapter 11 Plan.

The Purchaser:

          L.C. NIXON DEVELOPMENT CO., LLC
          18209 Oldtown Road, SE
          Oldtown, MD 21555
          Telephone: (301) 722-1212

The Purchaser is represented by:

          Jayci Shaw Duncan, Esq.
          2 W. Main Street
          Frostburg, MD 21532

                       About Diamond Shine

Diamond Shine, Inc., which operates three car washes in Maryland,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
W.D. Tex. Case No. 16-70154) on March 3, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Steven E. Leydig, Sr., authorized representative.  The
Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million.  The Debtor is represented by Donald R.
Calaiaro, Esq., at Calaiaro Valencik.


DIAMOND SHINE: Wallses Buying La Vale Property for $575K
--------------------------------------------------------
Diamond Shine, Inc., Steven E. Leydig, Sr., and Betty D. Leydig,
ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of
Pennsylvania to authorize the sale of their interest in the real
estate at Vocke Road, La Vale, Maryland, also known as Campground
Road, consisting of two parcels and all personal property located
thereon, to Cassius W. Walls and Crystal L. Walls for $575,000,
subject to overbid.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Nov. 17, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.  The
objection deadline is Oct. 20, 2017.

Among the assets of the estate is the Debtors' interest in real
estate at Vocke Road also known as Campground Road, consisting of
two parcels.  Said real estate is improved by a commercial building
currently used as a car wash.  Debtor Diamond Shine also owns
personal property and equipment used to operate the car wash.

The Debtors have agreed to sell the real estate and all the
personal property located at Vocke Road, which is used as a car
wash, to the Buyers for $575,000.  The sale is subject to a
financing contingency.  The Buyers paid a good faith hand money
deposit of $57,500.

The hand money was deposited in the IOLTA account of Donald R.
Calaiaro, Esq.  The Closing will take place within 14 days after
entry of the Order approving the sale at the office of the Debtors'
counsel.  The sale is subject to the approval of the Court.  

A copy of the Agreement attached to the Motion is available for
free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Diamond_Shine_144_Sales.pdf

The lien creditors, named as Respondents, in the order of their
recorded priority, are:

     a. First United Bank and Trust holds two allowed claims
against the Debtors in the allowed amounts of $1,601,735 and
$388,080, respectively; which said claims are secured by the lien
of a Deed of Trust dated Aug. 9, 2004 against the property proposed
to be sold as recorded among the Land Records of Allegany County,
Maryland at Book 1079, Page 001; and are further secured by the
liens of two Financing Statements filed among the Financing Records
of the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation
("SDAT") on Aug. 17, 2004 (and duly continued in effect
thereafter), as well as a third Financing Statement recorded among
said records on April 24, 2009 (and duly continued in effect
thereafter);

     b. U.S. Bank, N.A. holds an allowed claim against the Debtors
in the amount of $184,554; $65,000 of which being secured by a
purchase money security interest in the car wash equipment
evidenced by a Financing Statement filed among the said Financing
Records of SDAT on Nov. 5, 2015; with the balance of $119,554 being
unsecured;

     c. Butler Capital Corp. claims a security interest in personal
property of the Debtor by virtue of two Financing Statements
recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on Nov. 2, 2007 and Nov.
6, 2008, respectively;

     d. Chessie Federal Credit Union claims a security interest in
personal property of the Debtor by virtue of a Financing Statement
recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on Nov. 5, 2012;

     e. On Deck Capital, Inc. claims a security interest in
personal property of the Debtor by virtue of a Financing Statement
recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on Oct. 9, 2015 in the
name of ASSN Company; and

     f. CT Corp. System, as Representative claims a security
interest in personal property of the Debtor by virtue of a
Financing Statement recorded among the SDAT Financing Records on
Dec. 17, 2015.

In addition to the claimed recorded liens, the Respondent Madison
Funding claims a security interest in personal property of the
Debtor Diamond Shine pursuant to a 36-month term commercial
lease/purchase agreement.

The sale is to "bona fide" Purchasers in accordance with the
holding of In re: Abbots Dairies of Pennsylvania, Inc., 788 F.2d
143 C.A.3 (Pa) 1986.  The Purchaser is the daughter of the
Debtors.

The sale is an "as is, where is" sale, free and clear of all liens
and encumbrances and claims against the Debtors.  In order to
convey good title, it will be necessary that all these interests,
mortgages, claims, and encumbrances be divested as liens against
the real property and shifted to the funds to be realized from the
sale.

The Estate will accept higher and better offers at the time of sale
upon terms and conditions not less advantageous to the Debtors and
the Estates than those included in the Sales Agreement.  Any bidder
must pre-qualify prior to the hearing on the sale1 by: (i)
submission of an executed agreement of sale in substantially that
same form as the Sales Agreement; (ii) demonstrating to the
Debtors' counsel the ability of said bidder to close within 30 days
following Court approval of the proposed sale; and (iii) delivering
to Debtors' counsel a non-refundable deposit of $57,500 in
immediately available funds.  The Debtors ask that the Court allows
higher bids in $5,000 increments.

First United Bank and Trust will be permitted to credit bid upon
the proposed sale provided that if such credit bid is the highest
and best bid approved by the Court, said First United will be
required to pay all costs associated with closing including
adjusted real estate taxes.

The Debtors propose to pay through the settlement officer the
following: (i) all normal and ordinary settlement charges; (ii) pay
Calaiaro Valencik the fee of $3,000 for legal fees related to the
sale; (iii) pay Calaiaro Valencik for reimbursement for all costs
of mailing and copying, and advertising expense; (iv) any unpaid
real estate or other taxes constituting a lien against the property
to be sold; (v) the amount necessary to pay all unpaid U.S. Trustee
fees; (vi) $65,000 to U.S. Bank in full satisfaction of its secured
claim on the car wash equipment; and (vii) the balance to First
United.

The sale is in the best interest of all parties since it will help
the Debtors to fund their Chapter 11 Plan.

The Purchasers:

          Cassius W. and Crystal L. Walls
          10112 Stanley Lane, NW
          La Vale, MD 21502
          Telephone: (301) 697-1460

With a copy to:

          THE GRANT COUNTY BANK
          1336 New Creek Highway
          Keyser, WV 26726

                       About Diamond Shine

Diamond Shine, Inc., which operates three car washes in Maryland,
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-70154) on March 3, 2016.  The petition was
signed by Steven E. Leydig, Sr., authorized representative.  The
Debtor estimated both assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million.  The Debtor is represented by Donald R.
Calaiaro, Esq., at Calaiaro Valencik.


DIGITILITI INC: Names Mark Miller as New President and CEO
----------------------------------------------------------
David S. Macey resigned as president and CEO of Digitiliti, Inc.,
effective on June 15, 2017.  The Company appointed Mark A. Miller
as its new president and CEO.  Mr. Miller is also the sole director
of the Company.

Mark A. Miller, age 40, has been self employed by MJ Miller
Construction as the CEO and licensed general contractor for the
past sixteen years.  Mr. Miller is in charge of every aspect of the
business including estimating, invoicing, finance, sales and
marketing.

                     About Digitiliti, Inc.

St. Paul, Minnesota-based Digitiliti, Inc. --
http://www.digitiliti.com/-- develops and delivers storage
technologies and methodologies enabling its customers to manage,
control, protect and access their information and data with ease.
The Company's core business is providing a cost effective on-line
data protection solution to the small to medium business ("SMB")
and small to medium enterprise ("SME") markets through its DigiBAK
service.  This on-line data protection solution helps organizations
properly manage and protect their entire network from one
centralized location.

The Company reported a net loss of $3.98 million in 2011, compared
with a net loss of $6.41 million in 2010.  The Company's balance
sheet at Dec. 31, 2011, showed $1.03 million in total assets, $4.29
million in total liabilities and a $3.26 million total
stockholders' deficit.  In the auditors' report accompanying the
consolidated financial statement for the year ended Dec. 31, 2011,
MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, expressed substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, due to
the Company's losses from operations and has a working capital
deficit.

In October 2012, the Company filed a Form 15 with the U.S.
Securities and
Exchange Commission to voluntarily deregister its common stock and
suspend its reporting obligations with the SEC.  The Company said
it is deregistering its common stock because holders of its common
shares are less than 500 and the Company has than $10 million in
assets.

The Company didn't submit SEC filings until October 2017, when it
announced the appointment of a new CEO.


DIOCESE OF NEW ULM: Wants Plan Exclusivity Extended to Feb. 26
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Diocese of New Ulm asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Minnesota to extend its exclusive right to file a
Chapter 11 plan until Feb. 26, 2018; and the exclusive period in
which the Diocese may obtain acceptances of the plan until April
27, 2018.

The Court has scheduled for Oct. 19, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. the hearing
to consider The Diocese of New Ulm's request to extend its
exclusive periods.  Any response to the Diocese's request must be
filed by Oct. 13.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on July 3, 2017, the
Court extended, at the behest of the Diocese, the period within
which the Debtor has the exclusive right to file a plan until Oct.
29, and the exclusive period in which the Debtor may obtain
acceptances of the plan until Dec. 28.

Since the filing of the case, the Diocese has attempted to pave the
way for the mediation, including by negotiating various issues with
the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors and counsel for
certain sexual abuse claimants, and undertaking communications and
information-sharing efforts with various insurance companies.

The Diocese is currently working with the mediator and other
parties to schedule the mediation, and is hopeful that it may
commence as soon as early- to mid-November, depending on the
availability of other parties.  However, mediation will not
commence before Oct. 29, 2017 -- the end of the current exclusive
period for the Diocese to file a plan.  In addition, even if
mediation commences by mid-November, it may take multiple sessions
to achieve any resolution.

The Diocese is paying its bills as they become due.

The Diocese believes that the extensions sought in the motion will
be beneficial to it as well as creditors and other parties in
interest; will provide time to proceed with the mediation and
attempt to reach a consensus regarding plan terms; will allow the
plan to be based on more accurate information because the claims
deadline will have passed; and will result in a more efficient use
of its assets for the benefit of all creditors.

The requested extensions of the exclusive period and solicitation
period are essential to allow the Diocese to proceed with the plan
process as contemplated by the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.

Moreover, the possibility of multiple plans would inevitably lead
to unnecessary and costly adversarial confrontations that would
likely cause a dramatic increase in the professional fee burden
borne by the Diocese and a concomitant deterioration in asset
values.  The Diocese recognizes that the value of its assets will
be adversely affected by any unnecessary delay in the Chapter 11
process and would be prejudicial to all parties in interest.

The Diocese is hopeful that mediation will proceed expeditiously
and that a plan can be developed within the requested extensions of
the exclusivity period and solicitation period, but reserves the
right to request additional extensions based on further
developments in the case, including in the mediation.

                   About Diocese of New Ulm

The Diocese of New Ulm sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Minn. Case No. 17-30601) on March 3,
2017.  The petition was signed by Monsignor Douglas L. Grams, vice
general.  The case is assigned to Judge Robert J. Kressel.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of $10
million to $50 million and liabilities of less than $50,000.

James L. Baillie, Esq., at Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., serves as the
Debtor's legal counsel.


E&E LANDSCAPING: Hires Brian W. Hofmeister as Attorney
------------------------------------------------------
E&E Landscaping Co., Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of New Jersey to employ the Law Firm of
Brian W. Hofmeister, LLC, as attorney to the Debtor.

E&E Landscaping requires Brian W. Hofmeister to provide legal
advice to the Debtor and assist in a successful Chapter 11
bankruptcy proceeding.

Brian W. Hofmeister will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                       $425
     Paralegals                      $195

Brian W. Hofmeister will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Brian W. Hofmeister, partner of the Law Firm of Brian W.
Hofmeister, LLC, assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estates.

Brian W. Hofmeister can be reached at:

     Brian W. Hofmeister, Esq.
     LAW FIRM OF BRIAN W. HOFMEISTER, LLC
     3131 Princeton Pike, Bldg. 5, Suite 110
     Lawrenceville, NJ 08648
     Tel: (609) 890-1500
     Fax: (609) 890-6961
     E-mail: bwh@hofmeisterfirm.com

              About E&E Landscaping Co., Inc.

E&E Landscaping Co., Inc., filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. D.N.J. Case No. 17-30237) on October 4, 2017. The Debtor is
represented by Brian W. Hofmeister, Esq., at the Law Firm of Brian
W. Hofmeister, LLC.


EDUARDO HERRERA: Creditors Seek Appointment of Ch. 11 Trustee
-------------------------------------------------------------
Creditors, Rancho Santa Teresita, LLC, and Purple Lane Farms, LLC,
jointly ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
Florida to convert or dismiss the Chapter 11 case of Eduardo Salas
Herrera, or alternatively, direct the appointment of a Chapter 11
Trustee or terminating exclusivity in the bankruptcy case of the
Debtor.

The Creditors assert that the Debtor is taking advantage of the
protections afforded to an individual Chapter 11 Debtor, through
his conduct and limited financial disclosures. The Creditors
contend that the Debtor has demonstrated the futility of keeping
this case in Chapter 11 as opposed to converting this case to
Chapter 7 or dismissing it outright.  

On October 28, 2008, the Debtor formed Rancho Santa Teresita, a
Florida limited company. The Debtor, through Rancho Santa Teresita,
acquired from Daryl E. Smith and Adrianne R. Smith a real property
located at 12126 Indian Mound Road, Wellington, Florida 33449 --
the Farm. In order to finance its acquisition of the Farm, Rancho
Santa Teresita executed and delivered to the Smiths, a wrap-around
balloon mortgage in the principal amount of $1,750,000. The Debtor
guaranteed payment of the Smith Loan.   

Less than six months after closing, Rancho Santa Teresita and the
Debtor defaulted under the Smith Loan and Guaranty, prompting the
Smiths to file a three-count mortgage foreclosure complaint against
Rancho Santa Teresita and the Debtor in the Fifteenth Judicial
Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, the case is Daryl E.
Smith and Adrianne R. Smith v. Rancho Santa Teresita, LLC, et al.,
Case No. 2014-5750-CA. Specifically, the Smiths alleged that Rancho
Santa Teresita was in default under the loan due to its failure to
make required payments from May 2012 and by failing to pay real
property taxes on the Farm for the years 2012 and 2013.
  
Pursuant to the terms of a Settlement Stipulation, the Smiths
agreed to reinstatement of the Smith Loan. Once again, Rancho Santa
Teresita and the Debtor defaulted. Such that, in May 2015, the
Debtor approached Purple Lane's principal, Gary Plichta and asked
him if he could loan him money to make his mortgage payments to the
Smiths. Each time the Debtor came to Mr. Plichta for financial
assistance, the Debtor continued to impress upon Mr. Plichta the
economic potential the Farm had. Although Mr. Plichta requested the
Debtor to provide tax returns and financial statements which he
could review, the Debtor put off such requests, unable to do so.

Around September 2015, the Debtor approached Mr. Plichta about
expanding Mr. Plichta's involvement with the Farm. The Debtor
wanted Mr. Plichta to become an owner of the Farm with the Debtor.
Consequently, Mr. Plichta and the Debtor reached an agreement
whereby the Parties agreed that Purple Lane would be provided a 55%
controlling membership interest in Rancho Santa Teresita with the
Debtor retaining the remaining 45% interests.

The Parties' agreement was memorialized in the Rancho Santa
Teresita, LLC Amended and Restated Operating Agreement.
Simultaneously with executing the Operating Agreement, Purple Lane
loaned Rancho Santa Teresita $30,000.     

Specifically, the Creditors contend that the Debtor looked to Mr.
Plichta to participate in Rancho Santa Teresita so that he could
take advantage of Mr. Plichta's creditworthiness and financial
wherewithal to refinance the Farm, save it from foreclosure and
meet operating expenses which the Debtor was unable to meet running
the Farm by himself.

The Debtor's prepetition and postpetition conduct warrants the
appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee, which includes:

     (a) failure to file a single monthly operating report since
the filing of this Chapter 11 case;

     (b) failure to timely file tax returns, exposing both the
Debtor and the estate to penalties and interest (the Debtor filed
his 2013 and 2014 returns in April 2017, and has yet to file his
2015 or 2016 returns), which resulting in the Internal Revenue
Service filing proof of claim for $103,869, of which over $77,000
is filed as priority claim.;

     (c) failure to contribute any monies to Rancho Santa Teresita
to pay the operating expenses of the Farm, including mortgage
payments; and

     (d) failure to account for unauthorized leasing and other
personal business activity on the Farm, from which he receives
unauthorized payments.

The Debtor's Schedules and Amended Schedules identify approximately
$221,000 in personal property assets, of which $114,000 are motor
vehicles subject to $73,000 in liens. The Debtor also attributes
$333,000 in value to four horses that he owns. The balance of the
scheduled assets with value is attributable to household furniture
and stable and horse equipment.

Parenthetically, the Debtor values his 45% ownership interest in
Rancho Santa Teresita at $0 and claims an unknown value for a
fraudulent conveyance claim against Gary Plichta -- which he has
asserted four months after filing the instant case, despite the
Debtor's sworn testimony at the 341 meeting that he filed this case
solely for such purpose.   

The Creditors also note that the Debtor's Schedule identifies
unsecured claims totaling $1.95 million, which aggregate number
includes an unknown amount for the claim of VA Leasing Corp. and
only $15,000 for a scheduled disputed claim of Purple Lane.

The Creditors further note that in the face of limited assets and
substantial liabilities, the Debtor discloses in his Schedule, net
monthly income of $3,600, monthly expenses of $5,100 -- of which
$1,600 per month is allocated to making car payments on the
Debtor's Mercedes.

The Creditors complain that since the Debtor has not filed monthly
reports reflecting his actual post-petition expenditures, neither
the Creditors nor the Court have any idea whether the Debtor spends
his disposable income on other luxury items. The Creditors tell the
Court that what is evident from the Debtor's limited disclosures,
however, is that no viable plan or reorganization can or should
either be proposed of confirmed in this case.

The Creditors assert that the Debtor's pre-petition conduct, which
has included misappropriation of revenue which belongs to Rancho,
his failure to abide by the Amended Operating Agreement of Rancho
and breach of his fiduciary duties to both Rancho and Purple Lane,
and failure to file a single monthly operating report since his May
2017 filing, evidence that the Debtor cannot be entrusted with the
responsibilities of a Debtor-in-Possession.

Moreover, more than three months into this Chapter 11 case, the
Creditors complain that the Debtor has failed to file any DIP
reports, leaving both Creditors and the Court in the dark as to
whether the Debtor has received any income since his Chapter 11
filing and whether he has used such income and other monies
received.

Purple Lane Farms is represented by:

           Craig A. Pugatch, Esq.
           Kenneth B. Robinson, Esq.
           Rice Pugatch Robinson Storfer & Cohens, PLLC
           101 N.E. 3rd Avenue, Suite 1800
           Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301
           Telephone: (954) 462-8000
           Facsimile: (954) 462-4300
           Email: krobinson@rprslaw.com

Rancho Santa Teresta is represented by:

           Aaron R. Resnick, Esq.
           Law Offices of Aaron Resnick, P.A.
           New World Tower, Suite 1607
           100 North Biscayne Boulevard
           Miami, Florida 33132
           Telephone: (305) 672-7495
           Email: aresnick@thefirmmiami.com

Eduardo F Salas Herrera filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-16667) on May 26, 2017.   


ELENA DELGADILLO: Trustee's $370K Sale of Oakland Property Okayed
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Ronald H. Sargis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of California authorized Irma Edmonds, Chapter 11 Trustee
for Elena Delgadillo, to sell the residential real property
commonly known as 5319 Bancroft Avenue, Oakland, California, APN
No. 40784974, to Thayer Dawson for $370,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Sept. 28, 2017 at 10:30 a.m.

The sale proceeds will first be applied to closing costs, real
estate commissions, prorated real property taxes and assessments,
liens, other customary and contractual costs and expenses incurred
in order to effectuate the sale.

The Trustee is authorized to execute any and all documents
reasonably necessary to effectuate the sale.

The Trustee is authorized to pay a real estate broker's commission
in an amount equal to 6% of the actual purchase price upon
consummation of the sale.  The 6% commission will be paid to the
Chapter 11 Trustee's agent, Coldwell Banker Residential, which may
be divided between the real estate brokers representing the parties
to the sale.

The sale of the Property is on an "as is, where is, with all
faults" basis, with no representations or warranties, express or
implied, with respect to the Property.

Based on the consent to the sale of the Property as stated on the
record at the hearing on the Motion by counsel for creditor
Sacramento Lopez, the Court orders the sale of the Property free
and clear of the lien of Mr. Lopez, with the lien of such creditor
attaching to the proceeds payable to Mr. Lopez at close of escrow.

The Trustee will retain from the sale proceeds of the sale of the
Property, at closing, the sum of $77,000 as a reserve to cover
state and federal taxes arising from the sale, with such funds
being free and clear of liens following the close of escrow.

After payment of and/or reserving for all of the foregoing related
to the sale, the Trustee will disburse the residual net sale
proceeds from the sale, at closing, to Sacramento Lopez, on account
of his abstract of judgment lien.

                      About Elena Delgadillo

Elena Delgadillo filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Cal. Case
No. 16-90500) on June 9, 2016, and is represented by David C.
Johnston, Esq.

Irma Edmonds was appointed as Chapter 11 Trustee for the Debtor's
estate on Dec. 21, 2016, and continues to serves in that capacity.

The Trustee filed on March 16, 2017, an application to hire
Stephanie Davis of Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage as real
estate agent.  The application was approved by order filed March
23, 2017.

Attorneys for the Chapter 11 Trustee:

         HEFNER, STARK & MAROIS, LLP
         Howard S. Nevins, Esq.
         Aaron A. Avery
         2150 River Plaza Drive, Suite 450
         Sacramento, CA
         Tel: (916) 925-6620
         Fax: (916) 925-1127

The real estate agent can be reached at:

         Stephanie Davis
         Realtor Associate
         COLDWELL BANKER RESIDENTIAL BROKERAGE
         6137 La Salle Ave, Oakland, CA 94611, USA
         Phone: (510) 207-5209
         E-mail: stephanie.davis@cbnorcal.com


ENERGY TRANSFER: Fitch Assigns BB+ Rating to New Secured Notes
--------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has assigned Energy Transfer Equity, LP's (ETE)
proposed offering of senior secured notes a 'BB+/RR1' rating. The
notes will be secured on a first-priority basis with the loans and
obligations under ETE's revolving credit facility (RCF), ETE's term
loan facility and its existing senior notes, by a lien on
substantially all of ETE's and certain of its subsidiaries'
tangible and intangible assets. Proceeds from the offering are
expected to be used to repay a portion of the outstanding
indebtedness under ETE's term loan facility. Concurrent with this
repayment ETE intends to refinance the remaining indebtedness under
its term loan facility with a new tranche of loans under the
facility with a lower interest rate.

ETE's ratings reflect Fitch's expectation that while ETE's
deconsolidated leverage will continue to be elevated in 2017, it
should improve significantly as ETE's operating subsidiary
partnerships, particularly Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
(BBB-/Stable), complete large capital spending programs, cash flows
come online, and distributions up to ETE increase. Capital needs at
the ETE level are limited, operating and interest expenses are
generally low, and ETE maturities are manageable in the near term,
with no maturities on any debt until late 2020, providing ETE time
for improvement in the credit profiles of and distribution payments
from its subsidiaries.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

Elevated 2017 Metrics: ETE's deconsolidated leverage, debt/adjusted
EBITDA, which Fitch calculates as ETE debt divided by distributions
received from subsidiaries less ETE-level operating expenses, is
expected to remain elevated in 2017, moving above 4.5x. Fitch
expects ETE deconsolidated leverage of roughly 4.5x-4.8x for 2017,
given the anticipated incentive distribution waivers at ETE in
support of operating subsidiaries ETP and SXL (the collective name
for Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P. and Sunoco Logistics Partners
Operations L.P.).

Fitch projects ETE's leverage should improve to below 4.0x in 2018
as these waivers begin to decrease and distributions begin to grow
at the operating partnerships when ETP's large project backlog is
completed.

Interfamily Merger: ETE's largest subsidiary, Energy Transfer
Partners, L.P. (legacy ETP) was acquired by another ETE subsidiary,
Sunoco Logistics Partners L.P., on April 28, 2017, with the
combined entity changing its name to Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
(ETP).

Associated with the merger, Fitch downgraded the Long-Term Issuer
Default Rating (IDR) and senior unsecured ratings of SXL, and
affirmed the legacy ETP Long-Term IDR and senior unsecured ratings,
all at 'BBB-', reflective of a consolidated approach to the
combined entities.

ETE's ratings consider roughly $6.4 billion in parent-level debt is
structurally subordinate to roughly $34 billion in subsidiary-level
debt and reliant on subsidiary distributions to support ETE-level
obligations. Distributions from subsidiaries are expected to grow
significantly in 2018 and 2019 as distribution waivers roll off and
projects at the subsidiaries are completed.

ETE's operating affiliates have some operating flexibility with
adequate liquidity, and Fitch expects each subsidiary will be able
to fund its planned growth with capital market transactions without
sustained negative effects on ETE's credit metrics.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

ETE's earnings and cash flow are largely generated from
distribution payments from its underlying partnerships, primarily
Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. This is similar to The Williams
Companies, Inc. (WMB, BB+/Stable). However, ETE's stand-alone
leverage (ETE debt divided by distributions received from
subsidiaries less ETE-level operating expenses) is higher than WMB,
at above 4.5x for ETE versus 2.1x-2.3x for WMB.

ETE's ratings consider the structural subordination ETE has to its
subsidiary-level debt. However, Fitch primarily assesses ETE's
credit profile and metrics on its stand-alone financial
characteristics. A positive or negative rating action at ETE's
operating subsidiary could lead to a positive or negative rating
action at ETE.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its ratings case for the issuer
include:

- ETE provides incentive distribution waivers to SXL/ETP
consistent with management guidance, with waivers rolling off in
2018 and 2019.

- Subsidiary growth spending consistent with management guidance.
Growth spending at ETP high but declining in 2017-2019. Proceeds
from debt and equity issuances at ETP used to fund spending in a
balanced manner. Growth projects completed on time at an average
8.0x EBITDA multiple.

- Flat ETP distribution in 2017, reset at the SXL level, with
slight to moderate distribution growth in outer years.
Distributions at SUN at current level.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action

- A material improvement in credit metrics, with the combined
partnership's consolidated adjusted leverage sustained below 4.0x
and distribution coverage above 1.0x, could lead to a positive
rating action.

- ETE parent company debt/EBITDA below 2.0x on a sustained basis,
provided the majority of distributions are coming from subsidiaries
rated 'BBB-'; the target could be higher if subsidiaries are rated
higher than 'BBB-'.

- Improving credit profiles or positive rating action at
underlying partnerships, primarily ETP.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action

- Weakening credit profiles or negative rating actions at ETP to
below investment grade. Fitch will seek to maintain a one- to
two-notch separation between ETE and the subsidiary providing the
majority of the cash needed to support ETE's structurally
subordinated debt.

- Increasing ETE parent company leverage above 4.5x on a sustained
basis. With no immediate maturities, Fitch is tolerant of elevated
stand-alone leverage above 4.5x for 2017, provided it is temporary
and done in support of maintaining investment-grade credit profiles
at operating subsidiaries.

LIQUIDITY

Adequate Liquidity: ETE has access to a $1.5 billion secured RCF
that matures in March 2022, with an ETE option to extend the term,
subject to certain terms and conditions. ETE's operating affiliates
have significant operating flexibility with adequate liquidity and
the ability to fund their planned growth with capital market
transactions. ETE's maturities remain highly manageable, with ETE
having no significant debt maturities until 2020, when $1.2 billion
in notes mature. Approximately $1.2 billion was drawn under ETE's
revolver as of June 30, 2017, leaving $298 million in availability.
Following the close of the retail divesture to 7-Eleven, Sunoco, LP
is expected to redeem the $300 million of preferred equity that ETE
owns at the liquidation preference. ETE is expected to use the
proceeds to repay borrowings under its RCF.

The ETE revolver and term loans have two financial covenants: a
maximum leverage ratio of 6.0x (7.0x during a specified acquisition
period) and fixed-charge coverage ratio of 1.5x-1.0x. ETE's notes,
term loan and credit facility are secured by a first-priority
interest in all tangible and intangible assets of ETE, including
its ownership interests in ETP.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch assigns the following rating:
-- Senior Secured Notes 'BB+/RR1'.

Fitch currently rates ETE as follows:

Energy Transfer Equity, L.P.
-- Long-Term Issuer Default Rating 'BB';
-- Secured senior notes 'BB+/RR1';
-- Secured term loan 'BB+/RR1';
-- Secured revolving credit facility 'BB+/RR1'.


ENERGY3 LLC: Hires Ring & Ring as Accountant
--------------------------------------------
Energy3, LLC, seeks authority from the US Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, to employ Dan Ring of
the accounting firm of Ring and Ring, CPA as accountant.

The professional services the Accountant will render are:

     (a) give advice to the Debtor with respect to its powers and
duties as a debtor-in-possession and the continued management of
its business operations;

     (b) advise the Debtor with respect to its responsibilities in
complying with the U.S. trustee's Operating Guidelines and
Reporting Requirements and with the rules of the court;

     (c) prepare tax returns or financial statements for the Debtor
and aid in any motions, pleadings, orders, applications, adversary
proceedings, and other accounting documents necessary in the
administration of the case; and

     (d) protect the interest of the Debtor in all matters
regarding the handling of D.I.P. reports.

Daniel J. Ring, CPA, attests that neither he nor the firm represent
any interest adverse to the debtor, or the estate, and they are
disinterested persons as that term is defined by 11 U.S.C. Sec.
101(14).

The Accountant can be reached through:

     Daniel J. Ring, CPA
     RING & RING, CPAs
     3158 Braverton Road, Suite 206
     Edgewater, MD 21037
     Tel: (410) 956-7899
     Fax: (443) 716-2251
     Email: info@ring-ring.com

                        About Energy3, LLC

Energy3 -- http://energy-three.com/--is a renewable energy
solutions company supported by dedicated people, who are in a
position to help clients challenge the current waste disposal and
fossil fueled power generating systems, developing new
environmentally sustainable solutions.

Based in Annapolis, Maryland, Energy3 filed a Chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-18986) on July 18, 2017. The petition
was signed by Fred R Deluca, member. Judge Robert A Mark presides
over the case. Robert C Meyer, Esq. at Robert C Meyer, PA
represents the Debtor as counsel.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimates $650,506 in assets and
$1.39 million in liabilities.


EVIO INC: Now Trading Under Ticker Symbol "EVIO"
------------------------------------------------
FINRA announced the formal approval of EVIO, Inc.'s ticker change.
Effective with the opening of trading on Oct. 3, 2017, EVIO Inc.
trades under the stock ticker "EVIO" and the CUSIP will remain
unchanged as 30051V106.

                       About EVIO, Inc.

Based in Bend, Oregon, EVIO, Inc., formerly known as Signal Bay,
Inc. -- http://www.eviolabs.com/-- is a life science company that
provides accredited analytical testing services and scientific
research to the regulated cannabis industry.  The Company's EVIO
Labs division provides state-mandated ancillary services that don't
directly support the supply chain, but are in place to ensure the
safety and quality of the nation's cannabis supply.  

At a special meeting of stockholders held on Aug. 30, 2017, the
stockholders of the Company approved, among other things, an
amendment to the Company's Restated and Amended Articles of
Incorporation to change the name of the Company to "EVIO, Inc."
The name change took effect at 12:01 am Sept. 6, 2017.

Signal Bay reported a net loss of $2.55 million for the year ended
Sept. 30, 2016, following a net loss of $1.45 million for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017, Signal Bay had $3.97
million in total assets, $3.13 million in total liabilities and
$838,396 in total equity.

MaloneBailey, LLP, in Houston, Texas, issued a "going concern"
qualification on the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended Sept. 30, 2016, stating that the Company has negative working
capital, recurring losses from operations and likely needs
financing in order to meet its financial obligations.  These
conditions raise significant doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.


EXCO RESOURCES: Restructures Incentive Plans to Retain Key Workers
------------------------------------------------------------------
EXCO Resources, Inc., and its outside compensation consultants and
strategic advisors have reviewed the Company's incentive plans to
determine whether they continue to fulfill their purpose of
retaining key employees, incentivizing key employees to perform at
a high level and aligning the interests of key employees with
shareholders.  Currently, the Company's incentive plans consist
primarily of an annual cash bonus program and long-term equity
incentive awards.  After reviewing these plans, the Company and the
Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors have
determined that (i) normal annual and long-term incentive cycles
are likely to be ineffective due to the Company's ongoing strategic
restructuring efforts and (ii) the use of equity compensation is
currently ineffective and inefficient.

As a result, the Company and the Compensation Committee determined
that in order to restructure the Company's incentive plans to
retain its key employees and encourage them to devote their best
efforts to the Company while the Company executes the next phase of
its restructuring plan, the Company would (i) terminate the 2017
Management Incentive Plan; (ii) make incentive payments to the
seven MIP participants based on the Company's achievement of
performance goals under the MIP as of June 30, 2017; (iii) adopt
two new cash-based incentive programs; (iv) enter into Retention
Bonus Agreements with five key employees; and (v) discontinue
equity incentive grants until the completion of a restructuring.

Accordingly, on Sept. 29, 2017 the Company entered into (i) the
2017 Key Employee Incentive Plan; (ii) the 2017 Key Employee
Retention Plan; (iii) the Retention Bonus Agreements with five  key
employees, including all of the Company's named executive officers
that remain current employees, pursuant to which the Company agreed
to pay retention bonuses to those persons; and (iv) Incentive
Payment Agreements with the seven MIP participants, including the
NEOs, pursuant to which the Company agreed to make the Incentive
Payments.  In addition, acting pursuant to authority granted by the
Company's Board of Directors, the Company terminated the MIP,
effective as of June 30, 2017.

                      New Incentive Plans

The purpose of the New Incentive Plans is to align the interests of
the Company and eligible employees of the Company and its
subsidiaries.  The New Incentive Plans are intended to replace the
MIP, the Company's annual cash bonus plan, and the Company's
long-term equity incentive plans.  The New Incentive Plans are
expected to remain in effect until a new equity incentive program
becomes a viable alternative following the completion of a
restructuring.  The New Incentive Plans provide a means of
rewarding KEIP Participants and KERP Participants based on the
overall performance of the Company and the achievement of certain
quarterly performance goals under the KEIP or KERP, as applicable.

Each of the New Incentive Plans became effective as of July 1,
2017.  The KEIP has a term continuing until June 30, 2018, unless
earlier terminated by the Company or extended pursuant to the
approval of the Compensation Committee.  The KERP has a term
continuing until terminated by the Company.  The Company has the
right, in its sole discretion, to modify, supplement, suspend or
terminate each of the New Incentive Plans at any time, subject to
certain exceptions.

The KEIP is administered by the Compensation Committee and the KERP
is administered by the Company.  The Compensation Committee, with
respect to the KEIP, and the Company, with respect to the KERP,
have full authority and discretion within the limits of the
applicable plan to establish such administrative measures as may be
necessary to administer and attain the objectives of such plan. The
interpretation of the Compensation Committee, with respect to the
KEIP, and the Company, with respect to the KERP, will be binding on
all of such plan's respective participants.  The Compensation
Committee may delegate to officers of the Company the authority to
administer the KEIP.

The Committee has the authority to designate persons, from time to
time, as participants under the KEIP.  Currently, there are a total
of five individuals designated as KEIP Participants, including the
NEOs.  All employees of the Company not designated as KEIP
Participants are participants in the KERP.

                     KEIP Performance Goals and
                  Quarterly Performance Incentives

Subject to the provisions of the KEIP and any participation
agreement between a KEIP Participant and the Company, each KEIP
Participant will have the opportunity to earn an incentive payment
for each quarter during the term of the plan, with the first
performance period being July 1, 2017, through Sept. 30, 2017,
depending on the achievement of the performance goals for each
Performance Period.

The Company will develop and the Compensation Committee will
approve (i) the performance measures underlying the Performance
Goals, which will include Production, General and Administrative
Costs, Lease Operating Expenses and EBITDA.  The Performance
Measures are subject to certain pro forma adjustments pursuant to
the terms of the KEIP.

The potential amount payable upon the achievement of the Quarterly
Threshold, Target and Maximum Performance Goals is based on a given
KEIP Participant's individual target Quarterly Performance
Incentive, which is set forth in each KEIP Participant's
Participation Agreement.  The target Quarterly Performance
Incentive for each of the Company's NEOs is as follows:

   Name of NEO          Target Quarterly Performance Incentive
   -----------          --------------------------------------
   Harold L. Hickey                     $581,250
   Harold H. Jameson                    $288,125
   Tyler S. Farquharson                 $260,313

One hundred percent of a Quarterly Performance Incentive will be
based on the Company's Overall Performance Level, which is the sum
of the weighted actual achievement of the Performance Goals for
each Performance Measure in a particular Performance Period.
Achievement of the Performance Goals will be calculated on the
basis of straight-line interpolation between the Quarterly
Threshold, Target and Maximum Achievement levels for each
Performance Measure underlying the Performance Goal.

In addition to being measured on a quarterly basis, the Performance
Goal for each Performance Measure will be measured cumulatively
during the second, third and fourth quarter of the term such that
employees may receive "catch-up" payments if the Company fails to
achieve Performance Goals for a given Performance Period but
overachieves its Performance Goals in a subsequent quarter.  For
the second, third and fourth quarter of the term, a KEIP
Participant will earn an amount equal to the positive difference,
if any, between (i) the aggregate Quarterly Performance Incentive
payable based on achievement, as applicable, of the cumulative
Performance Goals as of the end of such quarter, and (ii) the
Quarterly Performance Incentive actually paid for prior quarters
during the term, if any.  Any such cumulative "catch-up" payment
for a quarter is payable in addition to any Quarterly Performance
Incentive earned for that quarter.

An overriding automatic adjustment to the Company's Cumulative
Overall Performance Level of five percent will be made at the
earlier of June 30, 2018, or the termination of the KEIP based on
the Safety Modifier, which is a comparison of the Company's Total
Recordable Incident Rate and the total incident rate of nonfatal
occupational injuries and illnesses for the oil and natural gas
industry in the year immediately preceding the Performance Period.
In the event that the Company's Total Recordable Incident Rate for
the KEIP Safety Modifier Performance Period is at or below the
Target Recordable Incident Rate, the Cumulative Overall Performance
Level will be automatically positively adjusted by five percent,
while if the Company's Total Recordable Incident Rate for the KEIP
Safety Modifier Performance Period is above the Target Recordable
Incident Rate, the Cumulative Overall Performance Level will be
automatically negatively adjusted by five percent.

Each KEIP Participant will be entitled to a Quarterly Performance
Incentive based on the following Performance Measures, which will
remain the same for each Performance Period under the KEIP:

      Performance Measure                         Weight
      -------------------                         ------      
      Production (Mmcfe)                            30%
      General and Administrative Costs
     (gross) (dollars in millions)                  30%
      Lease Operating Expenses (dollars per Mcfe)   30%
      EBITDA (dollars in millions)                  10%

Each Performance Measure has a Threshold, Target, and Maximum
Performance Goal.  The Quarterly Performance Incentive will be
determined using the following payout schedule based on the
Company's overall performance on each of the Performance Measures.
Performance less than the Threshold Performance Goal for a
Performance Measure will result in zero payout for that portion of
the Quarterly Performance Incentive.

Portion of Applicable Portion Payable if Quarterly       75%
and/or Cumulative Threshold Performance Goal
Achieved:

Portion of Applicable Portion Payable if Quarterly
and/or Cumulative Target Performance Goal
Achieved:                                               100%

Portion of Applicable Portion Payable if
Cumulative Maximum Performance Goal
Achieved:                                               125%

Portion of Applicable Portion Payable if
Achievement is Between Quarterly and/or
Cumulative Threshold and Maximum
Performance Goals:                      Linear interpolation
                                        between 75% and 125%

In the Performance Period of July 1, 2017, through Sept. 30, 2017,
for example, if the Overall Performance Level meets the Quarterly
Threshold Performance Goal, a KEIP Participant would be entitled to
75% of the Quarterly Performance Incentive specified in such KEIP
Participant's Participation Agreement.  No catch-up payment is
payable for the Performance Period of July 1, 2017, through Sept.
30, 2017.

Once a Quarterly Performance Incentive has been determined, payment
of such award will be made within 30 days after the end of the
applicable Performance Period or as soon as reasonably estimable
financials are available for the Performance Period; provided, that
in no event will a Quarterly Performance Incentive be paid at a
time later than as required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended.

Quarterly Performance Incentives under the KEIP are payable in
cash.  In the event a KEIP Participant's employment is terminated
for any reason prior to the date on which a Quarterly Performance
Incentive for the applicable Performance Period is paid, such KEIP
Participant will forfeit his or her right to such payment.

KERP Performance Goals and Quarterly Incentive Opportunities

Subject to the provisions of the KERP, each KERP Participant will
have the opportunity to earn an incentive payment for each
Performance Period, depending on the achievement of Performance
Goals for each Performance Period.  The Company shall establish and
approve the Performance Goals for each Performance Period.  The
Performance Periods and Performance Measures under the KERP Plan
are the same as those under the KEIP.
Fifty percent of a Quarterly Incentive Opportunity will be payable
so long as the KERP Participant remains employed by the Company
through the payment date for a Quarterly Incentive Opportunity and
fifty percent of a Quarterly Incentive Opportunity will be payable
based on the Company's achievement of the threshold Performance
Goals during a Performance Period.

In addition to being measured on a quarterly basis, the Performance
Goal for each Performance Measure will be measured cumulatively
during the second, third and fourth quarter of the term such that
employees may receive "catch-up" payments if the Company fails to
achieve Performance Goals for a given Performance Period but
overachieves its Performance Goals in a subsequent quarter.  For
the second, third and fourth quarter of the term, a KERP
Participant will earn an amount equal to the positive difference,
if any, between (i) the aggregate Performance Component payable
based on achievement, as applicable, of the cumulative Threshold
Performance Goals as of the end of such quarter, and (ii) the
Performance Component actually paid for prior quarters during the
term, if any.  Any such cumulative "catch-up" payment for a quarter
is payable in addition to any Performance Component earned for that
quarter.

An overriding automatic adjustment to the Cumulative Overall
Performance Level of five percent will be made at the earlier of
June 30, 2018 or the termination of the KERP and is subject to the
same terms as the KEIP's Safety Modifier.  The payment terms and
conditions for Quarterly Incentive Opportunities under the KERP,
including those related to forfeiture of Quarterly Incentive
Opportunities, are substantially similar to those under the KEIP.

Retention Bonuses

In addition to the adoption of the New Incentive Plans, the Company
entered into the Retention Bonus Agreements with five of the
Company's key employees, including the NEOs, each of which has an
effective date of Oct. 1, 2017.  Under the terms of each Retention
Bonus Agreement, each recipient was entitled to a cash Retention
Bonus in an aggregate amount equal to two and one-half (2.5) times
such recipient's base salary.  The Retention Bonuses were paid on
Sept. 29, 2017.

Under the Retention Bonus Agreements, in the event a recipient of a
Retention Bonus voluntarily terminates his or her employment
without Good Reason, or the Company terminates such recipient's
employment for Cause, in either case, before March 31, 2019, then
such recipient will be required to promptly repay to the Company,
in any event no later than 10 days following such termination, an
amount equal to the Retention Bonus reduced by all taxes the
Company actually withholds therefrom.  A recipient will not be
required to repay a Retention Bonus in the event of termination of
employment due to death or disability, by the Company without Cause
or by the recipient for Good Reason prior to the Retention Date.

The aggregate value of Retention Bonuses made to the NEOs under the
Retention Bonus Agreements is set forth in the table below:

    Name of NEO    Annual Base Salary   Retention Bonus Amount
    -----------    ------------------   ----------------------
Harold L. Hickey       $750,000                $1,875,000
Harold H. Jameson      $425,000                $1,062,500
Tyler S. Farquharson   $385,000                $962,500

Incentive Payments

In connection with the restructuring of the Company's key employee
incentive compensation program by the adoption of the New Incentive
Plans and payment of the Retention Bonuses, the Company determined
to terminate the MIP, effective as of June 30, 2017, and enter into
Incentive Payment Agreements with each of the
seven MIP participants, including the NEOs, each of which has an
effective date of Sept. 25, 2017, and a payment date of Sept. 29,
2017.

Under the terms of each Incentive Payment Agreement, each recipient
was entitled to receive a cash payment based on the Company's pro
rata achievement of performance goals under the MIP through its
termination date such that recipients were paid 50% of the bonus
they would have earned under the MIP for the 2017 calendar year.
The Incentive Payments were paid on Sept. 29, 2017.

The Incentive Payments differ from awards payable under the MIP in
that, among other things, (i) Incentive Payments were made one
hundred percent (100%) in cash, as opposed to awards under the MIP
being payable 75% in cash and 25% in shares of fully-vested
restricted stock, and (ii) Incentive Payments were based on
modified performance measures intended to align with the Company's
budget and forecast for the Modified Performance Period.' Finding
and Development Costs was removed as a performance measure for
purposes of the Incentive Payments and its 20% weight was
proportionally reallocated among the remaining four performance
measures.  The Company's management determined that it was not
feasible to calculate Finding and Development Costs for the
Modified Performance Period due to the limited number of wells
completed during the first half of 2017 and the unavailability of a
third party reserve report.

                    Termination of the MIP

In connection with the Company's restructuring of its incentive
plans, including the entry into the KEIP, the KERP, the Retention
Bonus Agreements and the Incentive Payment Agreements, on
Sept. 29, 2017, the Company terminated the MIP, effective as of
June 30, 2017.  As a result of such termination, the MIP is void
and of no further effect and the Company has no liability or
obligation to make any awards thereunder.

Additional information is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/C8R2qR

                         About EXCO

EXCO Resources, Inc. -- http://www.excoresources.com/-- is an oil
and natural gas exploration, exploitation, acquisition, development
and production company headquartered in Dallas, Texas with
principal operations in Texas, Louisiana and Appalachia.

EXCO Resources reported a net loss of $225.3 million on $271
million of total revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
compared to a net loss of $1.19 billion on $355.70 million of total
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017,
EXCO Resources had $696.34 million in total assets, $1.43 billion
in total liabilities and a total shareholders' deficit of $741.12
million.

KPMG LLP, in Dallas, Texas, issued a "going concern" qualification
on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended  Dec.
31, 2016, citing that probable failure to comply with a financial
covenant in its credit facility as well as significant liquidity
needs, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

                           *    *    *

In December 2016, Moody's Investors Service downgraded EXCO
Resources' corporate family rating to 'Ca' from 'Caa2'.  "EXCO's
downgrade reflects its eroded liquidity position which is
insufficient to fully fund development expenditures at the level
required to stem ongoing production declines," commented Andrew
Brooks, Moody's vice president.  "Absent an injection of additional
liquidity, the source of which is not readily identifiable, EXCO
could face going concern risk as it confronts an unsustainable
capital structure."

In March 2017, S&P Global Ratings raised its corporate credit
rating on EXCO Resources to 'CCC-' from 'SD' (selective default).
The rating outlook is negative.  "The upgrade reflects our
reassessment of our corporate credit rating on EXCO after the
company exchanged most of its outstanding 12.5% second-lien secured
term loans for $683 million new 1.75-lien secured payment-in-kind
(PIK) term loans," said S&P Global Ratings' credit analyst
Alexander Vargas.


FAMILY CHILD CARE: Kennamer Buying Two 2008 Chevy Buses for $16K
----------------------------------------------------------------
Family Child Care, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Alabama to authorize the private sale of (i) a
2008 Chevy Bus, bearing VIN 1GBHG31C681114085, and (ii) a 2008
Chevy Bus, bearing VIN 1GBGH31C981171851 to Joel Kennamer for The
Debtor owns the Assets.  The Assets currently sit on its property
at 124 Plaza Boulevard, Madison, Alabama.  The Buyer, who is a
third party unrelated to the Debtor, wants to take possession of
the Assets as soon as possible.

The proposed sale of the Assets will be by private sale on the
Debtor's property where the Assets now sit.  The combined sale
price is $16,000.  The Debtor sets forth that the sale price
represents the fair market value of the Assets.  The sale is
"as-is," and "where-is," without warranty of any kind.  

The Debtor proposes to sell the Assets free and clear of any and
all mortgages, liens, interests and/or other encumbrances.  There
are no known liens, mortgages, or other interest in the property
sought to be sold, however, the Debtor reserves the right to
contest the validity, priority, and extent of any claim, lien or
other interest if, any exist.

The Debtor proposes Debtor to hold the consideration paid on the
date of the sale until the dispute can be resolved.

Sound business judgment exists in support of the sale, in that the
sale will liquidate an unused asset, which would be expensive to
move from its current location.  The proposed sale will generate
cash for use in the estate, and should not hamper the Debtor's
ability to operate going forward.  The Assets identified is not
necessary for its effective reorganization.

                     About Family Child Care

Family Child Care, LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ala. Case No. 17-80334) on Feb. 3,
2017.  The petition was signed by Troy Ponder, owner.  At the time
of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than $50,000 and
liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Clifton R. Jessup Jr.

Stuart M. Maples, Esq., at Maples Law Firm, PC, serves as the
Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


FITNESS UNLIMITED: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Fitness Unlimited Health Club,
Inc.

              About Fitness Unlimited Health Club

Fitness Unlimited Health Club, Inc., operates a health club
facility at 1212 Highway 35 North, Benton, Arkansas.

The Debtor sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. E.D. Ark. Case No.
17-14711) on Aug. 30, 2017.  It previously sought bankruptcy
protection on Nov. 20, 2013 (Bankr. E.D.Ark. Case No. 13-16393).
The petition was signed by Kimberly McClendon, general manager.

The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities in the range of $1
million to $10 million.


FREESEAS INC: Appoints New Chief Financial Officer and Director
---------------------------------------------------------------
Mr. Dimitris Filippas has been appointed as chief financial officer
of FreeSeas Inc. in replacement of Mr. Dimitris Papadopoulos, who
resigned as chief financial officer and director of the Company.
Mr. Dimitris Filippas has been serving as deputy chief financial
officer since November 2013.  Ms. Argyro Fonia has been appointed
as Class B director filing the vacancy created by Mr. Papadopoulos'
resignation.

Mr. Ion G. Varouxakis, chairman, president and CEO, commented: "I
would like to thank Mr. Dimitris Papadopoulos for his valuable
contribution to the Company during challenging times and wish him
success in his new endeavors.  The Company is continuing its
efforts with last the last Lender of the Company, the National Bank
of Greece, in order to settle its last outstanding loan, secured on
M/V "Free Neptune".  A successful conclusion of the matter will
enable the Company to fully leverage on opportunities presented in
the presently improving dry-bulk market."

                     About FreeSeas Inc.

Headquartered in Athens, Greece, FreeSeas Inc., formerly known as
Adventure Holdings S.A. --  http://www.freeseas.gr/-- was
incorporated in the Marshall Islands on April 23, 2004, for the
purpose of being the ultimate holding company of ship-owning
companies.  The management of FreeSeas' vessels is performed by
Free Bulkers S.A., a Marshall Islands company that is controlled by
Ion G. Varouxakis, the Company's Chairman, President and CEO, and
one of the Company's principal shareholders.

The Company's fleet consists of six Handysize vessels and one
Handymax vessel that carry a variety of drybulk commodities,
including iron ore, grain and coal, which are referred to as "major
bulks," as well as bauxite, phosphate, fertilizers, steel products,
cement, sugar and rice, or "minor bulks."  As of Oct. 12, 2012, the
aggregate dwt of the Company's operational fleet is approximately
197,200 dwt and the average age of its fleet is 15 years.

Freeseas reported a net loss of US$20.51 million on US$506,000 of
operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared to a
net loss of US$52.94 million on US$2.30 million of operating
revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of Dec. 31, 2016,
Freeseas had US$2.93 million in total assets, US$36.52 million in
total liabilities and a total shareholders' deficit of US$33.59
million.

Fruci & Associates II, PLLC, in Spokane, Washington, issued a
"going concern" opinion on the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, noting that the Company has been
unable to obtain ongoing sources of revenue sufficient to cover
cost of operations and scheduled debt repayments.  Additionally,
the Company has not made scheduled payments and is in violation of
debt covenants associated with its bank loan, and per the loan
agreement, this violation may result in acceleration of outstanding
indebtedness, which would require the Company to obtain significant
additional financing in order to meet obligations under the loan
agreement.  These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability
to continue as a going concern.


GARBER BROS: Hires Zeisler & Zeisler as Litigation Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Garber Bros., Inc. seeks authorization from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Massachusetts to employ Zeisler &
Zeisler, P.C. as successor special litigation counsel to represent
the Debtor in connection with pursuing certain collection actions
in the State of Connecticut against former customers of the Debtor
on account of unpaid receivables due to the Debtor.

The Debtor previously employed Reid & Riege, P.C. as special
Connecticut litigation counsel.  The Debtor says the retention of
Zeisler & Zeisler is necessary because Eric Henzy, the principal
attorney handling the Debtor's matters at Reid & Riege, has
recently moved his practice to Zeisler & Zeisler.

Eric Henzy, partner with Zeisler & Zeisler, attests that his firm
has not represented, nor does it now represent, any interest
adverse to the Debtor with respect to the matters on which the Firm
is to be employed. The Firm and its principals and employees are
otherwise disinterested persons with respect to the Debtor, as that
term is defined in the Bankruptcy Code.

The Firm can be reached through:

     Eric Henzy, Esq.
     ZEISLER & ZEISLER, P.C.
     10 Middle Street, 15th Floor
     Bridgeport, CT 02108-3107
     Phone: 203-368-4234
     Fax: 203-367-9678
     Email: ehenzy@zeislaw.com

                        About Garber Bros.

Garber Bros., Inc., is a greater Boston convenience store
distributor. It abruptly closed its doors on April 10, 2017, and
ceased operations.

Alleged creditors signed an involuntary Chapter 7 petition for
Garber Bros. (Bankr. D. Mass. Case No. 17-11802) on May 15, 2017.
The petitioning creditors are BIC USA, Conagra Brands, Inc.,
General Mills, Inc., Mars Financial Services, Mondelez, Nestle USA,
The Coca-Cola Company, and The Hershey Company.  The petitioning
creditors are represented by Janet E. Bostwick, at Janet E.
Bostwick, PC.

On June 7, 2017, the Court granted the Debtor's motion to convert
the case to Chapter 11.  Murphy & King, PC, is the Debtor's
counsel, and Argus Management Corporation serves as the Debtor's
financial advisor.

On June 28, 2017, the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee
of unsecured creditors.  The Committee is represented by Blakeley
LLP.


GARDA WORLD: Fitch Affirms B+ Long-Term IDR; Outlook Stable
-----------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed Garda World Security's (GW) Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B+'. Fitch has also affirmed all
senior secured debt at 'BB+/RR1' in addition to affirming the
company's senior unsecured notes at 'B-/RR6'.  The Rating Outlook
is Stable.

KEY RATING DRIVERS

GW's ratings are supported by the firm's significant market
position, successful organic and acquisitive growth in conjunction
with its consistent cash flow generation. GW's ratings are further
supported by historical technology investments that the company has
made in its cash-in-transit business which allows the segment to
maintain low capital needs on a go-forward basis. The company
continues to successfully integrate new targets while realizing
both revenue and operational synergies as evidenced by improving
normalized EBITDA margins and cash flow levels as the company
continues to grow.

Following the integration of the company's numerous transactions in
recent years, GW has concentrated on business development and
efficiencies in its operations. The company's margins have improved
in all of its verticals for 16 consecutive quarters, with a most
notable increase in fiscal 2017 which saw a 360bp EBITDA margin
improvement to 14.6% from 11% during the prior year. Fitch expects
GW's EBITDA margins to continue to improve toward the mid 16% range
in the medium term.

Protective Services revenue increased by 14.8% while Cash Services
increased by 0.4% resulting in an 8.9% overall revenue increase
over prior year in first half (1H) fiscal 2018. Revenue from
business acquisitions increased by $57.4 million or 4.8%, largely
explained by the KK Security acquisition. In addition, there was
$37 million of organic growth and a $12 million positive foreign
exchange impact in 1H fiscal 2018. Gross margins have also improved
through July 31, 2017, advancing to 23.8% from 22.9% (when
excluding D&A) over the same period the prior year.

On May 26, 2017, Garda and Rhone Capital completed the purchase of
all of Apax's Partner's remaining participation in HCA Parent Corp,
the ultimate parent company of Garda World Security Corp. Apax
first took an equity stake in the company in November 2012 and the
company has nearly doubled its revenue and employees since that
time. As a result of the transaction, Apax no longer owns shares in
Garda's parent company, while Stephan Cretier, founder, chairman,
and CEO now holds, along with certain members of the management
team, 39% of the shares in GW's parent company and Rhone Capital
will increase its holding to 61%.

In December 2016, GW completed the acquisition of KK Security, a
leading provider of security services in East Africa, operating in
seven countries on the continent and generating close to CAD120
million in annual revenue. Fitch expects the KK acquisition to
further enable GW to capitalize on the consolidating security
services market across the Middle East and Africa and sees positive
growth trends across these geographies.

GW has completed other significant acquisitions in recent years,
acquiring G4S cash services in Canada in April 2014, 32 currency
vaults from Bank of America in the U.S. in April 2014, and the
international protective services firm Aegis in September 2015. GW
spent an aggregate of roughly USD300 million in the three
transactions and has grown revenue and EBITDA significantly over
the past three years. Fitch views the company's ability to
integrate these transactions favorably and expects the company to
continue its acquisitive pace through the medium term.

Rating concerns include GW's willingness to operate at elevated
leverage levels, frequent acquisition activity, and relatively
concentrated customer base. GW's top 10 customers currently account
for approximately 35% of its revenue, which has increased in recent
years. Much of this increased customer concentration comes from
additional contracts that the company has attained (both
organically and through acquisition) in protecting U.S. embassies
in the Middle East and Africa. Additional concerns include the
company's end-market concentration, appetite for shareholder
dividends, and significant cash restructuring and integration
costs. Though this recent recapitalization funded a liquidation
event for shareholders with incremental debt, Fitch views this as
credit-neutral as the firm has continued to grow rapidly through
accretive acquisitions and Fitch expects leverage to fall in fiscal
2018, absent a significant negative currency movement.

GW's total debt/EBITDA has varied in recent years because of
frequent acquisitions and negative currency movements. The
company's leverage was 7.9x and 8.5x at fiscal year-end 2015 and
2016, respectively. Leverage has declined significantly recently
with debt/EBITDA falling to 5.1x as of Jan. 31, 2017 and
subsequently rising due to the recent recapitalization to roughly
5.9x as of July 31, 2017. Fitch expects the company's leverage to
be roughly at or below 6.0x for fiscal year-end 2018. Given the
successful integration of GW's recent acquisitions and its highly
accretive contribution to cash flows, Fitch will continue to view
the company's pro forma leverage metrics as a counterbalance to the
risk of the firm's more elevated reported leverage. Fitch expects
the company's pro forma leverage (with temporary fluctuations due
to future acquisitions) to remain within the 6.0x range through the
intermediate term.

The strength of GW's business profile provides somewhat of an
offset to the relatively elevated leverage in the company's credit
profile. The recurring nature of the company's revenues, long
customer contracts, and relatively stable operating margins are
features of higher rating categories. GW enjoys a more stable
operating profile than most issuers in the 'B+' rating category.
Although high leverage and debt service costs will continue to be
the largest medium-term risk, positive free cash flow (FCF) should,
to a degree, counterbalance them. Fitch expects GW to generate
roughly CAD100 million of FCF in fiscal 2018, which would equate to
a roughly 4% FCF margin.

Fitch expects GW to primarily deploy excess cash toward additional
acquisitions. Fitch further expects funds from operations (FFO)
interest coverage to be between 2x and the low 3x range at year-end
fiscal 2018 compared to 2.8x at year-end fiscal 2017. With an
asset-light business model (the firm's largest cost is personnel)
GW utilizes operating leases for its armored vehicle fleets and
other heavy equipment, which allows for cash flow flexibility. The
medium-term maturity schedule is favorable with no material debt
maturities until 2021 which is when the company's remaining senior
unsecured notes that were not tendered earlier this year mature.

The rating of 'BB+/RR1' on GW's senior secured credit facility
reflects its substantial going-concern enterprise value coverage
and outstanding recovery prospects in a distressed scenario, which
Fitch estimates in the 90%-100% range. Collateral consists of
nearly all U.S. and Canadian assets of restricted subsidiaries,
including such assets which may be under lease agreements. This
includes without limitation, accounts receivables, inventory,
equipment, investment property, intellectual property, other
general intangibles, and owned (but not leased) real property. The
equity interests of the borrower and all equity interests of any
wholly owned subsidiaries are also included within the collateral
package. The rating of 'B-/RR6' on the company's senior unsecured
notes reflects the minimal recovery prospects on the notes,
estimated by Fitch to be in the 0%-10% range in a distressed
scenario.

Recovery Rating Assumptions
The recovery analysis assumes that GW would be considered a
going-concern in bankruptcy and that the company would be
reorganized rather than liquidated. Fitch assumes a 10%
administration claim.

GW's going concern EBITDA is based on an estimate of fiscal 2018
EBITDA. The going concern EBITDA estimate reflects Fitch's view of
a sustainable, post-reorganization EBITDA level upon which Fitch
base the valuation of the company. Fitch utilized a $300 million
going-concern EBITDA to reflect a potential weakening of cash
logistics market as well as the potential for the loss of a
significant customer, given that GW has large customer
concentrations.

An EV multiple of 5.5x is used to calculate a post-reorganization
valuation and reflects a mid-cycle multiple. The estimate
considered the fact that historical bankruptcy exit multiple for
companies in the industrial sector average roughly 5.7x. With
respect to EV public market trading multiples, many of GW's cash
logistics competitors trade in the 13x to 16x multiple range and
GW's recent equity recapitalization with Rhone Capital transpired
at roughly a 12.0x LTM EBITDA multiple.

The secured revolving credit facility is assumed to be fully-drawn
upon default. The credit facility and other secured loans are
senior to the senior unsecured notes in the waterfall.

The waterfall results in a 100% recovery corresponding to 'RR1' for
the senior secured debt totalling roughly CAD1,462 million (assumed
both revolvers to be fully drawn at USD233 million in addition the
company's USD30 million secured revolver). The waterfall also
indicates a 3% recovery corresponding to RR6 for the roughly CAD821
million of senior unsecured notes outstanding.

DERIVATION SUMMARY

Garda compares favorably to its peers such as The Brinks Company on
operating margin and FCF metrics. GW has consistently generated
positive FCF in recent years. Fitch notes that GW's leverage is
among the highest in its peer group, though the company has
demonstrated an ability to de-lever given its high cash generation.
Further, GW's credit metrics have been disproportionately affected
by its high proportion of USD-denominated debt though only 40% of
the company's revenue is generated in USD. Roughly half of GW's
revenue is generated in Canada, which has also depreciated
significantly in recent years against the USD. GW is also further
distinguished from its peers as more than half of its revenue comes
from protective services, while its peers are more concentrated in
cash logistics.

KEY ASSUMPTIONS

Fitch's key assumptions within its ratings case for the issuer
include:

-- Approximately 15% revenue growth in fiscal 2018, driven by
    organic growth and recent acquisitions;
-- EBITDA margins of 13% or higher;
-- No debt-funded dividends through the medium term;
-- Capital intensity remains at roughly 2.5% of revenue through
    the medium term;
-- Limited additional foreign-currency impacts.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Positive Rating Action
-- Maintaining total debt/EBITDA below 5x;
-- Maintaining a FCF margin above 4%;
-- Maintaining an EBITDA margin above 12%;
-- Continued successful M&A integration.

Future Developments That May, Individually or Collectively, Lead to
Negative Rating Action
-- Total pro forma debt/EBITDA above 6.5x for an extended period;
-- Debt-funded shareholder-friendly activity;
-- A decline in the company's EBITDA margin to below 10% on a
    sustained basis;
-- Loss of a material contract or customer.

LIQUIDITY

Fitch expects GW to continue to hold minimal cash balances and fund
short-term needs with operating cash flows and draws from its new
multi-currency USD233 million senior secured revolver. The company
has adequate liquidity with a CAD89 million cash balance as of July
31, 2017, though this was counterbalanced against CAD112 million of
customer advances which Fitch considers restricted and not readily
available. The company's funding needs are manageable given GW's
working capital structure and low capital intensity. Working
capital volatility is largely kept in check, as accounts
receivables and payables have only seen large swings in past years
due to large new business wins. Inventory is minimal and only
includes spare parts to the company's vehicles and aircrafts. The
majority of new fixed assets are funded through finance (capital)
leases, decreasing annual costs, especially for new armored
vehicles. The security solutions segment is an asset-light business
and needs minimal capital expenditures as well.

FULL LIST OF RATING ACTIONS

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings with a Stable Outlook:

Garda World Security Corp.
-- Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) at 'B+';
-- Senior secured revolving credit facility at 'BB+/RR1';
-- Senior secured term loans at 'BB+/RR1';
-- Senior unsecured notes at 'B-/RR6'.


GENON ENERGY: Disclosures Approved; Nov. 13 Plan Hearing Set
------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court issued
an order approving GenOn Energy's Disclosure Statement on October
5, 2017 and scheduled a November 13, 2017 hearing to consider the
Second Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization, with
objections due by November 6, 2017.

BankruptcyData noted that according to the Disclosure Statement,
"Through the Plan, the Debtors will, among other things: (a)
equitize approximately $1.8 billion in debt; (b) pay cash to
Holders of Allowed GAG Notes Claims at an agreed-upon discount to
par; (c) transition to a standalone enterprise with a leaner
capital and operating structure that is better suited for today's
market challenges; and (d) implement a global settlement of
potential claims and causes of action against NRG. This settlement
provides substantial cash and non-cash consideration, including a
handover of NRG's 100% equity position in GenOn, a $261.3 million
cash contribution, a pension contribution worth approximately $13.2
million, a $27.8 million credit against amounts GenOn owes under
the Shared Services Agreement. The Plan provides for the
reorganization of the Debtors as a standalone entity separate from
NRG and will significantly reduce long-term debt and annual
interest payments and preserve the Debtors' existing liquidity,
resulting in a stronger, de-levered balance sheet. Moreover,
through the NRG Settlement, it will resolve all potential claims
against their non-Debtor parent, NRG, for substantial cash and
non-cash consideration that will give the Reorganized Debtors a
true 'blank slate' upon emergence. Specifically, the Plan
contemplates a restructuring of the Debtors through a
debt-for-equity conversion, together with certain other forms of
consideration and the possibility of a sale of some or all of the
Debtors' assets pursuant to a marketing process. The key terms of
the Plan are as follows: A. Substantial Debt-for-Equity Exchange. A
key element of the Plan is the agreement of the Consenting GenOn
Noteholders to convert the GenOn Notes Claims into New Common Stock
(along with, potentially, receiving other forms of
consideration)."

                    About GenOn Energy

GenOn Energy, Inc., is a wholesale power generation corporation
with 15,394 megawatts in generating capacity, operating operate 32
power plants in eight states. GenOn is subsidiary of NRG Energy
Inc., which is a competitive power company that produces, sells and
delivers energy and energy services, primarily in major competitive
power markets in the U.S.

GenOn is the product of two mergers since 2010. First, on Dec. 3,
2010, two wholesale power generation companies — RRI Energy, a
company formerly known as Reliant Energy, and Mirant Corporation
— completed an all-stock, tax-free merger with Mirant becoming
RRI’s wholly-owned subsidiary. Following the merger, RRI took its
current name: GenOn.

NRG, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, and GenOn completed a
stock-for-stock merger in a $6 billion deal, with GenOn continuing
as the surviving company on December 14, 2012. NRG, as
consideration for acquiring GenOn's entire equity, issued 0.1216
shares of NRG common stock for each outstanding share of GenOn. In
structuring the merger, NRG "ring-fenced" GenOn's debt, leaving
GenOn's creditors without recourse against NRG’s assets in the
event of GenOn's default.

As of March 31, 2017, GenOn Energy had $4.81 billion in total
assets, $4.51 billion in total liabilities and $304 million in
total stockholders’ equity.

GenOn Energy, Inc. ("GenOn"), GenOn Americas Generation, LLC
("GAG") and 60 of their directly and indirectly-owned subsidiaries
commenced the Chapter 11 cases in Houston, Texas (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Lead Case No. 17-33695) on June 14, 2017, to implement a
restructuring plan negotiated with stakeholders prepetition. The
Debtors’ cases have been assigned to Judge David R. Jones.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel. Zack A.
Clement, PLLC, is the local counsel. Rothschild Inc. is the
financial advisor and investment banker. McKinsey Recovery &
Transformation Services U.S. is the restructuring advisor. Epiq
Systems, Inc., is the claims and noticing agent.

Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC serves as GenOn Energy’s
financial advisor and investment banker.

Special Counsel to the GAG Steering Committee is Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP. The Steering Committee of GAG Noteholders
is comprised of Benefit Street Partners LLC, Brigade Capital
Management, LP, Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC, and Solus
Alternative Asset Management LP, each on behalf of itself or
certain affiliates, and/or accounts managed and/or advised by it or
its affiliates.

Counsel to the GenOn Steering Committee and the GAG Steering
Committee are Keith H. Wofford, Esq., Stephen Moeller-Sally, Esq.,
and Marc B. Roitman, Esq., at Ropes & Gray LLP.

Counsel for NRG Energy, Inc., are C. Luckey McDowell, Esq., and Ian
E. Roberts, Esq., at Baker Botts L.L.P.


GENON ENERGY: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to April 12
--------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. David R. Jones of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Texas has extended, at the behest of GenOn
Energy, Inc., and its affiliates, the exclusive period during which
the Debtors may file a Chapter 11 plan through April 12, 2018, and
solicit acceptances to its plan through June 11, 2018.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 19, 2017, the
Debtors asked for the extension, telling the Court that their
restructuring efforts have the support of the vast majority of
their creditors at every level of the capital structure.  A
restructuring support agreement the Debtors entered into prior to
the bankruptcy filing provides that the reorganized equity, plus a
substantial amount of cash, will be distributed to unsecured
creditors, including enough consideration to render all trade
claims unimpaired.  This "remarkable" result, the Debtors state, is
coupled with a commitment from certain of the Debtors' prepetition
bondholders to backstop exit financing for the reorganized
company.

                        About GenOn Energy

GenOn Energy, Inc., is a wholesale power generation corporation
with 15,394 megawatts in generating capacity, operating operate 32
power plants in eight states.  GenOn is subsidiary of NRG Energy
Inc., which is a competitive power company that produces, sells and
delivers energy and energy services, primarily in major competitive
power markets in the U.S.

GenOn is the product of two mergers since 2010.  First, on Dec. 3,
2010, two wholesale power generation companies -- RRI Energy, a
company formerly known as Reliant Energy, and Mirant Corporation --
completed an all-stock, tax-free merger with Mirant becoming RRI's
wholly-owned subsidiary.  Following the merger, RRI took its
current name: GenOn.

NRG, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, and GenOn completed a
stock-for-stock merger in a $6 billion deal, with GenOn continuing
as the surviving company on Dec. 14, 2012.  NRG, as consideration
for acquiring GenOn's entire equity, issued 0.1216 shares of NRG
common stock for each outstanding share of GenOn.  In structuring
the merger, NRG "ring-fenced" GenOn's debt, leaving GenOn's
creditors without recourse against NRG's assets in the event of
GenOn's default.

As of March 31, 2017, GenOn Energy had $4.81 billion in total
assets, $4.51 billion in total liabilities and $304 million in
total stockholders' equity.

GenOn Energy, Inc. ("GenOn"), GenOn Americas Generation, LLC
("GAG") and 60 of their directly and indirectly-owned subsidiaries
commenced the Chapter 11 cases in Houston, Texas (Bankr. S.D. Tex.
Lead Case No. 17-33695) on June 14, 2017, to implement a
restructuring plan negotiated with stakeholders prepetition.  The
Debtors' cases have been assigned to Judge David R. Jones.

Kirkland & Ellis LLP is the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  Zack A.
Clement, PLLC, is the local counsel.  Rothschild Inc. is the
financial advisor and investment banker.  McKinsey Recovery &
Transformation Services U.S. is the restructuring advisor.  Epiq
Systems, Inc., is the claims and noticing agent.

Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC serves as GenOn Energy's
financial advisor and investment banker.

Special Counsel to the GAG Steering Committee is Quinn Emanuel
Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP.  The Steering Committee of GAG
Noteholders is comprised of Benefit Street Partners LLC, Brigade
Capital Management, LP, Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC, and Solus
Alternative Asset Management LP, each on behalf of itself or
certain affiliates, and/or accounts managed and/or advised by it or
its affiliates.

Counsel to the GenOn Steering Committee and the GAG Steering
Committee are Keith H. Wofford, Esq., Stephen Moeller-Sally, Esq.,
and Marc B. Roitman, Esq., at Ropes & Gray LLP.

Counsel for NRG Energy, Inc., are C. Luckey McDowell, Esq., and Ian
E. Roberts, Esq., at Baker Botts L.L.P.


GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT: Taps CBRE Inc. as Appraiser
-----------------------------------------------
Global Empowerment Ministries, Inc. seeks approval from the US
Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta
Division, to employ CBRE, Inc as appraiser.

The professional services which the Appraiser is to render are:

     a) inspect and appraise the Real Property;

     b) testify at any hearing or any deposition regarding issues
        such as the value of the Real Property; and

     c) provide testimony at any hearing, or any deposition
        regarding the value of the Real Property at hourly fee
        of $350.00 per hour.

Don Poore, MAI and managing director of CBRE, Inc., attests that he
and every person in his firm is a "disinterested person" as defined
by Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Appraiser has agreed to perform the appraisal of Real Property,
including preparing a written appraisal report, for a fee of
$5,000, which fee must be paid before the appraisal is commenced,
and to provide testimony at any hearing, or any deposition
regarding the value of the Real Property at hourly fee of $350.00
per hour.

The Firm can be reached through:

     Don Poore, MAI
     CBRE, Inc.
     201 S. College Street, Suite 1700
     Charlotte, NC 28244
     Tel: 704 376 7979
     Fax: 704 331 1259

                  About Global Empowerment Center

Based in Decatur, Georgia, The Global Empowerment Center, Inc.,
formerly doing business as Victory House Evangelistic Temple, is a
Georgia non-profit corporation who operates a church out of its
real property.

Global Empowerment Center sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 17-63234) on July 31,
2017.  The Debtor is represented by Leslie M. Pineyro, Esq., at
Jones & Walden, LLC, as counsel.


GOLDEN DAY SCHOOLS: Taps Leslie Cohen Law as Bankruptcy Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Golden Day Schools, Inc. seeks approval from the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California, Los
Angeles Division, to employ Leslie Cohen Law, P.C. as bankruptcy
counsel.

Professional services required of Leslie Cohen Law, P.C. are:

     a. advise the Debtor regarding its rights and responsibilities
as a Chapter 11 debtor and a debtor in possession, specifically
including the requirements of the United States Bankruptcy Code,
the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, the Local Bankruptcy
Rules, and how the application of the provisions relates to the
administration of the Debtor's estate;

     b. advise and assist the Debtor in connection with the
preparation of certain documents to be filed with the Bankruptcy
Court and/or the Office of the United States Trustee;

     c. represent the Debtor, with respect to bankruptcy issues, in
the context of its pending Chapter 11 case and to represent the
Debtor in contested matters as would affect the administration of
the Debtor's case, except to the extent that any proceeding
pertains to the excluded services described above or requires
expertise in areas of law outside of the Firm's expertise;

     d. advise, assist and represent the Debtor in the negotiation,
formulation and attempted confirmation of a plan of
reorganization;

     e. render services for the purpose of pursuing, litigating
and/or settling litigation as may be necessary and appropriate in
connection with this case, including without limitation objections
to claims, adversary proceedings to recover preferences and
fraudulent conveyances, and all associated matters.

Leslie A. Cohen attests that her Firm is a "disinterested person"
within the meaning of Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and
that the Firm does not hold any interest adverse to the estate.

Current billing rates of the Counsel are:

     Leslie Cohen               -- $575/hr
     J'aime Williams            -- $390/hr
     Senior Contract Attorneys  -- $350/hr
     Paraprofessionals          -- $110/hr

The Counsel maintains office at:

     Leslie A. Cohen, Esq.  
     J'aime K. Williams Esq.  
     LESLIE COHEN LAW, PC
     506 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 200
     Santa Monica, CA 90401
     Tel: (310) 394-5900
     Fax: (310) 394-9280
     Email: leslie@lesliecohenlaw.com
            jaime@lesliecohenlaw.com

                     About Golden Day Schools

Golden Day Schools, Inc. is a privately held company that operates
a private elementary school in Los Angeles California.  It is a
non-profit federal 501(c)(3) and California State Tax Exempt
Corporation.

Golden Day Schools filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. C.D. Cal.
Case No. 17-21651) on September 22, 2017. The petition was signed
by Clark E. Parker, president.  The Hon. Neil W. Bason presides
over the case.  The Debtor is represented by Leslie A Cohen, Esq.
at Leslie Cohen Law, P.C. as counsel.

At the time of filing, the Debtor estimates $100,000 to $500,000 in
assets and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.


GOODRICH PETROLEUM: 5 Parties Realigned as Additional Plaintiffs
----------------------------------------------------------------
8587 BRR LLC; The Cibolo Seven, Ltd.; Patrick Burns Clark, Trustee
of the Patrick Burns Clark 2012 Irrevocable Trust; Richard Burns
Clark, Trustee of the Richard Burns Clark Family 2011 Trust; and
Walter Edwin, LP ("Additional Defendants") filed a motion to
realign them as plaintiffs rather than defendants in the adversary
proceeding captioned AROLYN JULIA CLARK, et al, Plaintiff(s), v.
GOODRICH PETROLEUM COMPANY, L.L.C., et al, Defendant(s), Adversary
No. 16-3149 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.).  Bankruptcy Judge Marvin Isgur
granted the Additional Defendants' motion.

A motion to realign parties is most commonly employed to obtain
diversity jurisdiction in cases where a court must "look beyond the
pleadings, and arrange the parties according to the sides in the
dispute."

Here, the Additional Defendants were brought into the case as
necessary parties and the term "Additional Defendants" was
initially used to ensure they did not face any burden of proof or
production with regard to the pending motions. However, subsequent
events demonstrate that the Additional Defendants are actually
adverse to the original oil company lessees who were named as
defendants. The Additional Defendants clearly demonstrated
antagonism by filing cross-claims against the lessees alleging
unpaid royalties. Furthermore, by filing these cross-claims, the
Additional Defendants also assumed the burden of proof, aligning
their interests and responsibilities with the original plaintiffs
seeking the same remedy. Accordingly, the Additional Defendants are
realigned in this case as "Realigned Plaintiffs" in order to more
accurately reflect their position in this case.

The bankruptcy case is in re: GOODRICH PETROLEUM CORPORATION, et
al, Chapter 11, Debtor(s), Case No. 16-31975 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.).

A full-text copy of Judge Isgur's Memorandum Opinion dated Oct. 3,
2017, is available at https://is.gd/txJLca from Leagle.com.

Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, Debtor, represented by Frank C.
Brame, Attorney at Law, Bradley Roland Foxman, Vinson Elkins &
Garrick Chase Smith -- gsmith@velaw.com -- Vinson & Elkins LLP.

US Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Nancy Lynne Holley --
nancy.holley@usdoj.gov -- US Trustee & Christine A. March, Office
of the US Trustee.

Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Goodrich Petroleum
Corporation, Creditor Committee, represented by Sarah A. Schultz --
sschultz@akingump.com -- Akin Gump et al.

                 About Goodrich Petroleum

Goodrich Petroleum Corporation is an independent oil and natural
gas company engaged in the exploration, development and production
of oil and natural gas on properties primarily in (i) Southwest
Mississippi and Southeast Louisiana, which includes the Tuscaloosa
Marine Shale Trend, (ii) Northwest Louisiana and East Texas, which
includes the Haynesville Shale, and (iii) South Texas, which
includes the Eagle Ford Shale Trend.

Goodrich Petroleum and its subsidiary Goodrich Petroleum Company,
L.L.C., filed voluntary petitions on April 15, 2016 (Bankr. S.D.
Tex.) to pursue a pre-packaged Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.
The Debtors have filed a motion with the Court seeking joint
administration of the Chapter 11 Cases under the caption In re
Goodrich Petroleum Corporation, et al. (Case No. 16-31975).

Goodrich estimated $50 million to $100 million in assets and $500
million to $1 billion in liabilities.  The petition was signed by
Robert C. Turnham, Jr., president and chief operating officer.
Bankruptcy Judge Marvin Isgur presides over the case.

Bradley Roland Foxman, Esq., Garrick Chase Smith, Esq., Harry A.
Perrin, Esq., David S. Meyer, Esq., and Lauren R. Kanzer, Esq., at
Vinson & Elkins LLP, serve as the Debtors' counsel. Lazard Freres &
Co. LLC, serves as the Debtors' investment banker while BMC Group,
Inc., serves as notice, claims and balloting agent.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 27 appointed six creditors
of Goodrich Petroleum Corporation to serve on an Official Committee
of Unsecured Creditors.  The Committee retained Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Feld LLP as counsel and Opportune LLP as its financial
advisor.


GRANDPARENTS.COM INC: Liquidating Trustee Taps Akerman as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Joshua Rizack, the Liquidating Trustee of Grandparents.com, Inc.,
and its debtor-affiliates seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ Akerman LLP,
as counsel to the Liquidating Trustee.

The Liquidating Trustee requires Akerman to:

   (a) advise the Liquidating Trustee regarding general
       administration of the Liquidating Trust;

   (b) assist the Liquidating Trustee in his investigation and
       pursuit of causes of action under Chapter 5 of the
       Bankruptcy Code and other applicable law;

   (c) assist the Liquidating Trustee in investigating,
       prosecuting, and compromising the Litigation Claims;

   (d) evaluate filed proofs of claim in the Bankruptcy Cases,
       object to such claims as appropriate, and prosecute and
       resolve such objections; and

   (e) assist the Liquidating Trustee as necessary and
       appropriate in otherwise discharging his duties under
       the Liquidating Trust.

Akerman will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                          $295-$800
     Paraprofessionals                  $100-$225

Akerman will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Steven R. Wirth, a partner of Akerman LLP, assured the Court that
the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Akerman can be reached at:

     Steven R. Wirth, Esq.
     AKERMAN LLP
     401 E. Jackson St., Suite 1700
     Tampa, FL 33602
     Tel: (813) 223-7333
     Fax: (813) 223-2837
     E-mail: steven.wirth@akerman.com

              About Grandparents.com, Inc.

New York-based Grandparents.com, Inc., is a family-oriented social
media company that through its Web site --
http://www.grandparents.com/-- serves the age 50+ demographic
market. The website offers activities, discussion groups, expert
advice and newsletters that enrich the lives of grandparents by
providing tools to foster connections among grandparents, parents,
and grandchildren.

Grandparents.com, Inc., and Grand Cards LLC filed Chapter 11
petitions (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case Nos. 17-14711 and 17-14704,
respectively) on April 14, 2017. The petitions were signed by
Joshua Rizack, chief restructuring officer, The Rising Group
Consulting, Inc. The Hon. Laurel M. Isicoff presides over the
cases.

The Debtors disclosed combined assets of $1 million and combined
liabilities of $24.9 million.

The Debtors tapped Steven R. Wirth, Esq., and Eyal Berger, Esq., at
Akerman LLP, as bankruptcy counsel.  They have also tapped Genovese
Joblove & Battista, P.A., as special litigation counsel and
conflicts counsel, and EisnerAmper LLP as accountants and financial
advisor.

Joshua Rizack, the Liquidating Trustee of Grandparents.com, Inc.,
and its debtor-affiliates, hired Akerman LLP, as counsel.


GREAT FALLS DIOCESE: Hires Moulton Bellingham as Special Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------------
Roman Catholic Bishop of Great Falls, Montana, seeks authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Montana to employ
Moulton Bellingham PC, as special counsel to the Debtor.

Great Falls Diocese requires Moulton Bellingham to provide legal
representation needed by the Debtor-in-Possession in pursuing the
petition with the 13th Judicial District Court for Yellowstone
County in Billings, Montana, to seek termination of the deed
restriction in a 1917 deed relating to Fratt School, now St.
Francis Upper School, of the Billings Catholic School. Termination
of the deed restriction will result in sole ownership of the
property by the BCS and enable the property to be sold with the
proceeds to be applied to a new school being constructed by
Billings Catholic School.

Moulton Bellingham will provide the legal services on a pro-bono
basis. Reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the firm will
be paid by Billing Catholic Schools Foundation.

Jessica T. Fehr, member of Moulton Bellingham PC, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Moulton Bellingham can be reached at:

     Jessica T. Fehr, Esq.
     MOULTON BELLINGHAM PC
     27 N. 27th Street, Suite 1900
     Billings, MT 59101
     Tel: (406) 248-7731

              About Roman Catholic Bishop of
                  Great Falls, Montana

The Roman Catholic Bishop of Falls, Montana, a Montana Religious
Corporate Sole, also known as the Diocese of Great Falls-Billings
-- http://www.dioceseofgfb.org/-- filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy
petition (Bankr. D. Mont. Case No. 17-60271) on March 31, 2017. The
petition was signed by Bishop Michael W. Warfel.

In its petition, the Debtor disclosed $20.75 million in total
assets and $14.78 million in total liabilities.

The Hon. Benjamin P. Hursh presides over the case.

Bruce Alan Anderson, Esq., at Elsaesser Jarzabek Anderson Elliott &
MacDonald, CHTD.; and Gregory J. Hatley, Esq., at Davis Hatley
Haffeman & Tighe PC, serves as counsel to the Debtor, Moulton
Bellingham PC, as special counsel.

NAI Business Properties and Matt Robertson have been employed as
realtor.

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP is the counsel to the official
committee of unsecured creditors formed in the Debtor's case.


GREEN TERRACE: Wants Davenport to Continue as Property Manager
--------------------------------------------------------------
Green Terrace Condominium Association, Inc. seeks authorization
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida
to continue to employ Davenport Property Management as property
manager on a permanent basis in the bankruptcy proceeding.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor's state court receiver,
Kolman Kenigsberg, removed the Debtor's previous board of directors
and appointed new members to the board.

By Order dated August 16, 2017, the Debtor, through the Receiver's
Board, retained Eric Rosen, Esq. and Fowler White Burnett, P.A., as
its counsel.  By written notice dated August 22, a majority of the
voting interests in the Debtor recalled the Receiver's Board.
Pursuant to Florida Statutes 718.112(2)(j), the Receiver's Board
has been deemed recalled, and a new board consisting of Raymond
Benel, Sandra Matus, Tiara Bumgardner and Yolanda Samuels has been
appointed.

On September 19, the Debtor, through the Current Board, served
notice of termination of Fowler White's engagement.

On August 25, the Debtor filed its Application to Employ Davenport
Property Management for 90 Days from the Filing Date, Nunc Pro Tunc
to July 21, Without Prejudice to Seek to Retain Davenport on a
Permanent Basis.  Davenport has been the Debtor's property manager
since February 2014, and has considerable knowledge concerning the
Debtor's operations and business affairs.

By Order dated September 21, Davenport's retention was approved
only through September 15.

On September 15, the Debtor, through the Receiver's Board, filed an
Application to Employ Sea Breeze Community Management Services,
Inc. Effective as of September 15.  The stated basis for replacing
Davenport is not for any performance issues, but for an unclear
potential conflict of interest due to the replacement of the
Receiver's Board with the Current Board.  The Debtor, through the
Current Board, says it would be filing a notice of withdrawal of
the Sea Breeze Application shortly.

Davenport can be reached at:

       Philip Farnhill
       DAVENPORT PROPERTY MANAGEMENT GROUP
       6620 Lake Worth Road
       Lake Worth, FL 33467
       Tel: (561) 642-5080
       Fax: (561) 642-5481

                  About Green Terrace Condominium

Green Terrace Condominium Association, Inc., based in West Palm
Beach, Fla., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No.
17-19188) on July 21, 2017.  In its petition, the Debtor estimated
less than $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  The petition was signed by Kolman Kenigsberg as
receiver for the Debtor.

Judge Paul G. Hyman, Jr. presides over the case.  Eric A Rosen,
Esq., at Fowler White Burnett, P.A., serves as bankruptcy counsel.


The Debtor's list of 16 unsecured creditors is available for free
at http://bankrupt.com/misc/flsb17-19188.pdf


GROUP 701: Del Lago Buying Dallas Commercial Building for $1.8M
---------------------------------------------------------------
Group 701, LLC, asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern
District of Texas to authorize the sale of its commercial building
located at 7300 Ambassador Row, Dallas, Texas to Del Lago Ventures,
Inc., for $1,780,000.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 21 days from the date of
filing of the Motion.

The Debtor is the owner of the Property.  It has received an offer
from the Buyer to purchase the Property for $1,780,000.  The
earnest money deposit is $20,000.  The Debtors proposes to sell the
Property free and clear of all liens claims and encumbrances and
that the net sales proceeds be placed into the DIP account with all
liens attaching to the proceeds and not to be distributed without
further Order of the Court.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/Group_701_4_Sales.pdf

The Debtor would show that Veritex Bank holds a lien against the
Property.  It believes the Veritex debt is approximately
$1,200,000.  The Debtor had previously filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy and obtained confirmation of its Plan.  The Plan
provided the Debtor would sell the Property by Sept. 3, 2017.
Unfortunately, that sell fell through.  However, the Debtor has
obtained the Contract and has every reason to believe the sale will
close.

The Debtor would asks that the matter be set down for an Hearing
and that upon hearing, the Court enters an Order authorizing its
sale of the Property, and for such other and further relief as it
may show itself justly entitled.

The Purchaser:

          DEL LAGO VENTURES, INC.
          200 Galleria Parkway S.E., Suite 900
          Atlanta, GA 30339
          Attn: Corporate Counsel - Real Estate (PW)
          Facsimile: (770) 955-0985

The Broker:

          RE/MAX ADVANTAGE
          1990 Justin Road
          Highland Village, TX 75067
          Attn: Lee Holtzman
          Telephone: (214) 232-3278

                        About Group 701

Group 701, LLC's business consists of the ownership of one piece of
property located at 7300 Ambassador Row, Dallas, valued by the
Company at $1.78 million.  Group 701 posted gross revenue of
$67,500 in 2016 and gross revenue of $90,000 in 2015.  

The Company previously sought bankruptcy protection (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 17-30858) on March 6, 2017.

Group 701, LLC, again sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case No. 17-33726) on Oct. 2, 2017, disclosed total assets at
$1.78 million and total liabilities at $1.10 million.  The petition
was signed by Mahmoud Shahsiah, managing member.  Judge Harlin
DeWayne Hale is assigned to the case.  The Debtor tapped Eric A.
Liepins, Esq., at Eric A. Liepins, P.C. as counsel.


GST AUTOLEATHER: Oct. 13 Meeting Set to Form Creditors' Panel
-------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Vara, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, will hold an
organizational meeting on Oct. 13, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in the
bankruptcy case of GST AutoLeather, Inc. et al.

The meeting will be held at:

               Sheraton Suites
               422 Delaware Avenue
               Wilmington, DE 19801

The sole purpose of the meeting will be to form a committee or
committees of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.

The organizational meeting is not the meeting of creditors pursuant
to Section 341 of the Bankruptcy Code.  A representative of the
Debtor, however, may attend the Organizational Meeting, and provide
background information regarding the bankruptcy cases.

To increase participation in the Chapter 11 proceeding, Section
1102 of the Bankruptcy Code requires that the United States Trustee
appoint a committee of unsecured creditors as soon as practicable.
The Committee ordinarily consists of the persons, willing to serve,
that hold the seven largest unsecured claims against the debtor of
the kinds represented on the committee.

Section 1103 of the Bankruptcy Code provides that the Committee may
consult with the debtor, investigate the debtor and its business
operations and participate in the formulation of a plan of
reorganization.  The Committee may also perform other services as
are in the interests of the unsecured creditors whom it
represents.

                            About GST AutoLeather

Headquartered in Southfield, Michigan, GST AutoLeather, Inc., was
founded in 1933, then known as Garden State Tanning, initially
operated as a tanning company that processed leather for the
upholstery and garment industries.  The Company entered the
automotive industry in 1946.

As of Oct. 3, 2017, the Company employs approximately 5,600 people
worldwide, including the United States, Mexico, Japan, China,
Korea, Germany, Hungary, South Africa, and Argentina.  The Company
supplies leather to virtually every major OEM in the automotive
industry, including Audi, BMW/Mini, Daimler, Fiat Chrysler, Ford,
General Motors, Hyundai, Honda, Porsche, PSA, Nissan, Kia, Toyota
and Volkswagen.
  
GST AutoLeather, Inc. and five of its affiliates filed voluntary
petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12100) on Oct. 3,
2017.

The Company has obtained a commitment for a $40 million
debtor-in-possession facility from its existing senior lenders.
This facility will allow GST to continue operations without
interruption during the reorganization process, including payment
of vendors and suppliers for all goods and services provided
following commencement of the cases, while its management team and
advisors focus on a sale of the Company.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as local
bankruptcy counsel; KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Lazard Middle Market, LLC, as financial advisor; Alvarez &
Marsal North America, LLC, as restructuring advisor; and Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, as claims and noticing agent.


GST AUTOLEATHER: Wants to Obtain $25M in Financing From Royal Bank
------------------------------------------------------------------
GST AutoLeather, Inc., and its debtor affiliates seek permission
from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to
obtain postpetition secured financing and to use cash collateral.

The Debtors request that the Court approve a senior secured
superpriority priming debtor in possession credit facility in the
amount of $25 million on an interim basis and $40 million in the
aggregate on a final basis provided by Royal Bank of Canada, as
administrative agent and collateral agent, and the lenders
thereunder.  The DIP Facility will provide the Debtors with
sufficient liquidity to stabilize and fund the Debtors' general and
corporate operations during these chapter 11 cases.

Absent entry into the DIP Facility, the Debtors will have no
alternative but to immediately cease operating and convert these
cases to cases under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. The
liquidity provided by the DIP Facility will ensure the Debtors can
continue to operate uninterrupted in the ordinary course of
business and will provide the Debtors with sufficient time to
bridge to a sale of substantially all the Debtors' assets.

The maturity date of the loan is six months after the Closing Date;
provided that if the day is not a Business Day, the Maturity Date
will be the Business Day immediately preceding the day.

Borrower may, upon written notice to the Administrative Agent,
terminate the unused Commitments of any class, or from time to time
permanently reduce the unused Commitments of any Class; provided
that (i) any notice will be received by the Administrative Agent
three Business Days prior to the date of termination or reduction
and (ii) any partial reduction shall be in an aggregate amount of
$1 million or any whole multiple of $100,000 in excess thereof.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, borrower may rescind or postpone any
notice of termination of the Commitments if the termination would
have resulted from a refinancing of all of the Facility, which
refinancing will not be consummated or otherwise will be delayed.

The Delayed Draw Term Commitment of each Delayed Draw Term Lender
will be automatically and permanently reduced to $0 upon the making
of the Delayed Draw Term Lender's Delayed Draw Term Loans pursuant
to Section 2.01(b) of the DIP Agreement.  The Roll-Up Term
Commitment of each Lender will be automatically and permanently
reduced to $0 upon the deemed making of the Lender's Roll-Up Term
Loans pursuant to Section 2.01(a) of the DIP Agreement.

LIBOR Eurocurrency (with a floor of 1.25%) plus 7.50% per annum
will be payable monthly in cash.  The default interest rate is an
additional 2%.

Base Rate (with a floor of 2.25%) plus 6.50% per annum, will be
payable monthly in cash.  The default interest rate is an
additional 2%.

The Default Rate is equal to (a) the Base Rate plus (b) the
Applicable Rate applicable to Base Rate Loans plus (c) 2.0% per
annum; provided that with respect to a Eurocurrency Rate Loan, the
Default Rate will be an interest rate equal to the interest rate
(including any Applicable Rate) otherwise applicable to the Loan
plus 2.0% per annum, in each case, to the fullest extent permitted
by applicable Laws.

Subject to the provisions of Section 2.08(b) of the DIP Agreement,
each Eurocurrency Rate Loan will bear interest on the outstanding
principal amount thereof for each Interest Period at a rate per
annum equal to the Eurocurrency Rate for the Interest Period plus
the Applicable Rate; and (ii) each Base Rate Loan will bear
interest on the outstanding principal amount thereof from the
applicable borrowing date at a rate per annum equal to the Base
Rate plus the Applicable Rate.

Commencing (i) upon an Event of Default under Section 8.01(a), (f)
or (g) or (ii) upon the occurrence and during the continuation of
any Event of Default not described in the foregoing clause (i), the
borrower will pay interest on (x) the principal amount of the Loans
and (y) to the extent then due and payable all other outstanding
Obligations, in each case under clauses (x) and (y) at a
fluctuating interest rate per annum at all times equal to the
Default Rate to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Laws.
Accrued and unpaid interest on past due amounts (including on past
due interest to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Laws)
shall be due and payable upon demand.

Interest on each Loan will be due and payable in arrears on each
Interest Payment Date applicable thereto and at other times as may
be specified herein.  Interest will be due and payable in
accordance with the terms hereof before and after judgment, and
before and after the commencement of any proceeding under any
Debtor Relief Law.

The borrower will pay to the Agents the fees as will have been
separately agreed upon in writing (including in the Fee Letter and
the Agent Fee Letter) in the amounts and at the times so specified.
The fees will be fully earned when paid and will not be refundable
for any reason whatsoever (except as expressly agreed between
Borrower and the applicable Agent).

For any week, commencing with the third week following the Petition
Date:

     (a) the borrower will not permit Adjusted Operating Cash Flow
on a cumulative basis to be less than the corresponding amounts set
forth in the Budget for the period(s), subject to a variance of not
greater than the greater of (x) 15% of the amount set forth in the
budget for the period(s) and (y) $5 million;

     (b) the borrower will not permit Total Adjusted Cash Receipts
less intercompany receipts on a cumulative basis to be less than
the corresponding amounts set forth in the budget for the
period(s), subject to a variance of not greater than (i) for week
3, 15%, (ii) for week 4, 12.5%, (iii) for weeks 5 and 6, 10% and
(iv) for week 7, 7.5% and (v) for each week thereafter, 5%, in each
case as compared to the amount set forth in the budget for the
period(s);

     (c) the borrower will not permit Total Adjusted Cash
Disbursements less intercompany disbursements on a cumulative basis
to be greater than the corresponding amounts set forth in the
budget for the period(s), subject to a variance of not greater than
(i) for weeks 3 and 4, 10%, (ii) for weeks 5, 6 and 7, 7.5% and
(iii) for each week thereafter, 5%, in each case as compared to the
amount set forth in the budget for the period(s); and

     (d) the borrower will not permit Intercompany Disbursements
from North America to the Republic of South Africa, Germany and
Hungary (on a collective basis) on a cumulative basis to be greater
than the corresponding amounts set forth in the budget for the
period(s), subject to a variance of not greater than 15% as
compared to the amount set forth in the budget for the period(s).

For any month, commencing with the month ending Oct. 31, 2017, the
borrower will not permit the fees and expenses of the case
professionals incurred during any month to be greater than the
corresponding amounts set forth in the Budget for such period(s),
subject to a variance of not greater than 10% as compared to the
amount set forth in the budget for the period(s).

A copy of the Debtors' Motion is available at:

            http://bankrupt.com/misc/deb17-12100-6.pdf

                    About GST AutoLeather

Headquartered in Southfield, Michigan, GST AutoLeather, Inc., was
founded in 1933, then known as Garden State Tanning, initially
operated as a tanning company that processed leather for the
upholstery and garment industries.  The Company entered the
automotive industry in 1946.

As of Oct. 3, 2017, the Company employs approximately 5,600 people
worldwide, including the United States, Mexico, Japan, China,
Korea, Germany, Hungary, South Africa, and Argentina.  The Company
supplies leather to virtually every major OEM in the automotive
industry, including Audi, BMW/Mini, Daimler, Fiat Chrysler, Ford,
General Motors, Hyundai, Honda, Porsche, PSA, Nissan, Kia, Toyota
and Volkswagen.

GST AutoLeather, Inc., and five of its affiliates filed voluntary
petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-12100) on Oct. 3,
2017.

The Company has obtained a commitment for a $40 million
debtor-in-possession facility from its existing senior lenders.
This facility will allow GST to continue operations without
interruption during the reorganization process, including payment
of vendors and suppliers for all goods and services provided
following commencement of the cases, while its management team and
advisors focus on a sale of the Company.

The Hon. Laurie Selber Silverstein is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP as local
bankruptcy counsel; Kirkland & Ellis LLP as general bankruptcy
counsel; Lazard Middle Market, LLC, as financial advisor; Alvarez &
Marsal North America, LLC, as restructuring advisor; and Epiq
Bankruptcy Solutions, LLC, as claims and noticing agent.


GUIDO DIMITRI: 2450, LLC Buying Winchester Property for $304K
-------------------------------------------------------------
Guido and Pauli Dimitri ask the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of California to authorize the sale of real
property described as 36323 Cosimo Lane, Winchester, California,
with APN 963-1030-42, to 2450, LLC, for $304,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Nov. 8, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

The Subject Property is a single family home with 4 beds, 2.25
baths, and approximately 2,016 square feet of living space.  The
Debtors have listed the Subject Property through Red Brick Realty
for approximately 30 days and Red Brick has located the Buyer
though its significant and valuable efforts.  The Debtors ask by
the Motion to sell the Subject Property and related relief,
including the approval of Red Brick's employment.

There is currently an all-cash offer from the Buyer on the Subject
Property for $304,000 under the fully executed California
Residential Purchase Agreement and Joint Escrow Instructions.  The
offer on hand is a significant cash offer, without a financing
contingency.

Thus, as a result of the efforts of the Debtors' broker, the estate
has received this post-petition offer to purchase the Subject
Property from the Purchaser, free of all liens and claims.  The
Debtors are informed and believe that the Purchaser is a bona fide
purchaser with the financial ability and the good faith intent to
purchase the Subject Property.  The Purchaser has the financial
ability to pay for the Subject Property without financing and there
is no financing contingency in the purchase agreement between the
Debtors and the Purchaser.

The Debtors believe that the essential terms of the purchase
transaction are fair and equitable.  The Motion is made in good
faith and to benefit creditors who will benefit from the proceeds
being brought into the Debtors' estate.

The essential terms of the Purchase and Sale Contract are:

      a. Purchase Price: $304,000

      b. The offer is being made with an initial deposit made to
escrow in the amount of $3,040 which has already been deposited to
Stewart Title at 29995 Technology Drive, Murrieta, California;

      c. There is no loan contingency and this is an all cash
offer; and

      d. The Seller's counter offer no. 1 provides that close of
escrow is to occur 45 days from acceptable subject to the Court's
Approval.  The Buyer is also to waive the termite report and that
the Seller is not responsible for providing a report or any
repairs.

A copy of the Contract attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

       http://bankrupt.com/misc/Guido_DiMitri_417_Sales.pdf

Based on the Debtors' understanding and knowledge, they have
identified the known liens on the Subject Property.  The
preliminary title report for the Subject Property has been obtained
and they have reviewed the title report.  They believe that there
are no recorded security interests.

The net proceeds of the sale are to go to Mark Kirk based on the
previously approved Settlement Agreement between Kirk and the
Debtors.  The Settlement Agreement called for the Debtors to
provide Kirk with a secured claim on the Subject Property and the
Debtors have, in fact, provided Kirk with a long form deed of trust
securing Kirk's claim.  However, based on the title report, it does
not appear that this deed of trust has been recorded.

In the event that the deed of trust is recorded, the sale is to be
free and clear of this lien.  As provided, the net proceeds of the
sale of the Subject Property are to be paid to Kirk.

The Debtors ask that they'd be authorized to pay half of escrow
fees and all escrow costs, which the Debtors anticipate will not be
more than $6,000.  The Debtors' will also pay the commission of 6%
to ROG in the amount of $18,240.  The actual amounts are to be
determined prior to the time of sale based on the estimated closing
statement prepared by the escrow holder.

The Debtors anticipate that there will be approximately $279,760
remaining after the valid and uncontested closing costs are paid
and commissions are distributed.  Should there be unanticipated tax
consequences; the net proceeds of the sale will be more than
sufficient to provide a reserve for taxes to pay tax obligations,
if any.  The Debtors do not anticipate there being a taxable gain
on the Subject Property.  As provided, they will be paying the net
proceeds of the sale to Mark Kirk on Nov. 28, 2017 in accordance
with the Settlement Agreement.

The Debtors believe the 6% commission to be earned by Red Brick,
and being shared with the Purchaser's broker, is more than
reasonable and is well within the going rate for brokerage services
relating the sale of residential properties in San Diego.  The
benefit to the Debtors is clear in this case as they will be
realizing a substantial gain from the sale of the Subject Property.
They therefore respectfully ask that the Court approves the
compensation of Red Brick for their services at the reasonable rate
of a 6% commission on the sale of the Subject Property, i.e.
$18,240.

The Purchaser:

         2450, LLC
         36323 Cosimo Ln
         Winchester, CA 92596

The Escrow Agent:

         STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA
         29995 Technology Drive, Suite 305
         Murrieta, CA 92563
         Attn: Brian Stroh

Guido and Pauli Dimitri filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. S.D. Cal. Case No. 14-02953) on April 16, 2014.  The
Dimitris are an elderly couple living in Fallbrook, California.
They operated a number of avocado groves and maintained active
investments in the stock market.  They also purchased real
properties intended for both rental income and long-term investment
or appreciation.

The Hon. Margaret M. Mann presides over the case.  The Dimitris
are
represented by:

         John L. Smaha, Esq.
         Gustavo E. Bravo, Esq.
         SMAHA LAW GROUP APC
         2398 San Diego Avenue
         San Diego, CA 92110
         Tel: 619-688-1557
         Fax: 619-688-1558
         E-mail: jsmaha@smaha.com


GULFMARK OFFSHORE: Expects to Emerge from Chapter 11 in 30 Days
---------------------------------------------------------------
GulfMark Offshore, Inc. (OTCPink: GLFM) said the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Delaware confirmed the Company's chapter
11 Plan of Reorganization.  GulfMark expects to emerge from chapter
11 within the next 30 days, pending completion of related
documentation.

On Oct. 4, 2017, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order confirming
the Plan.  A copy of the Findings of Fact and Order Confirming the
Plan of Reorganization is available at https://is.gd/3jIwoP

The material terms of the Plan are:

    -- The Company commenced the $125 million Rights Offering,
pursuant to which -- subject to limitations regarding the Jones Act
-- eligible holders of the 6.375% senior notes due 2022 of the
Company have the right to purchase, on the effective date of the
Plan, their pro rata share of 60% of GulfMark's common stock, or as
applicable, the Jones Act Warrants, subject to dilution by the
Reorganized GulfMark Equity issued or issuable under the proposed
management incentive plan, and upon exercise of the New Existing
Equity Warrants.  The Rights Offering is backstopped by certain of
the Noteholders for a 6.0% commitment premium paid in the form of
3.6% of the Reorganized GulfMark Equity, subject to dilution by the
Reorganized GulfMark Equity issued or issuable under the MIP and
upon exercise of the New Existing Equity Warrants.

   -- Each holder of the Senior Notes will receive -- subject to
limitations regarding the Jones Act -- its pro rata share of the
Reorganized GulfMark Equity representing in the aggregate 35.65% of
Reorganized GulfMark Equity, subject to dilution by the Reorganized
GulfMark Equity issued or issuable under the MIP and the exercise
of the New Existing Equity Warrants.

   -- The Jones Act, which applies to companies that engage in
coastwise trade, requires that, among other things, with respect to
a publicly traded company, the aggregate ownership of common stock
by non-U.S. citizens be not more than 25% of its outstanding common
stock. Accordingly, the recipients of common stock pursuant to the
Plan or the Rights Offering who are non-U.S. holders may receive
warrants to acquire common stock at an exercise price in a minimal
amount in lieu of common stock (the "Jones Act Warrants").

   -- All outstanding common stock of GulfMark will be cancelled
and each holder of outstanding common stock of GulfMark will
receive its pro rata share of (a) common stock representing in the
aggregate 0.75% of the Reorganized GulfMark Equity, subject to
dilution by the Reorganized GulfMark Equity issued or issuable
under the MIP and the exercise of the New Existing Equity Warrants,
and (b) warrants for 7.5% of the equity in reorganized GulfMark
subject to dilution by the Reorganized GulfMark Equity issued or
issuable under the MIP, with a 7-year term and with an exercise
price based on an equity value of $1 billion (the "New Existing
Equity Warrants").

   -- The guaranty claims of the lender under the Norwegian
Facility Agreement among GulfMark, GulfMark Rederi AS and DNB Bank
ASA will receive, on the Effective Date, payment in cash in an
amount equal to the allowed amount of such guaranty claims.

   -- The guaranty claims of the lenders under the Multicurrency
Facility Agreement among Royal Bank of Scotland plc, as the agent
for the syndicate lenders, GulfMark and GulfMark Americas, Inc.
will receive, on the Effective Date, payment in cash in an amount
equal to the allowed amount of such guaranty claims.

   -- Holders of allowed claims arising under the Company's DIP
facility, administrative expense claims, priority tax claims, other
priority claims, and other secured claims against the Company will
receive in exchange for their claims payment in full in cash or
otherwise have their rights unimpaired under Title 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code.  The Company will continue to pay any general
unsecured claims in the ordinary course of business.

On the Effective Date, there will be 10,000,000 shares of common
stock of the Company issued and outstanding, including shares
issuable under the Jones Act Warrants.

"I want to thank our customers and employees for their trust and
dedication throughout this process. We will continue our commitment
to world class operations and safety while we emerge as a stronger
company positioned to capitalize on industry opportunities," said
Quintin Kneen, President and Chief Executive Officer.

Counsel to Consenting Noteholders:

         Evan R. Fleck, Esq.
         Nelly Almeida, Esq.
         MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & MCCLOY LLP
         28 Liberty Street
         New York, New York 10005-1413
         E-mail: efleck@milbank.com
                 nalmeida@milbank.com
         Facsimile: (212) 822-5567

                    About Gulfmark Offshore

GulfMark Offshore, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was incorporated
in 1996.  The Company provides offshore marine support and
transportation services primarily to companies involved in the
offshore exploration and production of oil and natural gas.  The
Company's vessels transport materials, supplies and personnel to
offshore facilities, and also move and position drilling and
production facilities.  The majority of the Company's operations
are conducted in the North Sea, offshore Southeast Asia and
offshore the Americas.  The Company currently operates a fleet of
73 owned or managed offshore supply vessels, or OSVs, in the
following regions: 30 vessels in the North Sea, 13 vessels offshore
Southeast Asia, and 30 vessels offshore the Americas.

GulfMark Offshore filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 17-11125) on May 17, 2017.  Quintin V.
Kneen, president and chief executive officer, signed the petition.

Mark D. Collins, Esq., Zachary I. Shapiro, Esq., Brett M. Haywood,
Esq., and Christopher M. De Lillo, Esq., of Richards, Layton &
Finger, P.A., as well as Gary T. Holtzer, Esq., Ronit J. Berkovish,
Esq., and Debora A. Hoehne, Esq., of Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP,
serve as counsel to the Debtor.  The Debtor has also tapped Blank
Rome LLP as corporate counsel; Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC
as financial advisor; Evercore Group L.L.C. as investment banker;
Ernst & Young LLP as restructuring consultant; KPMG US LLP as
auditor and tax consultant; and Prime Clerk LLC as claims and
noticing agent.


HAGHIGHI FAMILY: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
---------------------------------------------------------
An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Haghighi Family and Sports
Medicine, P.A. as of Oct. 4, according to a court docket.

                   About Haghighi Family and
                      Sports Medicine, P.A.

Haghighi Family and Sports Medicine, P.A.'s business operations
involve owning and operating a medical practice with two locations
in northeast Florida.  

The Debtor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. M.D.
Fla. Case No. 17-03033) on Aug. 18, 2017.  Dr. Michael Haghighi,
president, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $249,621 in assets
and $1 million in liabilities.

Judge. Paul M. Glenn presides over the case.  Jason A. Burgess,
Esq., serves as counsel to the Debtor.  The Debtor hired Gunn
Chamberlain, P.L. as its accountant.


HAMPSHIRE GROUP: Liquidation Plan Declared Effective
----------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Hampshire Group filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court a notice of withdrawal of the Company's fifth
motion for an exclusivity extension.  The Company's First Amended
Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation subsequently became effective,
and the Company emerged from Chapter 11 protection.

BankruptcyData.com relayed that the Court confirmed the Plan on
September 28, 2017. BankruptcyData notes, "The Plan contemplates to
provide for the establishment on the Effective Date of the
Liquidation Trust for the primary purpose of administering and
liquidating the Trust Assets. On the Effective Date, all Assets of
the Debtors' Estates, including, but not limited to, Causes of
Action, any recoveries related to the issuance of the Bond and the
related letter of credit draw, certain accounts receivable, and
cash, will vest in the Liquidation Trust." BankruptcyData's Plan
Summary continues, "All Interests in the Debtors will be cancelled,
and the Holders of Class 3 Interests will not be entitled to, and
will not receive or retain, any property on account of such
Interests under the Plan." The Court Order states, "On or prior to
the Effective Date, the Debtors, the Committee, and the Liquidation
Trustee executed the Liquidation Trust Agreement. Richard S. Lauter
has been appointed the Liquidation Trustee. In accordance with the
Confirmation Order and the Plan, November 6, 2017 is established as
the deadline to assert an Administrative Expense Claim (i) arising
during the period from May 1, 2017 through the Effective Date."

                    About Hampshire Group

New York-based Hampshire Group, Limited (OTC Markets: HAMP) is a
provider of fashion apparel across a broad range of product
categories, channels of distribution and price points.  As a
holding company, the Company operates through its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, Hampshire Brands, Inc. and Hampshire International,
LLC.

Hampshire Group, Limited and two affiliates -- Hampshire Brands and
Hampshire International -- sought Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Case Nos. 16-12634 to 16-12636) on Nov. 23, 2016,
to facilitate the orderly wind-down of their business operations.

The petitions were signed by Paul Buxbaum, president and CEO.

Hampshire Group disclosed $25.9 million in assets and $41.8 million
in liabilities.  Brands estimated under $50 million in both assets
and debt.  International estimated under $50,000 in assets and
under $50 million in liabilities.

Blank Rome LLP is the Debtors' counsel.  William Drozdowski of GRL
Capital Advisors LLC is the Debtors' chief financial officer.

The U.S. Trustee for Region 3 has formed an official unsecured
creditors committee in the case.  Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP
serves as legal counsel and Gavin/Solmonese LLC as financial
advisor to the Committee.

                         *     *     *

The Bankruptcy Court authorized Hampshire Group, Limited, to sell
the James Campbell assets to The Fashion Exchange, LLC, pursuant to
an asset purchase agreement dated Jan. 13, 2017.  Klestadt Winters
Jureller Southard & Stevens, LLP, served as legal advisor to the
buyer.


HANSELL/MITZEL: Sale of Mount Vernon Property for $145K Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Timothy W. Dore of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Washington authorized Daniel R. Mitzel and Patricia R.
Burklund to sell real property of the estate located at 24340
Nookachamp Hills Drive, Mount Vernon, Washington, to Cheryl Torbet
and Brian Torbet for $145,000.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, claims, and encumbrances,
with all such liens, claims and encumbrances attaching to the
proceeds.

The Debtors are authorized to pay pro-rated real property taxes,
and all reasonable and customary costs of sale, including excise
taxes.

The Debtors are authorized to distribute the net Sale proceeds to
Peoples Bank on its secured debt against the Property.

The stay of the order under Bankruptcy Rule 6004(h) is waived.

                      About Hansell/Mitzel

Based in Mt. Vernon, Washington, Hansell/Mitzel LLC, which conducts
business under the names Hansell Mitzel Homes and Resort
Maintenance Services, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. W.D.
Wash. Case No. 16-16311) on Dec. 21, 2016.  In its petition, the
Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in assets and
liabilities.  The petition was signed by Daniel R. Mitzel, as
managing member.

The case is administratively consolidated with the Chapter 11 case
(Bankr. W.D. Wash. Case No. 17-10565) of Daniel Mitzel and Patricia
Burklund.

Judge Timothy W. Dore presides over the Chapter 11 cases.  

Bush Kornfeld LLP serves as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.


HHGREGG INC: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Nov. 6
-----------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. Jeffrey J. Graham of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Indiana has extended, at the behest of
hhgregg, Inc., and its affiliates, the Debtors' exclusive periods
for filing a plan through and including Nov. 6, 2017.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 4, 2017, the
Debtors ask the Court to extend the Debtors' exclusive periods for
filing a plan through and including Nov. 6, 2017, and soliciting
acceptances for that plan through and including Jan. 5, 2018.  The
Debtors were a multiregional retailer that provided an extensive
selection of premium appliances, consumer electronics, home
products and computers and tablets in their 220 brick-and-mortar
stores in 19 states and nationwide via hhgregg.com.  The Debtors
undertook multiple strategies to liquidate their assets including a
store closing sale process, the sale of their intellectual property
assets, and are in the process of selling their rights in certain
class actions.  Additionally, the Debtors have a number of
competing constituencies with which to negotiate issues in their
cases and to formulate a plan of liquidation.

                       About hhgregg Inc.

Indianapolis, Indiana-based hhgregg, Inc., is an appliance,
electronics and furniture retailer.  Founded in 1955, hhgregg is a
multi-regional retailer currently with 220 stores in 19 states that
also offers market-leading global and local brands at value prices
nationwide via http://www.hhgregg.com/  

hhgregg Inc., Gregg Appliances Inc. and HHG Distributing LLC sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.
Ind. Lead Case No. 17-01302) on March 6, 2017.  The petitions were
signed by Kevin J. Kovacs, chief financial officer.

At the time of the filing, hhgregg and HHG Distributing estimated
assets and liabilities of less than $50,000.  Gregg Appliances
estimated assets and liabilities at $100 million to $500 million.

The Debtors engaged Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP and Ice Miller LLP
as counsel; Berkeley Research Group, LLC as financial advisor;
Stifel and Miller Buckfire & Co. as investment banker; Hilco IP
Services as intellectual property advisor; Altus Group US, Inc., as
tax advisor; and Donlin, Recano & Company, Inc., as claims and
noticing agent.

The U.S. Trustee has appointed creditors to serve on the official
committee of unsecured creditors in the case of Gregg Appliances,
Inc., Case No. 17-01303-RLM-11.  No official committee has been
appointed in the cases of hhgregg, Inc., No. 17-01302-RLM-11 or HHG
Distributing, LLC, No. 17-01304-RLM-11.

The Committee hired Cooley LLP and Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP as
counsel, and ASK LLP as avoidance claims counsel.  The Committee
retained Province Inc. as financial advisor.

Counsel to the Agent for the Debtors' prepetition secured lenders
and the lenders providing DIP financing are Sean M. Monahan, Esq.,
at Choate, Hall & Stewart LLP; and Jay Jaffe, Esq., at Faegre Baker
Daniels, LLP.

Counsel to the FILO Agent is Stuart Brown, Esq., at DLA Piper LLP.

                          *     *     *

When hhgregg filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, it had signed a term
sheet with an anonymous party to purchase the Company assets.  The
Company said at that time it expected a quick and smooth process
through Chapter 11 with emergence in approximately 60 days.  Ten
days later, hhgregg said it has terminated the nonbinding term
sheet with the anonymous party because the Company was unable to
reach a definitive agreement on terms, and said it continues to
work with interested third parties to purchase assets of the
business.  hhgregg added it had received strong interest from third
parties interested in buying some or all of the Company's assets.

Subsequently, hhgregg executed a consulting agreement with a
contractual joint venture comprised of Tiger Capital Group, LLC,
and Great American Group, LLC, to conduct a sale of the merchandise
and furniture, fixtures and equipment located at the Company's
retail stores and distribution centers.

In an April order, the Bankruptcy Court approved, at the Company's
request, a plan for the Company to close 132 retail stores and the
Company's distribution centers.

According to a disclosure with the Securities and Exchange
Commission in March, debtors Gregg Appliances, Inc., and HHG
Distributing, LLC, entered into a Consulting Agreement with a
contractual joint venture between Tiger Capital Group and Great
American Group to conduct the sale of the merchandise and
furniture, fixtures and equipment located at the Company's 132
retail stores and the distribution centers.

As of June 8, 2017, the Debtors have completed store closing sales
in all its stories.

The Company has said it does not anticipate any value will remain
from the bankruptcy estate for the holders of the Company's common
stock, although this will be determined in the continuing
bankruptcy proceedings.


HILTZ WASTE: Trustee's Sale of All Assets to Hometown for $3M OK'd
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Joan N. Feeney of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Massachusetts, Eastern Division, authorized the private sale by
Mark G. DeGiacomo, the duly-appointed Chapter 11 Trustee for Hiltz
Waste Disposal, Inc., of substantially all of the Debtor's assets
to Hometown Waste, LLC for $2,925,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Sept. 28, 2017.

The sale is free and clear of all Interests, with all such
Interests to attach to the net proceeds of the Sale in the order of
their priority, subject to any claims or defenses of the Trustee or
any other party in interest.

No employee or former employee of the Debtor will be deemed to be
an employee of the Purchaser absent an agreement between the
Purchaser and the employee or former employee establishing new
terms of employment.

The Purchaser will not be liable for any broker's fee, finder's
fee, or similar fee relating in any manner to the Sale.

The Trustee is authorized, but not directed, to pay valid secured
claims against the Purchased Assets from the proceeds of the sale
without further Court order.

The Court, pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.P. 6004(h), declines to order
the sale of Purchased Assets pursuant to the Sale Motion stayed.

                   About Hiltz Waste Disposal

Hiltz Waste Disposal, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Mass. Case No. 16-13459) on Sept. 7, 2016.  Deborah S. Hiltz, its
president, signed the petition.  The Debtor estimated assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Joan N. Feeny.

Aaron S. Todrin, Esq., at Sassoon & Cymrot, LLP, serves as counsel
to the Debtor.  Silverman, Avila & Gershaw, CPAs, is the Debtor's
accountants.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors formed in the case
retained Morrissey Wilson & Zafiropoulos, LLP, as counsel to the
Committee, effective as of Oct. 19, 2016.

Mark G. DeGiacomo has been appointed as Chapter 11 Trustee for the
Debtor.  The Trustee hired Murtha Cullina LLP as counsel.
Verdolino & Lowey, P.C., serves as accountant to the Trustee.


HOUSTON AMERICAN: Unveils Recent Developments in Reeves County
--------------------------------------------------------------
Houston American Energy Corp. has prepared updated slides
reflecting recent developments in Reeves County and updated Company
information to be posted on the Company's web site and for use in
connection with investor presentations.  

Houston American's game plan is to generate healthy returns and
peer group leading growth while maintaining low leverage:

  - Achieve first production during October 2017 from its first two
horizontal wells on Reeves County acreage

  - Drill two additional horizontal Wolfcamp wells on Reeves County
acreage during the last two months of 2017

  - Add Permian proven reserve categories to report for year end
2017

  - Anticipate preliminary plans to drill 6-8 new wells on Reeves
County Acreage during 2018

  - Aggressively pursue and execute on opportunistic leasing and/or
acquisitions in the Delaware or Midland Basins

  - Evaluate potential to scale up in the Permian Basin through
increased participation in projects

  - Generate opportunities to attract additional equity capital by
utilizing recent success with its unconventional Delaware Basin
development project and removal of NYSE listing deficiencies

The presentation slides are available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/4Ec4Hu

                About Houston American Energy

Based in Houston, Texas, Houston American Energy Corp.
(NYSEMKT:HUSA) -- http://www.HoustonAmericanEnergy.com/-- is an
independent energy company with interests in oil and natural gas
wells, minerals and prospects.  The Company's business strategy
includes a property mix of producing and non-producing assets with
a focus on Texas, Louisiana and Colombia.

Houston American reported a net loss of $2.64 million on $165,910
of oil and gas revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared
to a net loss of $3.83 million on $429,435 of oil and gas revenue
for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  

At June 30, 2017, Houston American had $4.86 million in total
assets, $616,366 in total liabilities and $4.24 million in total
shareholders' equity.

GBH CPAs, PC, in Houston, Texas -- http://www.gbhcpas.com/--
issued a "going concern" qualification on the consolidated
financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, noting that
the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, which
raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going
concern.


I-LIGHTING LLC: Exclusive Plan Filing Deadline Moved to Dec. 12
---------------------------------------------------------------
The Hon. David E. Rice of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland to extend the exclusive periods during which
only i-Lighting, LLC, may file a plan of reorganization and solicit
acceptances of the Plan, to Dec. 12, 2017, and Feb. 12, 2018,
respectively.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Sept. 19, 2017, the
Debtor asks for the extension, saying that it is still in the
process of negotiating the consent of the purported lienholders on
the assets at issue in the AHPharma settlement, so that the Debtor
can then seek approval of the compromise of the AHPharma claims and
the transfer of the assets.  The Debtor intends to move forward
with its reorganization with the resolution of the AHPharma
litigation -- which is likely being a structured repayment of
debts.  The Debtor also believes that a 90-day extension of the
Exclusive Periods will give it a better handle on its future
revenue growth and, thereby, a better idea as to the expected debt
repayment structure and timeline.

                       About i-Lighting LLC

Based in North East, Maryland, i-Lighting LLC --
http://www.ilightingled.com/-- conducts business under the name
Stairlighting.  It was founded in 2011 and manufacturers and
distributes LED lighting solutions for use under kitchen cabinets,
and on outdoor decks, stairs, hardscapes, patios and landscapes.
Its patented Easy Plug Installation System, which lowers the
expense and eases the installation of LED lighting systems, has
made LED lighting accessible to more contractors and consumers.
The company was recently honored with a "Bright Lights Award for
Innovation and Entrepreneurship" by the Maryland Comptroller.

The Debtor sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-16807) on May 16, 2017.  Scott D.
Holland, its managing member and chief executive officer, signed
the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $294,316 in assets
and $2.34 million in liabilities.

Judge David E. Rice presides over the case.

The Debtor hired Tydings & Rosenberg LLP as Chapter 11 counsel.


IRONCLAD PERFORMANCE: Committee Objects to DIP Financing Motion
---------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Ironclad Performance Wear's
official committee of unsecured creditors filed with the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court an objection to the Debtors' post-petition
financing motion. The committee asserts, "The Debtors apparently
believe that the DIP Loan is necessary and the terms provided by
Radians are preferable to a contested cash collateral request.
While the Committee supports the Debtor's request, the Committee is
concerned that some of the terms of the proposed DIP Loan favor
Radians -- The DIP Lender and stalking horde bidder -- and pose a
significant risk of diminishing or even eliminating unsecured
creditor recoveries. Much of the Committee's trepidation stems from
the extraordinary powers Radians seeks from this Court; namely the
authority to terminate the automatic stay to pursue far-reaching
remedies following an Event of Default under the DIP Loan
Agreement."

            About Ironclad Performance Wear Corp.

Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation designs and manufactures
branded performance work wear for a variety of construction,
do-it-yourself, industrial, sporting goods and general services
markets.  Since inception, the company has leveraged its
proprietary technologies to design task-specific technical gloves
and performance apparel designed to improve the wearer's ability to
perform specific job functions.

Ironclad's gloves are available through industrial suppliers,
hardware stores, home centers, lumber yards, and sporting goods
retailers nationwide; and through authorized distributors in North
America, Europe, Australia, Middle East, Asia and South America.

Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation, a California corporation and
Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation, a Nevada corporation sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case Nos. 17-12408 and 17-12409) on Sept. 8, 2017.  Geoffrey
L. Greulich, chief executive officer, signed the petitions.  The
cases are jointly administered and are assigned to Judge Martin R.
Barash.

Ironclad California estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.  In its schedules,
Ironclad Nevada disclosed $16.6 million in assets and $8.05 million
in debt.

On Sept. 22, 2017, the U.S. Trustee appointed three creditors to
serve in the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Debtors' cases.


IRONCLAD PERFORMANCE: Hires Craig-Hallum as Financial Advisor
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to employ
Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, as financial advisor to the
Debtor.

Ironclad Performance requires Craig-Hallum to:

   a. identify acquirers, which in the opinion of Craig-Hallum
      and the Debtors, are most likely to acquire the Debtors;

   b. assist the Debtors in formulating a strategy for soliciting
      interest from acquirers, whether approached by Craig-Hallum
      or whether the Debtors are approached proactively, which
      may have an interest in acquiring the Debtors (the
      "Potential Acquirers"), and the development of procedures
      and timetable for marketing the Debtors to the Potential
      Acquirers;

   c. if requested, assist in the preparation of management's
      confidential memorandum describing the Debtors;

   d. introduce the Debtors to Potential Acquirers, and
      coordinate due diligence investigations of the Debtors by
      Potential Acquirers;

   e. along with the Debtors, evaluate proposals from interested
      parties regarding a "Sale or Restructuring" (as that term
      is defined in the Engagement Letter), formulate negotiation
      strategies, and assist in negotiations and closing of a
      Sale or Restructuring; and

   f. if the Debtors pursue a stand-alone restructuring, Craig-
      Hallum will advise and assist the Debtors in developing and
      seeking approval of a restructuring plan (a "Plan"), which
      may be a plan under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code; in
      structuring any new securities to be issued under the Plan;
      in providing valuation analyses with respect to the
      Debtors, their assets or businesses; in seeking and
      evaluating the terms of any exit financing; and will
      participate in hearings before the bankruptcy court with
      respect to the matters upon which C-H has provided
      advice, including, as relevant, providing testimony in
      connection therewith in coordination with the Debtors'
      counsel.

Craig-Hallum will be compensated with a "Sale or Restructuring Fee"
in the amount of $275,000 plus 2.5% of the "Aggregate Transaction
Value" in excess of $20 million up to $22.5 million, plus 4.5% of
the Aggregate Transaction Value in excess of $22.5 million.

Steve Rickman, managing director of Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Craig-Hallum can be reached at:

     Steve Rickman
     CRAIG-HALLUM CAPITAL GROUP LLC
     222 South Ninth Street, Suite 350
     Minneapolis, MN 55402
     Tel: (612) 334-6300
     Fax: (612) 334-6399

                 About Ironclad Performance Wear

Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation designs and manufactures
branded performance work wear for a variety of construction,
do-it-yourself, industrial, sporting goods and general services
markets. Since inception, the company has leveraged its proprietary
technologies to design task-specific technical gloves and
performance apparel designed to improve the wearer's ability to
perform specific job functions.

Ironclad's gloves are available through industrial suppliers,
hardware stores, home centers, lumber yards, and sporting goods
retailers nationwide; and through authorized distributors in North
America, Europe, Australia, Middle East, Asia and South America.

Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation, a California corporation,
and Ironclad Performance Wear Corporation, a Nevada corporation
sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr.
C.D. Cal. Case Nos. 17-12408 and 17-12409) on Sept. 8, 2017.
Geoffrey L. Greulich, chief executive officer, signed the
petitions. The cases are jointly administered and assigned to Judge
Martin R. Barash.

Ironclad California estimated assets of $10 million to $50 million
and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million. In its schedules,
Ironclad Nevada disclosed $16.6 million in assets and $8.05 million
in debt.

The Debtor taps Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, as financial
advisor.

On Sept. 22, 2017, the U.S. Trustee appointed three creditors to
serve in the official committee of unsecured creditors in the
Debtors' cases.


JOHN BATISTA: Dermotta Buying Sewickley Property for $260K
----------------------------------------------------------
John J. Basista asks the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Pennsylvania to authorize the sale of his 50% interest
in 216 acres (+/-) located at Brunazzi Road, Sewickley Township,
Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania, Tax No. 58-06-00-0-008, to Daryl
L. Dermotta for $260,000, subject to overbid.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Nov. 7, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.  The
objection deadline is Oct. 21, 2017.

The Debtor has claimed a $13,050 exemption in the Property.  It has
entered into an agreement of sale with the Buyer to sell the
Property for $260,000 less a credit for $4,197 for the Debtor's
real estate taxes for 2014, 2015, and 2016 which were paid by the
Buyer.  The Property will be sold free and clear of all liens,
claims and encumbrances.

The Buyer is the Debtor's cousin and has acted in good faith with
respect to the within sale in accordance with In re Abbots Dairies
of Pennsylvania, Inc., 788 F2d 143 (3rd Cir. 1986).

The Property has been marketed by William Smith and Shale
Consultants, LLC , a Court approved real estate agent, since Feb.
9, 2017.  

Based upon agent's efforts, the Debtor believes that the proposed
sale price represents the Property's fair market value.  It desires
to close the sale to the Purchaser or to sell the Property to
another bidder who submits a higher and better offer free and clear
of all liens and encumbrances.

A copy of the Agreement of Sale attached to the Motion is available
for free at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/John_Basista_74_Sales.pdf

The Property is encumbered by these liens and subject to an
exemption claim as set forth in the order listed: (i) R. E.
taxes/muni. liens; (ii) John Basista exemption - $13,050; (iii)
Livingston Fin. judgment lien, Lien No. 15JU02075 - $15,393; (iv)
PA Revenue statutory tax lien, Lien No. 1706-14 - $3,500; (v)
Royalty Lender, LTC mortgage, Lien No. 201504090010714 - $120,000;
(vi) PA Revenue statutory tax lien, Lien No. 4614-15 - $12,500;
(vii) Elina M. Dang judgment lien, Lien No. 15JU02075 - $58,190;
and (viii) Liem Dang/Khanh Doan judgment lien, Lien No. 15JU02075 -
$232,755.

Livingston Financial, LLC will be paid $2,342 which the balance
owed on its $15,392 claim (see proof of claim 11-1) less the
Debtor's $13,050 exemption in the Property.

Royalty Lender, Ltd. obtained a judgment on its mortgage on March
9, 2016 in the amount of $107,298.  Royalty has added legal fees
and costs in the amount of $15,611 which is excessive for an
uncontested mortgage foreclosure action.  Since the entry of
judgment Royalty has received royalty payments totaling not less
than $14,236.  The Debtor intends to file an objection to this
claim.

The Debtor will ask the Court to authorize Royalty to be paid not
more than $120,000 less all royalty payments it received after
Sept. 30, 2017, at closing with any excess claim asserted by
Royalty to be held in escrow by the Debtor's counsel pending a
resolution of the Objection.

The proceeds of sale will be distributed at closing in the
following order of priority:

     a. current real estate taxes for 2017 for the Debtor's
interest will be pro-rated at closing (the Buyer will be
responsible for his share of 2017 real estate taxes for the entire
tract);

     b. 50% of real estate taxes years pre-dating 2017 will be paid
by the Debtor;

     c. the Debtor's share of real estate transfer taxes;

     d. Realtor commission in the amount of $20,800 will be paid to
Shale Consultants, LLC whose retention has been approved by the
Court;

     e. Costs of local newspaper and legal journal advertising to
be paid to Gary W. Short;

     f. the Court approved attorney's fees of the Debtor's counsel,
Gary W. Short, plus copy and postage expenses (an itemization of
service and expenses was filed with the Court);

     h. $13,050 which represents the Debtor's exemption in the
Property will be distributed at closing to the Debtor, John J.
Basista;

     g. Livingston Financial, LLC will be paid $2,342;

     h. The balance owed on a Pennsylvania Department of Revenue
tax lien recorded in Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania on April 3,
2014 at no. 1706-14 as per a pay off statement to be provided by
Revenue;

     i. Royalty Lender, LTC will be paid $120,000 less all royalty
payments it receives after Sept. 30 , 2017 and to the extent
Royalty asserts are larger claim, such excess will be held in
escrow by the Debtor's counsel pending further order of Court;

     j. The balance owed on a Revenue tax lien recorded in
Westmoreland County, Pennsylvania on Sept. 22, 2015 at no. 4614-15
as per a pay off statement to be provided by Revenue;

     k. The remaining of the sale proceeds, if any, will be
prorated between the balance owed on the judgment of Elina M. Dang
judgment lien entered on June 30, 2016 at 15 JU 02075 and the
balance owed on the judgment of Liem Dang and Khanh Doan judgment
lien entered on June 30, 2016 at 15 JU 02075.

The Purchaser:

          Daryl L. Dermotta
          416 Rodebaugh Road
          Irwin, PA 15642

John J. Basista filed a petition under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy
Code on Nov. 14, 2016.  His case was converted to a Chapter 11
(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Case No. 16-24231) on Aug. 21, 2017.  Gary W.
Short, Esq., in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, serves as counsel to the
Debtor.


JOHNNY CHIMPO II: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
----------------------------------------------------------
An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Johnny Chimpo II, LLC.

Headquartered in Tampa, Florida, Johnny Chimpo II, LLC, filed for
Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No.
17-07764) on Aug. 31, 2017, estimating its assets at between
$50,001 and $100,000 and its liabilities at between $100,001 and
$500,000.  Jake C. Blanchard, Esq., at Blanchard Law, PA, serves as
the Debtor's bankruptcy counsel.


KEYCORP: Fitch Affirms 'BB' Preferred Stock Rating
--------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed the Long- and Short-Term Issuer Default
Ratings (IDRs) of KeyCorp (Key), and Key Bank, N.A. to 'A-'/'F1'.
The Rating Outlook has been revised to Stable from Negative. The
affirmation reflects the strong earnings profile, stable and
diverse business model, and consistency of performance through
time.

The rating action follows a periodic review of the large regional
banking group, which includes Keycorp (KEY), BB&T Corporation
(BBT), Capital One Finance Corporation (COF), Citizens Financial
Group, Inc. (CFG), Comerica Incorporated (CMA), Fifth Third Bancorp
(FITB), Huntington Bancshares Inc. (HBAN), M&T Bank Corporation
(MTB), MUFG Americas Holding Corporation (MUAH), PNC Financial
Services Group (PNC), Regions Financial Corporation (RF), SunTrust
Banks Inc. (STI), US Bancorp (USB), and Wells Fargo & Company
(WFC).

Company-specific rating rationales for the other banks are
published separately, and for further discussion of the large
regional bank sector in general, refer to the special report titled
"Large Regional Bank Periodic Review," to be published shortly.

KEY RATING DRIVERS
IDRS, NATIONAL RATINGS AND SENIOR DEBT

Fitch's affirmation of KEY's IDRs is supported by the company's
sound financial profile, solid asset quality performance,
diversified revenue mix, and reduced risk profile. While KEY's
earnings measures have been lower than most large regional banks,
KEY's financial metrics for the first-half of 2017 were more in
line peer averages and what Fitch believes would be KEY's long run
performance. Additionally, identified revenue synergies should
further improve KEY's profit measures to remain in-line with its
peer group.

The revision of the Outlook to Stable from Negative reflects
Fitch's view that KEY has demonstrated successful progress in its
First Niagara Financial Group (FNFG) integration, including the
targeted branch closures, the exit of FNFG's sizeable third party
vendor relationships, and integrating FNFG into KEY's platforms.
KEY had identified 40% of the targeted costs saves would come from
technology and the elimination of third party vendors.

KEY remains on track to execute on its financial targets announced
at the acquisition and should benefit from revenue synergies. To
date, KEY has already achieved its initial cost save target of $400
million and, more recently, expects an additional $50 million to be
achieved by early 2018. The $450 million cost save figure
represents 46% of FNFG's expense base prior to acquisition.
Further, management estimates $300 million of revenue synergies to
come through over the next two to three years from areas including
residential mortgage, commercial payments, private banking and
commercial bank and capital market offerings.

Positively, the company continues to deliver improving financial
performance. Fitch views 2Q17 results as emblematic of KEY's
longer-run performance and supportive of the current ratings. KEY
has been successful in driving positive operating leverage. The
company reported cash efficiency ratio of 59.4% from 69% the same
period a year ago, which is in line with its long-term target of
below 60%. ROTE stood at 12.9%, in-line with long-term targeted
range of 13% to 15%. Fitch also considers the company's diversified
revenue base as a rating strength evidenced by non-interest income
contributing roughly 44% of total revenues, consistently above the
peer group average. The company has benefited from its solid
commercial platform that reflects its middle-market focused capital
markets business. Incorporated in the affirmation is that
profitability will trend positively and pull consistently to
peer-averages over time.

Given the company's reduced risk profile over the years, credit
performance continues to be better than peers with average net
charge-offs (NCOs) of 0.29% over the last five quarters. Further,
for 2Q17, Fitch calculated non-performing assets (NPAs) stood at
1.01% compared to 2.04% on average for the peer group. KEY
estimates its through-the-cycle loan losses should fall between 40
basis points (bps) and 60bps. Given current NCOs levels at 29bps
for 2Q17, Fitch expects some credit deterioration for KEY, as well
as the industry, as credit losses are likely at unsustainably low
levels.

Although concerns exist with the quality of FNFG's acquired loans,
given FNFG's aggressive growth, particularly in new business lines,
KEY's estimated credit mark of 3% on the loan portfolio combined
with its capital position should cushion any potential credit
deterioration.

Given the FNFG acquisition and continued capital deployment
actions, KEY's capital measures are in-line with the peer average.
Although Fitch had expected capital to decline, the company has
historically operated with above peer average capital levels. Fitch
believes the company's improving earnings profile, enhanced risk
profile and solid asset quality performance helps offset the
company's reduced capital position.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

KEY has a Support Rating of '5' and Support Rating Floor of 'NF'.
In Fitch's view, KEY is not systemically important and therefore,
the probability of support is unlikely. IDRs and VRs do not
incorporate any support.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

KEY's subordinated debt is notched one level below its VR for loss
severity. KEY's preferred stock is notched five levels below its
VR, two times for loss severity and three times for
non-performance, while KEY's trust preferred securities are notched
two times from the VR for loss severity and two times for
non-performance. These ratings are in accordance with Fitch's
criteria and assessment of the instruments non-performance and loss
severity risk profiles and have been affirmed due to the
affirmation of the VR.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

KeyBank, N.A.'s uninsured deposit ratings are rated one notch
higher than KEY's IDR and senior unsecured debt because U.S.
uninsured deposits benefit from depositor preference. U.S.
depositor preference gives deposit liabilities superior recovery
prospects in the event of default.

HOLDING COMPANY

KEY's IDR and VR are equalized with those of its operating
companies and bank, reflecting its role as the bank holding
company, which is mandated in the U.S. to act as a source of
strength for its bank subsidiaries. Ratings are also equalized
reflecting the very close correlation between holding company and
subsidiary failure and default probabilities.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDRS, NATIONAL RATINGS AND SENIOR DEBT

Fitch believes that KEY's current ratings are at the high-end of
its rating potential given that financial performance is similar to
rated large regional peers.

Negative rating action could ensue should the company take a more
aggressive approach to capital management such has a high total
pay-out ratio versus peers, resulting in a rapid capital decline
that is not offset with improved earnings generation and
retention.

Additionally, unexpected changes to current business strategy or
key executive management, and/or a declining trend in operating
performance would also be viewed negatively.

Should KEY consider future acquisition activity of material size
and/or appear to be out of line with current strategies, ratings
would be reviewed.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

Since KEY's Support and Support Rating Floors are '5' and 'NF',
respectively, there is limited likelihood that these ratings will
change over the foreseeable future.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

The ratings for KEY and its operating companies' subordinated debt
and preferred stock are sensitive to any change to KEY's VR.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

The long-and short-term deposit ratings are sensitive to any change
to KEY's Long- and Short-term IDR.

HOLDING COMPANY

Should KEY's holding company begin to exhibit signs of weakness,
demonstrate trouble accessing the capital markets, or have
inadequate cash flow coverage to meet near-term obligations, there
is the potential that Fitch could notch the holding company IDR and
VR from the ratings of the operating companies.

Fitch has affirms the following ratings and has revised Ratings
Outlooks as indicated:

KeyCorp
-- Long-Term IDR at 'A-'; Outlook to Stable from Negative;
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1';
-- Viability at 'a-';
-- Senior debt at 'A-';
-- Subordinated debt at 'BBB+';
-- Preferred stock at 'BB';
-- Short-term debt at 'F1';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support Floor at 'NF'.

KeyBank NA
-- Long-Term IDR at 'A-'; Outlook to Stable from Negative;
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F1';
-- Viability at 'a-';
-- Long-term deposits at 'A';
-- Senior debt at 'A-';
-- Subordinated debt at 'BBB+';
-- Short-term deposits at 'F1';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support Floor at 'NF'.

KeyCorp Capital I - III
-- Preferred stock at 'BB+'.


KY LUBE: Hires Seiller Waterman as Counsel
------------------------------------------
KY Lube LLC seeks approval from the US Bankruptcy Court for the
Western District of Kentucky, Louisville Division, to employ
Seiller Waterman LLC as counsel.

Services required of Seiller Waterman are:

     a. give legal advice with respect to the Debtor's powers and
        duties as debtor in possession in the continued
        operations of the estate's business and management of its
        assets;

     b. take all necessary action to protect and preserve the
        Debtor's estate, including the prosecution of actions on
        behalf of the Debtor, the defense of any actions
        commenced against the Debtor, negotiations concerning all
        litigation in which the Debtor are involved, if any, and
        objecting to claims filed against the Debtor's estate;

     c. prepare on behalf of the Debtor all necessary motions,
        answers, orders, reports and other legal papers in
        connection with the administration of the Debtor's
        estate; and

     d. perform any and all other legal services for the Debtor
        in connection with this chapter 11 case and the
        formulation and implementation of the Debtor's chapter 11
        plan.

William P. Harboson, Esq. assures the Court that Seiller Waterman
is a "disinterested person" as defined by section 101(14) of the
Bankruptcy Code.

Seiller Waterman's hourly rates are:

     David M. Cantor      $345
     Neil C. Bordy        $340
     Paul J. Krazeise     $300
     Keith J. Larson      $275
     William P. Harbison  $275
     Paralegals           $125
     Law Clerk            $125

SW maintains office at:

     William P. Harboson, Esq.
     SEILLER WATERMAN LLC
     Meidinger Tower – 22nd Floor
     462 S. Fourth Street
     Louisville, KY 40202
     Tel: (502) 584-7400
     Fax: (502) 583-2100
     E-mail: harbison@derbycitylaw.com

                         About KY Lube LLC

The Kentucky Jiffy Lubes is locally owned and operated Jiffy Lubes
that service the Louisville and Lexington communities. Its core
offering is the Jiffy Lube Signature Service Oil Change. Based in
Lexington, Kentucky, KY Lube LLC filed a chapter 11 petition
(Bankr. W.D. Ky. Case No. 17-32876) on September 7, 2017. The
Debtor is represented by William P. Harboson, Esq. at Seiller
Waterman LLC. The Debtor estimates less than $1 million in assets
and liabilities.


LARKIN EXCAVATING: Sale of All Assets to Flat Land for $2M Approved
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Dale L. Somers of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of Kansas authorized Larkin Excavating, Inc.'s sale of
substantially all assets to Flat Land Excavating, LLC, for
$2,030,000.

Subject to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement and as defined
in the APA, the Assets will include inventory, equipment, goodwill,
customer lists, patents, intellectual property, copyrights,
trademarks and two parcels of real property.  

The Debtor also owns certain real property located at 000000
Eisenhower Road, Leavenworth, Kansas, and accounts receivable, is a
party to contracts, and leases certain equipment from Commercial
Credit Group, Inc. and from Commercial Capital Co., all of which
are specifically excluded from the Assets to be sold to the
Purchaser as may be other Excluded Assets set forth in the APA.

The sale is free and clear of all liens, encumbrances, claims and
interests, which liens, encumbrances, claims and interests will
attach to the proceeds to the same extent, validity and priority as
existed in the assets prior to the Sale.

The sale proceeds will be deposited at closing in the trust account
of Evans & Mullinix, P.A., the Debtor's attorneys, and will be
distributed pursuant to the attached Sale Proceeds Allocation,
which constitutes the agreement and directives of Spectrum Home
Health Agency, Central Bank of the Midwest, University National
Bank, CNH Industrial Capital America and the IRS.

CNH will be paid from the sale proceeds for its Case IH 570NXT
Tractor/Loader S/N JJGN570NCDC593l40 the sum as set forth in its
proof of claim in the amount of $29,366.

CNH has a purchase money security interest in the Tractor/Loader
and will be paid by Debtor within 10 business days after closing.


The sale proceeds will be delivered to the attention of: Kimberly
Hoover, Legal Department, 5729 Washington Ave., Racine, WI 53406.

All amounts to be paid by the Debtor pursuant to the APA, will be
payable without further order of the Court (or will be a credit to
the Purchase Price) if and when such obligations arise, as an
administrative expense of the Debtor's Chapter 11 case.

If the Purchaser desires to assume any leases other than leases on
the schedule of Excluded Assets, the Purchaser will advise the
Debtor and the Debtor will file a Motion to assume and assign those
leases to the Purchaser, however, if the Purchaser does not accept
the cure cost associated with respect to a designated lease, the
Debtor will not be required to assume that lease.

The Debtor and the Purchaser will each pay their own fees and
expenses to professionals, advisors and agents as set forth in the
APA.

Notwithstanding the provisions of Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and
6006(d), the Order will be effective and enforceable immediately
upon entry.

                    About Larkin Excavating

Larkin Excavating, Inc. -- http://larkinexcavating.com/-- provides
construction services and operates throughout the United States.
It owns a shop and office building located at 13575 Gilman Road,
Lansing, Kansas, valued at $453,500; a vacant land in Eisenhower
Road, Leavenworth, with a value of $300,000; and a track of real
property, identified by Larkin as the rock quarry and landfill, in
Leavenworth County, valued at $400,000.

Larkin Excavating sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. D. Kan. Case No. 17-20890) on May 17, 2017.
John Larkin, president, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $3.46 million in
assets and $6.38 million in liabilities.  

Judge Dale L. Somers presides over the case.

The Debtor is represented by Joanne B. Stutz, Esq., at Evans &
Mullinix, P.A.


LEVERETTE TILE: U.S. Trustee Unable to Appoint Committee
--------------------------------------------------------
An official committee of unsecured creditors has not yet been
appointed in the Chapter 11 case of Leverette Tile, Inc.

                      About Leverette Tile

Leverette Tile, Inc., based in Hudson, Florida, is a kitchen and
bath remodeling contractor and a granite countertop and cabinet
fabricator.

Leverette Tile filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case
No. 17-07840) on Sept. 5, 2017.  The petition was signed by Brian
Leverette, president.  In its petition, the Debtor estimated
$100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.

Alberto F. Gomez, Jr., Esq., at Johnson Pope Bokor Ruppel & Burns,
LLP, serves as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.


LIBERTY ASSET: Sale of Arcadia Property to South Lake for $10M OK'd
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Ernest M. Robles of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California authorized Liberty Asset Management Corp.'s
sale of real properties and improvements located at (i) 1020 S.
Baldwin Avenue, Arcadia, California, APN 5778-006-010 and (ii) 652
Fairview Avenue, Arcadia, California, APN 5778-006-005 to South
Lake 12, LLC for $10,000,000, including the assumption and
assignment of the lease relating to the Property between Arcadia
Pacific Investments, LLC and AMF Bowling Centers, Inc. dated March
31, 1999 ("Existing Lease") to which the Debtor is the successor in
interest.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Oct. 3, 2017.

The sale is free and clear of all Interests, with all such
Interests, including the liens of Shanghai Commercial Bank, Ltd.,
Blue Sky Communications, Huesing Holdings, LLC, and Los Angeles
County to attach to the net proceeds.

The Debtor's assumption and assignment to Buyer of the Existing
Lease is approved, with such assumption and assignment to be
effective as of the date of the Closing.

Upon the entry of the Order, and prior to closing, the escrow
company is ordered and instructed to transfer to the Debtor the
deposit made by Buyer, in the amount of $300,000.

Upon closing, the Debtor is authorized, but not directed, to pay
over, or instruct escrow to pay over, the proceeds realized by the
Debtor from the sale of the Property and assignment of the Existing
Lease as follows:

     a. Customary and ordinary closing costs, including escrow and
title costs;

     b. Broker commissions to the respective real estate brokers;

     c. Unpaid and outstanding real property taxes due and owing to
Los Angeles County Assessor and Tax Collector; and

     d. Shanghai Commercial Bank on account of the Shanghai
Commercial Bank first priority allowed secured claim in full and
complete satisfaction of Shanghai Commercial Bank's claims secured
by the Property.

The balance of the sale proceeds will be maintained by the Debtor
pending further order of the Court.

All time periods set forth in the Order will be calculated in
accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 9006(a).

Notwithstanding Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and 6006(d), the Order
will be effective and enforceable immediately upon entry and will

not be subject to any stay as provided therein and its provisions
will be self-executing.

                About Liberty Asset Management

Before ceasing operations, West Covina, California-based Liberty
Asset Management Corporation was a real estate management company.
Its mission was to seek out real estate opportunities throughout
Northern and Southern California, invest in such opportunities, and
manage them.

Liberty Asset Management Corporation filed for Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-13575) on March 21, 2016.
The Debtor estimated assets at $100 million to $500 million and
debt at $50 million to $100 million.  The petition was signed by
Benjamin Kirk, CEO.

The Debtor tapped Leven Neale Bender Yoo & Brill LLP, as counsel.
The Debtor also engaged SierraConstellation Partners LLC, as
restructuring management advisor, and Lawrence R. Perkins, as chief
restructuring
officer.

The Office of the U.S. Trustee on April 27, 2016, appointed three
creditors to serve on an official committee of unsecured creditors.
The Committee tapped Jeremy V. Richards, Esq., John D. Fiero,
Esq., Gail S. Greenwood, Esq., and Victoria A. Newmark, Esq., at
Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP, in Los Angeles, California, as
counsel.  Development Specialists Inc. serves as the Committee's
financial advisor.


LITTLE SAIGON: Sale of All Assets to Lucky Taro for $600K Approved
------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Julia W. Brand of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central
District of California authorized Little Saigon Supermarket, LLC's
sale of substantially all of its assets and property, which
includes a liquor license and all of its rights and interests in
that 15-year lease with HMZ Retail, LP, concerning the commercial
real property located at 10932 Westminster Ave., Garden Grove,
California, to Lucky Taro, Inc. for $600,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Sept. 25, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.

The Assets are being sold on an "as is, where is," basis and the
Debtor makes no warranties or representations about whether the
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control will approve the transfer
of the liquor license to the Buyer.  The sale is free and clear of
all liens, claims, interests, and encumbrances.

The cure amount owed to HMZ through Sept. 25, 2017 is $146,901,
with a daily rent accruing of $1,256 ("Cure Payment").  The Cure
Payment will be paid by the Debtor upon Closing.

Should Lucky Taro fail to close, and the failure to close is a
default under the Asset Purchase Agreement, West Mountain
Investment, Inc. ("WMI"), a corporation wholly-owned by Ms. Jasmine
Nguyen, will serve as the Back-Up Bid and purchase the Assets for a
cash purchase price of $650,000, pursuant to the terms of the Asset
Purchase Agreement that WMI submitted to counsel for the Debtor on
Sept. 20, 2017 in connection with its Qualified Bid (with such
changes as were agreed-upon between WMI and the Debtor during the
Sale Hearing, including the increase of the purchase price to
$650,000).

At the Closing, the Buyer will pay or deliver the balance of the
Purchase Price for deposit into the attorney-client trust account
of Weintraub & Selth, APC ("Trust Account").  The Purchase Price
and the Deposit will remain in the Trust Account, and no
distributions of the Purchase Price or the Deposit (other than the
Cure Payment to be made by the Debtor to HMZ as set forth, and
quarterly fees due to the United States Trustee) will be made
absent further order of the Court following notice and a hearing.

The Debtor's counsel will promptly refund the Deposit of WMI, which
was provided by WMI in connection with the Back-Up Bid, upon entry
of the Order, pursuant to the Bid Procedures.  Should the Closing
not occur with respect to Lucky Taro, and should WMI close the Sale
with respect to the Back-Up Bid, WMI will be deemed to be the Buyer
as set forth.

Pursuant to sections 105(a) and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, and
subject to and conditioned upon the Closing of the Sale, the
Debtor's assumption and assignment to the Buyer of the Lease is
approved.

The Order will be effective and enforceable immediately upon entry
of the Order and the stay imposed by Bankruptcy Rules 6004 (h) and
6006 (d) is waived.

               About Little Saigon Supermarket

Little Saigon Supermarket, LLC, was formed in August 2015 to
develop and operate a Vietnamese supermarket.  Little Saigon on
Nov. 11, 2015, it entered into 15-year lease with HMZ Retail, LP,
concerning the commercial real property located at 10932
Westminster Ave., Garden Grove, California.  Thereafter, it spent
approximately, one year and $1,800,000 in cash designing,
developing and building out the space for a Vietnamese supermarket.
On Dec. 3, 2016, Little Saigon opened the "Farmer's Garden
Supermarket.  The Westminster address is a central location for the
Vietnamese community in Orange County.

Sun Valley Management, LLC ("SVM") is Little Saigon's Manager and
its sole Class A member.  Huy Dinh Le and Vo Thi Hong Truc are its
Class B members by virtue of their investment under the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services EB-5 Immigrant Investor
Program.

The Market opened in December 2016 and initially operated at a
profit, generating gross sales in its first month of $724,180.
However, gross sales began to drop and along with it, the Market's
profitability.  Having difficulty meeting payroll and falling
behind to vendors, on June 7, 2017, at a Managers meeting of SVM,
the Managers voted to, among other things, (i) close the Market and
start liquidation; (ii) designate Peter Nguyen as the Debtor's
authorizes Representative; and (iii) file for bankruptcy.  On June
26, 2017, the Market closed its doors.

Little Saigon Supermarket sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 17-20227) on Aug. 20, 2017.  Elaine V. Nguyen, Esq.,
at Weintraub Selth and Nguyen, APC, serves as general bankruptcy
counsel to the Debtor.


LUVU BRANDS: Posts $203,000 Net Income in Fiscal 2017
-----------------------------------------------------
Luvu Brands, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission its annual report on Form 10-K reporting net income of
$203,000 on $16.93 million of net sales for the year ended June 30,
2017, compared to a net loss of $312,000 on $16.82 million of net
sales for the year ended June 30, 2016.

As of June 30, 2017, Luvu Brands had $3.87 million in total assets,
$6.06 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $2.19 million.

Liggett & Webb, P.A. Certified Public Accountants, in Boynton
Beach, Florida, issued a "going concern" opinion in its report on
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended June 30,
2017, noting that the Company has a working capital deficit of
approximately $1.8 million, and an accumulated deficit of
approximately $9 million.  These factors raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company's cash and cash equivalents
totaled $742,193 compared to $544,772 in cash and cash equivalents
as of June 30, 2016.

Net cash provided by operating activities primarily consists of the
net income (loss) adjusted for certain non-cash items, including
depreciation, stock-based compensation, loss on disposal of fixed
assets, and the effect of changes in operating assets and
liabilities.  Net cash provided by operating activities increased
from the prior year due to the net income from operations and a
reduction in accounts receivable offset, in part, by an increase in
inventory and a reduction in accounts payable.

Cash used in investing activities in the years ended June 30, 2017,
and 2016 was primarily for the purchase of production equipment,
leasehold improvements and computer equipment.

Cash used in financing activities in the year ended June 30, 2017,
was primarily due to the repayment of short-term debt and repayment
of the advances secured by its credit card receipts, offset in part
by borrowing from the new credit card advance and other credit
facilities.

Cash provided by financing activities in the year ended June 30,
2016, was primarily due to increased borrowings from secured and
unsecured notes payable and issuance of common stock, offset in
part by repayment of existing credit obligations.

"We expect total capital expenditures for fiscal 2018 to be less
than $250,000 and to be funded by equipment loans and, to a lesser
extent, anticipated operating cash flows and borrowings under the
line of credit with Advance Financial Corporation.  This includes
capital expenditures in support of our normal operations.

"If our business plans and cost estimates are inaccurate and our
operations require additional cash or if we deviate from our
current plans, we could be required to seek additional debt
financing for particular projects or for ongoing operational needs.
This indebtedness could harm our business if we are unable to
obtain additional financing on reasonable terms.  In addition, any
indebtedness we incur in the future could subject us to restrictive
covenants limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to
changes in, our business.  If we do not comply with such covenants,
our lenders could accelerate repayment of our debt or restrict our
access to further borrowings, which in turn could restrict our
operating flexibility and endanger our ability to continue
operations."

A full-text copy of the Form 10-K is available for free at:

                     https://is.gd/IubBdH

                       About Luvu Brands

Formerly known as Liberator, Inc., Luvu Brands, Inc. (OTCMKTS:LUVU)
is an Atlanta, Georgia-based manufacturer that has built several
brands in the wellness, lifestyle and casual furniture and seating
categories.  The Company's brands are headquartered in Atlanta in a
140,000 square foot manufacturing facility.  The Company also
manages, markets, and distributes its products directly to
consumers through several websites that include: liberator.com,
theliberator.co.uk, jaxxliving.com, and avanacomfort.com.


LW RETAIL: Case Summary & 5 Unsecured Creditors
-----------------------------------------------
Debtor: LW Retail Associates LLC
        123 Remsen Street
        Brooklyn, NY 11201

Type of Business: LW Retail Associates LLC filed as a Single Asset
                  Real Estate (as defined in 11 U.S.C. Section
                  101(51B)).  The Company owns in fee simple
                  interest four condominium units in New York
                  valued by the Company at $12.20 million in the
                  aggregate.

Chapter 11 Petition Date: October 5, 2017

Case No.: 17-45189

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court
       Eastern District of New York (Brooklyn)

Judge: Hon. Elizabeth S. Stong

Debtor's Counsel: Dawn Kirby, Esq.
                  DELBELLO DONNELLAN WEINGARTEN WISE & WIEDERKEHR,
LLP
                  One North Lexington Avenue, 11th Floor
                  White Plains, NY 10601
                  Tel: 914-681-0200
                  E-mail: dkirby@ddw-law.com

Total Assets: $12.64 million

Total Debts: $6.25 million

The petition was signed by Louis Greco, manager.  A full-text copy
of the petition is available for free at:

              http://bankrupt.com/misc/nyeb17_45189.pdf

List of Debtor's Five Largest Unsecured Creditors:

   Entity                          Nature of Claim   Claim Amount
   ------                          ---------------   ------------
Itkowitz PLLC                        Legal Fees          $19,313
26 Broadway, 26th Flr.
New York, NY 10004

Warren Furman                                             $5,000
156 William Street, Ste 800
New York, NY 10038

Top Out Consultants                                       $1,600
312 Broadway, Ste 404
New York, NY 10007

Epi Design Network                                        $1,500
434 E. 52nd Street #9
New York, NY 10022

WYS Design LLC                                            $1,500
63 Greene Street #505
New York, NY 10012


M&T BANK: Fitch Affirms BB+ Preferred Stock Rating
--------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has affirmed M&T Bank Corporation's (MTB) Long-Term
Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) and Viability Rating (VR) at 'A' and
'a', respectively. The Rating Outlook is Stable.

The rating action follows a periodic review of the large regional
banking group, which includes M&T Bank Corporation (MTB), BB&T
Corporation (BBT), Capital One Finance Corporation (COF), Citizens
Financial Group, Inc. (CFG), Comerica Incorporated (CMA), Fifth
Third Bancorp (FITB), Huntington Bancshares Inc. (HBAN), Keycorp
(KEY), MUFG Americas Holding Corporation (MUAH), PNC Financial
Services Group (PNC), Regions Financial Corporation (RF), SunTrust
Banks Inc. (STI), US Bancorp (USB), and Wells Fargo & Company
(WFC).

Company-specific rating rationales for the other banks are
published separately, and for further discussion of the large
regional bank sector in general, refer to the special report titled
'Large Regional Bank Periodic Review,' to be published shortly.

KEY RATING DRIVERS
IDRS, NATIONAL RATINGS AND SENIOR DEBT

MTB's rating affirmation is supported by the company's core
strengths and financial profile, such as consistently delivering
solid performance through various economic downturns as well as its
improved capital position. Additionally, Fitch views the company's
strong franchise, veteran management team, and revenue
diversification favorably.

MTB's core earnings profile is considered to be one of the
strongest of its peer group. MTB is one of the most consistent
performers from an earnings perspective and its financial measures
have seen less volatility than most of its large regional peers. As
an example, MTB's ROA has one of the lowest 10-year standard
deviations among its peers.

More recently, MTB's results have benefited from recent rate
increases with NIM rising 31bps on the back of net interest income
growth of 9% for 2Q17 compared to 2Q16. Going forward, Fitch
expects modest expansion of the NIM with some pressure expected in
the 2H17 from loan spreads and refinancing of long-term debt.

MTB's Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve was lifted in July
2017. Fitch recognizes that MTB could begin to pursue its
long-established M&A strategy although not expected in the
near-term given the recent Hudson City acquisition. In Fitch's
view, given improvements to BSA/AML compliance areas, MTB would be
well positioned to execute on future bank acquisitions. Further,
MTB has proven its ability to successfully execute M&A transactions
and integrate them effectively. Despite all of its acquisitions,
MTB has typically put its management team into place, which has
helped maintain its consistent strategy and direction over many
decades. Strategically, the franchise seeks to add to its density
in the corridor from NY to northern VA.

Fitch believes the Hudson City acquisition should provide a solid
platform for future commercial growth and deepens MTB's franchise
in the Northeast, particularly in Northern New Jersey, where the
company historically had a limited presence. The company has also
indicated that the deal is still in-line to achieve many of its
projected targets. The focus will be to transition HCBK from a
residential mortgage lender to a commercial lender over the next
few years.

Credit performance is consistently solid, despite the company's
large exposure to commercial real-estate assets (CRE), which stood
at 35% of total loans versus the large regional peer average of 19%
as of June 30, 2017. MTB's NCOs and NPAs have been superior versus
most of its peer group through numerous economic and real estate
downturns and indicative of the strong credit culture at the
company. Fitch believes the company's reserve coverage also
provides good support given loss history. Although MTB's CRE
lending, particularly multi-family, has been growing rapidly,
albeit slowing in recent periods and competition has been
aggressive for the industry, Fitch's affirmation incorporates the
expectation that MTB would continue to deliver superior credit
performance.

Fitch recognizes that MTB has continued to build capital in line
with similarly-rated peers. MTB's tangible common equity ratio
stood at 8.93% versus a 6.41% 10-year average. In Fitch's view,
MTB's longer-term capital ratios will tend to fall on the mid to
lower-end of the large regional peer group averages. However,
Fitch's believes the company's strong equity generation, good asset
quality performance through various credit cycles, solid reserves
when compared to net charge-offs (NCOs) help offset the company's
leaner capital position.

Further, Fitch considers MTB's management team to be a rating
strength given the stable, average tenure of 20+ years with the
company. Further, despite a history of acquisitions, board
composition has not changed dramatically. Fitch estimates 12% of
MTB's ownership is held by management and employees of the company,
which creates a strong alignment between management and
shareholders interest.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

MTB has a Support Rating of '5' and Support Rating Floor of 'NF'.
In Fitch's view, MTB is not systemically important and therefore,
the probability of support is unlikely. IDRs and VRs do not
incorporate any support. ]

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

MTB's subordinated debt is notched one level below its VR for loss
severity. MTB's preferred stock is notched five levels below its
VR, two times for loss severity and three times for
non-performance, while MTB's trust preferred securities are notched
two times from the VR for loss severity and two times for
non-performance. These ratings are in accordance with Fitch's
criteria and assessment of the instruments non-performance and loss
severity risk profiles and have been affirmed due to the
affirmation of the VR.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

The uninsured deposit ratings of Manufacturers and Traders Trust
Co, are rated one notch higher than MTB's IDR and senior unsecured
debt because U.S. uninsured deposits benefit from depositor
preference. U.S. depositor preference gives deposit liabilities
superior recovery prospects in the event of default.

HOLDING COMPANY

MTB's IDR and VR are equalized with those of its operating
companies and bank, reflecting its role as the bank holding
company, which is mandated in the U.S. to act as a source of
strength for its bank subsidiaries. Ratings are also equalized
reflecting the very close correlation between holding company and
subsidiary failure and default probabilities.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDRS, VR, AND SENIOR DEBT
MTB's ratings are at the high end of its rating potential given its
performance and credit profile. Although not envisioned over the
rating horizon, MTB's ratings could have positive momentum should
it develop a more diversified franchise by strengthening its
consumer/retail penetration and product offerings along with
further geographic diversification of its commercial lending book,
while successfully integrating Hudson City. This would also entail
maintaining peer leading profitability and asset quality measures.

Conversely, negative rating drivers would be a more aggressive
approach to capital management, and/or announcing an acquisition in
the near term given the sizeable Hudson City transaction. In
addition, unexpected changes to current business strategy or key
executive management would also be viewed negatively.

Although not expected, a material deterioration in credit
performance could signal an increase in risk appetite and/or
loosening underwriting, which would be viewed negatively.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

Since MTB's Support and Support Rating Floors are '5' and 'NF',
respectively, there is limited likelihood that these ratings will
change over the foreseeable future.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

The ratings for MTB and its operating companies' subordinated debt
and preferred stock are sensitive to any change to MTB's VR.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

The long- and short-term deposit ratings are sensitive to any
change to MTB's Long- and Short-term IDR.

HOLDING COMPANY

Should MTB's holding company begin to exhibit signs of weakness,
demonstrate trouble accessing the capital markets, or have
inadequate cash flow coverage to meet near-term obligations, there
is the potential that Fitch could notch the holding company IDR and
VR from the ratings of the operating companies.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

M&T Bank Corporation
-- Long-term IDR at 'A'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-term IDR at 'F1';
-- Viability at 'a';
-- Preferred stock at 'BB+'.
-- Support at '5';
-- Support floor 'NF'.

Manufacturers and Traders Trust Co
-- Long-term IDR at 'A'; Outlook Stable;
-- Long-term deposits at 'A+'.
-- Short-term IDR at 'F1';
-- Short-term deposits at 'F1';
-- Viability at 'a';
-- Senior unsecured debt at 'A';
-- Subordinated debt at 'A-';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support floor 'NF'.

Wilmington Trust, N.A. (formerly M&T Bank, NA)
-- Long-term IDR at 'A'; Outlook Stable;
-- Long-term deposits at 'A+'.
-- Short-term IDR at 'F1';
-- Short-term deposits at 'F1';
-- Viability at 'a';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support floor 'NF'.

Wilmington Trust Corporation
-- Long-term IDR at 'A'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-term IDR at 'F1';
-- Subordinated debt at 'A-';
-- Viability at 'a'.
-- Support at '5';
-- Support floor at `NF'.

Wilmington Trust Company
-- Long-term IDR at 'A'; Outlook Stable;
-- Short-term IDR at 'F1';
-- Viability at 'a'.
-- Support at '5';
-- Support floor at 'NF'

Provident (MD) Capital Trust I
-- Preferred stock at 'BBB-'.


MARINA BIOTECH: Appoints Amit Shah as Chief Financial Officer
-------------------------------------------------------------
Marina Biotech, Inc., announced that Amit Shah joined the company
in the newly created role of chief financial officer, effective
Oct. 5, 2017.

Prior to joining Marina, Mr. Shah served as senior director of
finance - ERP, at Young's Market Company.  Prior to Young's, he was
the vice president of finance & accounting, and acting chief
financial officer, of Insightra Medical Inc.  Mr. Shah also
previously served as VP finance and acting chief financial officer
at IgDraSol Inc., as corporate controller & director of finance at
ISTA Pharmaceuticals, as corporate controller at Spectrum
Pharmaceuticals, and controller/senior manager internal audits at
Caraco Pharmaceuticals Laboratories.  Mr. Shah received a Bachelor
of Commerce degree from the University of Mumbai, and is an
Associate Chartered Accountant from The Institute of Chartered
Accountants of India.  Mr. Shah is also an inactive CPA from
Colorado, USA.

"We are thrilled to have Amit join the Marina Biotech team to
establish a strong finance and accounting organization for Marina
Biotech.  Amit brings with him over 15 years of strong financial,
accounting and auditing experience to Marina," stated Joseph
Ramelli, CEO of Marina Biotech.  "Our recent acquisition of the FDA
approved therapy Prestalia represents a large and attractive market
opportunity for Marina, which made finding the right Chief
Financial Officer essential.  I am confident that Amit is that
person."

Mr. Shah stated, "The opportunity to work with the leadership at
Marina on a new vision for building a strong finance and accounting
organization for Marina, as well as growing the company through
sales of Prestalia is exciting.  I am equally excited to be
contributing to the transition of Marina into a strong and growing
commercial organization.  There are several promising therapies in
our clinical pipeline that, if they are approved by the FDA, we
could bring to market using the sales and marketing platforms
developed for Prestalia."

The Company will pay to Mr. Shah a base salary of $120,000 per
year, and Mr. Shah will be entitled to receive a discretionary
bonus as determined by the Board of Directors of the Company in an
amount up to 40% of his base salary (with the payment of such bonus
to be based on the achievement of such milestones as will be
determined by the Board following good faith consultation with Mr.
Shah), with such payment obligations not becoming effective unless
and until the closing of a single capital raising transaction
involving the issuance by the Company of its equity (or
equity-linked) securities yielding aggregate gross proceeds to the
Company of not less than $5 million on or prior to Dec. 31, 2017.

Mr. Shah was also granted options to purchase up to 60,000 shares
of the common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $2.70
per share under the Company's 2014 Long-Term Incentive Plan, with
all of those options vesting and becoming exercisable on the
one-year anniversary of the date of the Offer Letter.

                      About Marina Biotech

Headquartered in Bothell, Washington, Marina Biotech, Inc. --
http://www.marinabio.com/-- is a biopharmaceutical company engaged
in the discovery, acquisition, development and commercialization of
proprietary drug therapeutics for addressing significant unmet
medical needs in the U.S., Europe and additional international
markets.  The Company's primary therapeutic focus is the disease
intersection of hypertension, arthritis, pain, and oncology
allowing for innovative combination therapies of the plethora of
already approved drugs and the proprietary novel oligotherapeutics
of Marina Biotech, Inc.  The Company's approach is meant to reduce
the risk associated with developing a new drug de novo and also
accelerate time to market by shortening the clinical development
program through leveraging what is already known or can be learned
in its proprietary Patient Level Database (PLD).

Squar Milner LLP, in Los Angeles, California, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company has suffered
recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations and has
had recurring negative working capital.  This raises substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

Marina Biotech reported a net loss of $837,100 on $0 of revenue for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared with a net loss of $1.11
million on $0 of revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  

As of June 30, 2017, Marina had $6.63 million in total assets,
$4.15 million in total liabilities, and $2.47 million in total
stockholders' equity.

At June 30, 2017, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $4.205
million and a negative working capital of $3.756 million.  The
Company anticipates that it will continue to incur operating losses
as it executes its plan to raise additional funds and investigate
strategic and business development initiatives.  In addition, the
Company has had and will continue to have negative cash flows from
operations.  The Company has previously funded its losses primarily
through the sale of common and preferred stock and warrants, the
sale of notes, revenue provided from its license agreements and, to
a lesser extent, equipment financing facilities and secured loans.
In 2016 and 2015, the Company funded operations with a combination
of the issuance of notes and preferred stock, and license-related
revenues.  At June 30, 2017, the Company had a cash balance of
$263,900.  Its operating activities consume the majority of its
cash resources.


MCCLATCHY CO: Chatham Funds Hold 7.5% of Shares as of Aug. 31
-------------------------------------------------------------
Chatham Asset Management, LLC, and Anthony Melchiorre disclosed in
a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission
that as of Aug. 31, 2017, they beneficially own 387,516 shares of
Class A common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the McClatchy
Company, constituting 7.5 percent of the shares outstanding.

The 387,516 shares of Common Stock of the Company held in the
aggregate by the Chatham Funds, which constitute approximately 7.5%
of the shares of Common Stock of the Company deemed to be issued
and outstanding as of Oct. 3, 2017, may be deemed to be
beneficially owned (x) indirectly by Chatham Asset Management, LLC,
as the investment manager to the Chatham Funds, and (y) indirectly
by Mr. Melchiorre, as the managing member of CAM.

As of Oct. 3, 2017, Chatham Asset High Yield Master Fund, Ltd. held
271,439 shares of Common Stock, constituting approximately 5.2% of
the Common Stock deemed to be issued and outstanding.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                   https://is.gd/qI6JJN

                      About McClatchy

The McClatchy Company -- http://www.mcclatchy.com/-- is publisher
of iconic brands such as the Miami Herald, The Kansas City Star,
The Sacramento Bee, The Charlotte Observer, The (Raleigh) News &
Observer, and the (Fort Worth) Star-Telegram.  McClatchy operates
30 media companies in 29 U.S. markets in 14 states, providing each
of its communities with high-quality news and advertising services
in a wide array of digital and print formats.  McClatchy is
headquartered in Sacramento, Calif., and listed on the New York
Stock Exchange under the symbol MNI.

McClatchy reported a net loss of $34.19 million for the year ended
Dec. 25, 2016, compared to a net loss of $300.16 million for the
year ended Dec. 27, 2015.

As of June 25, 2017, the Company had $1.68 billion in total assets,
$1.68 billion in total liabilities, and a $8.74 million
stockholders' deficit.

                          *     *     *

McClatchy continues to hold Moody's Investors Service's "Caa1"
corporate family rating.  In December 2015, Moody's affirmed the
"Caa1" corporate family rating rating and changed the rating
outlook to stable from positive due to continued weakness in the
print advertising market and the ongoing pressure on the company's
operating cashflow.

McClatchy continues to hold Standard & Poor's "B-" corporate credit
rating (outlook stable).  As reported by the TCR on April 2, 2014,
S&P affirmed all ratings on McClatchy including the 'B-' corporate
credit rating, and revised the rating outlook to stable from
positive.  The outlook revision to stable reflected S&P's
expectation that the time-frame for a potential upgrade lies beyond
the next 12 months, and could also depend on the company realizing
value from its digital minority interests.


MERIDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS: Court Denies K. Carr's Second Appeal
--------------------------------------------------------------
Judge D. Brock Hornby of the United States District Court for the
District of Maine issued an order denying Kenneth Carr's second
motion for leave to appeal in the case captioned KENNETH CARR,
Appellant, v. NATHANIEL R. HULL, Chapter 7 Trustee; JEFFREY CARR
AND ROBERT ALLISON, Appellees, Misc. No. 1:17-MC-208-DBH (D. Me.).

Judge Hornby contends that he sees no reason to alter his previous
ruling denying interlocutory appeal. Carr has shown no change in
the controlling legal authority, no new evidence that was not
earlier obtainable, nor any blatant error. Instead, he has come up
with a new argument that he could have made but did not make,
originally. Even if the previous ruling is not law of the case in
the strict sense, those are sound reasons for denying this second
bite at the apple.

The bankruptcy court's decision also does not satisfy the
collateral order doctrine for immediate interlocutory review,
because the remand refusal is still subject to review at the end of
the case.

The bankruptcy case is in re: MERIDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, LLC,
CHAPTER 11, Debtor, CASE No. 15-20640 PGC (D. Me.).

A copy of Judge Hornby's Order dated Oct. 3, 2017, is available at
https://is.gd/SB2nut from Leagle.com.

KENNETH L CARR, Appellant, represented by RANDY J. CRESWELL --
rcreswell@perkinsthompson.com -- PERKINS THOMPSON, PA.

NATHANIEL R HULL, Appellee, represented by ROGER CLEMENT --
rclement@verrilldana.com -- VERRILL DANA LLP.

JEFFREY CARR, Appellee, represented by ANTHONY E. PERKINS --
aperkins@bernsteinshur.com -- BERNSTEIN SHUR SAWYER & NELSON & D.
SAM ANDERSON -- sanderson@bernsteinshur.com -- BERNSTEIN SHUR
SAWYER & NELSON.

ROBERT ALLISON, Appellee, represented by ANTHONY E. PERKINS,
BERNSTEIN SHUR SAWYER & NELSON & D. SAM ANDERSON, BERNSTEIN SHUR
SAWYER & NELSON.

MERIDIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS LLC, Debtor, represented by BRUCE B.
HOCHMAN -- bhochman@eatonpeabody.com -- EATON PEABODY, ERICA M.
JOHANSON -- ejohanson@eatonpeabody.com -- EATON PEABODY & MICAH A.
SMART -- msmart@eatonpeabody.com -- EATON PEABODY.

Meridian Medical Systems LLC (Bankr. D. Me. Case No. 15-20640)
filed a voluntary Chapter 11 petition on September 11, 2015, and is
represented by Bruce B. Hochman, Esq., at Eaton Peabody.


MONTCO OFFSHORE: Breach of Contract Suit vs. Black Elk Dismissed
----------------------------------------------------------------
Montco Oilfield Contractors, LLC, filed the adversary proceeding
captioned MONTCO OILFIELD CONTRACTORS, LLC Plaintiff(s). v. BLACK
ELK ENERGY OFFSHORE OPERATIONS, LLC, et al, Defendant(s), Adversary
No. 17-3249 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) against Defendants in order to
recover unpaid amounts allegedly owed to Montco for plugging and
abandonment services it completed pursuant to a Turnkey Service
Agreement, as well as alleged damages associated with performing
additional, unanticipated decommissioning work that resulted from
undisclosed liabilities.  Montco alleges claims for breach of
contract, quantum meruit, misrepresentation, and a declaratory
judgment against Defendants.

The Defendants moved to dismiss Montco's Amended Complaint pursuant
to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 9, and 12. The Defendants'
motions to dismiss argue that Montco failed to plead requisite
facts under Rules 8 and 9. If Montco's claims meet the federal
pleading standards, the Defendants alternatively argue that those
claims fail as a matter of law or are barred by Texas law.

Upon analysis, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Marvin Isgur dismissed count I
of Montco's Amended Complaint as to all Defendants. Count I is
dismissed without prejudice upon the satisfaction of the conditions
to payment as to Black Elk. Count II is dismissed as to all
Defendants except Black Elk. Counts III, IV, and VI of Montco's
Amended Complaint are dismissed as to all Defendants. Montco is
allowed to replead Count V.

Montco's Amended Complaint asserts six claims against the
Defendants; the six claims include:

   * Count I. A breach of Contract claim against Black Elk,
Argonaut, and the other signatories to the Black Elk Contract's
amendments based upon those Defendants' failure to remit payment to
Montco for the work it completed pursuant to the Black Elk
Contract.

   * Count II. A breach of contract claim against Black Elk and W&T
for failure to indemnify Montco under the Black Elk Contract for
services performed while controlling wild or uncontrolled wells, as
well as the cleaning and disposing of hazardous materials and
waste.

   * Count III. A breach of contract claim against all of the
Defendants for failing to pay Montco for the extra-contractual work
it completed on the Black Elk Job sites.

   * Count IV. In the alternative, a quantum meruit claim against
all of the Defendants for accepting the benefits of Montco's
unanticipated work but failing to pay Montco for such benefits.

   * Count V. In the alternative, a misrepresentation claim against
all of the Defendants for misrepresentations and omissions of
material fact made to Montco during the negotiation and bidding
process for the Black Elk Contract regarding the true scope of the
work required to plug and abandon the oil wells and structures on
the Black Elk Job sites.

   * Count VI. A claim for a declaratory judgment of Montco's legal
rights and the Defendants' obligations to Montco.

Regarding Count I, Judge Isgur opines that Montco's allegations,
when taken as true, fail to state a plausible claim for relief.
Argonaut is not a contracting party to the Black Elk Contract or
its amendments and thus is not in privity of contract with Montco.
Instead, Argonaut's obligation to release the surety bond proceeds
within its possession to ultimately allow Black Elk to compensate
Montco for its decommissioning services arose outside of the Black
Elk Contract. Consequently, regardless of the lack of objections
during the negotiation process for the Black Elk Contract, no
privity exists between Montco and Argonaut under the Black Elk
Contract. Montco's Amended Complaint fails to plead a plausible
claim for relief necessary to survive Argonaut's motion to dismiss
Count I.

Montco failed to plead any form of relief upon which to base a
claim for a breach of an oral contract or promissory estoppel
against Defendants. Accordingly, Montco cannot recover from Black
Elk, Argonaut, or any other Defendant for a failure to pay Montco
for its completed services under the Black Elk Contract based upon
these theories.

Montco, however, is allowed to replead Count V of its amended
complaint with respect to additional work completed as part of its
decommissioning of Black Elk Job sites that was occasioned by a
misrepresentation. Montco's Omnibus Brief stipulates that Montco
brings Count V against Black Elk and the Legacy Owners but
voluntarily dismisses Count V as to the Working Interest Parties
and Argonaut. Black Elk and the Legacy Owners' motions to dismiss
are accordingly denied.

Count VI of Montco's Amended Complaint is moot or would add nothing
to the adversary proceeding or Montco's claims beyond what its
breach of contract claims already accomplish. Accordingly, Count VI
of Montco's Amended Complaint is dismissed.

The bankruptcy case is in re: MONTCO OFFSHORE, INC., et al, Chapter
11, Debtor(s), Case No: 17-31646 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.).

A full-text copy of Judge Isgur's Memorandum Opinion dated Oct. 3,
2017, is available at https://is.gd/r4JE0O from Leagle.com.

Montco Offshore, Inc., Debtor, represented by David E. Avraham --
david.avraham@dlapiper.com -- DLA Piper LLP (US), Adam Lanza --
adam.lanza@dlapiper.com -- DLA Piper LLP (US), Daniel Simon --
daniel.simon@dlapiper.com -- DLA Piper LLP (US), Vincent P. Slusher
-- vince.slusher@dbr.com -- Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Jeffrey
Torosian -- jeffrey.torosian@dlapiper.com -- DLA Piper LLP (US) &
Andrew B. Zollinger -- andrew.zollinger@dlapiper.com -- DLA Piper
LLP.

US Trustee, U.S. Trustee, represented by Christine A. March, Office
of the US Trustee & Stephen Douglas Statham --
stephen.statham@usdoj.gov -- Office of US Trustee.

The Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Montco Offshore, Inc.,
Creditor Committee, represented by Eric Michael English --
eenglish@porterhedges.com -- Porter Hedges LLP, John F. Higgins, IV
-- jhiggins@porterhedges.com -- Porter Hedges LLP & Joshua W.
Wolfshohl -- jwolfshohl@porterhedges.com -- Porter Hedges LLP.

                 About Montco Offshore

Based in Galliano, Louisiana, Montco Offshore, Inc. --
http://www.montco.com/mo--  was founded by the Orgeron family in
1948.  Over its 60+ years, the Company has served the offshore
energy industries with crew boats, ocean-going tugs, deck barges,
supply boats, and liftboats. Currently, Montco specializes in
liftboats ranging in size from 235 feet to 335 feet which provide
the best quality and safety of service for customers requiring
versatile elevated vessels/work-platforms.  Montco has total fleet
of six vessels includes (a) two 335' class liftboats, known as (i)
"Robert," which was unveiled in the first quarter of 2012, and (ii)
"Jill," which was completed in 2014; (b) two 245' class liftboats,
known as (i) "Kayd," which was completed in 2006, and (ii)
"Myrtle;" which was completed in 2002; and (c) two 235' class
liftboats, each completed in 2009, known as (i) "Paul," and (ii)
"Caitlin."

Montco Offshore, Inc. and its affiliate Montco Oilfield
Contractors, LLC, filed Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead
Case No. 17-31646) on March 17, 2017.  The petitions were signed by
Derek C. Boudreaux, the CFO.

As of the Petition Date, on a book basis, Montco Offshore had an
aggregate of approximately $265 million in total assets and
approximately $136 million in total liabilities.  MO Contractors
had approximately $84 million in total assets (which are mostly
made up of receivables) and approximately $126 million in total
liabilities.  

As of the Petition Date, the Debtors estimate that $5.3 million was
due and owing to holders of prepetition trade claims against MO
Contractors, and $75 million was due and owing to holders of
prepetition trade claims against MO Contractors, not including the
intercompany obligations.

The cases are assigned to Judge Marvin Isgur.

DLA Piper LLP (US) is serving as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel,
with the engagement led by Vincent P. Slusher, Esq., David E.
Avraham, Esq., and Adam C. Lanza, Esq.

Blackhill Partners, LLC, is the Debtors' financial advisor and
investment broker, with Joe Stone, Todd Heinz, and Tripp Ballard
leading the engagement.

BMC Group, Inc., is the claims & noticing agent.

On March 29, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Porter Hedges LLP is
serving as counsel to the Creditors Committee, with the engagement
led by John F Higgins, IV, Joshua W. Wolfshohl, and Eric Michael
English.


MRI INTERVENTIONS: AIGH Investment Has 4.9% Stake as of Oct. 3
--------------------------------------------------------------
In an amended Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, AIGH Investment Partners, L.P. and Orin Hirschman
reported that as of Oct. 3, 2017, they beneficially own 506,621
shares of common stock of MRI Interventions, Inc., constituting 4.9
percent of the shares outstanding.  

The amount excludes 606,536 warrants to purchase common stock
warrants to purchase stock not exercisable at the present time due
to the reporting persons' 4.9% beneficial ownership limitation.

The percentage is based on 10,339,210 shares of Common Stock of the
issuer outstanding as of Aug. 18, 2017, as reported by the issuer
in its Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on Sept. 5, 2017.

Mr. Hirschman is the managing member of AIGH LP's General Partner
and president of AIGH Investment Partners, L.L.C., with respect to
shares of Common Stock directly held by AIGH LP, and AIGH LLC.

The principal office and business address of AIGH Investment
Partners, L.P., AIGH Investment Partners LLC, and Mr. Hirschman is

6006 Berkeley Avenue Baltimore MD 21209.

A full-text copy of the regulatory filing is available at:

                      https://is.gd/5KkePd

                    About MRI Interventions

Based in Irvine, Calif., MRI Interventions, Inc. --
http://www.mriinterventions.com/-- is a medical device company
that develops and commercializes innovative platforms for
performing minimally invasive surgical procedures in the brain and
heart under direct, intra-procedural magnetic resonance imaging, or
MRI, guidance.  From its inception in 1998 to 2002, the Company
deployed significant resources to fund its efforts to develop the
foundational capabilities for enabling MRI-guided interventions and
to build an intellectual property portfolio.  In 2003, the
Company's focus shifted to identifying and building out commercial
applications for the technologies it developed in prior years.

MRI Interventions incurred a net loss of $8.06 million in 2016,
compared to a net loss of $8.44 million in 2015.  

As of June 30, 2017, MRI Interventions had $16.85 million in total
assets, $8.32 million in total liabilities and $8.52 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Cherry Bekaert LLP, in Charlotte, North Carolina, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company incurred net
losses during the years ended Dec. 31, 2016, and 2015 of
approximately $8.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively.
Additionally, the stockholders' deficit at Dec. 31, 2016, was
approximately $756,000.  These conditions raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


MRI INTERVENTIONS: May Issue 1.8M Shares Under 2013 Incentive Plan
------------------------------------------------------------------
MRI Interventions, Inc., filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission a Form S-8 registration statement relating to the
registration of 1,800,000 additional shares of its common stock
issuable under the Company's Second Amended and Restated 2013
Incentive Compensation Plan.  A full-text copy of the regulatory
filing is available for free at https://is.gd/IpXgRx

                    About MRI Interventions

Based in Irvine, Calif., MRI Interventions, Inc. --
http://www.mriinterventions.com/-- is a medical device company
that develops and commercializes innovative platforms for
performing minimally invasive surgical procedures in the brain and
heart under direct, intra-procedural magnetic resonance imaging, or
MRI, guidance.  From its inception in 1998 to 2002, the Company
deployed significant resources to fund its efforts to develop the
foundational capabilities for enabling MRI-guided interventions and
to build an intellectual property portfolio.  In 2003, the
Company's focus shifted to identifying and building out commercial
applications for the technologies it developed in prior years.

MRI Interventions incurred a net loss of $8.06 million in 2016,
compared to a net loss of $8.44 million in 2015.  

As of June 30, 2017, MRI Interventions had $16.85 million in total
assets, $8.32 million in total liabilities and $8.52 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Cherry Bekaert LLP, in Charlotte, North Carolina, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company incurred net
losses during the years ended Dec. 31, 2016, and 2015 of
approximately $8.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively.
Additionally, the stockholders' deficit at Dec. 31, 2016, was
approximately $756,000.  These conditions raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


MRI INTERVENTIONS: Seven Directors Elected by Stockholders
----------------------------------------------------------
An annual meeting of the stockholders of MRI Interventions, Inc.,
was held on Oct. 3, 2017, at which the Company's stockholders:

   (a) elected John R. Fletcher, Pascal E.R. Girin, Francis P.
Grillo, Kimble L. Jenkins, Timothy T. Richards, Maria Sainz and
John N. Spencer, Jr. as directors of the Company to serve until the
2018 annual meeting of stockholders or until their successors have
been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death,
resignation, disqualification or removal;

   (b) ratified the appointment of Cherry Bekaert LLP as the
Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the
year ending Dec. 31, 2017; and

   (c) approved the Company's Second Amended and Restated 2013
Incentive Compensation Plan.

On Oct. 3, 2017, MRI Interventions posted an updated investor
presentation to its website at
http://ir.stockpr.com/mriinterventions/investor-presentation. A
copy of the investor presentation is available for free at:

                    https://is.gd/52vjOn

                   About MRI Interventions

Based in Irvine, Calif., MRI Interventions, Inc. --
http://www.mriinterventions.com/-- is a medical device company
that develops and commercializes innovative platforms for
performing minimally invasive surgical procedures in the brain and
heart under direct, intra-procedural magnetic resonance imaging, or
MRI, guidance.  From its inception in 1998 to 2002, the Company
deployed significant resources to fund its efforts to develop the
foundational capabilities for enabling MRI-guided interventions and
to build an intellectual property portfolio.  In 2003, the
Company's focus shifted to identifying and building out commercial
applications for the technologies it developed in prior years.

MRI Interventions incurred a net loss of $8.06 million in 2016,
compared to a net loss of $8.44 million in 2015.  As of June 30,
2017, MRI Interventions had $16.85 million in total assets, $8.32
million in total liabilities and $8.52 million in total
stockholders' equity.

Cherry Bekaert LLP, in Charlotte, North Carolina, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, citing that the Company incurred net
losses during the years ended Dec. 31, 2016, and 2015 of
approximately $8.1 million and $8.4 million, respectively.
Additionally, the stockholders' deficit at Dec. 31, 2016, was
approximately $756,000.  These conditions raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.


NATIONAL TRUCK: Gear & Axel, Bollier Appointed to Committee
-----------------------------------------------------------
Henry Hobbs, Jr., acting U.S. trustee for Region 5, on Oct. 4
appointed two more creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of National Truck
Funding, LLC, and American Truck Group, LLC.

The two unsecured creditors are:

     (1) Gear & Axel of Mobile
         Lindsey H. Ratliff
         8801 Bellingrath Road
         Theodore, AL 36582
         Tel: (251) 653-6376

     (2) The Bollier Family Trust
         Gerald Bollier
         11457 Regency Lane
         Carmel, IN 46033
         Tel: (317) 575-0654

The U.S. Trustee for Region 5, on Sept. 19, appointed three
creditors -- Yolo Capital, Inc., Hannah Baby, LLC, and Kevin C.
Faerber -- to serve on the official committee of unsecured
creditors in the Chapter 11 case of National Truck Funding, LLC.

                  About National Truck Funding

Headquartered in Gulfport, Mississippi, National Truck Funding, LLC
-- http://nationaltruckfunding.com/-- retails and rents trucks.  
It operates as a subsidiary of American Truck Group, LLC --
http://americantruckgroup.com/

National Truck and American Truck sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. S.D. Miss. Case Nos. 17-51243 and 17-51244) on June 25,
2017.  The petitions were signed by Louis J. Normand, Jr.,
manager.

National Truck estimated its assets and liabilities at $10 million
to $50 million.  American Truck estimated its assets and
liabilities at $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Katharine M. Samson presides over the cases.  The Debtors
hired Lugenbuhl, Wheaton, Peck, Rankin & Hubbard as bankruptcy
counsel; Wessler Law Firm as local counsel; Lefoldt & Company PA as
accountant; and Chaffe & Associates as restructuring advisor and
investment banker.


NET ELEMENT: All Seven Proposals Approved at Annual Meeting
-----------------------------------------------------------
Net Element, Inc., held its annual meeting of stockholders on Oct.
3, 2017, at which the Company's stockholders:

    (a) elected Oleg Firer, Kenges Rakishev, James Caan, Drew
Freeman and Howard Ash as directors to serve for a one-year term
expiring in 2018;

    (b) approved an amendment to the Company's Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation to effectuate a reverse split of the
Company's issued and outstanding shares of the Company's common
stock at a ratio of between 1-for-10 and 1-for-30, inclusive, which
ratio will be selected at the sole discretion of the Company's
Board of Directors;

    (c) approved an amendment to the Company's Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation to decrease authorized Common Stock
from 400 million shares to 100 million shares;

    (d) approved an amendment to the Company's 2013 Equity
Incentive Plan, as amended, to increase the number of shares of the
Common Stock available for issuance thereunder by 3,680,000 shares
of Common Stock;

    (e) approved the issuance pursuant to the Common Stock Purchase
Agreement between the Company and Cobblestone Partners, LLC, dated
as July 5, 2017, of shares of Company Common Stock to Cobblestone
Capital Partners LLC in excess of 19.99% of the outstanding shares
of the Company's Common Stock as of the date of the Common Stock
Purchase Agreement, to comply with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635;

    (f) approved the issuance by the Company of 471,388 restricted
shares of Common Stock to the Company's Chief Executive Officer,
Oleg Firer as a performance bonus, as required by and in accordance
with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635; and

    (g) ratified the selection of Daszkal Bolton LLP as the
Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the
year ending Dec. 31, 2017.

                        About Net Element

North Miami Beach, Florida-based Net Element, Inc. (NASDAQ: NETE)
-- http://www.netelement.com/-- operates a payments-as-a-service
transactional and value-added services platform for small to medium
enterprise in the US and selected emerging markets.  In the U.S. it
aims to grow transactional revenue by innovating SME productivity
services such as its cloud based, restaurant and retail
point-of-sale solution Aptito.  Internationally, Net Element's
strategy is to leverage its omni-channel platform to deliver
flexible offerings to emerging markets with diverse banking,
regulatory and demographic conditions such as UAE, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan where initiatives have been recently
launched.  Net Element was named in 2016 by South Florida Business
Journal as one of the fastest growing technology companies.

Net Element reported a net loss of $13.61 million on $54.28 million
of total revenues for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared
to a net loss of $13.32 million on $40.23 million of total revenues
for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2015.

As of June 30, 2017, Net Element had $21.97 million in total
assets, $19.99 million in total liabilities and $1.97 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Daszkal Bolton LLP's report on the Company's consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, contains an
explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt as to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The independent
auditors stated that the Company's recurring losses from operations
and working capital and accumulated deficits raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


NET ELEMENT: Effects Stock Split to Regain Nasdaq Compliance
------------------------------------------------------------
Net Element, Inc., announced that effective at 12:01 am, Eastern
Time, on Oct. 5, 2017, the Company effected a one-for-ten reverse
stock split of its outstanding common stock.  The Company's common
stock will open for trading on the NASDAQ Capital Market on Oct. 5,
2017, on a post-split basis.

The Reverse Stock Split is intended to increase the per share
trading price of the Company's common stock to satisfy the $1.00
minimum bid price requirement for continued listing on the NASDAQ
Capital Market.  When the reverse stock split becomes effective,
every 10 shares of common stock will automatically convert into one
share of common stock with no change in par value per share.  This
will reduce the number of shares outstanding as of Oct. 3, 2017,
from approximately 22,048,974 to approximately 2,204,897.  Any
fractional shares resulting from the reverse stock split will be
rounded up to the next whole share.  There is no impact on the
actual trading of Net Element's shares.  They will continue to
trade on the NASDAQ Capital Market without interruption under the
symbol NETE.  The new CUSIP number for the common stock following
the reverse split will be 64111R300.

Proportional adjustments will be made to Net Element's outstanding
stock options, outstanding warrants and equity-compensation plans.
The number of authorized shares of the Company will remain
unchanged and the reverse stock split will not affect the common
stock capital account on its balance sheet.


Stockholders holding common shares through a brokerage account or
book entry form will have their shares automatically adjusted to
reflect the reverse stock split as of the effective date.  The
Company's transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust
Company will act as the exchange agent for the reverse stock split.
If you have shares held a brokerage or bank, you can contact them
directly with any questions.  If you hold shares in book entry form
or you hold physical certificates, you should contact Continental
at 917-262-2378.

                       About Net Element

North Miami, Florida-based Net Element, Inc. (NASDAQ:NETE) --
http://www.netelement.com/-- operates a payments-as-a-service
transactional and value-added services platform for small to medium
enterprise in the US and selected emerging markets.  In the U.S. it
aims to grow transactional revenue by innovating SME productivity
services such as its cloud based, restaurant and retail
point-of-sale solution Aptito.  Internationally, Net Element's
strategy is to leverage its omni-channel platform to deliver
flexible offerings to emerging markets with diverse banking,
regulatory and demographic conditions such as UAE, Kazakhstan,
Kyrgyzstan and Azerbaijan where initiatives have been recently
launched.  Net Element was named in 2016 by South Florida Business
Journal as one of the fastest growing technology companies.

Net Element reported a net loss of $13.61 million on $54.28 million
of total revenues for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared
to a net loss of $13.32 million on $40.23 million of total revenues
for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2015.  

As of June 30, 2017, Net Element had $21.97 million in total
assets, $19.99 million in total liabilities and $1.97 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Daszkal Bolton LLP's report on the Company's consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, contains an
explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt as to the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.  The independent
auditors stated that the Company's recurring losses from operations
and working capital and accumulated deficits raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.


NEW COVENANT PAINTING: Hires Smith & Taylor as Accountant
---------------------------------------------------------
The New Covenant Painting of NWA, Inc., seeks authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Arkansas to
employ Smith & Taylor Tax and Management, LLC, as accountant to the
Debtor.

New Covenant Painting requires Smith & Taylor to provide accounting
services, including tax preparation and consultation, and other
accounting and tax related services, both annually and on an
ongoing basis.

Smith & Taylor will be paid at the hourly rate of $75 to $150.
Smith & Taylor received a retainer in the amount of $300. It will
also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Pat Taylor, partner of Smith & Taylor Tax and Management, LLC,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Smith & Taylor can be reached at:

     Pat Taylor
     SMITH & TAYLOR TAX AND MANAGEMENT, LLC
     9 W Township Rd.
     Fayetteville, AR 72703
     Tel: (479) 442-4224

            About The New Covenant Painting of NWA, Inc.

The New Covenant Painting of NWA, Inc., filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. W.D. Ark. Case No. 17-70191) on Jan.
27, 2017, disclosing under $1 million in both assets and
liabilities. The Debtor is represented by Emily J. Henson, Esq., at
Bond Law Office, as counsel.


NOLES PARTNERS: Wants to Use D McClain's Cash Collateral
--------------------------------------------------------
Noles Partners, LLC, seeks permission from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Middle District of Florida to use cash, accounts
receivable and other income derived from the Debtor's operations to
fund its operating expenses and costs of administration in this
Chapter 11 case for the duration of the Chapter 11 case.

Upon information and belief, D McClain Enterprises, LLC, is owed
$21,096 which is secured by the Debtor's furnishings and equipment
of the restaurant operating as All Star Grill - Haines City at 94
Maxcy Plaxa Circle, Haines City, Florida 33844.  The Debtor
reserves the right to challenge the validity, priority and extent
of the Secured Creditor's liens against the collateral.

The Debtor says that in order for it to remain in business, it is
imperative that it have the use of its cash collateral.

As adequate protection for the use of cash collateral, the Debtor
offers the following:

     a. the Secured Creditors will have postpetition liens on the
collateral to the same extent, validity and priority as existed
prepetition;

     b. the Debtor will maintain insurance on the Collateral to the
same amount as required under the underlying loan documents;

     c. Secured Creditors will have a right to inspect the
collateral on 48 hours, reasonable notice; and

     d. upon written request, the Debtor will provide Secured
Creditors with copies of monthly financial documents generated in
the ordinary course of business, and other information as the
Secured Creditors reasonably request with respect to the Debtor's
operations.

The Debtor's Motion is available at:

          http://bankrupt.com/misc/flmb17-08142-10.pdf

Noles Partners, LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-08142) on Sept. 22, 2017.

The Debtor is represented by:

         Buddy D. Ford, Esq.
         Jonathan A. Semach, Esq.
         BUDDY D. FORD, P.A.,
         9301 West Hillsborough Avenue
         Tampa, Florida 33615-3008
         Tel: (813) 877-4669
         E-mail: Buddy@tampaesq.com
                 Jonathan@tampaesq.com
                 All@tampaesq.com


NUTRITION RUSH: Sale of Retail Stores Inventory for $19K Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Gary Spraker of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Nevada authorized Nutrition Rush, LLC's sale of its health
supplements, vitamin packs, and nutrition powders located in retail
stores to Mike's Muscle, Inc., for $18,592.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Sept. 14, 2017.

On Jan. 5, 2017, the Debtor filed a Motion to Assume and Reject
Certain Leases including lease agreements for these locations:

    a. 4050 Airport Center Dr. Palm Springs, California ("Palm
Springs Store");
    b. 77920 Country Club Dr., Palm Desert, California ("Palm
Desert Store");
    c. 9705 S. Eastern Ave., Las Vegas, Nevada ("Eastern Store");
    d. 2655 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada ("Maryland
Store");
    e. 1725 N. Rainbow Blvd., Las Vegas, Nevada ("Rainbow Store");
and
    f. 6050 N. Decatur Blvd., Las Vegas, Nevada ("Decatur Store").

The Debtor's request to assign the Leases for the Rainbow Store and
Maryland Store is denied.

The Debtor is authorized to take all actions necessary to assign
the Leases to the Buyer for the Palm Springs Store, Palm Desert
Store and the Eastern Store.

The Debtors are authorized to sell the Inventory and assign the
Approved Leases to the Buyer for the Palm Springs Store ($6,479),
Palm Desert Store ($5,877) and the Eastern Store ($6,236), for the
total purchase price of $18,592.

The sale of the Inventory will, upon full payment of the proceeds,
after costs, be free and clear of all liens, claims, encumbrances
and interests which may be asserted against the Inventory
("Encumbrances"), with all such Encumbrances attaching only to the
Proceeds of the sale.

The Buyer will deposit the Proceeds into the trust account of
Schwartz Flansburg PLLC, and such Proceeds will be held by Schwartz
Flansburg PLLC until further order of the Court.

The Schwartz Flansburg's request to a surcharge of $10,000 of the
Proceeds is denied, without prejudice, to Schwartz Flansburg filing
a separate motion with its billing records for review by the Court
and any subsequent Chapter 7 trustee.

The Debtor will surrender and vacate the premises and turn in the
keys to LVAC no later than close of business 5:00 p.m. (PCT) on
Sept. 30, 2017, for the following stores: (i) the Decatur Store;
(ii) the Rainbow Store; and (iii) the Maryland Store.

As provided by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 7062, the Order
will become effective immediately upon its entry and the 14-day
stay period under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 6004(h) is
waived.

                       About Nutrition Rush

Nutrition Rush, LLC, is a health supplement retailer operating in
Nevada, California, and previously, in Arizona.  Nutrition Rush
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Nev. Case No. 16-16771) on
Dec. 22, 2016.  Laura Kuveke, the Debtor's managing member, signed
the petition.  At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated $500,000
to $1 million in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.  The case is assigned to Judge Laurel E. Davis.  The
Debtor is represented by Bryan A. Lindsey, Esq., and Samuel A.
Schwartz, Esq., at Schwartz Flansburg PLLC.  No creditors'
committee has been appointed in the Chapter 11 case by the U.S.
Trustee.


PAC ANCHOR TRANSPORTATION: Hires Trojan and Company as Accountant
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc., consisting of the mermger of Pac
Anchor Transportation Inc. and Green Anchor Lines, Inc., seeks
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District
of California to employ Trojan and Company Accountancy Corporation,
as accountant to the Debtor.

Pac Anchor Transportation requires Trojan and Company to:

   (a) analyze tax implications of actions that may be taken in
       the bankruptcy proceeding;

   (b) analyze the Debtor's internally prepared accounting
       records and transactions for the preparation of federal
       and state income tax returns;

   (c) analyze and assist in preparing the Debtor's internally
       prepared accounting records and transactions;

   (d) provide tax advice respecting the Debtor's current and
       next fiscal year;

   (e) provide annual review services of the Debtor's annual
       financial statements; and

   (f) assist the Debtor in preparing Monthly Operating Reports
       and other financial documents during the pendency of
       the Debtor's bankruptcy case.

Trojan and Company will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Donald Trojan                 $310
     Amanda Trojan                 $250
     Charlene Carpenter            $150
     Jessica Chompff               $150

Trojan and Company will be paid a retainer in the amount of
$50,000.

Trojan and Company will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Donald J. Trojan, president of Trojan and Company Accountancy
Corporation, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estates.

Trojan and Company can be reached at:

     Donald J. Trojan
     TROJAN AND COMPANY ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATION
     3351 Cerritos Avenue
     Los Alamitos, CA 90720
     Tel: (562) 598-5600

              About Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc.

Pac Anchor Transportation, Inc., was formed from the merger of Pac
Anchor Transportation, Inc., and Green Anchor Lines, Inc. Pac
Anchor is a trucking company located in Wilmington, California,
that provides trucking services throughout the western United
States.

Pac Anchor filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr. C.D.
Cal. Case No. 17-18213) on July 6, 2017. Alfredo Barajas, its
president, signed the petition.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor disclosed $12.08 million in
assets and $11.24 million in liabilities.

Judge Ernest M. Robles presides over the case. On Aug. 10, 2017,
the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an official committee of
unsecured creditors.


PARADISE WINE: Hires Joseph Striegel as Accountant
--------------------------------------------------
Paradise Wine, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Florida to employ Joseph Striegel EA, as
accountant to the Debtor.

Paradise Wine requires Joseph Striegel to:

   (a) provide various accounting and bookkeeping services to
       the Debtor in connection with payroll, payments to
       vendors, and financial statements;

   (b) prepare the Debtor's tax returns;

   (c) prepare the Debtor's payroll;

   (d) prepare the Debtor's monthly operating reports; and

   (e) perform such other functions as requested by the Debtor or
       its counsel.

Joseph Striegel will be paid at the hourly rate of $450.  The firm
will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses
incurred.

Joseph Striegel, member of Joseph Striegel EA, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Joseph Striegel can be reached at:

     Joseph Striegel
     JOSEPH STRIEGEL EA
     7537 Citrus Hill Lane
     Naples, FL 34109
     Tel: (239) 289-6289

              About Paradise Wine, LLC

Paradise Wine, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr.
M.D. Fla. Case No. 17-08033) on September 18, 2017, disclosing
under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The Debtor is
represented by Barbara A Hart, Esq., at Stichter Riedel Blain &
Postler, P.A.


PARALLAX HEALTH: Incurs $2.02M Net Loss in June 30 2016 Quarter
---------------------------------------------------------------
Parallax Health Sciences, Inc., filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission its quarterly report on Form 10-Q disclosing a
net loss of $2.02 million on $6.81 million of revenue for the three
months ended June 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $276,893 on
$0 of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2015.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, Parallax had a net loss of
$3.91 million on $14.21 million of revenue compared to a net loss
of $540,920 on $0 of revenue for the six months ended June 30,
2015.

As of June 30, 2017, Parallax had $7.23 million in total assets,
$16.18 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $8.94 million.

As at June 30, 2016, the Company had cash in the amount of $174,878
compared to $912,399 as of Dec. 31, 2015.

The Company had a working capital deficit of $1,030,307 as of June
30, 2016, compared to working capital of $827,499 as of Dec. 31,
2015.  The decrease in working capital of $1,857,806 is primarily
attributable to a decrease in cash of $737,521, a decrease in trade
and other receivables, net of allowance, of $56,007, an increase in
rebates receivable of $62,333, a decrease in inventory of $367,495,
a decrease in employee advances of $17,588, a decrease in prepaid
expenses of $21,051, an increase in accounts payable and accrued
expenses of $745,481, and a decrease in related party payables of
$25,004.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company used
$309,256 of cash flow for operating activities compared with
$36,018 for the six months ended June 30, 2015.  The increase in
cash used for operating activities of $273,238 is attributable an
increase in net loss of $3,372,221, an increase in depreciation and
amortization expense of $99,269, an increase in stock
compensation/stock option amortization of $65,984, an increase in
discount amortization of $2,342,600, an increase in bad debt
allowance of $23,935, a decrease in accruals converted to related
party loans of $201,635, an increase in trade and other receivables
of $12,672, a decrease in inventories of $367,495, a decrease in
prepaid expenses of $21,051, an increase in accounts payable and
accrued expenses of $671,541, and a decrease in related party
payables of $278,585.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company used $83,853
of cash flow for investing activities compared with $0 for the six
months ended June 30, 2015.  The increase in cash used for
investing activities of $83,853 is attributable the purchase of
professional equipment.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company used
$344,412 of cash flow from financing activities, compared with
being provided with $37,980 for the six months ended June 30, 2015.
The decrease in cash flows provided by financing activities is
attributable to an increase in proceeds from notes payable of
$100,000, an increase in repayment of notes payable of $444,412,
and a decrease in proceeds of $37,980 from the sale of common
stock.

During the six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company received no
funds from the issuance of common shares or other equity
instruments, compared to $37,980 in proceeds during the six months
ended June 30, 2015.

A full-text copy of the Form 10-Q is available for free at:

                       https://is.gd/SR2qpz

                       About Parallax Health

Saanta Monica, California-based Parallax Health Sciences, Inc.
(OCTCMKTS:PRLX) focuses on personalized patient care through the
Company's Pharmacy, RoxSan, and eventually through the diagnostic
testing platform capable of diagnosing and monitoring several
health issues.  Through the Company's wholly owned subsidiary
Parallax Diagnostics Inc., the Company holds the right, title, and
interest in perpetuity to certain point-of-care diagnostic tests.
The Company has the following two business segments: Retail
Pharmacy Services (RPS) and Corporate.  The Company's Web sites are
at http://www.parallaxhealthsciences.com/,
http://www.parallaxdiagnostics.com/, http://www.roxsan.com/and
http://www.roxsanfertility.com/  

Parallax Health reporting a net loss of $3.41 million on $11.57
million of revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a
net loss of $1.11 million on $0 of revenue for the year ended Dec.
31, 2014.

Dave Banerjee CPA, an Accountancy Corporation, in Woodland Hills,
California, issued a "going concern" qualification on the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015,
noting that the Company has incurred recurring losses and recurring
negative cash flow from operating activities and has an accumulated
deficit which raises substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern.


PARAMOUNT BUILDING: U.S. Trustee Forms Three-Member Committee
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ilene J. Lashinsky, U.S. Trustee for the District of Arizona, on
Oct. 5 appointed three creditors to serve on the official committee
of unsecured creditors in the Chapter 11 cases of Paramount
Building Solutions, LLC, Cleaning Solutions, LLC, JMS Building
Solutions, LLC, and Starlight Building Solutions, LLC.

The committee members are:

     (1) AMANO PIONEER ECLIPSE CORPORATION
         Attn: Henry C. Roemer, III, by proxy
         102 West Third Street, Suite 200-B, Lobby Level
         Winston Salem, NC 27101
         Tel: (336) 723-4311
         Fax: (336) 759-0965
         E-mail: henry@hcroemerlaw.com

     (2) PHILIP ROSENAU CO., INC.
         Attn: Scott Holland, EVP
         750 Jacksonville Road
         Warminster PA 18974
         Tel: (215) 956-1980
         Fax: (215) 956-0864
         E-mail: sholland@philiprosenau.com

     (3) BRADY COMPANIES, LLC
         Attn: Joshua Dobbins, CFO
         7055 Lindell Road
         Las Vegas NV 89118
         Tel: (702) 876-5685
         E-mail: Joshua.dobbins@bradyindustries.com

Official creditors' committees have the right to employ legal and
accounting professionals and financial advisors, at a debtor's
expense.  They may investigate the debtor's business and financial
affairs.  Importantly, official committees serve as fiduciaries to
the general population of creditors they represent.

                About Paramount Building Solutions

Founded in 2003 in Tempe, Arizona, Paramount Building Solutions --
http://www.paramountbldgsol.com-- provides janitorial and floor
care services to thousands of locations, 24 hours a day, seven days
a week.  

Paramount Building Solutions and its affiliates filed a Chapter 11
petition (Bankr. D. Ariz. Lead Case no. 17-10867) on Sept. 15,
2017.  The petition was signed by Jeffory Southard, CEO.

The affiliates are Cleaning Solutions, LLC (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case
No. 17-10868); JMS Building Solutions, LLC (Bankr. D. Ariz. Case
No. 17-10869) and Starlight Building Solutions, LLC (Bankr. D.
Ariz. Case no.17-10870).  Cleaning is the 100% sole member of
Paramount, and JMS.  Paramount is the 100% sole member of
Starlight.

Judge Eddward P. Ballinger Jr. presides over the case.  Michael W.
Carmel, Esq., at Michael W. Carmel, Ltd., represents the Debtors as
counsel.

At the time of filing, Paramount estimates $1 million to $10
million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in liabilities.


PARSLEY ENERGY: Moody's Rates $600MM Senior Unsecured Notes B2
--------------------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service assigned a B2 rating to Parsley Energy
LLC's $600 million senior unsecured notes due 2027. Parsley's other
ratings and stable outlook remained unchanged. The net proceeds
from the notes will be used to fund a portion of Parsley's capital
program.

"Even though this opportunistic notes issuance increases gross
debt, Moody's expects Parsley to use it to increase its Permian
drilling activity via increased rig count and grow its production
meaningfully," said Arvinder Saluja, Moody's Vice President.

The following rating was assinged:

Issuer: Parsley Energy LLC

-- Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Assigned B2 (LGD 4)

RATINGS RATIONALE

The existing and new senior unsecured notes are rated B2, one notch
below Parsley's B1 Corporate Family Rating (CFR), due to the
subordination of the notes to Parsley's secured revolving credit
facility due 2021, in accordance with Moody's Loss Given Default
methodology.

Parsley's B1 CFR reflects the company's strong execution on its
growth capital spending, material production growth despite weak
commodity prices, and willingness to support its credit metrics via
equity issuances. The B1 rating also reflects its concentrated
geographic presence in the Permian Basin and expectation of
meaningful negative free cash flow over at least the next couple of
years due to high growth capex. The rating incorporates Moody's
expectations of good cash margins, partly due to Parsley's strong
hedge portfolio for 2017-2019. The CFR is supported by good acreage
in the Permian Basin, liquids-rich production that generates
healthy cash margins, multiple year drilling inventory, and a high
degree of operational control over its leasehold acreage, which
allows for flexible capital allocation and development of its
acreage in light of crude price volatility.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectations that Parsley will
continue to execute on its growth plans in 2017-18 while
maintaining a good cost structure and favorable credit metrics. If
Parsley is able to maintain production growth at competitive costs,
sustainably maintain RCF/debt ratio above 40% and debt to proved
developed reserves below $9, and take meaningful steps to minimize
ongoing cash flow outspend, an upgrade could be considered. Moody's
could considers a negative outlook or a downgrade if the RCF/debt
ratio falls below 15% or the debt to average daily production ratio
could not be sustained below $30,000 per boe.

Parsley Energy, LLC is an independent oil and gas exploration and
production (E&P) company with all of its properties located in the
Midland and Delaware Basins in west Texas.

The principal methodology used in this rating was Independent
Exploration and Production Industry published in May 2017.


PARSLEY ENERGY: S&P Rates New $60MM Sr. Unsecured Notes 'BB-'
-------------------------------------------------------------
S&P Global Ratings assigned its 'BB-' issue-level and '2' recovery
ratings to U.S.-based exploration and production company Parsley
Energy LLC's proposed $600 million senior unsecured notes due 2027.
S&P expects the company to use the net proceeds to fund a portion
of its capital program and for general corporate purposes.

S&P said, "At the same time, we raised the rating on the company's
existing senior unsecured notes to 'BB-' from 'B+' and revised the
recovery rating to '2' from '3'. The '2' recovery rating indicates
our expectation for a substantial recovery (70%-90%; rounded
estimate: 85% cap) to creditors in the event of a payment default.

We based the increased recovery expectation on a company-provided
PV-10 report.

"Our 'B+' corporate credit rating and stable outlook on Parsley are
unchanged."

RECOVERY ANALYSIS

Key analytical factors:
S&P Global Ratings' simulated default for Parsley assumes a
sustained period of low commodity prices, consistent with past
defaults in this sector.

S&P said, "We assume the borrowing base under the company's reserve
based loan facility is fully drawn to the commitment level at
default.

"We based our valuation of the company's reserves on a
company-provided PV-10 report using our recovery price deck
assumptions of $50 per barrel for West Texas Intermediate crude oil
and $3 per million British thermal units for Henry Hub natural
gas."

Simulated Default and Valuation Assumptions:

-- Simulated year of default: 2021

Simplified Waterfall:

-- Net enterprise value (after 5% administrative costs): $3.145
Billion
-- Senior-secured reserve-based lending claims: $1.038 billion
    --Recovery expectations: Not applicable
-- Total value available to unsecured claims: $2.107 billion
-- Senior unsecured claims: $2.159 billion
    --Recovery expectations: 85% (cap)

Note: All debt amounts include six months of prepetition
interest.

RATINGS LIST

  Parsley Energy LLC
  Corporatate Credit Rating                B+/Stable

  New Rating

  Parsley Energy LLC                       To        From
   Senior Unsecured
   $600mil sr notes due 2027               BB-       B+
   Recovery Rating                         2(85%)    3(65%)


PATIO MARKET: Hires Robert Bassel as Bankruptcy Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------
Patio Market, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan to employ Robert Bassel, Esq.,
as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.

Patio Market requires Robert Bassel to assist and represent the
Debtor for all matters arising in and under the Chapter 11 case.

Robert Bassel received a retainer of $6,717.00, of which $1,717 was
used for the filing fee and $3,250 was used to pay Robert Bassel's
prepetition legal fees incurred within 30 days of the petition,
leaving a retainer of $1,750.

Robert Bassel, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and
its estates.

Robert Bassel can be reached at:

     Robert Bassel, Esq.
     P.O. Box T
     Clinton, MI 49236
     Tel: (248) 677-1234
     Fax: (248) 369-4749
     E-mail: bbassel@gmail.com

              About Patio Market, Inc.

Patio Market, Inc., owns real estate and business assets on which
it operates a convenience store.

Patio Market filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Mich. Case
No. 17-52595) on Sept. 7, 2017. The petition was signed by George
Shammas, president. At the time of filing, the Debtor estimated
$100,000 to $500,000 in assets and $1 million to $10 million in
liabilities.

The case is assigned to Judge Thomas J. Tucker.

The Debtor is represented by Robert N. Bassel, Esq., at Robert N.
Bassel.

No official committee of creditors holding unsecured claims has
been appointed in the case.


PEEKAY BOUTIQUES: Files Joint Plan and Disclosure Statement
-----------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that Peekay Boutiques filed with the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court a Joint Plan and related Disclosure
Statement. According to the Disclosure Statement, "The Plan
provides for the liquidation and sale of substantially all of the
Debtor's Assets to the Buyer, subject in all respects to high and
better offers pursuant to the Bid Procedures, under Bankruptcy Code
section 363 pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, dated August
9, 2017 between the Debtors and TLA Acquisition, Inc., as may be
amended, modified or supplemented from time to time (the 'Asset
Purchase Agreement'). Pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 363 and
1123 and Bankruptcy Rule 9019, the provisions of the Plan shall
also constitute a good faith compromise of the claims and Causes of
Action asserted or that could have been asserted among the
Creditors' Committee, Debtors, Term A Lenders, and Buyer. After
extensive negotiations among the Debtors, the Creditors' Committee,
Term A Lenders and Buyer, the parties reached a global settlement
which resolves all outstanding issues amongst the parties (the
'Global Settlement'). If the Plan is confirmed by the Bankruptcy
Court and consummated, except to the extent that a holder of an
Allowed Administrative Claim and the Debtors agree to less
favorable treatment with respect to such holder, each holder of an
Allowed Administrative Claim shall be paid in full in Cash on the
Effective Date. Further, the Plan provides that, the Debtors shall
pay, in full in Cash, any fees due and owing to the U.S. Trustee as
of the Effective Date."

                   About Peekay Acquisition

Headquartered in Auburn, Washington, Peekay --
http://www.loverspackage.com/-- is a specialty retailer of a broad
selection of lingerie, sexual health and wellness products and
accessories.  Peekay currently owns and operates 47 retail stores
across six states under the brand names "Christals," "LoVerS,"
"ConReV" and "A Touch of Romance."

Peekay Acquisitions, LLC, and its affiliates each sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11722) on Aug. 10,
2017.  The petitions were signed by Albert Altro, chief
restructuring officer.  Peekay Acquisition estimated its assets
between $10 million and $50 million and its debts between $50
million and $100 million.

Judge Brendan Linehan Shannon presides over the cases.

Landis Rath & Cobb LLP serves as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  
The Debtors hired SSG Advisors, LLC as investment banker and
Traverse, LLC as financial advisor.  Rust Consulting/Omni
Bankruptcy serves as claims and noticing agent.

On Aug. 21, 2017, five creditors were named to serve in the
official committee of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' cases.
The panel tapped Cullen and Dykman LLP as general counsel;
Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLC as Delaware counsel; and The DAK
Group, Ltd., as financial advisor.


PERFUMANIA HOLDINGS: No Longer Obliged to File Periodic Reports
---------------------------------------------------------------
Perfumania Holdings, Inc. filed a Form 15 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission notifying the removal from listing or
registration of Perfumania Holdings, Inc.'s common stock, $.01 par
value, from Nasdaq Stock Market, under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.  As a result of the Form 15 filing, the Company's
obligation to file periodic reports such as Forms 10-Q and 10-K
under the Exchange Act will be suspended.

                   About Perfumania Holdings

Perfumania Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: PERF) --
http://www.perfumaniaholdings.com/-- is a specialty retailer and
distributor of fragrances and related beauty products across the
United States.  Perfumania has a 30 year history of innovative
marketing and sales management, brand development, license sourcing
and wholesale distribution making it the premier destination for
fragrances and other beauty supplies.  The Company operates retail
stores and e-commerce specializing in the sale of fragrances and
related products across the United States, Puerto Rico, and the
U.S. Virgin Islands.  The Company also operates a wholesale
distribution network, selling to mass retail, department stores as
well as domestic and international distributors.

On Aug. 26, 2017, Model Reorg Acquisition, LLC and 18 affiliated
debtors, including perfumania Holdings, Inc., each filed voluntary
petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Delaware seeking relief under chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code.  The Debtors' cases are jointly administered for
procedural purposes under the case docket for Model Reorg
Acquisition, LLC (Bankr. D. Del. Case No. 17-11794).

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP is serving as legal
counsel, Ankura Consulting Group, LLC, is serving as financial
advisor, and Imperial Capital is serving as investment banker to
the Company.

The Skadden team includes Corporate Restructuring partners Lisa
Laukitis and J. Gregory Milmoe (Boston), and associates Raquelle
Kaye (Boston), Esther Adzhiashvili and AZ Biazar, as well as
Corporate Restructuring and Bankruptcy Litigation partner Anthony
Clark (Wilmington) and associate Cameron Fee (Wilmington); Banking
partner Sarah Ward and associates Emily Stork, Shan Song (Chicago)
and Katherine Webb; Tax partner Brian Krause and associate Joseph
Soltis; and Corporate partner Richard Grossman (New York).

Epiq Bankruptcy Solutions is the claims and noticing agent and
maintains the Web site http://dm.epiq11.com/perfumania


PFO GLOBAL: Trustee Seeks Approval of Plan Support Agreement
------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that PFO Global Inc.'s Chapter 11
trustee filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court a motion to approve a
plan support agreement.  According to documents filed with the
Court, "The terms of the Plan Support Agreement needed to address
this dilemma reference how prospective funds that may be
administered as the result of a confirmed plan regarding all or
more likely some subset of the Debtors is detailed as follows: The
Trustee shall use commercially reasonable efforts to: i) secure the
entry of orders necessary to secure Bankruptcy Court authority for
items detailed in 1(a) and 1(b) below; and ii) file a Disclosure
Statement and Plan of Reorganization for all of the Debtor Estates,
which incorporates the treatment provisions detailed in 1(c)
through 1 (h) below with regard to funds held in the PFO Global,
case, the Hillair Funds, the funds from the 364 Borrowing Motion
and funds as otherwise may be available for distribution from the
other Debtors Estates (hereinafter the 'Prospective Plan Funds') in
the order stated therein: (a) the Trustee has in his control, a
$35,000 fund arising from the settlement agreement between the
Debtors and Hillair Capital Investments, [Dkt. No. 167, 242, 265]
(the 'Hillair Funds').  The Trustee will file a motion and seek an
order approving the transfer of the Hillair Funds to ROMC to serve
as a post-petition retainer, which retainer will be subject to this
district's local rules on interim application, as well as final
allowance authority; (b) the Trustee will file and seek an order
approving the employment of RBSM and the ability to utilize $15,000
of the 364 Borrowing, assuming the 364 Borrowing Motion is approved
by the Bankruptcy Court, to serve as a post-petition retainer for
RBSM, which retainer will be subject to this district's local rules
on interim application, as well as final allowance authority; (c)
$12,500 of the Prospective Plan Funds shall be allocated to
reimbursing all mailing, notice, copying and other out-of-pocket
expenses related to the Trustee's Anticipated Disclosure Statement
and Plan: (d) $15,000 to ROMC with regard to its final fee award;
(e) $25,000 to Trustee for costs and fees, to the extent not
otherwise payable from existing funds in the Participant Debtor
Estates, upon allowance of Trustee's administrative expense claim;
(f) a minimum of $147,500 plus any excess of any retainer not
awarded or portion of funds for the Trustee not required to be
utilized for the costs or fees or other requirements noted above
from those Participant Debtor Estates which have a plan confirmed,
will collectively be a pool for all allowed fees and expense of
Professional's administrative claims."

                        About PFO Global

PFO Global, Inc., and its affiliates are a consolidated group of
companies that operate in the eyewear and lenses industry
worldwide.  Global owns 100% of the equity interests in Pro Fit
Optix Holding Company, LLC.  In turn, Holding owns 100% of the
equity interests in Pro Fit Optix, Inc., PFO Technologies, LLC, PFO
Optima, LLC, and PFO MCO, LLC.

PFO Global, Pro Fit Optix Holding Company, Pro Fit Optix, PFO
Technologies, PFO Optima, and PFO MCO, filed Chapter 11 petitions
(Bankr. N.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-30355) in Dallas on Jan. 31,
2017.

Rosa R. Orenstein, Esq., and Nathan M. Nichols, Esq., at Orenstein
Law Group, P.C., serve as the Debtors' bankruptcy counsel.  Haynes
and Boone, LLP, is their special corporate and securities law
counsel.  Mahesh Shetty, a certified public accountant, is the
Debtor's financial officer.

In February 2017, a three-member panel was appointed as official
committee of unsecured creditors in the Debtors' case.  The
Committee retained Shraiberg, Ferrara, Landau & Page, P.A., as
legal counsel, and McCathern, PLLC as local counsel.

Shawn K. Brown was appointed on June 21, 2017, as Chapter 11
Trustee to oversee the bankruptcy estate.


PREMIER MARINE: Wants Plan Filing Period Extended to Dec. 8
-----------------------------------------------------------
Premier Marine, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Minnesota to extend the Debtors exclusive
periods to file a plan of reorganization and to solicit acceptance
of that plan through Dec. 8, 2017, and Feb. 6, 2018, respectively.

The Court will hold a hearing on the requested extension at 1:30
p.m. on Oct. 17, 2017.

The U.S. Bankruptcy Code Section 1121(c) provides that a debtor has
the exclusive right to file a plan in the first 120 days after
commencement of the case and a further 60 days within which to gain
acceptance of that plan, which will expire on Oct. 17, 2017, and
Dec. 16, 2017, respectively.

The Debtor first proposed a cash operating budget shortly after the
Petition Date.  The Debtor projected a gradual ramp up and return
to pre distress boat production levels based upon the Trusek $2.5
million dollar cash infusion.  Due to unforeseen supplier
limitations the ramp up and return to profitability is occurring
but at a slower rate consistent with key supplier limitations.  In
August the Debtor proposed a revised Budget to ABN, Trusek and the
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors with explanation.  The
revised Budget downwardly adjusted boat production, revenues and
expenditures.  The revised Budget was attached to a First Amendment
to Stipulation for use of cash collateral.  The Debtor lost more
than originally projected in July but was profitable in August and
September and expects to continue to gradually increase production
and build cash between now and year end.

The Debtor has not received an unconditional cash offer to support
a 363 sale process but continues to negotiate with several
interested parties now conducting due diligence.

Trusek has confirmed by term sheet that it will sponsor a plan of
reorganization that provides for satisfaction of secured debt and
provides for an earnings formula based return to unsecured
creditors over time in the minimum amount of $1 million dollars
with significant upside potential dependent upon post confirmation
performance.  Trusek has also confirmed that it will withdraw plan
financing and support a 363 sale process should the Debtor receive
a cash offer in the minimum amount of $10 million dollars which is
required to satisfy secured claims in full.

The Debtor shareholders are also actively soliciting plan financing
in amounts sufficient to satisfy secured claims and support a
reorganization plan.

The Debtor requested that the Committee support a short extension
of exclusivity to expose the company to additional prospective
purchasers, conclude negotiations with parties now conducting due
diligence and to otherwise prepare a disclosure statement and plan
to be financed by Trusek.  The Committee supports a short extension
of exclusivity.

The Debtor tells the Court that it is critical that the Debtor be
permitted the time necessary, consistent with the interests of its
estate, to restructure its finances and operations in order to
maximize the value of the estate and assure a successful emergence
from Chapter 11.

               About Premier Marine, Inc.

Premier Marine, Inc., filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. Minn.
Case No. 17-32006) on June 19, 2017. Premier Marine is a family
owned business formed in 1992 by Robert Menne and Eugene Hallberg.

The Menne family controls 72.8% of the company equity. Hallberg
controls the remaining 27.2% and is Premier's landlord.

For 25 years, Premier Marine has manufactured "Premier" brand
pontoon boats -- http://www.pontoons.com/-- in Wyoming, Minnesota.
Premier Marine designs, builds and markets luxury pontoons and
holds many patents on manufacturing elements such as furniture
hinges, J-Clip rail fasteners and the PTX performance package.  The
family-owned and operated Company sells its pontoons through boat
dealers located throughout the United States and Canada.

The need for reorganization in chapter 11 was precipitated by a
failed acquisition of another pontoon manufacturer in 2011.  The
Chapter 11 was filed in response to an eviction action commenced by
Hallberg for the nonpayment of rent.  The Chapter 11 is necessary
to attract a new equity partner, reject the Hallberg leases,
consolidate manufacturing under a single roof and reorganize the
business for the mutual benefit of the Debtor creditors, employees
and dealer network.

The bankruptcy petition was signed by Lori J. Melbostad, the
Debtor's president.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities
between $10 million and $50 million.

The case is assigned to Judge Katherine A. Constantine.  The
Debtor's counsel are Michael F. McGrath, Esq., and Will R. Tansey,
Esq., at Ravich Meyer Kirkman McGrath Nauman & Tansey, A
Professional Association. Guidesource's Richard Gallagher is the
Debtor's financial consultant.

On June 27, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Fafinski, Mark &
Johnson, P.A., represents the committee as bankruptcy counsel.


QUADRANT 4: Court Approves Key Employee Incentive Program
---------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved
Quadrant 4 Systems' key employee incentive program (KEIP).  As
previously reported, "For a variety of reasons, including the
limited availability of resources and the concentrated sale efforts
focused on other Business Units, the Debtor was not simply not able
to sell the Remaining Assets on the same accelerated timeframe as
the other Business Units. The Debtor nonetheless seeks to realize a
going concern sale for the Remaining Assets and requires Mr.
Steele's expertise and knowledge of the assets and the unique
factors involved in the Chapter 11 Case to obtain stalking horse
bidders for such assets, maintain the underlying business
operations, oversee an auction process, and ultimately close such
sales. Mr. Steele's background in the healthcare IT industry, his
history with the Debtor in entering that industry, and his tireless
efforts to assist the Debtor and its professionals in consummating
sales of the five Business Units during the Chapter 11 Case to
date, make him uniquely qualified to shepherd the Debtor through
the next phase of the Chapter 11 Case
-- the marketing and sale of the Remaining Assets. Obtaining
stalking horse bids and closing sales of these assets is by no
means guaranteed, especially in light of the nature of the assets
and that the consent of both secured lenders is required due to the
significant secured debt that is outstanding. Mr. Steele shall be
entitled to a payment in the amount of one and one half percent
(1.5%) of the purchase price of any assets which are the subject of
a Sale Transaction."

                     About Quadrant 4 System

Quadrant 4 System Corporation (OTC:QFOR) -- http://www.qfor.com/--
sells IT products and services.  Its revenues are primarily
generated from the placement of staffing or solution consultants,
and the sale and licensing of its proprietary cloud-based Software
as a Service (SaaS) systems, as well as a wide range of technology
oriented services and solutions.  Quadrant's principal executive
offices are located in Schaumburg Illinois.  The Company also
operates its business from various offices located in Naples,
Florida; Alpharetta, Georgia; Bingham Farms, Michigan; Cranbury,
New Jersey; Pleasanton, California; and Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Quadrant 4 System is the 100% owner of the issued and outstanding
common stock of Stratitude, Inc., a California corporation, which
it acquired on or about Nov. 3, 2016. Concurrently with the
Stratitude Acquisition, Stratitude acquired certain of the assets
of Agama Solutions, Inc., a California corporation.  Both
Stratitude and Agama are located in Pleasanton and Fremont,
California and are engaged in the IT business.

Quadrant 4 System disclosed total assets of $47.05 million and
total liabilities of $31.39 million as of Sept. 30, 2016.

Quadrant 4 System filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ill.
Case No. 17-19689) on June 29, 2017.  CEO Robert H. Steele signed
the petition.

Quadrant 4, which was subject to a securities fraud probe that led
to the arrest and resignation of its top two executives seven
months ago, sought Chapter 11 protection after reaching a
settlement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and
signing deals to sell four business segments for at least $6.9
million.

The Chapter 11 case is assigned to Judge Jack B. Schmetterer.

The Debtor's bankruptcy attorneys are Adelman & Gettleman, Ltd.'s
Chad H. Gettleman, Esq. and Nathan Q. Rugg, Esq.  Nixon Peabody LLP
acts as special counsel for matters concerning taxes, labor, ERISA,
securities compliance, international law, and related matters while
Faegre Baker Daniels LLP acts as special counsel for securities
litigation.  Silverman Consulting Inc., serve as financial
consultants to the Debtor, and Livingstone Partners, LLC, as
investment banker.

On July 10, 2017, a three-member panel was appointed as official
committee of unsecured creditors in the Debtor's case.  Sugar
Felsenthal Grais & Hammer LLP serve as counsel to the Committee and
Amherst Partners, LLC as financial advisor.


QUEST SOLUTION: Inks One-Year Employment Agreement with CFO
-----------------------------------------------------------
Quest Solution, Inc., entered into an employment agreement with Mr.
Benjamin Kemper to serve as its chief financial officer.

The term of the agreement is effective on Oct. 2, 2017, and will
continue for 12 months, unless earlier terminated in accordance
with the employment agreement entered into between the Company and
Kemper.  The term of Kemper's employment will be automatically
renewed for successive one-year periods until Kemper or the Company
delivers to the other party a written notice of their intent not to
renew the employment term.  

The Company will pay Kemper a base salary at the annual rate of
$130,000, a $20,000 signing bonus, as well as grant Kemper 500,000
options to purchase common stock of the Company at the closing
stock price on the trading date prior to Oct. 5, 2017.

As previously disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
Aug. 25, 2017, the Company terminated without cause its Contractor
Agreement with Mr. Joey Trombino and the Amendment 1 to the
Contractor Agreement with an effective date of Aug. 31, 2017.  On
Sept. 29, 2017, the Company entered into a Termination Agreement
with Mr. Trombino.  The Company will pay Mr. Trombino $26,000 on
the execution of this Agreement and $26,000 on Nov. 1, 2017.  If
the Company defaults on the Nov. 1, 2017, payment, the Company will
be assessed a $20,000 penalty due immediately.  Pursuant to the
Agreement, Mr. Trombino waived any claims that he may have against
the Company.

                       About Quest Solution

Quest Solution, formerly known as Amerigo Energy, Inc., is a
Specialty Systems Integrator focused on Field and Supply Chain
Mobility.  The Company is also a manufacturer and distributor of
consumables (labels, tags, and ribbons), RFID solutions, and
barcoding printers.  Founded in 1994, Quest is headquartered in
Eugene, Oregon, with offices in the United States.

Prior to 2008, the Company was involved in various unrelated
business activities.  From 2008-2014 the Company was involved in
multiple businesses inclusive of an oil and gas investment company.
Due to changes in market conditions, management determined to look
for acquisitions which were positive cash flow and would provide
immediate shareholder value.  In January 2014, the first such
acquisition was completed of Quest Marketing Inc. (dba Quest
Solution, Inc.).

The Company has acquired a significant working capital deficit and
issued a substantial amount of subordinated debt in connection with
its acquisitions.  As of June 30, 2017, the Company had a working
capital deficit of $14,940,888 and an accumulated deficit of
$33,808,344.  The Company said its continuation as a going concern
is dependent upon its ability to generate sufficient cash flow to
meet its obligations on a timely basis to obtain additional debt or
equity financing for working capital or refinancing (restructuring
of subordinated debt) as may be required and, ultimately, to attain
profitable operations.

The Company's independent accounting firm RBSM, LLP, issued a
"going concern" qualification on the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016.  The auditors said the
Company has a working capital deficiency and significant
subordinated debt resulting from acquisitions.  These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern.

Quest Solution incurred a net loss attributable to common
stockholders of $14.21 million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
following a net loss attributable to common stockholders of $1.71
million for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.  As of June 30, 2017,
Quest Solution had $27.47 million in total assets, $43 million in
total liabilities and a total stockholders' deficit of $15.53
million.


REGIONS FINANCIAL: Fitch Raises Preferred Stock Rating to BB-
-------------------------------------------------------------
Fitch Ratings has upgraded Regions Financial Corp.'s (RF) Long-Term
Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to 'BBB+' from 'BBB'. Fitch has also
affirmed RF's Short-Term IDR at 'F2'. The Rating Outlook has been
revised to Stable from Positive.  

The rating action follows a periodic review of the large regional
banking group, which includes BB&T Corporation (BBT), Capital One
Finance Corporation (COF), Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG),
Comerica Incorporated (CMA), Fifth Third Bancorp (FITB), Huntington
Bancshares Inc. (HBAN), Keycorp (KEY), M&T Bank Corporation (MTB),
MUFG Americas Holding Corporation (MUAH), PNC Financial Services
Group (PNC), Regions Financial Corporation (RF), SunTrust Banks
Inc. (STI), US Bancorp (USB), and Wells Fargo & Company (WFC).

Company-specific rating rationales for the other banks are
published separately, and for further discussion of the large
regional bank sector in general, refer to the special report titled
'Large Regional Bank Periodic Review,' to be published shortly.

KEY RATING DRIVERS
IDRs, VRs, AND SENIOR DEBT

The upgrade reflects Fitch's view that RF's operating performance
and overall financial condition have continued to improve,
reflecting a 'BBB+' credit profile. These metrics have converged
with higher rated peers. The upgrade also reflects RF's
strengthened risk management, evidenced by reasonable credit losses
through the energy downturn and limited loan growth over recent
periods.

Fitch continues to view RF's banking franchise throughout the
Southeastern United States as a ratings strength and supportive of
upgrade. RF enjoys strong deposit market share in Alabama,
Mississippi and Tennessee. Much of RF's deposit base is related to
its Consumer Segment and in less urban areas, which in Fitch's
view, should allow the company to continue to lag deposit pricing
as short-term interest rates increase to a relatively larger degree
than peers. Fitch also notes that RF has a fairly low loan to
deposit ratio of 82%, which could augment the company's ability to
keep deposit pricing relatively low.

While still below peer median levels, core earnings performance has
improved and is expected to remain relatively consistent on a
forward looking basis. RF's return on average assets (ROA) has
averaged between 90 and 95bps on a five, 10 and 20 quarter basis,
driven by solid cost management, improving credit costs and low
funding costs. Fitch's expectation that RF should continue to
generate reasonable returns due to its ability to hold funding and
operating costs down while credit costs remain manageable is
incorporated into upgrade and the Outlook revision to Stable.

Similar to peers, overall loan growth has been low with average
loan balances actually down 2.3% from 2Q16 to 2Q17. Fitch views the
company's loan growth restraint as a credit positive and points
towards RF's risk management systems effectively and positively
impacting lending decisions. Management has indicated that it is
very focused on originating and growing more profitable loans with
solid risk-adjusted returns with the goal of creating more
consistent earnings over time. As a result, RF exited a third-party
arrangement within its indirect auto business while growing its
residential mortgage loan portfolio.

Asset quality remains a constraint on RF's ratings. Non-performing
assets (NPAs) to loans plus other real estate owned stood at 2.56%,
well-above peer averages. Credit quality has primarily been
adversely impacted by RF's energy exposure with 13% of total direct
energy loans on nonaccrual. Fitch also notes that well-over half of
RF's NPAs are accruing troubled debt restructures (TDRs) of which
around 90% are current. Moreover, despite a higher exposure to
energy than peers, Fitch continues to view the risk as manageable,
and RF has demonstrated success in lowering this exposure with
appropriate reserves.

RF's credit quality will likely show some adverse impact from the
recent natural disasters in its operating footprint. However, the
company has shown reasonable ability to manage credit losses in
previous natural disasters. Thus, while earnings could be impacted
through an elevated level of provisioning, Fitch does not believe
RF's capital base is at risk.

RF's capital profile remains good with an estimated fully phased-in
Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) ratio under Basel III of approximately
11.4% at 2Q17, up 60bps from a year ago and above the peer median.
Fitch continues to expect these capital levels to fall over time,
but will remain above peer averages over the near term given the
lack of strong organic balance sheet growth. Furthermore, RF has
publicly stated its long-term CET1 target is 9.5%. Fitch views RF's
capital planning practices as solid and informed by appropriate
triggers and limits. Fitch's expectation that RF's capital ratios
will converge downward with the peer group is incorporated into
upgrade and the outlook revision.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

RF's subordinated debt is notched one level below its VR for loss
severity. RF's preferred stock is notched five levels below its VR,
two times for loss severity and three times for non-performance.
These ratings are in accordance with Fitch's criteria and
assessment of the instruments non-performance and loss severity
risk profiles and have been affirmed due to the affirmation of the
VR.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

Regions Bank's uninsured deposit ratings are rated one notch higher
than the bank's IDR and senior unsecured debt because U.S.
uninsured deposits benefit from depositor preference. U.S.
depositor preference gives deposit liabilities superior recovery
prospects in the event of default.

HOLDING COMPANY

RF's VR is equalized with those of its operating companies and
banks, reflecting its role as the bank holding company, which is
mandated in the U.S. to act as a source of strength for its bank
subsidiaries. Ratings are also equalized reflecting the very close
correlation between holding company and subsidiary failure and
default probabilities.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

RF has a Support Rating (SR) of '5' and Support Rating Floor (SRF)
of 'NF'. In Fitch's view, the probability of support is unlikely.
IDRs and VRs do not incorporate any support.

RATING SENSITIVITIES

IDR VR, IDRs, AND SENIOR DEBT

With upgrade, Fitch views RF's rating as solidly situated at its
current level. While Fitch view's RF's franchise as attractive,
RF's relatively worse asset quality and earnings performance
constrains positive rating action over the near to medium term.

Fitch expects credit quality to remain on a modestly improving
trend. However, although unexpected, a sustained reversal of
moderating credit trends, combined with a large decrease in
capital, could result in negative rating action. Moreover, Fitch
expects RF will take some time to manage its CET1 ratio down to its
long-term capital target of around 9.5% given CCAR constraints and
subdued organic loan growth expectations. If RF were to become much
more aggressive with its capital distribution plans under CCAR or
begin to materially grow its balance sheet, its ratings could be
adversely impacted.

Similar to some of its large regional bank peers, RF is continuing
to build out its capital markets capabilities in order to support
its client base. While these businesses can result in much more
volatile earnings, Fitch expects that capital markets revenues will
remain low relative to total revenues for RF. Outsized growth or
contribution from capital markets-related revenues may impede
upwards rating momentum.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES

The ratings for RF and its operating companies' subordinated debt,
trust preferred securities, and preferred stock are sensitive to
any change to the VR.

LONG- AND SHORT-TERM DEPOSIT RATINGS

The long- and short-term deposit ratings are sensitive to any
change to RF's Long- and Short-term IDR.

HOLDING COMPANY

Should RF's holding company begin to exhibit signs of weakness,
demonstrate trouble accessing the capital markets, or have
inadequate cash flow coverage to meet near-term obligations, there
is potential that Fitch could notch the holding company VR from the
ratings of the operating companies.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR

Since RF's Support and Support Rating Floors are '5' and 'NF',
respectively, there is limited likelihood that these ratings will
change over the foreseeable future.

Fitch has upgraded the following ratings:

Regions Financial Corporation

-- Long-Term IDR to 'BBB+' from 'BBB'; Outlook Revised to Stable;
-- Subordinated debt to 'BBB' from 'BBB-';
-- Viability rating to 'bbb+' from 'bbb';
-- Senior unsecured to 'BBB+' from 'BBB';
-- Preferred stock to 'BB-' from 'B+';

Regions Bank
-- Long-Term IDR to 'BBB+' from 'BBB'; Outlook Revised to Stable;
-- Long-Term deposits to 'A-' from 'BBB+';
-- Senior debt to 'BBB+' from 'BBB';
-- Subordinated debt to 'BBB' from 'BBB-';
-- Viability Rating to 'bbb+' from 'bbb';

AmSouth Bancorporation

-- Subordinated debt to 'BBB' from 'BBB-'.

Fitch has affirmed the following ratings:

Regions Financial Corporation

-- Short-Term IDR at 'F2';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support floor at 'NF'.

Regions Bank

-- Short-Term deposits at 'F2';
-- Short-Term IDR at 'F2';
-- Support at '5';
-- Support floor at 'NF'.


RITE AID: Moody's Confirms B2 Corporate Family Rating
-----------------------------------------------------
Moody's Investors Service confirmed the B2 Corporate Family Rating
and the B2-PD probability of default rating of Rite Aid
Corporation. Moody's also confirmed the B2 rating of the company's
senior secured term loans, the Ba2 rating of its senior secured
revolving credit facility, the B3 rating of its senior unsecured
guaranteed notes and the Caa1 rating of its senior unsecured notes.
The rating of the senior secured revolving credit facility could
potentially be downgraded one notch based on Moody's Loss Given
Default Model depending upon the final amount of remaining post
asset sale debt junior to the revolving credit facility in the
capital structure. The company's speculative grade liquidity rating
was affirmed at SGL-2. The SGL-2 liquidity rating reflects Moody's
expectation that the asset sales contemplated to Walgreens will
conclude as proposed within the next 6 to 9 months. The ratings
outlook is stable.

This concludes a review which was initiated on October 28, 2015.
The company has received FTC approval to sell 1,932 Rite Aid stores
and related Rite Aid distribution assets and inventory for an
all-cash purchase price of $4.375 billion to Walgreens Boots
Alliance Inc.

"The significant amount of debt reduction through the proceeds of
the asset sales to Walgreens will improve credit metrics," Moody's
Vice President Mickey Chadha stated. "However the weak operating
performance of the company in the last 12 to 18 months and its
smaller scale after the asset sales puts the company in a weak
competitive position vis-a-vis its peers especially in a
challenging reimbursement rate environment," Chadha further
stated.

Outlook Actions:

Issuer: Rite Aid Corporation

-- Outlook, Changed To Stable From Rating Under Review

Confirmations:

Issuer: Rite Aid Corporation

-- Probability of Default Rating, Confirmed at B2-PD

-- Corporate Family Rating, Confirmed at B2

-- Senior Secured 2nd Lien Term Loan, Confirmed at B2(LGD3)

-- Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility, Confirmed at
    Ba2(LGD2)

-- Guaranteed Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Confirmed
    at B3(LGD5)

-- Senior Unsecured Regular Bond/Debenture, Confirmed at
    Caa1(LGD6)

Affirmations:

Issuer: Rite Aid Corporation

-- Speculative Grade Liquidity Rating, Affirmed SGL-2

RATINGS RATIONALE

Although Rite Aid's proforma debt/EBITDA will improve by about a
turn to about 5.7 times after it uses approximately $4.4 billion in
asset sale proceeds to reduce debt, its leverage remains high as
reflected in its B2 Corporate Family Rating. The rating also
reflect the company's modest proforma interest coverage at about
1.0 times. The rating also incorporates Rite Aid's smaller scale
and weak competitive position vis-a-vis its peers especially in a
challenging reimbursement rate environment which makes its earnings
the most vulnerable. It also reflects Envision's small scale
relative to other PBMs. Positive ratings consideration is given to
Moody's expectation that Rite-Aid's leverage and interest coverage
will improve in the next 12-18 months as the uncertainty of the
last two years regarding the FTC's decision on the company's
proposed sale to Walgreens is eliminated. Management can now focus
on expense control and increase the level of script growth through
file buys and strategically target participation in limited and
preferred networks to boost the top line. Rite Aid also has the
opportunity to improve purchasing efficiencies by shifting its drug
purchases to Walgreens Boots Alliance's group purchasing
organization. Rite Aid's good liquidity, and the relative stability
and positive longer term trends of the prescription drug industry
are other positive rating considerations.

The stable outlook reflects Moody's expectation that Rite Aid's
asset sale to Walgreens will be consummated as proposed, operating
performance will not deteriorate and credit metrics will improve in
the next 12-18 months.

An upgrade would require Rite Aid's, operating performance to
improve or absolute debt levels to fall such that the company
demonstrates that it can maintain debt to EBITDA below 5.5 times
and EBIT to interest expense above 1.75 times. In addition, a
higher rating would require Rite Aid to continue to maintain at
least an adequate liquidity profile.

Ratings could be downgraded if Rite Aid experiences sustained
declines in revenues or earnings or increases debt such that debt
to EBITDA is likely to remain above 7.0 times and EBIT to interest
expense is likely to remain below 1.25 times. Ratings could also be
downgraded should free cash flow become persistently negative.

Proforma for the asset sale Rite Aid Corporation will operate 2,575
drug stores in 20 states. It also operates a full-service pharmacy
benefit management company (Envision Rx). Proforma revenues are
about $22 billion.

The principal methodology used in these ratings was Retail Industry
published in October 2015.


ROCKY PINE: Sale of 2015 Ford Super Duty Truck for $39K Approved
----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Mary Ann Whipple of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Northern District of Ohio authorized Rocky Pine Farms, LLC's sale
of 2015 Ford Super Duty truck, ID No. 1FT8W3B63FEA94164, to Michael
Rood and Patricia K. Nye for $39,000.

The proceeds of sale will be distributed in accordance of the terms
of and conditions of the Debtor's Motion including the payment of
the Ford Motor Credit lien, and a report of sale filed with the
Court no later than 14 days for the completion of the sales
transaction.

                     About Rocky Pine Farms

Founded 2007, Rocky Pine Farms, LLC, is a small organization in the
crop farms industry.  Rocky Pine Farms, based in Tiffin, Ohio,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Ohio Case No. 17-32918) on
Sept. 12, 2017.  The petition was signed by Patricia Nye,
president.  The Hon. Mary Ann Whipple presides over the case.  In
its petition, the Debtor estimated $100,000 to $500,000 in assets
and $1 million to $10 million in liabilities.  Raymond L. Beebe,
Esq., at Raymond L. Beebe Co., LPA, serves as bankruptcy counsel.


ROOT9B HOLDINGS: Nasdaq Appeal Hearing Set for Nov. 16
------------------------------------------------------
On Sept. 20, 2017, root9B Holdings, Inc., received notification
from the Listing Qualifications Department of The Nasdaq Stock
Market that the Company has failed to maintain a minimum Market
Value of Listed Securities of $35.0 million for the last 30
consecutive business days.  On Sept. 6, 2017, the Company received
a letter from Nasdaq informing the Company that, pursuant to
Listing Rule 5101, Nasdaq was accelerating the due date for the
Company to submit a plan to regain compliance with the Listing
Rules to Sept. 15, 2017.  On Sept. 21, 2017, the Company received a
Staff Determination Letter from Nasdaq noting that the Company had
not yet submitted a plan to regain compliance and accordingly, the
Nasdaq determined to deny the Company's request for continued
listing on The Nasdaq Stock Market.  Unless the Company requests an
appeal of this determination, trading of the Company's common stock
would be suspended.  The determination from Nasdaq was based upon:

   1. Noncompliance with Listing Rules 5605(b)(1), 5605(c)(2) and
5605(d)(2) regarding vacancies in the Company's Board of Directors
which resulted in an insufficient number of independent directors
on the audit committee and the compensation committee.

   2. Failure to maintain a minimum MVLS of $35.0 million for the
last 30 consecutive business days.

   3. Failure to file Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2017,
in compliance with Listing Rules.

On Sept. 28, 2017, the Company appealed Nasdaq's determination and
was informed a hearing date had been set for Nov. 16, 2017.

On Oct. 2, 2017, the Company received an additional Staff
Determination letter noting that the Company is no longer an
operating business and is currently a "public shell".  Further, in
accordance with Listing Rule 5101, Nasdaq determined to apply more
stringent criteria to preserve and strengthen the quality and
integrity of The NASDAQ Stock Market in considering the Company's
appeal, and accordingly, in addition to the three items noted
above, the Nasdaq Hearings Panel will consider this matter as well
in rendering a determination regarding the Company's continued
listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market.  There can be no assurance
the Company will be successful in its appeal or regain compliance
with Nasdaq's rules or that Nasdaq will allow the Company's stock
to resume trading.

                     About Root9B Holdings

root9B Holdings (OTCQB: RTNB) -- http://www.root9bholdings.com/--
is a provider of Cybersecurity and Regulatory Risk Mitigation
Services.  Through its wholly owned subsidiaries root9B and IPSA
International, the Company delivers results that improve
productivity, mitigate risk and maximize profits.  Its clients
range in size from Fortune 100 companies to mid-sized and
owner-managed businesses across a broad range of industries
including local, state and government agencies.

Root9B Technologies, Inc., changed its name to root9B Holdings,
Inc., effective Dec. 5, 2016, and relocated its corporate
headquarters from Charlotte, NC, to the current headquarters of
root9B, its wholly owned cybersecurity subsidiary, in Colorado
Springs, CO.

Root9B reported a net loss of $30.48 million for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, following a net loss of $8.33 million in 2015.

As of March 31, 2017, Root9B Holdings had $16.84 million in total
assets, $15.80 million in total liabilities, and $1.03 million in
total stockholders' equity.

Cherry Bekaert LLP, in Charlotte, North Carolina, issued a "going
concern" qualification on the consolidated financial statements for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, noting that Company has suffered
recurring losses from operations and has negative operating cash
flows and will require additional financing to fund the continued
operations.  The availability of such financing cannot be assured.
These conditions raise substantial doubt about its ability to
continue as a going concern, the auditors said.


RUBY TUESDAY: Amends Fiscal 2017 Annual Report to Add Part III
--------------------------------------------------------------
Ruby Tuesday, Inc., filed its annual report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 6, 2017, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on Aug. 21, 2017.  The Company had amended the report to
amend Part III, Items 10 through 14 of the Original Form 10-K to
include information previously omitted from the Original Form 10-K
in reliance on General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K.  General
Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K provides that registrants may
incorporate by reference certain information from a definitive
proxy statement which involves the election of directors if such
definitive proxy statement is filed with the SEC within 120 days
after the end of the fiscal year.  The Company's definitive proxy
statement involving the election of directors will not be filed
before Oct. 4, 2017 (i.e., within 120 days after the end of our
2017 fiscal year).  The information included by Part III, Items 10
through 14 of Form 10-K is more limited than what is required to be
included in the definitive proxy statement to be filed in
connection with its annual meeting of stockholders.  The definitive
proxy statement to be filed at a later date will include additional
information related to the topics herein and additional information
not required by Part III, Items 10 through 14 of Form 10-K.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
         Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and
         Director Independence

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

A full-text copy of the Form 10-K/A is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/Cl7j2g

                       About Ruby Tuesday

Maryville, Tenn.-based Ruby Tuesday, Inc. --
http://www.rubytuesday.com/-- owns and franchises Ruby Tuesday
brand restaurants.  As of June 6, 2017, there were 605 Ruby Tuesday
restaurants system-wide, of which 543 were Company-owned.  During
the fourth quarter, one Company-owned Ruby Tuesday restaurant and
one international franchised Ruby Tuesday restaurant were closed.

As of June 6, 2017, Ruby Tuesday had $723.64 million in total
assets, $416.27 million in total liabilities and $307.36 million in
total shareholders' equity.  

Ruby Tuesday reported a net loss of $106.14 million on $951.97
million of total revenue for the year ended June 6, 2017, compared
to a net loss of $50.68 million on $1.09 billion of total revenue
for the year ended May 31, 2016.

                         *     *     *

In April 2017, S&P Global Ratings lowered its corporate credit
rating on Ruby Tuesday Inc. to 'CCC+' from 'B-'.  The outlook is
negative.  "The downgrade reflects our view of uncertainty
regarding the company's ability to meaningfully improve earnings
growth that can support what we currently see as an unsustainable
capital structure.  While liquidity is also tightening, we do not
currently envision a specific default scenario in the next 12
months, as the company does not face any significant debt
maturities within the next year," said credit analyst Mathew
Christy.


RUE21 INC: Court Lifts Stay as to Garrison in J.Trujillo Suit
-------------------------------------------------------------
Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe of the United States District
Court for the Eastern District of California lifted the stay as to
Defendant Garrison Tulare, LLC, in the case captioned JOSE
TRUIJILLO, Plaintiff, v. RUE21, INC. and GARRISON TULARE, LLC,
Defendants, Case No. 1:17-cv-795 LJO-BAM (E.D. Cal.).

The initial scheduling conference will remain as set on Nov. 2,
2017, at 9:30 A.M in Courtroom 8 (BAM).

A copy of Judge McAuliffe's Order dated Oct. 3, 2017, is available
at https://is.gd/KEVSHn from Leagle.com.

Jose Trujillo, Plaintiff, represented by Zachary Best, Mission Law
Firm, A.P.C.

Garrison Tulare LLC, Defendant, represented by Aaron David Langberg
-- aaron.langberg@wilsonelser.com -- Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman
& Dicker & Edward P. Garson -- edward.garson@wilsonelser.com --
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker.

                        About rue21, Inc.

rue21, Inc. -- http://www.rue21.com/-- is a teen specialty apparel
retailer.  For over 37 years, rue21 has been famous for offering
the latest trends at an affordable price point.  It has core brands
in girls' apparel (rue21), intimate apparel (true), girls'
accessories (etc!), girls' cosmetics (ruebeaute!), guys' apparel
and accessories (Carbon), girls' plus-size apparel (rue+), and
girls' swimwear (ruebleu).  The company is headquartered in
Warrendale, Pennsylvania and have one distribution center located
in Weirton, West Virginia.

Headquartered just north of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, rue21 had
1,179 stores in 48 states in shopping malls, outlets and strip
centers, and on its website.  In April, Company began the process
of closing approximately 400 underperforming stores in its 1,179
store fleet in order to streamline operations.

On May 15, 2017, rue21, inc., and affiliates filed voluntary
petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code
(Bankr. W.D. Pa. Lead Case No. 17-22045).  rue21 estimated $1
billion to $10 billion in assets and liabilities.

Todd M. Lenhart, the Company's senior vice president, treasurer,
chief financial officer, and chief accounting officer, signed the
petitions.

The Debtors have sought joint administration of the Chapter 11
cases. The Honorable Gregory L. Taddonio is the case judge.

The Debtors tapped Reed Smith LLP as local counsel; Kirkland &
Ellis LLP as bankruptcy counsel; Rothschild Inc., as investment
banker; Berkeley Research Group, LLC, as financial advisor; A&G
Realty Partners, LLC, as real estate advisor and consultant; and
Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as claims and notice agent.

Counsel to the DIP Term Loan Agent, DIP Term Loan Lenders,
Prepetition Term Loan Agent and Term Loan Steering Committee are
Scott J. Greenberg, Esq., Michael J. Cohen, Esq., and Jeffrey J.
Bresch, Esq., at Jones Day.

Counsel to the DIP ABL Agent and the Prepetition ABL Agent are
Julia Frost-Davies, Esq., and Amelia C. Joiner, Esq., at Morgan
Lewis & Bockius LLP; and James D. Newell, Esq., and Timothy Palmer,
Esq., at Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC.

The Sponsor Lenders are represented by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett's
Elisha D. Graff, Esq.

An Ad Hoc Cross-Holder Group is represented by Milbank, Tweed,
Hadley & McCloy's Gerard Uzzi, Esq., and Eric Stodola, Esq.

Andrew R. Vara, Acting U.S. Trustee for Region 3, on May 23, 2017,
appointed seven creditors to serve on the official committee of
unsecured creditors. The Committee has tapped Cooley LLP as
counsel; and Fox Rothschild LLP as local counsel.


SCPD GRAMERCY: MW Capital Buying Project Assets for $110K
---------------------------------------------------------
SCPD Gramercy 1 Holding, LLC, and SCPD Gramercy 1, LLC, ask the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York to
authorize their private sale of project assets consisting of all
construction plans, drawings, approvals, permits, reports and other
materials concerning the real property located at 327 East 22nd
Street, New York, New York, Block 928, Lot 15, in the Gramercy
neighborhood of Manhattan, formerly owned by SCPD Gramercy, to MW
Capital, LLC for $110,000.

A hearing on the Motion is set for Oct. 31, 2017 at 10:00 a.m.
Objections, if any, must be filed not later than seven days prior
to the hearing date.

SCPD Gramercy was formed in 2013 and SCPD Holding was formed in
2014 for the purpose of acquiring, owning, and developing the Real
Property.  SCPD Gramercy held title to the Property and had been
the "operating" entity.  SCPD Holding's sole purpose was to hold
all of the membership interests in SCPD Gramercy.

SCPD Gramercy intended to construct, from the ground-up, a
seven-story, eleven unit, luxury, residential condominium building
on the Property ("Project").  In furtherance thereof, the Debtors,
among other things: (i) obtained signed construction bids for hard
and soft costs; (ii) obtained appraisal and environmental reports
before the acquisition of the Property, February 2014 and December
2013, respectively, then completed/updated again on April 2016 for
both; (iii) obtained a Property Condition Report in February 2014;
(iv) completed asbestos removal from building in September 2014 and
filed Form ACP21 on Sept. 17, 2014 with the New York City Dept. of
Environmental Protection; (v) completed interior demolition in
early 2015; (vi) obtained and filed approved plans with Department
of Building in June 2015; and (vii) received approved CPS-l from
NYS Attorney General's office in May 2015.

On the Petition Date, and as a result of a dispute with their
pre-Petition Date secured lender, ACM Shelf A, LLC, each of the
Debtors filed a voluntary petition for relief under chapter ll of
the Bankruptcy Code with the Court and Orders for Relief were
entered.

On March 20, 2017, the Court confirmed the Debtors' First Amended
Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization, dated Feb. 3, 2017, as
modified by way of the Debtors' First Pre-Confirmation Modification
of Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization Pursuant to 11 U.S.C.
Section 1127, dated March 10, 2017.  The Plan was to be implemented
by way of a settlement between the Debtors and ACM, and the
distributions contemplated to be made under the Plan were to be
funded by, certain equity and construction financing to be obtained
by the Debtors

The material terms of the settlement between the Debtors and ACM
encompassed in the Plan are:

     a. ACM agreed to accept the sum of $12,600,000 under a
confirmed chapter 11 plan in full settlement of its secured claim,
provided that said amount was paid within 60 days (plus or minus 14
days to provide for the expiration of the appeal period concerning
an Order confirming a chapter 11 plan);

     b. The sum of $400,000 would be deposited into escrow with the
Debtors' counsel within five days to be held pending confirmation
of a chapter 11 plan to be proposed by the Debtors' as a good faith
deposit with regard to the amounts to be paid to ACM;

     c. SCPD Gramercy would sign a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure in
favor of ACM which would be held in escrow by ACM's counsel;

     d. In the event that the Debtors failed to confirm a chapter
11 plan, failed to fully pay $12,600,000 to ACM and/or failed to
make the $400,000 good faith deposit as agreed, and said failure
was not cured within five business days' written notice to the
Debtors' counsel, then the Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure would he
released from escrow and ACM could record same.  If the $400,000
good faith deposit had been made prior to any uncured default, said
amount would be returned to the payor of such fund.

     e. ACM's secured claim would be fixed in the amount of
$12,600,000 under a chapter 11 plan to be proposed by the Debtors
and ACM's general unsecured deficiency claim would be fixed in the
amount of $1,448,000, provided however that ACM's general unsecured
deficiency claim would be for voting purposes only and ACM would
waive any distribution under a plan on account thereof; and

     f. ACM would vote its secured claim and its general unsecured
deficiency claim in favor of the plan to be proposed by the
Debtors.

Pursuant to Orders entered on March 21, 2017, the law firm Pick &
Zabicki LLP ("P&Z") was awarded final professional fees and
expenses as counsel to the Debtors (through March 16, 2017) in the
following amounts: (i) with regard to SCPD Gramercy, a total of
$73,731 (i.e., $71,350 in fees and $2,382 in expenses) against
which P&Z was holding a retainer of $17,075 leaving a balance
payable of $56,6567; and (ii) with regard to SCPD Holding, a total
of $63,570 (i.e., $61,288 in fees and $2,309 in expenses) against
which P&Z was holding a retainer of $7,075 leaving a balance
payable of $56,523 ("Administrative Professional Fees").

The Debtors have filed monthly operating reports for all reporting
periods from the Petition Date through August 2017.  Upon
information and belief, they owe statutory fees to the United
States Trustee totaling approximately $3,900 through the third
quarter of 2017.

Subsequent to the entry of the Confirmation Order, the $400,000
good faith deposit in connection with ACM's secured claim was
escrowed in accordance with the Plan.  However, the Debtors were
not able to consummate or otherwise obtain the Financing needed to
satisfy ACM's secured claim within the time required to do so under
the Plan.  As a result, ACM declared the Debtors' to be in default
under the Plan and the "Effective Date" of the Plan never
occurred.

The Property was deeded to ACM pursuant to the Deed in Lieu of
Foreclosure effective May 2, 2017.  The Debtor has been advised
that, thereafter, ACM sold the Property to the Purchaser; an
unrelated good faith purchaser in accordance with this third-party
sale, ACM executed and provided to the Purchaser a Deed dated Aug.
30, 2017, conveying title to the Property to the Purchaser.

The Debtors were subsequently approached by the Purchaser whom
inquired as to whether the Debtors would be interested in selling
all construction plans, drawings, approvals, permits, reports and
other materials concerning the Property and/or the Project.
Arms-length negotiations ensued, with the involvement of
independent counsel, as a result of which it was ultimately agreed
that the Purchaser would pay the sum of $110,000, plus reasonable
expenses up to $1,000, for all of the Debtors' rights, title and
interests in and to the Project Assets.

The Purchaser's offer for the Project Assets is conditioned on the
entry of an Order by the Court approving the proposed sale of the
Project Assets, free and clear of all liens, claims and
encumbrances, by not later than Oct. 31, 2017.  The Debtors are
advised that, in connection with its purchase of the Property from
ACM, the Purchaser satisfied all obligations that were secured by
liens or encumbrances on the Property at the time of said purchase.


As such, and with the exception of the statutory fees owed to the
United States Trustee and the Administrative Professional Fees, all
secured claims and administrative expense claims which were to be
afforded treatment under the Plan have been satisfied.  The Debtors
now want to utilize the proceeds of the sale of the Project Assets
to satisfy all statutory fees payable to the United States Trustee
as well as the Administrative Professional Fees.

The Debtors respectfully ask that they be authorized to distribute
the proceeds of the sale of the Project Assets to the United States
Trustee on account of any statutory fees (including any statutory
fees payable in connection with the disbursement of the proceeds of
the sale of the Project Assets) and the remaining balance to P&Z on
account of the Administrative Professional Fees.

All other administrative expense claims and all secured claims that
were to be afforded treatment under the Plan have been satisfied.
As such, the statutory fees payable to the United States Trustee
and the Administrative Professionals Fees owed to P&Z are next in
statutory priority of payment under the Bankruptcy Code.  

Also, although the Administrative Professional Fees payable by the
Debtors to P&Z total $113,178 (not including professional fees and
expenses incurred by P&Z as counsel to the Debtors after March 16,
2017), P&Z has agreed to accept the aforementioned proceeds of the
sale of the Project Assets in full satisfaction of the
Administrative Professional Fees.

The Debtors respectfully submit that cause exists for the dismissal
of their chapter 11 cases because they no longer own the Property
that they were formed for the specific purpose of developing and,
as such, there is no business left for the Debtors to reorganize
under the Bankruptcy Code.  The Effective Date of the Plan did not
occur and, as a result, title to the Property was conveyed to ACM.


The Project Assets are the Debtors' only remaining property of
consequential value; however they are useless to the Debtors
without having title to the Property.  As such, there is simply no
reason for their cases to remain open and, thus, cause exists for
the dismissal of their cases.

The Debtors further respectfully submit that dismissal, as opposed
to conversion to chapter 7, would be in the best interests of
creditors.  If the proposed sale is approved, there would be no
assets of any particular value which could be liquidated by a
chapter 7 Trustee for the benefit of creditors.

The Purchaser:

          MW CAPITAL LLC
          5404 Bosey Court
          Richmond, CA 94806

ACM can be reached at:

          ACM 322 V, INC.
          780 Third Ave., 27th Floor
          New York, NY 10017

                      About SCPD Gramercy

SCPD Gramercy 1, LLC and SCPD Gramercy 1 Holding, LLC are New York
limited liability companies formed in 2013 for the purpose of
acquiring, owning, and developing certain real property located at
327 East 22nd Street, New York, New York, Block 928, Lot 5, in the
Gramercy neighborhood of Manhattan.  SCPD Gramercy holds title to
the Property and is the operating entity.  SCPD Holding's sole
purpose is to hold all of the membership interests in SCPD
Gramercy.

The Debtors sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. S. D. N.Y. Case Nos. 16-11886 and 16-11885) on June
30, 2016.  The petitions were signed by Arnold Cariaso, authorized
sign or on behalf of the manager SC Property
Development, LLC.

The cases are assigned to Judge Sean H. Lane.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors estimated their assets and
debt at $0 to $50,000.

The Debtors are represented by Douglas J. Pick, Esq., at Pick &
Zabicki LLP.

On March 20, 2017, the Court confirmed the Debtors' First Amended
Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.


SEADRILL LIMITED: Hires Conyers Dill as Special Bermuda Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Seadrill Limited, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to employ
Conyers Dill & Pearman Limited, as special Bermuda counsel to the
Debtors.

The Debtor Seadrill Limited and certain other Debtors each are
Bermuda companies.  The filing of chapter 11 cases in the United
States required the commencement of parallel liquidation
proceedings in Bermuda pursuant to the Companies Act 1981 of
Bermuda, and the appointment of joint provisional liquidators.
Indeed, Seadrill Limited and certain other Debtors have commenced
parallel liquidation proceedings in Bermuda and joint provisional
liquidators were appointed on September 13, 2017.

Moreover, an important aspect of the restructuring term sheet
accompanying the Debtors' restructuring support agreement is the
treatment of the shares of Seadrill Limited, North Atlantic
Drilling Limited, and Sevan Drilling Limited, as well as the
commencement of parallel proceedings to implement the transaction
steps.

The Debtors seek to retain Conyers Dill to advise and represent
them on all aspects of Bermuda restructuring and insolvency law.

Conyers Dill will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                      $300-$910
     Paraprofessionals              $110-$150

A total of $700,000 in retainer was paid in advance by the Debtors
to Conyers Dill prior to the Petition Date.

As of the Petition Date, Conyers Dill has been paid for all
professional services and expenses rendered to the Debtors prior to
the Petition Date, and the remaining amount of the Retainer was
$326,325.64.  In addition, the Firm holds on trust in its client
account in favor of Seadrill Limited $154,965.98 as a result of a
payment made in relation to a previously issued, but reversed
invoice.  The funds will be added to the Retainer for an aggregate
retainer amount of $481,291.62.

Conyers Dill will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Robin Mayor, director in the Bermuda office of Conyers Dill &
Pearman Limited, assured the Court that the firm and its
professionals are a "disinterested person" as the term is defined
in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and (a) are not
creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the Debtors; (b)
have not been, within two years before the date of the filing of
the Debtors' chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or employees
of the Debtors; and (c) do not have an interest materially adverse
to the interest of the estate or of any class of creditors or
equity security holders, by reason of any direct or indirect
relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the Debtors, or
for any other reason.

Conyers Dill can be reached at:

     Robin Mayor, Esq.
     CONYERS DILL & PEARMAN LIMITED
     Clarendon House, 2 Church Street
     Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda
     Tel: (441) 295-1422
     Fax: (441) 292-4720

                  About Seadrill Limited

Seadrill Limited is a deepwater drilling contractor, providing
drilling services to the oil and gas industry. It is incorporated
in Bermuda and managed from London. Seadrill and its affiliates own
or lease 51 drilling rigs, which represents more than 6% of the
world fleet.

As of Sept. 12, 2017, Seadrill employs 3,760 highly-skilled
individuals across 22 countries and five continents to operate
their drilling rigs and perform various other corporate functions.

As of June 30, 2017, Seadrill had $20.71 billion in total assets,
$10.77 billion in total liabilities and $9.94 billion in total
equity.

Seadrill reported a net loss of US$155 million on US$3.17 billion
of total operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
following a net loss of US$635 million on US$4.33 billion of total
operating revenues for the year ended in 2015.

After reaching terms of a reorganization plan that would
restructure $8 billion of funded debt, Seadrill Limited and 85
affiliated debtors each filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-60079) on Sept. 12,
2017.

Together with the chapter 11 proceedings, Seadrill, North Atlantic
Drilling Limited ("NADL") and Sevan Drilling Limited ("Sevan")
commenced liquidation proceedings in Bermuda to appoint joint
provisional liquidators and facilitate recognition and
implementation of the transactions contemplated by the RSA and
Investment Agreement, and Simon Edel, Alan Bloom and Roy Bailey of
Ernst & Young serve as the joint and several provisional
liquidators.

In the Chapter 11 cases, the Company has engaged Kirkland & Ellis
LLP as legal counsel, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as financial advisor,
and Alvarez & Marsal as restructuring advisor. Slaughter and May
has been engaged as corporate counsel, and Morgan Stanley served as
co-financial advisor during the negotiation of the restructuring
agreement. Advokatfirmaet Thommessen AS is serving as Norwegian
counsel. Conyers Dill & Pearman is serving as Bermuda counsel.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP UK, as independent auditor. Prime Clerk
is the claims agent and maintains the Web site
https://cases.primeclerk.com/seadrill


SEADRILL LIMITED: Hires Jackson Walker as Co-Counsel
----------------------------------------------------
Seadrill Limited, and its debtor-affiliates, seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to
employ Jackson Walker L.L.P., as co-counsel to the Debtors.

Seadrill Limited requires Jackson Walker to:

   a. provide legal advice and services regarding local rules,
      practices, and procedures, including Fifth Circuit law;

   b. provide certain services in connection with administration
      of the chapter 11 cases, including, without limitation,
      preparing agendas, hearing notices, and hearing binders of
      documents and pleadings;

   c. review and comment on proposed drafts of pleadings to be
      filed with the Court;

   d. at the request of the Debtors, appear in Court and at any
      meeting with the U.S. Trustee and any meeting of creditors
      at any given time on behalf of the Debtors as their local
      and conflicts bankruptcy co-counsel;

   e. perform all other services assigned by the Debtors to the
      Firm as co-counsel to the Debtors; and

   f. provide legal advice and services on any matter on which
      Kirkland & Ellis LLP and Kirkland & Ellis International
      LLP may have a conflict, or as needed based on
      specialization.

Jackson Walker will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Partners                       $575-$750
     Associates                     $325-$465
     Paraprofessionals              $175-$265

On September 7, 2017, Jackson Walker received a retainer from the
Debtors in the amount of $500,000 for services performed and to be
performed in connection with and in contemplation of the filing of
the bankruptcy case, of which $75,961 was used for pre-petition
services.  On the day of the filing, the Firm incurred expenses in
the amount of $147,662 and that amount will be included in the
first interim fee application filed by the Firm.

Jackson Walker will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

In accordance with Appendix B-Guidelines for Reviewing Applications
for Compensation and Reimbursement of Expenses Filed under 11
U.S.C. Sec. 330 for Attorneys in Larger Chapter 11 Cases, the
following is provided in response to the request for additional
information:

   Question:  Did you agree to any variations from, or
              alternatives to, your standard or customary billing
              arrangements for this engagement?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  Do any of the professionals included in this
              engagement vary their rate based on the geographic
              location of the bankruptcy case?

   Response:  No.

   Question:  If you represented the client in the 12 months
              prepetition, disclose your billing rates and
              material financial terms for the prepetition
              engagement, including any adjustments during the
              12-months prepetition. If your billing rates and
              material financial terms have changed postpetition,
              explain the difference and the reasons for the
              difference.

   Response:  Patricia B. Tomasco's rate is $750. Matthew D.
              Cavenaugh's rate is $575. Jennifer F. Wertz's
              hourly rate is $465 and Rachel Biblo Block's
              hourly rate is $345. The rates of other attorneys
              in the Firm range from $275 to $750 an hour and the
              paralegal rates range from $175 to $265 an hour.
              The Firm represented the Debtors during the period
              immediately before the Petition Date, using the
              foregoing hourly rates.

   Question:  Has your client approved your prospective budget
              and staffing plan, and, if so for what budget
              period?

   Response:  Yes, the Debtors have approved the Firm's budget
              and staffing plan for the period beginning as of
              the Petition Date through December 12, 2017.

Patricia B. Tomasco, partner of Jackson Walker L.L.P., assured the
Court that the firm and its professionals are a "disinterested
person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy
Code and (a) are not creditors, equity security holders or insiders
of the Debtors; (b) have not been, within two years before the date
of the filing of the Debtors' chapter 11 petition, directors,
officers or employees of the Debtors; and (c) do not have an
interest materially adverse to the interest of the estate or of any
class of creditors or equity security holders, by reason of any
direct or indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest
in, the Debtors, or for any other reason.

Jackson Walker can be reached at:

     Patricia B. Tomasco, Esq.
     JACKSON WALKER L.L.P.
     1401 McKinney Street, Suite 1900
     Houston, TX 77010
     Tel: (713) 752-4200

                  About Seadrill Limited

Seadrill Limited is a deepwater drilling contractor, providing
drilling services to the oil and gas industry. It is incorporated
in Bermuda and managed from London. Seadrill and its affiliates own
or lease 51 drilling rigs, which represents more than 6% of the
world fleet.

As of Sept. 12, 2017, Seadrill employs 3,760 highly-skilled
individuals across 22 countries and five continents to operate
their drilling rigs and perform various other corporate functions.

As of June 30, 2017, Seadrill had $20.71 billion in total assets,
$10.77 billion in total liabilities and $9.94 billion in total
equity.

Seadrill reported a net loss of US$155 million on US$3.17 billion
of total operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
following a net loss of US$635 million on US$4.33 billion of total
operating revenues for the year ended in 2015.

After reaching terms of a reorganization plan that would
restructure $8 billion of funded debt, Seadrill Limited and 85
affiliated debtors each filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
17-60079) on Sept. 12, 2017.

Together with the chapter 11 proceedings, Seadrill, North Atlantic
Drilling Limited ("NADL") and Sevan Drilling Limited ("Sevan") are
commencing liquidation proceedings in Bermuda to appoint joint
provisional liquidators and facilitate recognition and
implementation of the transactions contemplated by the RSA and
Investment Agreement, and Simon Edel, Alan Bloom and Roy Bailey of
Ernst & Young are to act as the joint and several provisional
liquidators.

In the Chapter 11 cases, the Company has engaged Kirkland & Ellis
LLP as legal counsel, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as financial advisor,
and Alvarez & Marsal as restructuring advisor. Slaughter and May
has been engaged as corporate counsel, and Morgan Stanley served as
co-financial advisor during the negotiation of the restructuring
agreement. Advokatfirmaet Thommessen AS is serving as Norwegian
counsel. Conyers Dill & Pearman is serving as Bermuda counsel.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP UK, as independent auditor. Prime Clerk
is the claims agent and maintains the Web site
https://cases.primeclerk.com/seadrill


SEADRILL LIMITED: Hires Thommessen as Special Norwegian Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------------
Seadrill Limited, and its debtor-affiliates, seek authority from
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to
employ Advokatfirmeat Thommessen AS, as special Norwegian counsel
to the Debtors.

Seadrill Limited requires Thommessen to advise and represent the
Debtors in all aspects of Norwegian restructuring and insolvency
law.

Thommessen will be paid at these hourly rates:

   Attorneys                  NOK 1,600 - NOK 5,200
                              ($209-$670)

   Paraprofessionals          NOK 250 - NOK 1,000
                              ($32-$130)

A total of NOK 3,000,000 ($387,000) in retainer was paid in advance
by the Debtors prior to the Petition Date to Thommessen. As of the
Petition Date, Thommessen has been paid for all professional
services and expenses rendered to the Debtors prior to the Petition
Date, and the remaining amount of the retainer was NOK 2,387,631
($308,000).

Thommessen will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Ellen Teresa Heyerdahl, partner in the Norway office of
Advokatfirmeat Thommessen AS, assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and (a) is not creditors, equity security
holders or insiders of the Debtors; (b) has not been, within two
years before the date of the filing of the Debtors' chapter 11
petition, directors, officers or employees of the Debtors; and (c)
does not have an interest materially adverse to the interest of the
estate or of any class of creditors or equity security holders, by
reason of any direct or indirect relationship to, connection with,
or interest in, the Debtors, or for any other reason.

Thommessen can be reached at:

     Ellen Teresa Heyerdahl, Esq.
     ADVOKATFIRMEAT THOMMESSEN AS
     Haakon Viis Gate 10
     Postboks 1484 Vika
     NO-0161 Oslo
     Tel: +47 23 11 11 11
     Fax: +47 23 11 10 10

                  About Seadrill Limited

Seadrill Limited is a deepwater drilling contractor, providing
drilling services to the oil and gas industry. It is incorporated
in Bermuda and managed from London. Seadrill and its affiliates own
or lease 51 drilling rigs, which represents more than 6% of the
world fleet.

As of Sept. 12, 2017, Seadrill employs 3,760 highly-skilled
individuals across 22 countries and five continents to operate
their drilling rigs and perform various other corporate functions.

As of June 30, 2017, Seadrill had $20.71 billion in total assets,
$10.77 billion in total liabilities and $9.94 billion in total
equity.

Seadrill reported a net loss of US$155 million on US$3.17 billion
of total operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
following a net loss of US$635 million on US$4.33 billion of total
operating revenues for the year ended in 2015.

After reaching terms of a reorganization plan that would
restructure $8 billion of funded debt, Seadrill Limited and 85
affiliated debtors each filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-60079) on Sept. 12,
2017.

Together with the chapter 11 proceedings, Seadrill, North Atlantic
Drilling Limited ("NADL") and Sevan Drilling Limited ("Sevan")
commenced liquidation proceedings in Bermuda to appoint joint
provisional liquidators and facilitate recognition and
implementation of the transactions contemplated by the RSA and
Investment Agreement, and Simon Edel, Alan Bloom and Roy Bailey of
Ernst & Young serve as the joint and several provisional
liquidators.

In the Chapter 11 cases, the Company has engaged Kirkland & Ellis
LLP as legal counsel, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as financial advisor,
and Alvarez & Marsal as restructuring advisor. Slaughter and May
has been engaged as corporate counsel, and Morgan Stanley served as
co-financial advisor during the negotiation of the restructuring
agreement. Advokatfirmaet Thommessen AS is serving as Norwegian
counsel. Conyers Dill & Pearman is serving as Bermuda counsel.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP UK, as independent auditor. Prime Clerk
is the claims agent and maintains the Web site
https://cases.primeclerk.com/seadrill


SEADRILL LIMITED: Seeks to Hire Ordinary Course Professionals
-------------------------------------------------------------
Seadrill Limited, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to employ
professionals in the ordinary course of the Debtors' business.

Seadrill Limited require the services of these professionals:

   Tier 1 Ordinary Course Professionals

     Name                                   Service
     ----                                   -------
   Ashurst Australia                         Legal

   Aztek Consulting AS                       Legal

   Eastham, Watson, Dale & Forney, LLP       Legal

   Fearnley Offshore                         Valuation/Rig Broker

   Geoje Taxpayers Association              
Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Haynes And Boone CDG, LLP                 Legal

   Locke, Lord Bissell& Liddel LLP           Legal

   Seward and Kissel LLP                     Legal

   Shearman & Sterling                       Legal

   Afridi & Angell Legal Consultants      Local Counsel

   Al Bassam Certified Public
   Accountants And Consultants            Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Al Jubairi Law Firm                    Legal

   Ali Budiardjo, Nugroho, Reksodiputro   Local Counsel

   Allen & Gledhill LLP                   Legal

   Arifa Corporate Services, Inc          Local Counsel

   Ascension Consulting Services          Tax

   Aztek Consulting AS                    Legal

   Baker & Hostetler LLP                  Legal

   Baker & Mckenzie LLP                   Legal

   Baker & Mckenzie Ltd                   Legal

   Barbosa, Mussnich E Aragao-
   Advogados                              Legal

   Barreto Advogados & Consultores
   Associados                             Legal

   Bdo China Shu Lun Pan Certified
   Public Accountants LLP
   Shenzhen Branch                        Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Bedoya Goyes Abogados Sa               Legal

   Bell Pottinger LLP                     PR/Crisis

   Management Benson Buffett Plc          Legal

   Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP            Legal

   Bettencourt Tax Advisors Llc           Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Bewith Angola Lda                      Business Consulting

   Bugge, Arentz-Hansen & Rasmussen
   Advokaforening                         Legal

   Burness Paull & Williamsons LLP        Legal

   Ccw Partnership                        Local Counsel

   Cjsc "Alrud"                           Local Counsel

   Cms Cameron Mckenna LLP                Local Counsel

   Cogan & Partners LLP                   Legal

   Contatos Contabilidade Ltda - Epp      Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Cuatrecasas, Goncalves Pereira LLP     Local Counsel

   Dar Al-Noha Law Firm                   Legal

   Davidson & Co. Legal Consultants       Legal

   Dechert LLP                            Legal

   Deloitte & Touche Al Wazzan & Co.      Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Deloitte & Touche Bakrabdul
   Khair & Co                             Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Deloitte & Touche LLP                  Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Deloitte (Namibia)                     Tax

   D'empaire Reyna Abogados               Local Counsel

   Domingues E Pinho Contadores Ltda.     Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.                 Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Dwf LLP                                Legal

   Eastham, Watson, Dale & Forney, LLP    Legal

   Ensafrica (Mauritius)                  Local Counsel

   Eversheds LLP                          Legal

   Eversheds LLP (Uae)                    Legal

   Fearnley Offshore Pte Ltd              Valuation

   FFA Ernst & Young                      Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen &
   Lowey, LLP                             Legal

   Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP               Legal

   Garza Tello & Asociados, S.C.          Legal

   Halbouti E Kerr Pinheiro Advogados
   Associados                             Legal

   Haynes And Boone, LLP                  Legal

   Hogan Lovells Bstl, S.C.               Local Counsel

   Holman Fenwick Willan Middle
   East LLP                               Legal

   Holman Fenwick Willan Singapore LLP    Legal

   Hughes Arrell Kinchen LLP              Legal

   Ince & Co Singapore LLP                Legal

   Infis Consultoria Ltda Me              Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Irg Advisors LLP                       Business Consulting

   Jones Day                              Legal

   Junhe LLP                              Local Counsel

   Kasznar Leonardos Advogados            Legal

   Kim Chang & Lee                        Local Counsel

   Kimathi Partners                       Legal

   KPMG (Australia)                       Accounting/Finance/Tax

   KPMG (Ghana)                           Accounting/Finance/Tax

   KPMG Advisory (China) Limited
   Shenzhen Branch                        Accounting/Finance/Tax

   KPMG AS                                Accounting/Finance/Tax

   KPMG International                     Accounting/Finance/Tax

   KPMG Law Advokatfirma AS               Accounting/Finance/Tax

   KPMG Phoomchai Tax Ltd.                Accounting/Finance/Tax

   KPMG Professional Services/KPMG
   Advisory Services                      Accounting/Finance/Tax

   KPMG Tax AS                            Accounting/Finance/Tax

   KPMG Tax Limited                       Accounting/Finance/Tax

   KPMG Tax Services Sdn Bhd              Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Lara, Marambio & Asociados             Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Law Firm Of Dr. Mujahid Al-Sawwaf      Local Counsel

   Loyens & Loeff Nv                      Local Counsel

   Luiz Leonardos & Advogados             Legal

   Mancera, S.C.                          Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Mark A. Childers                       Legal

   Mckinney, Bancroft & Hughes            Local Counsel

   Miranda Alliance Stp, S.A              Legal

   Moore Stephens LLP                     Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Najvar & Najvar, CPAs                  Expat Tax Consulting

   Nunez Rodriguez Abogados, S.C.         Legal

   Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak &
   Stewart                                Legal

   P. Kaimakliotis & Partners Llc         Local Counsel

   Pistis Partners LLP                    Legal

   Price Sanond Prabhas & Wynne Ltd       Legal

   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP             Accounting/Finance/Tax

   PricewaterhouseCoopers Malaysia        Accounting/Finance/Tax

   PricewaterhouseCoopers Angola
   Limitada                               Accounting/Finance/Tax

   PricewaterhouseCoopers AS              Accounting/Finance/Tax

   PricewaterhouseCoopers Dubai           Accounting/Finance/Tax

   PricewaterhouseCoopers                 Accounting/Finance/Tax

   PricewaterhouseCoopers
   Konyvvizsgalo  Kft.                    Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Pt. KPMG Advisory Indonesia            Accounting/Finance/Tax

   Rajah & Tann (Thailand) Limited        Local Counsel

   Rajah & Tann LCT Lawyers               Local Counsel

   Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP             Local Counsel

   Resor N.V                              Legal

   Sanson Advogados                       Legal

   Schonherr Rechtsanwalte Gmbh           Legal

   Seward and Kissel LLP                  Legal

   Shearman & Sterling (London) LLP       Legal

   Sjl Jimenez Lunz                       Legal

   Souza,Cescon,Barrieu E Flesch
   Sociedade De Advogados                 Local Counsel

   Stephenson Harwood LLP                 Legal

   Steptoe & Johnson                      Legal

   Stewart Mckelvey                       Local Counsel

   Stork & May LLP                        Business Consulting

   Szabo Kelemen & Partners Attorneys     Local Counsel

   Trench, Rossi E Watanabe Advogados     Legal

   Vieira De Almeida & Associados,
   Sociedade De Advogados, R.L            Local Counsel

   Vieira, Rezende, Barbosa E Guerreiro
   Advogados S/C                          Legal

   Von Wobeser & Sierra Sc                Legal

   Watson, Farley & Williams LLP          Local Counsel

   Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman &
   Dicker LLP                             Legal

   Winter Scott LLP                       Legal

   Xavier, Duque Estrada, Emery, Denardi
   Advogados                              Legal

   Zaid Ibrahim & Co                      Local Counsel

To the best of the Debtors' knowledge, the firms are a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and (a) are not creditors, equity security
holders or insiders of the Debtors; (b) have not been, within two
years before the date of the filing of the Debtors' chapter 11
petition, directors, officers or employees of the Debtors; and (c)
do not have an interest materially adverse to the interest of the
estate or of any class of creditors or equity security holders, by
reason of any direct or indirect relationship to, connection with,
or interest in, the Debtors, or for any other reason.

                  About Seadrill Limited

Seadrill Limited is a deepwater drilling contractor, providing
drilling services to the oil and gas industry. It is incorporated
in Bermuda and managed from London. Seadrill and its affiliates own
or lease 51 drilling rigs, which represents more than 6% of the
world fleet.

As of Sept. 12, 2017, Seadrill employs 3,760 highly-skilled
individuals across 22 countries and five continents to operate
their drilling rigs and perform various other corporate functions.

As of June 30, 2017, Seadrill had $20.71 billion in total assets,
$10.77 billion in total liabilities and $9.94 billion in total
equity.

Seadrill reported a net loss of US$155 million on US$3.17 billion
of total operating revenues for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016,
following a net loss of US$635 million on US$4.33 billion of total
operating revenues for the year ended in 2015.

After reaching terms of a reorganization plan that would
restructure $8 billion of funded debt, Seadrill Limited and 85
affiliated debtors each filed a voluntary petition for relief under
Chapter 11 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No. 17-60079) on Sept. 12,
2017.

Together with the chapter 11 proceedings, Seadrill, North Atlantic
Drilling Limited ("NADL") and Sevan Drilling Limited ("Sevan")
commenced liquidation proceedings in Bermuda to appoint joint
provisional liquidators and facilitate recognition and
implementation of the transactions contemplated by the RSA and
Investment Agreement, and Simon Edel, Alan Bloom and Roy Bailey of
Ernst & Young serve as the joint and several provisional
liquidators.

In the Chapter 11 cases, the Company has engaged Kirkland & Ellis
LLP as legal counsel, Houlihan Lokey, Inc. as financial advisor,
and Alvarez & Marsal as restructuring advisor. Slaughter and May
has been engaged as corporate counsel, and Morgan Stanley served as
co-financial advisor during the negotiation of the restructuring
agreement. Advokatfirmaet Thommessen AS is serving as Norwegian
counsel. Conyers Dill & Pearman is serving as Bermuda counsel.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP UK, as independent auditor. Prime Clerk
is the claims agent and maintains the Web site
https://cases.primeclerk.com/seadrill


SEANERGY MARITIME: Vessel Refinancing Results in $11.4-M Gain
-------------------------------------------------------------
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. disclosed the closing of its early
termination of a credit facility of one of its Capesize vessels and
successful refinancing with a new senior secured credit facility.

The outstanding balance of the prior senior secured credit facility
was $35.4 million, which was settled under an early termination
agreement with the lender for $24.0 million.  The settlement
resulted into a $11.4 million gain and equity accretion for the
Company that will be recorded on its financial results for the
third quarter and nine months ended Sept. 30, 2017.

Stamatis Tsantanis, the Company's chairman & chief executive
officer, stated: "The closing of the previously announced
refinancing is a further positive step forward for Seanergy.  This
series of transactions has resulted in an $11.4 million equity
accretion for our shareholders which represents the unlocking of
value equal to approximately 25% of our current market value.  We
will continue to look for opportunities in the market to execute
on."  

The settlement amount of $24.0 million was funded by a new senior
secured credit facility from a European bank and from financing
arrangements with a company affiliated with the Company's sponsor.

The Company's pro-forma equity and total capitalization, taking
into effect the settlement of the $35.4 million secured loan
facility, are estimated to be $46.1 million and $267.1 million,
respectively.

                   Convertible Promissory Notes

On Sept. 27, 2017, the Company also issued a $13.75 million
convertible promissory note to Jelco Delta Holding Corp.  The Jelco
Note is repayable by two consecutive annual installments of $1.375
million with the first installment occurring 24 months after the
drawdown date, and a balloon payment of $11.0 million four years
after the drawdown date.  The Jelco Note bears quarterly interest
at three-month LIBOR plus a margin of 5%. At Jelco's option, the
whole or any part of the principal amount under the Jelco Note may
be paid at any time in common shares at a conversion price of $0.90
per share.  The conversion price was determined and approved by a
special committee of independent directors of the Company's Board
of Directors, as well as by the Board of Directors itself. The
special committee of independent directors of the Company's  Board
of Directors and our Board of Directors obtained a valuation report
from an independent third party financial advisor for the
conversion price.  Jelco also received customary registration
rights with respect to all shares it beneficially owns, including
any shares received upon conversion of the Jelco Note.  The Jelco
Note is secured by the following cross collaterals: second
preferred mortgages over the Championship and Partnership, second
priority general assignments covering earnings, insurances and
requisition compensation over each vessel, guarantees from our
vessel-owning subsidiaries, and a guarantee from its wholly-owned
subsidiary, Emperor Holding Ltd. Of the $13.75 million drawn down
under the Jelco Note, $4.75 million was used to make a mandatory
prepayment under the Jelco Loan Facility.

On Sept. 27, 2017, the Company also entered into a ninth amendment
to the $21.165 million revolving convertible promissory note dated
Sept. 7, 2015, and on Sept. 18, 2017, the Company entered into a
second amendment to the $4.0 million convertible promissory note
dated March 12, 2015, each note previously issued to Jelco. The
Ninth Amendment changed the reduction date of the applicable limit
so that the applicable limit of the note is now reduced by $3.3
million in the third quarter of 2019 (four years from the drawdown
date) and the remaining balance of the note of $17.865 million is
payable at maturity in the third quarter of 2020 (five years from
the drawdown date).  The Second Amendment amended the repayment
schedule so that the note is repayable in four installments so that
the first be repaid six months after the delivery date of the
Vessel to the ship owning company and the other three installments
semi-annually commencing four years after delivery date of the
Vessel (in the first quarter of 2019), and a balloon payment of
$3.2 million payable at maturity in the first quarter of 2020.  As
amended by the Second Amendment and the Ninth Amendment, these two
notes are also secured by a corporate guarantee offered by the
Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, Emperor Holding Ltd.

                   About Seanergy Maritime

Greece-based Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. --
http://www.seanergymaritime.com/-- is an international shipping
company that provides marine dry bulk transportation services
through the ownership and operation of dry bulk vessels.  Founded
in 2008, the Company currently owns a modern fleet of eleven dry
bulk carriers, consisting of nine Capesizes and two Supramaxes,
with a combined cargo-carrying capacity of approximately 1,682,582
dwt and an average fleet age of about 8.4 years.

The Company is incorporated in the Marshall Islands with executive
offices in Athens, Greece and an office in Hong Kong.  The
Company's common shares and class A warrants trade on the Nasdaq
Capital Market under the symbols "SHIP" and "SHIPW", respectively.

Seanergy incurred a net loss of US$24.62 million in 2016 following
a net loss of US$8.95 million in 2015.  For the three months ended
March 31, 2017, Seanergy reported a net loss of US$6.28 million.
As of June 30, 2017, Seaneargy had US$280.24 million in total
assets, US$255.92 million in total liabilities and US$24.31 million
in total stockholders' equity.


SEARS CANADA: CCAA Stay Period Extended to Nov. 7
-------------------------------------------------
The Honourable Mr. Justice Hainey of the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice (Commercial List) on Oct. 4, 2017, granted Sears Canada
Inc. an order extending until Nov. 7, 2017, the stay period under
the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act.

During the stay period, Sears Canada said it is continuing to
operate its retail stores and website at sears.ca, featuring new
Fall and Holiday apparel, accessories and home fashions as it
continues its restructuring efforts and continues to serve
Canadians with great quality products at outstanding prices.

The Court also approved transactions in respect of 11 of Sears
Canada's leased retail store locations, one leased fulfillment
centre, one of its owned properties, and two going-concern
transactions for certain business sections of the Company.

The Court ordered that each landlord will be advised by no later
than two business days after the selection of a successful bid(s)
(including a liquidation bid) relating to such landlord's lease(s),
and in any event no later than Oct. 13, 2017, which of its lease(s)
are included in such successful bid(s).

The Ontario Court approved:

    -- the lease surrender and resiliation transaction contemplated
by a Lease Surrender Agreement between Sears Canada Inc., as
Tenant, and CF/Realty Holdings Inc. and Ontrea Inc. as landlords
dated Sept. 27,2017.

    -- the sale of the businesses of Sears Canada known as Sears
Oil Services, Sears Heating and Cooling and Sears Duct Cleaning
Services (the "Sears Home Improvements Business"), together with
certain ancillary assets contemplated by an Asset Purchase
Agreement between Sears Canada Inc. (the "Seller"), as vendor, and
Confort Expert Inc. (the "Purchaser") as purchaser dated September
28, 2017, as amended (the "APA").

    -- the assignment of certain contracts to the Buyer as
contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement between Sears Canada
Inc., as seller, and Confort Expert Inc., as buyer, dated Sept. 28,
2017, with respect to the Sears Home Improvements Business.

    -- the sale transaction contemplated by an Asset Purchase
Agreement between S.L.H. Transport Inc., Sears Canada Inc. and
168886 Canada Inc., as vendors, and 8507597 Canada Inc., as
purchaser, made as of Sept. 29, 2017.

    -- the lease surrender and resiliation transaction contemplated
by a Lease Surrender Agreement between Sears Canada, as Tenant, and
Fairmall Leaseholds Inc. and Fairview Pointe-Claile Leaseholds Inc.
as Landlords dated Sept. 27, 2017;

    -- the sale transaction contemplated by an Asset Purchase
Agreement between Corbeil Electrique Inc. as Seller, Am-Cam
Electromenagers Inc. as Buyer, Distinctive Appliances Inc. as
Guarantor and Sears Canada as intervenor, dated Oct. 1, 2017;

    -- the sale of lands and buildings located at2311 McPhillips
Street, together with certain ancillary assets, with respect to
Garden City Mall Winnipeg (Store No. 1424) contemplated by a
Further Amended Agreement of Purchase and Sale between Sears Canada
Inc., as vendor, and 1562903 Ontario Limited as purchaser dated
Sept. 27, 2017;

    -- the lease transfer contemplated by a Lease Transfer
Agreement between Sears Canada, as Assignor, and Indigo Books &
Music Inc. as Assignee dated Sept. 28, 2017;

    -- the lease transfer contemplated by a Lease Surrender
Agreement between Sears Canada Inc., as Tenant, and Shape Brentwood
Limited Partnership, Brentwood Towncentre Limited Partnership and
0862223 B.C. Ltd., as landlord, dated Sept. 20, 2017 (the "LSA")
and certain related relief;

     -- the lease transfer contemplated by a Lease Surrender
Agreement between Sears Canada Inc., as Tenant, and Shape
Properties (Nanaimo) Corp., NNTC Equities Inc. and 1854 Holdings
Ltd., as landlord dated Sept. 20, 2017 (the "LSA") and certain
related relief, and

    -- the amendment of the lease contemplated by a Lease Amending
Agreement between Sears Canada Inc., as Tenant, and Crornbie
Developments Limited as Landlord dated Sept. 25, 2017;

    -- approving the lease surrender and resiliation contemplated
by a Lease Surrender Agreement between Sears Canada Inc., as
Tenant, and Orchard Park Shopping Centre Holdings Inc. as Landlord
dated Sept. 22, 2017;

    -- the lease surrender and resiliation contemplated by a Lease
Surrender Agreement between Sears Canada, as Tenant, and Orchard
Park Shopping Centre Holdings Inc., as landlord, dated Sept. 22,
2017;

    -- the lease termination with respect to Oakville Place Mall
Store # 1321, contemplated by a Lease Termination Agreement between
Sears Canada, as Tenant, and RioCan Holdings (Oakville Place) Inc.
as landlord dated as of Sept. 27,2017; and

    -- approving the lease surrender and resiliation with respect
to Scarborough Town Centre, Store #1308, contemplated by a Lease
Surrender Agreement between Sears Canada Inc., as Tenant, and
Scarborough Town Centre Holdings Inc. as Landlord dated Sept. 27,
2017.

                      About Sears Canada

Sears Canada Inc. is an independent Canadian digital and
store-based retailer and technology company whose head office is
based in Toronto. Sears Canada's unique brand format offers premium
quality Sears Label products, designed and sourced by Sears Canada,
and of-the-moment fashion and home decor from designer labels in
The Cut @ Sears.  Sears Canada also has a top ranked appliance and
mattress business in Canada.  Sears Canada is undergoing a
reinvention, including new customer experiences at every
touchpoint, a new e-commerce platform, new store concepts, and a
new set of customer service principles designed to deliver WOW
experiences to customers.  Information can be found at
sears.ca/reinvention.  Sears Canada operates as a separate entity
from its U.S.-based co-founder, now known as Sears Holdings Corp.
based in Illinois.

The Company's balance sheet as of April 29, 2017, showed total
assets of C$1.187 billion against total liabilities of C$1.107
billion.

Amid mounting losses and liquidity constraints Sears Canada and
certain of its subsidiaries on June 22, 2017, applied to the
Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) for protection
under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA"), in order
to continue to restructure its business.

Sears Canada and its subsidiaries on June 22, 2017, were granted an
order (the "Initial Order") under the Companies' Creditors
Arrangement Act (the "CCAA").  Pursuant to the Initial Order, FTI
Consulting has been appointed Monitor.  Sears Canada and certain of
its subsidiaries have obtained orders from the Ontario Superior
Court of Justice (Commercial List) extending the stay period
provided by the Initial Order to Nov. 7, 2017, under the CCAA.

The Company has engaged BMO Capital Markets, as financial advisor,
and Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, as legal advisor.  The Board of
Directors and the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of
the Company has retained Bennett Jones LLP, as legal advisor.

FTI Consulting is the CCAA Court-appointed monitor.  The Monitor
tapped Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP as counsel.


SEARS HOLDINGS: Borrows Additional $100 Million from Lenders
------------------------------------------------------------
Sears Holdings Corporation, through Sears, Roebuck and Co., Kmart
Stores of Illinois LLC, Kmart of Washington LLC, Kmart Corporation,
SHC Desert Springs, LLC, Innovel Solutions, Inc., Sears Holdings
Management Corporation, Maxserv, Inc. and Troy Coolidge No. 13,
LLC, entities wholly-owned and controlled, directly or indirectly
by the Company, entered into an Amended and Restated Loan
Agreement, which amended and restated its Loan Agreement, dated as
of Jan. 3, 2017, with JPP, LLC and JPP II, LLC.  Pursuant to the
Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, the Borrowers borrowed an
additional $100 million from the Lenders. After giving effect to
the Initial Incremental Loan, the aggregate principal amount
outstanding under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement was
$499.4 million.  

Mr. Edward S. Lampert, the Company's chief executive officer and
chairman, is the sole stockholder, chief executive officer and
director of ESL Investments, Inc., which controls JPP, LLC and JPP
II, LLC.  Subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions,
including pledging additional properties or other assets as
collateral, up to an additional $100 million may be drawn by the
Company prior to Dec. 1, 2017.  The Incremental Loans mature on
April 3, 2018.  The original loans under the Amended and Restated
Loan Agreement continue to mature on July 20, 2020.  The Company
expects to use the proceeds of the Incremental Loans for general
corporate purposes.

The Incremental Loans will have an annual interest rate of 11%,
with accrued interest payable monthly.  No upfront or funding fees
will be paid in connection with the Incremental Loans.  As with the
existing loans under the Amended and Restated Loan Agreement, the
Initial Incremental Loan is guaranteed by the Company and is
currently secured by a first priority lien on 61 real properties
owned by the Borrowers.

The Amended and Restated Loan Agreement includes certain
representations and warranties, indemnities and covenants,
including with respect to the condition and maintenance of the real
property collateral.  The Amended and Restated Loan Agreement has
certain events of default, including (subject to certain
materiality thresholds and grace periods) payment default, failure
to comply with covenants, material inaccuracy of representation or
warranty, and bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings.  If there is an
event of default, the Lenders may declare all or any portion of the
outstanding indebtedness to be immediately due and payable,
exercise any rights they might have under the Amended and Restated
Loan Agreement and related documents (including against the
collateral), and require the Borrowers to pay a default interest
rate equal to the greater of (i) 2.5% in excess of the base
interest rate and (ii) the prime rate plus 1%.

The Amended and Restated Loan Agreement permits the Lenders to
syndicate or participate all or a portion of the outstanding loans,
and the Lenders have advised the Borrowers that they are amenable
to syndicating all or a portion of the Incremental Loans to third
parties on the same terms.

The Amended and Restated Loan Agreement is available for free at:

                      https://is.gd/to2CNO

                      About Sears Holdings

Sears Holdings Corporation (NASDAQ: SHLD) --
http://www.searsholdings.com/-- is an integrated retailer focused
on seamlessly connecting the digital and physical shopping
experiences to serve members.  Sears Holdings is home to Shop Your
Waytm, a social shopping platform offering members rewards for
shopping at Sears and Kmart as well as with other retail partners
across categories important to them.

The Company operates through its subsidiaries, including Sears,
Roebuck and Co. and Kmart Corporation, with more than 2,000
full-line and specialty retail stores in the United States and
Canada.

Kmart Corporation and 37 of its U.S. subsidiaries filed voluntary
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. N.D. Ill. Lead Case No. 02-02474) on
Jan. 22, 2002.  Kmart emerged from chapter 11 protection on May 6,
2003, pursuant to the terms of an Amended Joint Plan of
Reorganization.  Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP,
represented Kmart in its restructuring efforts.  Its balance sheet
showed $16,287,000,000 in assets and $10,348,000,000 in debts when
it sought chapter 11 protection.

Kmart bought Sears, Roebuck & Co., for $11 billion to create the
third-largest U.S. retailer, behind Wal-Mart and Target, and
generate $55 billion in annual revenues.  Kmart completed its
merger with Sears on March 24, 2005.

Sears Holdings reported a net loss of $2.22 billion on $22.13
billion of revenues for the fiscal year 2016, compared to a net
loss of $1.12 billion on $25.14 billion of revenues for the fiscal
year 2015.  As of July 31, 2017, Sears Holdings had $8.35 billion
in total assets, $12 billion in total liabilities and a total
deficit of $3.65 billion.

                          *     *     *

In January 2017, Fitch Ratings affirmed the Long-term Issuer
Default Ratings (IDR) on Sears Holdings and its various subsidiary
entities at 'CC'.

In December 2016, that S&P Global Ratings affirmed its ratings,
including the 'CCC+' corporate credit rating, on Sears Holdings
Corp.  "We revised our assessment of Sears' liquidity to less than
adequate from adequate based on the impact of continued and
meaningful cash use and constraints on contractually committed
liquidity from cash use and incremental secured funded borrowings,"
said credit analyst Robert Schulz.  "We do not incorporate any
significant prospective asset sales or execution of strategic
alternatives for legacy hardline brands into our assessment of
committed liquidity."

In January 2017, Moody's Investors Service downgraded Sears
Holdings' corporate family rating to 'Caa2' from 'Caa1'.  Moody's
said Sears' 'Caa2' rating reflects the company's sizable operating
losses - Domestic Adjusted EBITDA was a loss of $884 million in the
latest 12 month period.


SED INTERNATIONAL: Wants Plan Filing Deadline Moved to March 9
--------------------------------------------------------------
SED International Holdings, Inc., and SED International, Inc., ask
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia to
extend the exclusive periods in which Debtors can file one or more
Chapter 11 plan(s) through and including March 9, 2018, and the
time to solicit acceptance thereto through and including May 8,
2018.

As reported by the Troubled Company Reporter on Aug. 21, 2017, the
Court previously extended the Debtors' exclusive periods for filing
a plan and soliciting acceptances to the plan, to Oct. 4, 2017, and
Dec. 5, 2017, respectively.

This is the Debtor's second motion requesting for an extension of
the exclusive periods.

The Debtors are investigating the possibility of monetizing tax
attributes which, if realizable, could impact the structure and
terms of any plan of reorganization that may be proposed by the
Debtors.  Accordingly, the Debtors need more time to determine the
best course of action to propose one or more Chapter 11 plan(s).
Thus, cause exists to extend the deadlines for filing one or more
Chapter 11 plan(s) and soliciting acceptances thereto through and
including March 9, 2018, and May 8, 2018, respectively.

                     About SED International

Founded in 1980, SED International Holdings, Inc., is a
multinational, preferred distributor of leading computer
technology, consumer electronics, and small appliance products.
The company also offers custom-tailored supply chain management
services ideally suited to meet the priorities and distribution
requirements of the e-commerce, business-to-business and
business-to-consumer markets.

Headquartered near Atlanta, Georgia with business operations in
California; Florida; Georgia; Bogota, Colombia and Buenos Aires,
Argentina, SED serves a customer base of over 10,000 channel
partners and retailers in the United States, Latin America, and
Caribbean.

On Feb. 24, 2016, Hill, Kertscher & Wharton, LLC, filed an
involuntary petition for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy
Code against SED International Holdings.  Alan Rothman joined in
the involuntary petition on March 31, 2016, and Brother
International Corp. on April 6, 2016.  The court on Sept. 14, 2016,
converted the Chapter 7 case to one under Chapter 11 (Bankr. N.D.
Ga. Case No. 16-53376).

Based in Lawrenceville, Georgia, SED International, Inc., filed a
Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 16-66019)
on Sept. 9, 2016, listing under $1 million in total assets and
between $10 million to $50 million in liabilities.  The petition
was signed by Sham Gad, its CEO.  The Debtors' cases are being
jointly administered under Case No. 16-53376.  No official
committee of unsecured creditors, trustee or examiner has been
appointed in the cases.

Robert J. Williamson, Esq., and Ashley Reynolds Ray, Esq., at
Scroggins & Williamson P.C., serve as the Debtors' counsel.
Finley, Colmer and Company was tapped by the Debtors to provide
interim management services.  Heritage & FB Consultant Group S.A.S.
is the investment banker.


SEMLER SCIENTIFIC: Stockholders Elect Sole Class II Director
------------------------------------------------------------
Semler Scientific, Inc., held its annual meeting of stockholders on
Oct. 3, 2017, at which the Company's stockholders elected Arthur
"Abbie" Leibowitz, M.D., F.A.A.P. to serve as the sole Class II
director on the Company's Board of Directors until the Company's
2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders or until his successor has been
duly elected and qualified.  The stockholders also ratified the
selection by the Audit Committee of the Board of BDO USA, LLP as
the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the
fiscal year ending Dec. 31, 2017.

                    About Semler Scientific

Semler Scientific, Inc. -- http://www.semlercientific.com/--
provides diagnostic and testing services to healthcare insurers and
physician groups.  The Portland, Oregon-based Company develops,
manufactures and  markets proprietary products and services that
assist healthcare providers in evaluating and treating chronic
diseases.

Semler Scientific reported a net loss of $2.55 million on $7.43
million of total revenue for the year ended Dec. 31, 2016, compared
to a net loss of $8.50 million on $7 million of total revenue for
the year ended Dec. 31, 2015.

As of June 30, 2017, Semler had $3.15 million in total assets,
$6.79 million in total liabilities and a total stockholders'
deficit of $3.63 million

BDO USA, LLP, in New York, issued a "going concern" qualification
on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended Dec.
31, 2016, stating that the Company has negative working capital, a
stockholders' deficit, recurring losses from operations and expects
continuing future losses that raise substantial doubt about its
ability to continue as a going concern.


SHEET METAL AIR: Hires John Leeper as Special Tax Counsel
---------------------------------------------------------
Sheet Metal Air Plus Co., LLC, seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Texas to employ John
Leeper, Esq., as special tax counsel to the Debtor.

Sheet Metal Air requires John Leeper to represent the Debtor in the
audit determination under administrative review regarding its sales
tax audit.

John Leeper will be paid at the hourly rate of $300. The firm will
be paid a retainer in the amount of $2,000. It will also be
reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

John Leeper, Esq., assured the Court that the firm is a
"disinterested person" as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of
the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any interest adverse to
the Debtor and its estates.

John Leeper can be reached at:

     John Leeper, Esq.
     801 El Paso St., Suite 225
     El Paso, TX 79902
     Tel: (915) 532-3447

              About Sheet Metal Air Plus Co., LLC

Sheet Metal Air Plus Co., LLC, sought protection under Chapter 11
of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No. 17-31270) on Aug.
10, 2017. The petition was signed by its sole member, Alberto
Ortiz.

At the time of the filing, the Debtor estimated assets of less than
$50,000 and liabilities between $100,000 and $500,000.

Judge H. Christopher Mott presides over the case.

The Debtor is represented by E.P. Bud Kirk, Esq., as legal counsel.
The Debtor hires John Leeper, Esq., as special tax counsel.


SHIRAZ HOLDINGS: Hires Miles Goldstein as Real Estate Broker
------------------------------------------------------------
Shiraz Holdings, LLC, seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the Southern District of Florida to employ Miles
Goldstein Real Estate, LLC, as real estate broker to the Debtor.

Shiraz Holdings requires Miles Goldstein to assist in the lease or
sale of certain of the Debtor's property located in Palm Beach
County, Florida with an addresses of 920 Iris Drive, Delray Beach,
Florida 33483, described as Tropic Isle 3 rd Section LT 390.

Miles Goldstein will be paid a commission of 6% of the purchase
price.

Alexander Goldstein, member of Miles Goldstein Real Estate, LLC,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Miles Goldstein can be reached at:

     Alexander Goldstein
     MILES GOLDSTEIN REAL ESTATE, LLC
     2739 Hollywood Boulevard
     Hollywood, FL 33020
     Tel: (305) 336-6959
     E-mail: AG@MilesGoldstein.com

                  About Shiraz Holdings, LLC

Shiraz Holdings, LLC, based in Delray Beach, Fla., filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. S.D. Fla. Case No. 17-17968) on June 26, 2017.
The Hon. Paul G. Hyman, Jr. presides over the case. Thomas M.
Messana, Esq., at Messana, P.A., serves as bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $10 million to $50 million in
both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Jordan A.
Satary, managing member.


SHOOT THE MOON: Ch. 11 Trustee Hires Cotner as Special Counsel
--------------------------------------------------------------
Jeremiah Foster, the Chapter 11 Trustee of Shoot The Moon, LLC,
seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of
Montana to employ Cotner Law, PLLC, as special counsel to the
Trustee.

The Trustee requires Cotner to investigate and, pursue claims
against third parties on behalf of the Debtors involving claims
such as Preferential Transfers, Fraudulent Transfers, Director and
Officer Negligence or Wrongful Conduct, Recovery Assets of the
Estate, Professional Negligence, and Usury Claims.

Cotner will be paid a contingency fees as follows:

   a. 25% of all gross sums or property value recovered through
      settlement memorialized in wiring on or before the 60th day
      after filing an action on the claim;

   b. 33.33% of all gross sums or property value recovered
      through settlement or judgment for the benefit of the
      Debtor after a claim has been pending for 60 days;

   c. 40% of all gross sums or property value recovered for the
      benefit of the client if the settlement or judgment is
      obtained on or after a period commencing 45 days prior to
      the scheduled trial or later; and

   d. 45% of the gross sums or property value recovered for the
      benefit of the client after an appeal is filed by either
      party.

Cotner will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

David B. Cotner, partner of Cotner Law, PLLC, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Cotner can be reached at:

     David B. Cotner, Esq.
     COTNER LAW, PLLC
     2700 Radio Way
     Missoula, MT 59808
     Tel: (406) 541-1111

              About Shoot The Moon, LLC

Shoot The Moon, LLC, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
(Bankr. D. Mont. Case No. 15-60979) on Oct. 21, 2015.  Gary S.
Deschenes, Esq., at Deschenes & Associates, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.

Prior to the Petition Date, the Debtor -- through approximately 19
separate entities -- operated 11 Chili's restaurants, 3 On the
Border restaurants, and two Moonshine Grill restaurants in the
states of Idaho, Montana, and Washington.

In a stipulation filed Oct. 26, 2015, the Debtor, the United States
Trustee and five creditors agreed that "the spirit and intent of 11
U.S.C. Sec. 1104(a)(2) w[ould] be served if the Court order[ed] the
appointment of a Chapter 11 Trustee."

The Court conditionally approved the appointment of Jeremiah Foster
as Trustee on Oct. 28, 2015, and thereafter appointed Mr. Foster as
Trustee without condition on Nov. 5, 2015.  The Trustee hired
Cotner Law, PLLC, as special counsel.


SOCO REAL ESTATE: Proposed Sale of Austin Property for $1.5M Denied
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Tony M. Davis of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Texas denied SOCO Real Estate, LLC's proposed sale of
real property located at 808 Avondale Road, Austin, Texas for
$1,500,000, subject to higher and better offers.

The Debtor owns and maintains the Property.

                   About SOCO Real Estate

Based in Austin, Texas, SOCO Real Estate, LLC, sought protection
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Case No.
17-10393) on April 4, 2017.  The petition was signed by Gerald
McMillan, managing member.  At the time of the filing, the Debtor
estimated its assets and debt at $1 million to $10 million.  Mark
A. Castillo, Esq., and Bryan C. Assink, Esq., at Curtis | Castillo
PC, serve as counsel to the Debtor.


SOUTHERN TV: Sale of TV Licenses to Winemiller for $1.2M Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Edward J. Coleman, III of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of Georgia (Savannah) authorized Southern TV
Corp.'s sale of licenses for WGSA Channel 35, Savannah, Georgia
(License #BLCDT-20071120AJC; Facility ID #69446); W32BJ Channel 32
Beaufort, South Carolina (License #BLTT-19970401JB; Facility ID
#69449); and W41CR Channel 41 Hinesville, Georgia (License
#BLTTL-20060605AAA; Facility ID #69450) together with station call
signs issued by the Federal Communication Commission and rights,
permits, and authorizations issued by any governmental or
regulatory agency, to Jeffrey C. Winemiller for $1.2 million.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Sept. 21, 2017.

A public auction of the Purchased Assets was conducted. There were
four prospective bidders at the Auction.  Two prospective bidders,
the Buyer of 1011 Jonte Drive, Manning South Carolina (Bidder #1),
and the Christian Television Network, represented by Robert
D'Andrea (Bidder #4) placed bids.

The sale is free and clear of liens, claims and encumbrances.

The Buyer will immediately pay an earnest money deposit of $120,000
into the trust account of Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC to be
applied against the Purchase Price at the closing to be held at the
offices of Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, PLC.

Within five business days of the Auction, the Buyer will provide
Debtor with an Asset Purchase Agreement.  

Notwithstanding any other provision in the Sale Motion or Order, no
assignment of any rights and/or interests of the Debtor in any
license issued by the FCC will take place prior to the issuance of
FCC regulatory approval for such assignment pursuant to the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended and the rules and
regulations promulgated thereunder.  The FCC's rights and powers to
take any action pursuant to its regulatory authority, including,
but not limited to, imposing any regulatory conditions on such
assignments and setting any regulatory fines or forfeitures, are
fully preserved, and nothing herein will proscribe or constrain the
FCC's exercise of such power or authority to the extent provided by
law.

In the event FCC regulatory approval is denied for reasons not
attributable to the Buyer, the Buyer's earnest money deposit of
$120,000 will be refund within 20 days from notification that FCC
regulatory approval will not be issued.

                       About Southern TV

Savannah, Georgia-based Southern TV Corp., doing business as WGSA
Channel 35, sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. S.D. Ga. Case No.
17-40134) on Jan. 27, 2017.  Judge Edward J. Coleman, III is
assigned to the case.  The petition was signed by Dan L. Johnson,
CEO.  The Debtor estimated assets and liabilities in the range of
$1 million to $10 million.

The Debtor tapped James L Drake, Jr., Esq., at James L. Drake, Jr.
P.C. as counsel.  Davina Sashkin of Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth,
PLC, was appointed as special counsel to assist the Debtor in FCC
licensing and regulatory matters on April 4, 2017.

                          *     *     *

The Debtor's business ceased operations on April 22, 2017.


SPI ENERGY: Appointed Lu Qing as Director
-----------------------------------------
SPI Energy Co., Ltd., had appointed Ms. Lu Qing to its Board of
Directors to replace Mr. Jeffrey Yunan Ren, who resigned as
director of the Company on May 16, 2017.  In addition Ms. Lu Qing
has also been appointed by the board of directors of the Company to
audit committee, compensation committee and nominating and
corporate governance committee.

Ms. Lu Qing is currently chief operating officer of WisePublic
Asset Management Limited, where she manages daily operations, and
acts as the special consultant to Peking Certified Public
Accountants.  Ms. Lu Qing has qualified experience in the finance,
accounting, tax and legal fields.  She served the head of internal
audit of China Regenerative Medicine International Limited (8158
HK) from January 2013 to October 2015.  Ms. Lu Qing also served as
financial controller of mainland China at Sing Tao News Corporation
Limited (1105 HK) from May 2005 to May 2008.  From February 1992 to
March 2002, Ms. Lu Qing served as one of the major business
partners and vice general manager at Peking Certified Public
Accountants. Ms. Lu Qing received bachelor's degree in economics,
major in accounting from Central University of Finance and
Economics in June 1993, and a master's degree in law from Peking
University in January 2001.  Ms. Lu Qing is also a Certified Tax
Agents, Certified Public Valuer, and Certified Public Accountant in
China.

                       About SPI Energy

SPI Energy Co., Ltd. -- http://investors.spisolar.com/-- is a
global provider of photovoltaic (PV) solutions for business,
residential, government and utility customers and investors.  SPI
Energy focuses on the EPC/BT, storage and O2O PV market including
the development, financing, installation, operation and sale of
utility-scale and residential PV projects in China, Japan, Europe
and North America.  The Company operates an online energy
e-commerce and investment platform in China, as well as B2B
e-commerce platform offering a range of PV and storage products in
Australia.  The Company has its operating headquarters in Hong Kong
and maintains global operations in Asia, Europe, North America and
Australia.

SPI Energy reported a net loss of $185 million on $191 million of
net sales for the year ended Dec. 31, 2015, compared to a net loss
of $5.19 million on $91.6 million of net sales for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2014.

As of June 30, 2016, SPI Energy had $549.4 million in total assets,
$415.0 million in total liabilities, and $134.4 million in total
stockholders' equity.

"[T]he Group has suffered significant losses from operations and
has a negative working capital as of December 31, 2015.  In
addition, the Group has substantial amounts of debts that will
become due for repayment in 2016.  These factors raise substantial
doubt about the Group's ability to continue as a going concern,"
the Company disclosed in its 2015 Annual Report.

"While management believes that the measures in the liquidity plan
will be adequate to satisfy its liquidity and cash flow
requirements for the twelve months ending December 31, 2016, there
is no assurance that the liquidity plan will be successfully
implemented.  Failure to successfully implement the liquidity plan
will have a material adverse effect on the Group's business,
results of operations and financial position, and may materially
adversely affect its ability to continue as a going concern.  The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
related to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets
or the amounts and classification of liabilities or any other
adjustments that might be necessary should the Group be unable to
continue as a going concern."


STOLLINGS TRUCKING: $40K Sale of 2005 Caterpillar Bulldozer OK'dd
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Frank W. Volk the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia authorized Stollings Trucking Co., Inc.'s
private sale of 2005 Caterpillar D-6R Bulldozer, S/N
CAT00D6RCADE01075, at a minimum sum of $40,000.

The sale is free and clear of liens, with liens to attach to the
proceeds.

The sale should be conducted as a private sale subject to upset
bids at a minimum increment of $1,000.

The proceeds from the sale are free and clear of liens and that
$1,625 will be withheld for purpose of a disbursement fee to the
Office of the U.S. Trustee.

All valid liens and encumbrances against the bulldozer will attach
to the proceeds of the sale and the Debtor will be authorized to
pay for the proceeds of the sale, subject to the hold back as set
forth in this order the balance to the secured creditor, Bonnie B
Land Company.

                     About Stollings Trucking

Stollings Trucking Company, Inc., began its operations in 1990.
Throughout the years, the Debtor both hauled coal and mined coal
for its own profit.  As it grew, it acquired more equipment and
rolling stock.  Stollings also obtained mining permits on property
in Logan County, West Virginia, and was a party to coal leases.

Stollings Trucking sought protection under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. W.Va. Case No. 15-20624) on Dec. 7,
2015.  Rhonda Marcum, president, signed the petition.  The Debtor
estimated assets and liabilities of $1 million to $10 million.

Judge Frank W. Volk presides over the case.

Joseph W. Caaldwell, Esq., at Caldwell & Riffee, in Charleston, WV,
is serving as counsel to the Debtor.


STW RESOURCES: Bid to Dismiss Power Up Suit Denied
--------------------------------------------------
Judge Arthur D. Spatt of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of New York dismissed Alan Murphy and Grant Seabolt, Jr.'s
motion to dismiss the entire amended complaint filed by Power Up
Lending Group, Ltd. in the case captioned POWER UP LENDING GROUP,
LTD., Plaintiff, v. ALAN MURPHY and GRANT SEABOLT, JR., Defendants,
No. 2:16-cv-01454 (ADS)(AYS) (E.D.N.Y.).

The Plaintiff commenced the action against the Defendants for
damages stemming from a financing agreement between the Plaintiff
and STW Resources Holding Corp., a corporation controlled by the
Defendants.  The amended complaint, which invokes the Court's
diversity jurisdiction, alleges causes of action sounding in New
York State fraudulent inducement and tortious interference with a
contract. The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's
entire amended complaint.

The Defendants assert that the fraudulent inducement claim in the
Plaintiff's amended complaint fails to meet Rule 9(b)'s mandate. In
opposition, the Plaintiff argues that viewed in the light most
favorable to the Plaintiff, fraud is properly alleged under the
standard. The Court finds that the Plaintiff does sufficiently
state a claim for fraudulent inducement that meets Rule 9(b)'s
heightened pleading standard.

The amended complaint asserts that the Plaintiff was defrauded both
in conversations with the Defendants and in documents that the
Defendants prepared and/or signed. The Plaintiff contends that
Murphy and Seabolt defrauded the Plaintiff "prior to entering into
the [Financing] Agreement," which the parties consummated on Feb.
8, 2016. During numerous conversations and in multiple documents,
the Defendants withheld the true financial situation and knowingly
made false, affirmative statements about STW's finances.

The Plaintiff's second claim, intentional (or tortious)
interference with a contract, alleges that the Defendants
"intentionally and with malice aforethought caused STW to breach
the [Financing] Agreement ... for their own personal benefit." The
Defendants contend that the claim fails to state a plausible claim
because the Defendants were acting solely in their professional
capacity as officers and directors of STW, and therefore cannot be
liable for intentional interference with STW's own contract. The
Plaintiff disagrees. The Court declines to hold that the claim
fails as a matter of law and finds that the Plaintiff has
adequately stated a claim for intentional interference under New
York law.

The Plaintiff's amended complaint is devoid of any assertions that
the Defendants were third parties, acting outside the scope of
their corporate duties. In fact, the Plaintiff pleads the exact
opposite, that the Defendants were acting in their professional
capacity as corporate officers and directors of STW. However, the
Plaintiff does, in fact, plead that the Defendants were motivated
by personal gain. In the Court's view, this is sufficient for the
Plaintiffs to state a claim that the Defendants, who were corporate
officers of STW, to be held individually liable for tortious
interference of STW's contract.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff has adequately pled a claim for
intentional interference.

A full-text copy of Judge Spatt's Order dated Oct. 3, 2017, is
available at https://is.gd/Yr3FsA from Leagle.com.

Power Up Lending Group, Ltd., Plaintiff, represented by Richard S.
Naidich, Naidich Wurman LLP.

Power Up Lending Group, Ltd., Plaintiff, represented by Bernard
Samuel Feldman, Bernard S. Feldman, P.C. & Robert P. Johnson,
Naidich Wurman Birnbaum & Maday LLP.

Alan Murphy, Defendant, represented by Robert Novack –
rnovaack@bressler.com -- Bressler Amery & Ross P.C., Christina D.
Gallo – cgallo@bresller.com -- Bressler, Amery & Ross, pro hac
vice & Michael David Margulies -- mmargulies@bresller.com --
Bressler, Amery & Ross P.C..

D. Grant Seabolt, Jr., Defendant, represented by Robert Novack,
Bressler Amery & Ross P.C., Christina D. Gallo, Bressler, Amery &
Ross, pro hac vice & Michael David Margulies, Bressler, Amery &
Ross P.C.

            About STW Resources Holding Corp.

STW Resources Holding Corp. (otcqb:STWS) --
http://www.stwresources.com/-- a water treatment and service  
company, filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Case No.
16-33121) on Aug. 2, 2016, and is represented by Michael S.
Mitchell, Esq., at Demarco Mitchell, PLLC, in Plano, Texas.  At the
time of filing, the Debtor had $874,495 in total assets and $17.27
million in total debt.  Alan Murphy, chief executive officer,
signed the petition.

On Sept. 14, 2016, a three-member panel has been appointed as
official unsecured creditors committee in the Debtor's case.


SUNEDISON INC: Court Approves Bid Procedures for Sherman Property
-----------------------------------------------------------------
BankruptcyData.com reported that the U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved
SunEdison Inc.'s bidding procedures related to the Debtors' sale of
real property located in Sherman, TX; the times, dates, places and
forms of notice for an auction and a sale hearing, a break-up fee
and expense reimbursement and an interim order approving the sale
and authorizing the payment of broker commissions from sale
proceeds.

As BankruptcyData previously reported, "Indeed, after a year plus
process and consideration of numerous written offers to acquire the
Texas Property, the Debtors accepted, subject to higher and better
offers and Bankruptcy Court approval, the written offer from
Corning Research & Development (the 'Stalking Horse Purchaser') as
a 'stalking horse offer.' The Debtors and the Stalking Horse
Purchaser have negotiated a purchase and sale agreement, providing
for the sale of the Texas Property for a purchase price of
$21,000,000 (the 'Purchase Price'), subject to higher or better
offers and Bankruptcy Court approval. The Stalking Horse Purchaser
provided the Debtors with a $500,000 initial deposit upon execution
of the Purchase Agreement (the 'Deposit'). If the Purchase
Agreement has not been previously terminated due to a default by
the Stalking Horse Purchaser or a Remediation Termination Event and
if the Court approves the Sale of the Texas Property to a
Successful Purchaser that is not the Stalking Horse Purchaser or
otherwise declines to approve the Sale to the Stalking Horse
Purchaser, the Purchase Agreement provides that the Stalking Horse
Purchaser will be entitled to (a) the return of the Deposit, (b) a
break-up fee equal to three-percent (3%) of the approved Purchase
Price, (the 'Break-Up Fee'), and (c) an expense reimbursement up to
$150,000 (the 'Expense Reimbursement')." The motion continues, "A
Qualified Bid for the Texas Property must be for a price that
exceeds the Purchase Price set forth in the Purchase Agreement by
at least $900,000 and under terms which the Debtors believe to be
higher or better than the Stalking Horse Purchaser's bid in cash;
The bid must be accompanied by a deposit in an amount equal to at
least $500,000. At the Auction, the minimum initial overbid must
be, in the aggregate, at least $900,000 greater than the Starting
Auction Bid, and subsequent bids must be, in the aggregate, at
least $100,000 greater than the prior bid."

                    About SunEdison, Inc.

SunEdison, Inc. (OTC PINK: SUNEQ), is a developer and seller of
photovoltaic energy solutions, an owner and operator of clean power
generation assets, and a global leader in the development,
manufacture and sale of silicon wafers to the semiconductor
industry.

On April 21, 2016, SunEdison, Inc., and 25 of its affiliates each
filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case Nos.
16-10991 to 16-11017).  Martin H. Truong, the senior vice
president, general counsel and secretary, signed the petitions.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $20.7 billion and total debt
of $16.1 billion as of Sept. 30, 2015.

The Debtors have hired Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP as
counsel, Togut, Segal & Segal LLP as conflicts counsel, Rothschild
Inc. as investment banker and financial advisor, McKinsey Recovery
& Transformation Services U.S., LLC, as restructuring advisors and
Prime Clerk LLC as claims and noticing agent.  The Debtors employed
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as financial advisors; and KPMG LLP as
their auditor and tax consultant.

SunEdison also tapped Eversheds LLP as its special counsel for
Great Britain and the Middle East.  Cohen & Gresser LLP has also
been retained as special counsel.

The Debtors tapped Ernst & Young LLP to provide tax-related
services.  Keen-Summit Capital Partners LLC has been hired as real
estate advisor.  Binswanger of Texas, Inc. also has been retained
as real estate agent.

Sullivan & Cromwell LLP serves as counsel to TerraForm Power, Inc.,
and TerraForm Global, Inc.

An official committee of unsecured creditors has been appointed in
the case.  The Committee tapped Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP as its
general bankruptcy counsel and Morrison & Foerster LLP as special
counsel.  Togut, Segal & Segal LLP and Kobre & Kim LLP serve as
conflicts counsel.  Alvarez & Marsal North America, LLC, serves as
the Committee's financial advisors.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the Debtors' prepetition
first lien credit agreement are Richard Levy, Esq., and Brad
Kotler, Esq., at Latham & Watkins.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the postpetition DIP
financing facility are Scott Greissman, Esq., and Elizabeth Feld,
Esq., at White & Case LLP.

Counsel to the Tranche B Lenders (as defined in the DIP credit
agreement) and the steering committee of the second lien creditors
are Arik Preis, Esq., and Naomi Moss, Esq., at Akin Gump Strauss
Hauer & Field, LLP.

Counsel to the administrative agent under the Debtors' prepetition
second lien credit agreement is Daniel S. Brown, Esq., at Pillsbury
Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP.

The collateral trustee under the Debtors' prepetition second lien
credit agreement and the indenture trustee under each of the
Debtors' outstanding bond issuances, is represented by Marie C.
Pollio, Esq., at Shipman & Goodwin LLP.

Counsel to the ad hoc group of certain holders of the Debtors'
convertible senior notes is White & Case LLP's Tom Lauria, Esq.

                          *    *    *

On March 28, 2017, the Debtors filed their Plan of Reorganization
and related Disclosure Statement.  The Disclosure Statement was
approved on June 13, 2017.  Judge Stuart Bernstein subsequently
confirmed the Debtors' Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization
on July 28, 2017.


SUNSET PARTNERS: Chapter 11 Trustee Hires Casner as Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------
Lynne F. Riley, the Chapter 11 Trustee of Sunset Partners, Inc.,
and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy
Court for the District of Massachusetts to employ Casner & Edwards
LLP, as counsel to the Trustee.

The Trustee requires Casner to handle any legal matters incidental
to the Trustee's administration of the Debtors' estate, including
but not limited to, operations, pursuit of avoidance and recovery
actions, sale of assets, objecting to proofs of claims, and
negotiating settlements of disputed claims.

Casner will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly billing
rates. The firm will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Lynee F. Riley, member of Casner & Edwards LLP, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Casner can be reached at:

     Lynne F. Riley, Esq.
     John T. Morrier, Esq.
     Casner & Edwards, LLP
     303 CONGRESS STREET
     Boston, MA 02210
     Tel: (617) 426-5900
     E-mail: riley@casneredwards.com
             morrier@casneredwards.com

              About Sunset Partners, Inc.

Sunset Partners, Inc., is a Massachusetts corporation that owns and
operates two Boston area restaurants: the Sunset Grill & Tap
located at 130 Brighton Avenue, Allston, MA; and, the Sunset
Cantina located at 916 Commonwealth Avenue, Brookline, MA.

Affiliate Bema Restaurant Corporation, dba Patron's, is a
Massachusetts corporation that owns and operates a Boston area
restaurant called Patrons, which is located at 138 Brighton Avenue,
Allston, MA.

Sunset Partners filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection (Bankr.
D. Mass. Case No. 17-12178) on June 7, 2017, disclosing $1.05
million in total assets and $5.67 million in total liabilities.

Bema Restaurant Corporation filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D.
Mass. Case No. 17-12434) on June 29, 2017, disclosing $1.12 million
in assets and $4.45 million in liabilities.

The petitions were signed by Marc Berkowitz, president.

The cases are jointly administered and assigned to Judge Joan N.
Feeney.

David B. Madoff, Esq., and Steffani Pelton Nicholson, Esq., at
Madoff & Khoury LLP, are serving as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtors. Verdolino & Lowey, P.C., is the Debtors' accountant.

On September 25, 2017, Lynee F. Riley was appointed as the Chapter
11 Trustee to the Debtors. The Trustee hires Casner & Edwards LLP,
as counsel.


TALOOK ENTERTAINMENT: Hires Kerney Law as Chapter 11 Counsel
------------------------------------------------------------
Talook Entertainment seeks authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court
for the Middle District of Tennessee to employ the Kerney Law
Office, as attorney to the Debtor.

Talook Entertainment requires Kerney Law to:

   a. advise the Debtor as to its rights, duties and powers as
      Debtor-in-Possession;

   b. prepare and file the statements, schedules, plans, and
      other documents and pleadings necessary to be filed by the
      Debtor in the bankruptcy proceeding;

   c. represent the Debtor at all hearings, meetings of
      creditors, conferences, trials and any other proceedings in
      the bankruptcy case; and

   d. perform other legal services as may be necessary in
      connection with the bankruptcy case.

Kerney Law will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                     $350
     Paralegals                    $125

Kerney Law will be paid a retainer in the amount of $4,000. It will
also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Christopher M. Kerney, member of Kerney Law Office, assured the
Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is
defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not
represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Kerney Law can be reached at:

     Christopher M. Kerney, Esq.
     KERNEY LAW OFFICE
     02A Public Square
     Gallatin, TN 37066
     Tel: (615) 206-9900
     Fax: (615) 451-0084
     E-mail: chris@kerneylaw.com

              About Talook Entertainment

Talook Entertainment, LLC, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. M.D. Tenn. Case No. 17-06079) on September 6, 2017,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities. The
Debtor is represented by Christopher Mark Kerney, Esq., at Kerney
Law Office.


THO VAN PHAN: Sale of Fountain Valley Property for $865K Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Theodor C. Albert of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Central District of California authorized Tho Van Phan's sale of
real property located at and commonly known as 16347 Shadbush
Street, Fountain Valley, California, outside the ordinary course of
business to Phuong My Thi Huynh for $865,000.

A hearing on the Motion was held on Sept. 27, 2017.

The sale of the Property shall be "as-is" and "where-is" with all
faults and without warranty, representation, or recourse
whatsoever; and free and clear of interests.

The Debtor is authorized to pay the costs of sale and the property
taxes.

The Debtor is authorized to enter into the PSA and sign all
documents necessary to consummate the sale and close escrow,
including but not limited to a grant deed and escrow instructions.

The 14-day stay regarding the effectiveness of the Order is
waived.

The bidding procedures proposed in the Motion are approved.

                       About Tho Van Phan

Tho Van Phan sought protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code (Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 16-13873) on Sept. 14, 2016.  The
Debtor is represented by Michael R. Totaro, Esq., at Totaro &
Shanahan.

The bankruptcy case was filed as a result of two state court
lawsuits involving Debtor's former business Kim Tho Gold, and his
son Quoc Viet Phan.  The state court lawsuits were filed by B.A.K.
Precious Metals, Inc. ("BAK"), and P&P Precious Metals Inc.,
("P&P").  On April 13, 2017, the Debtor and P&P and BAK attended
mediation with the Hon. Mitchel Goldberg (Ret.) of Judicate West.
The parties were able to come to terms on a global settlement.

As a result of the global settlements with BAK and P&P, the Debtor
and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors negotiated a
joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization.  On Aug. 10, 2017, the
Committee and the Debtor filed the Joint Plan, which contemplates
the  sale of the Debtor's property at 16347 Shadbush Street,
Fountain Valley, California.  The Court set a plan confirmation
hearing on Oct. 11, 2017, at 10:00 a.m.


TIMOTHY MCCLINCY: Sale of Federal Way Property for $420K Approved
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Timothy W. Dore of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Western
District of Washington authorized Timothy William McClincy's sale
of his real property located at 3339 18th Lane South A, B, Federal
Way, Washington, tax parcel # 7978200075, to Libby Ahn and Michael
Ahn for $420,000.

The sale will be free and clear of all liens claims and
encumbrances, with all said liens, claims and encumbrances
attaching to the sale proceeds in their relative order of
priority.

The Reorganized Debtor is authorized to pay: (i) all normal costs
of sale, including real estate commissions and the seller's closing
costs; (ii) all pro-rated outstanding real estate taxes owed to
King County; (iii) all outstanding administrative expenses
previously approved by the Court in the case.

These will apply to closing and payment of the first position lien
held by Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, as successor in interest to
Seneca Mortgage Servicing, LLC:

     a. Subsequent to entry of an Order on the Debtor's Motion to
Sell the Subject Property, Nationstar, by and through its counsel
of record, will provide the Debtor's counsel and the designated
Escrow Office a timely and updated for payoff Demand;

     b. Nationstar's claim will be paid in full, directly from
escrow, from the proceeds of the sale as a first position secured
creditor in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Order
and any payoff demand provided by Nationstar subsequent to entry of
the Order.  If the Debtor disputes any amounts set forth in any
payoff demand provided by Nationstar, then Debtor will be required
to notify Nationstar's counsel in writing least 48 hours prior to
any close of escrow and identify what amounts are in dispute.
Further, the Debtor will immediately release to Nationstar any and
all funds not alleged to be disputed, and hold and reserve in
escrow in a blocked, interest bearing account, the amount disputed,
along with the remaining excess net sale proceeds over and above
Nationstar's payoff demand ("Disputed Amount") for any attorneys'
fees and costs anticipated to be incurred by Nationstar to resolve
the Disputed Amount.  The release of any Disputed Amount maybe
pursuant to written stipulation between the parties submitted to
escrow without further order of the Court, or pursuant to Order of
the Court after notice and hearing;

     c. At least 48 hours prior to any scheduled closing of escrow,
the Escrow Officer or the Debtor's counsel will provide
Nationstar's counsel with a copy of the final estimated HUD-1
Settlement/Closing Statement for review and approval, and
Nationstar's counsel must provide prompt written approval of the
same prior to the closing of escrow.  If the sale is delayed and/or
rescinded for any reason, all secured creditors will be notified in
writing; and

     d. Nationstar reserves the right to require an updated payoff
demand prior to any close of escrow to ensure its claim is paid in
full; and the Debtor's Counsel will file a report of sale with the
Court which will include a copy of the final HUD-1
Statement/Closing Statement.

The remaining sale proceeds will be held in the IOLTA Trust account
of The Tracy Law Group PLLC for distribution consistent with the
terms of the Reorganized Debtor's confirmed Plan.  If and or when
the Liquidation Period, as defined by the Fourth Amended Plan of
Reorganization, commences, the remaining sale proceeds will be
distributed to the Class 8 creditors, within 10 days of
commencement of the Liquidation Period, without need for further
order of the Court.

The Order will be effective and enforceable immediately upon entry
and its provisions will be self-executing.  The Order is a final
Order, and in accordance with Bankruptcy Rule 8002(a)(1), the time
to file a notice of appeal will commence from date of entry.

                    About Timothy McClincy

Timothy William McClincy sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. W.D.
Wash. Case No. 16-10176) on Jan. 15, 2016.  The Reorganized Debtor
confirmed his Second Amended Plan of Reorganization on June 29,
2016.  On May 1, 2017, the Court approved the modification of his
confirmed Second Amended Plan, as set forth in the Reorganized
Debtor's Fourth Amended Plan of Reorganization.


TRUE RELIGION: Reorganization Plan Wins Confirmation
----------------------------------------------------
Lillian Rizzo, writing for The Wall Street Journal Pro Bankruptcy,
reported that jeans maker True Religion Apparel Inc. won court
approval to move forward with its reorganization plan, which
slashes more than 70% of its debt load.

According to the report, exactly three months from when True
Religion sought bankruptcy protection, Judge Christopher Sontchi of
the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Del., approved the plan.

"We have a situation that has becoming increasingly rare in the
space over the last year—a retailer that is reorganizing," True
Religion's attorney Laura Davis Jones, Esq., said in court, the
report related.

True Religion will now join this list of retailers with a second
lease on life, the report further related.

Early on, the company's private-equity backer, TowerBrook Capital
Partners, struck a deal with lenders to swap their debt for equity,
which will erase about $386 million in debt that was on True
Religion's balance sheet, the report said.  The apparel maker will
emerge from bankruptcy with total funded debt of $139.5 million,
the report added.  Much of its debt stems from TowerBrook's $835
million leveraged buyout four years ago, the report said.

                 About True Religion Apparel, Inc.

Manhattan Beach, California-based True Religion Apparel Inc.
designs and markets denim, sportswear and accessories for men,
women and children under the "True Religion" brand. Founded by Jeff
Lubell in 2002, the Company sells its products through wholesale
and retail channels on six continents and through their websites at
http://www.truereligon.com/and http://www.last-stitch.com/ As of
July 5, 2017, the True Religion Brand Jeans retailer had 140 True
Religion and Last Stitch brick-and-mortar stores.

The company has been controlled by TowerBrook Capital Partners
since its take-private transaction in July 2013.

True Religion and four affiliates sought Chapter 11 protection
(Bankr. D. Del. Lead Case No. 17-11460) on July 5, 2017, after
obtaining secured stakeholder support for a restructuring that
would reduce debt by over $350 million.

True Religion had $243.3 million in assets against $534.7 million
of liabilities as of Jan. 28, 2017.

The company's legal advisors include Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz
and Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones. Its financial advisor is MAEVA
Group, LLC.  Prime Clerk LLC is the claims and noticing agent.

The Ad Hoc Group of Unaffiliated Prepetition First and Second Lien
Lenders -- which signed the RSA -- tapped Akin Gump Strauss Hauer &
Feld LLP as counsel and Moelis & Company, LLP, as financial
advisor.

On July 12, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The Committee retained
Cooley LLP, as counsel, Province, Inc., as financial advisor.


UNI-PIXEL INC: Hires McNutt Law as Bankruptcy Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------
Uni-Pixel, Inc., and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California to
employ McNutt Law Group LLP, as bankruptcy counsel to the Debtor.

Uni-Pixel, Inc. requires McNutt Law to:

   a. advise the Debtors' with its obligations and rights
      pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code respecting their
      operation as debtors-in-possession;

   b. assist the Debtor with the requirements of the U.S.
      States Trustee respecting operating matters and the
      filing of reports;

   c. assist the Debtor with the administration of claims,
      including the evaluation of timely filed proofs of
      claim;

   d. assist with the treatment of executory contracts;

   e. negotiate and obtain court approval for a sale free
      and clear of liens and other interests of all of the
      Debtors' assets;

   f. assist in the formulation and prosecution of plans of
      reorganization; and

   g. provide the Debtors with general counsel and
      representation in the course of the bankruptcy
      proceeding.

McNutt Law will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                           $375-$595
     Paralegals/Law Clerks               $100-$160

McNutt Law received a pre-petition retainer in the total amount of
$80,000. McNutt Law billed a total of $86,649 for pre-petition
services to the Debtors.  Prior to the filing of the petitions in
these cases, McNutt Law fully drew down the retainer as
compensation for pre-petition services, and wrote off the unpaid
balance of $6,649. McNutt Law then waived any right to compensation
for any unpaid pre-petition fees or expenses, and therefore was not
a creditor of the Debtors as of the filing of the petition.

McNutt Law will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Scott H. McNutt, partner of McNutt Law Group LLP, assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

McNutt Law can be reached at:

     Scott H. McNutt, Esq.
     MCNUTT LAW GROUP LLP
     219 9th Street
     San Francisco, CA 94103
     Tel: (415) 995-8475
     Fax: (415) 995-8487

              About Uni-Pixel, Inc.

The Woodlands, Tex.-based Uni-Pixel, Inc. --
http://www.unipixel.com-- develops and markets metal mesh
capacitive touch sensors for the touch-screen and flexible displays
markets. The Company's roll-to-roll electronics manufacturing
process patterns fine line conductive elements on thin films. The
Company markets its technologies for touch panel sensor, cover
glass replacement, and protective cover film applications under the
XTouch and Diamond Guard brands.

Uni-Pixel, Inc., and its subsidiary Uni-Pixel Displays, Inc., filed
Chapter 11 petitions (Bankr. N.D. Cal. Case Nos. 17-52100 and Case
No. 17-52101) on Aug. 30, 2017.

The Debtors tapped Scott H. McNutt, Esq., at McNutt Law Group LLP,
as bankruptcy counsel; and Crowell & Moring LLP, as special
counsel.

Proofs of claim are due by Jan. 2, 2018.


UNION COUNTY TRANSPORT: Hires Berger as Bankruptcy Counsel
----------------------------------------------------------
Union County Transport Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California to employ
the Law Offices of Michael Jay Berger, as bankruptcy counsel to the
Debtor.

Union County Transport requires Berger to:

   a. prepare and file a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition for the
      Debtor;

   b. provide the legal services reasonably required to represent
      the Debtor in pre-bankruptcy planning, and preparation of
      the petition and all supporting schedules and statements;

   c. advise the Debtor regarding its legal rights and
      obligations in a bankruptcy proceeding;

   d. assist the Debtor in preparing the documents and reports
      required by the U.S. Trustee;

   e. represent the Debtor at the initial Debtor interview with
      the U.S. Trustee;

   f. represent the Debtor at the first meeting of creditors;

   g. represent the Debtor in opposition to any Motion for
       Relief from Stay that may be filed; and

   h. assist the Debtor in preparing the paperwork needed to
      continue and conclude a Chapter 11 proceeding.

Berger will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Attorneys                           $525
     Associates/Of Counsel               $395-$400
     Paralegals                          $200

On June 27, 2017, the Debtor paid Berger $10,000. On July 21, 2017,
the Debtor paid the remaining balance of $10,000, plus $1,717
filing fee.

Berger will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Michael Jay Berger, sole owner of the Law Offices of Michael Jay
Berger, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person"
as the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code
and does not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its
estates.

Berger can be reached at:

     Michael Jay Berger, Esq.
     LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL JAY BERGER
     9454 Wilshire Blvd. 6th Floor
     Beverly Hills, CA 90212-2929
     Tel: (310) 271-6223
     Fax: (310) 271-9805
     E-mail: Michael.berger@bankruptcypower.com

              About Union County Transport Inc.

Union County Transport Inc, filed a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition
(Bankr. C.D. Cal. Case No. 17-21514) on September 19, 2017,
disclosing under $1 million in both assets and liabilities.  The
Debtor is represented by Michael Jay Berger, Esq., at the Law
Offices of Michael Jay Berger.


UPLIFT RX: Hires Nelson Mullins as Special Counsel
--------------------------------------------------
Uplift RX, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates seek authority from the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas to employ
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, as special counsel to the
Debtor.

Uplift RX requires Nelson Mullins to:

   a. assist the Debtors and Chapter 11 counsel in discussions
      and negotiations with any administrative or regulatory
      agencies in North Carolina and South Carolina, including
      the Board of Pharmacy; and

   b. advise the Debtors and Chapter 11 counsel of duties
      concerning applicable healthcare laws, regulations, and
      related issues concerning the Debtors' pharmacy licensure
      in North Carolina and South Carolina.

Nelson Mullins will be paid at these hourly rates:

     Shareholders                    $425 - $550
     Associates/Of Counsel           $325 - $400
     Paralegals                      $150 - $250

Nelson Mullins will also be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket
expenses incurred.

Patricia A. Markus, partner of Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough,
LLP, assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as
the term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and
(a) is not creditors, equity security holders or insiders of the
Debtors; (b) has not been, within two years before the date of the
filing of the Debtors' chapter 11 petition, directors, officers or
employees of the Debtors; and (c) does not have an interest
materially adverse to the interest of the estate or of any class of
creditors or equity security holders, by reason of any direct or
indirect relationship to, connection with, or interest in, the
Debtors, or for any other reason.

Nelson Mullins can be reached at:

     Patricia A. Markus, Esq.
     NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP
     301 South College Street, 23rd Floor
     Charlotte, NC 28202
     Tel: (704) 417-3000
     Fax: (704) 377-4814

                 About Uplift RX

Uplift Rx, LLC is a Texas Limited Liability Company formed in June
2016.  It operates a pharmacy located in Houston, Texas.  Uplift
Rx, along with other affiliated entities together make up the
Alliance Healthcare family, a group of privately held companies
headquartered in South Jordan, Utah.  The Alliance network consists
of 20 pharmacies across the country, including three pharmacies in
Texas.  Since 2006, the Alliance Healthcare companies have been
working to improve the well-being of those with chronic health
conditions such as diabetes.

Uplift Rx, LLC and its debtor affiliates sought protection under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D. Tex. Lead Case No.
17-32186) on April 7 and 8, 2017. The petitions were signed by
Jeffrey C. Smith, its chief executive officer.

At the time of the filing, the Debtors estimated assets of less
than $1 million and liabilities of $50 million to $100 million.

The cases are assigned to Judge Marvin Isgur. The Debtors tapped
Baker & Hostetler LLP as legal counsel.

Following the appointment of Ronald L. Glass as the Chapter 11
trustee, BakerHostetler LLP was retained as his attorney. The
trustee hired GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group LLC as his
financial advisor. Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, as
special counsel.

On May 3, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors. The committee hired Fox
Rothschild as bankruptcy counsel, and CohnReznick LLP as financial
advisor and forensic accountant.


US COAL: Prepetition Collateral Subject to Carve-Out for Prof. Fees
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the case captioned EAST COAST MINER, LLC, et al., Appellants, v.
NIXON PEABODY, LLP, et al., Appellees, Civil Action Nos. 15-54,
15-65-HRW (E.D. Ky.), East Coast Miner, LLC, and East Coast Miner
II, LLC's appeal from Bankruptcy Court, Judge Tracey Wise's Order
Allowing Chapter 11 Professionals' Final Compensation and Payment
From Lender's Collateral.

Having reviewed the record and being otherwise sufficiently
advised, District Judge Henry R. Wilholt, Jr., affirms the decision
of the Bankruptcy Court.

This case arises from the final fee applications filed in In Re
Licking River Mining, LLC, et al.  Here, the Court reviews Judge
Wise's opinion that the Carve-Out extends to the East Coast Miners,
East Coast Miner II, Keith Goggin, and Michael Goodwin,
collectively referred to as the "Licking River Lenders,"
prepetition collateral.

Appellants' assignments of error are directed at Judge Wise's
interpretation of the Final Cash Collateral Order. The Final Cash
Collateral Order provides, by its very terms, that the Carve-Out
extends to the Licking River Lenders' pre-petition collateral.

The Court finds that Judge Wise reasonably looked to the text and
terms of the Final Cash Collateral Order in making her decision and
the Court finds no error in this regard.

The Licking River Lenders argue that the Bankruptcy Court erred by
considering what they term "extrinsic evidence" by considering
other orders it entered and the record as a whole in interpreting
the Final Cash Collateral Order. However, a cash collateral order
is more akin to a consent decree than a typical contract.
Therefore, considering the contours of it in a vacuum may lead to
an interpretation which runs afoul its intent.

In this case, Judge Wise looked to the record, to-wit, the
representations in the Cash Collateral Motion, the statements at
the first-day hearing, the filings and court hearings in connection
with the Termination Motion, and the conduct of the parties, and
found that it supported her conclusion that the prepetition
collateral was subject to a carve-out for professional fees.

Appellants maintain that although they agreed on the temporary use
of its Cash Collateral to pay the Professional Fees, it did not
intend it to be permanent security in said Cash Collateral once
that use terminated. Yet, this argument would render the language
Carve-Out all but meaningless as it provided for
"[t]he inclusion of the Professionals' fees and expenses in the
budgets, to be paid from Lenders' prepetition cash collateral is
inconsistent with the notion that the carve-out is limited to the
post-petition adequate protection liens."

A full-text copy of Judge Wilholt's Memorandum Opinion and Order
dated Oct. 3, 2017, is available at https://is.gd/iRkImK from
Leagle.com.

East Coast Miner LLC, Appellant, represented by Alex Talesnick --
talesnick@lsellp.com -- Luskin, Stern & Eisler LLP, pro hac vice.

East Coast Miner LLC, Appellant, represented by Matthew David
Ellison, Fowler Bell PLLC, Michael Luskin -- luskin@lsellp.com --
Luskin, Stern & Eisler LLP, pro hac vice & Taft A. McKinstry,
Fowler Bell PLLC.

East Coast Miner II LLC, Appellant, represented by Alex Talesnick,
Luskin, Stern & Eisler LLP, pro hac vice, Matthew David Ellison,
Fowler Bell PLLC, Michael Luskin, Luskin, Stern & Eisler LLP, pro
hac vice & Taft A. McKinstry, Fowler Bell PLLC.

Keith Goggin, Appellant, represented by Alex Talesnick, Luskin,
Stern & Eisler LLP, pro hac vice, Matthew David Ellison, Fowler
Bell PLLC, Michael Luskin, Luskin, Stern & Eisler LLP, pro hac vice
& Taft A. McKinstry, Fowler Bell PLLC.

Michael Goodwin, Appellant, represented by Alex Talesnick, Luskin,
Stern & Eisler LLP, pro hac vice, Matthew David Ellison, Fowler
Bell PLLC, Michael Luskin, Luskin, Stern & Eisler LLP, pro hac vice
& Taft A. McKinstry, Fowler Bell PLLC.

Nixon Peabody LLP, Appellee, represented by Christopher M.
Desiderio, Nixon Peabody LLP, pro hac vice & Dennis J. Drebsky,
Nixon Peabody LLP, pro hac vice.

DelCotto Law Group PLLC, Appellee, represented by Laura Day
DelCotto -- ldelcotto@dlgfirm.com ldelcotto@dlgfirm.com -- DelCotto
Law Group PLLC.

GlassRatner Advisory & Capital Group, LLC, Appellee, represented by
Eliot M. Smith – Elliot.smith@squirepb.com -- Squire Patton Boggs
(US) LLP, pro hac vice & Stephen D. Lerner –
Stephen.lerner@squirepb.com -- Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP, pro
hac vice.

Foley & Lardner LLP, Appellee, represented by David B. Goroff --
dgoroff@foley.com -- Foley & Lardner, LLP, Edward J. Green --
egreen@foley.com -- Foley & Lardner, LLP, pro hac vice & Geoffrey
S. Goodman – ggoodman@foley.com --Foley & Lardner, LLP.

Barber Law PLLC, Appellee, represented by T. Kent Barber --
kbarber@barberlawky.com. -- Barber Law PLLC.

Samuel K. Crocker, Appellee, represented by John L. Daugherty, U.S.
Department of Justice & Rachelle Cathleen Dodson, U.S. Trustee.

Phaedra Spradlin, Appellee, Pro se.

                    About U.S. Coal

On May 22, 2014, an involuntary Chapter 11 petition was filed
against Licking River Mining, LLC, before the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.  On May 23,
2014, an involuntary Chapter 11 petition was filed against Licking
River Resources, Inc. and Fox Knob Coal., Inc.  On June 3, 2014, an
involuntary Chapter 11 petition was filed against S.M. & J., Inc.

On June 4, 2014, an involuntary Chapter 11 petition was filed
against J.A.D. Coal Company, Inc.  On June 12, 2014, the Court
entered an order for relief in each of the bankruptcy cases.

On June 10, 2014, an involuntary Chapter 11 petition was filed
against U.S. Coal Corporation.  On June 27, 2014, the Court entered
an order for relief in U.S. Coal's bankruptcy case.

On Nov. 4, 2014, Harlan County Mining, LLC, Oak Hill Coal, Inc.,
Sandlick Coal Company, LLC, and U.S. Coal Marketing, LLC, filed
petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern
District of Kentucky seeking relief under chapter 11 of the United
States Bankruptcy Code.  The Debtors' cases have been assigned to
Chief Judge Tracey N. Wise.  The Debtors are seeking to have their
cases jointly administered for procedural purposes, meaning that
upon entry of such an order all pleadings will be maintained on the
case docket for Licking River Mining, LLC, Case No. 14-10201.

U.S. Coal produces and sells thermal coal purchased primarily by
utilities and trading companies and specialty coal purchased by
various industrial customers and trading companies (known as
"stoker" coal).  U.S. Coal operates through two divisions: (1) the
Licking River Division that was formed through the acquisition of
LR Mining, LRR, and S.M. & J., and Oak Hill Coal, Inc. in January
2007 for $33 million, and (2) the J.A.D. Division that was formed
through the acquisition of JAD and Fox Knob, and Sandlick Coal
Company, LLC and Harlan County Mining, LLC in April 2008 for $41
million.  Both the LRR Division and the JAD Division are located in
the Central Appalachia region of eastern Kentucky.  The LRR
Division has approximately 26.3 million tons of surface reserves
under lease.  The JAD Division has 24.4 million tons of surface
reserves, both leased and owned real property.  At present, U.S.
Coal has three surface mines in operation between the LRR Division
and JAD Division.

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors has tapped Barber Law
PLLC and Foley & Lardner as attorneys.

The Debtors are represented by Amelia Martin Adams, Esq., and Laura
Day DelCotto, Esq. of Delcotto Law Group PLLC; and Dennis J.
Drebsky, Esq., and Christopher M. Desiderio, Esq., of Nixon Peabody
LLP.


VANITY SHOP: Media Options, Maurices Sign Deal to Buy IP Assets
---------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Shon Hastings of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District
of North Dakota will convene a hearing on Oct. 17, 2017, at 9:30
a.m. (CST), to consider Vanity Shop of Grand Forks, Inc.'s bid/sale
procedures in connection with its sale of certain intellectual
property to Media Options S.A. for $100,000, and a different subset
of intellectual property to Maurices, Inc., for $75,000, both
subject to overbid.

Objections, if any, must be filed within 14 days from the date of
the mailing of the notice.

The Debtor determined that the best way to maximize value for the
benefit of all interested parties was a prompt and orderly
wind-down of the business through the implementation of store
closing sales and related liquidation initiatives.  Accordingly, it
conducted and finished its store closing sales pursuant to the
Court's final order authorizing the assumption of a consulting
agreement and the conduct of the store closing sales.

Pursuant to the most recent Monthly Operating Report, the Debtor
has $7,250,103 in cash as of Aug. 26, 2017, available for payment
of administrative expenses and for distribution to creditors upon
confirmation of a plan of reorganization.

In connection with its retail operation, the Debtor has developed
and utilized the Intellectual Property, which consists of
trademarks, domain names, customer files and related data,
including, among other things, the digital assets associated with
the e-commerce website operated by the Debtor at
http://www.vanity.com/and http://www.vanity.net/

The Debtor filed an application to engage Hilco IP Services, LLC,
doing business as Hilco Streambank, as its intellectual property
disposition consultant nunc pro tunc to May 12, 2017.  On June 16,
2017, the application to hire Hilco was approved.  Upon its
retention, Hilco Streambank immediately began extensive marketing
and due diligence efforts on the sale of the Intellectual Property
and began to solicit interest in a sale of all or a portion of the
Debtor's Intellectual Property.  That process is ongoing and will
continue up to the date of an auction.

Additionally, the Debtor filed an application to engage Diamond B
Technology Services, LLC ("DBTS") to assist Hilco Streambank as the
IT Consultant nunc pro tunc to May 12, 2017.  On Aug. 2, 2017 the
Court entered an order approving the employment of DBTS as IT
Consultant.

As a result of Hilco Streambank's efforts, the ultimately received
two "Stalking Horse" bids covering different subsets of the
Intellectual Property.  The first bid is from Media Options S.A.
which, as set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement ("Media Options
APA"), provides for $100,000 cash consideration for the Debtor's
interests in the Vanity.com trademark (USPTO Registration No.
4865304) and two domain names: www.vanity.com and www.vanity.net
("Media Options Assets").   Pursuant to the Media Options APA, the
Debtor has agreed, subject to Court approval, to pay to Media
Options a Break-Up Fee of $5,000 in the event it is overbid at the
Auction and an alternative buyer is selected as the Successful
Bidder for the Media Options Assets.

The second "Stalking Horse" bid is from Maurices, Inc. which, as
set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement ("Maurices APA"),
provides for $75,000 cash consideration for the Debtor's interests
in the Vanity trademark (USPTO Registration Nos. 4973696, 4973695,
3717668, 3717553, 3701029, 3717667, 3691530, 3691596, 3691531,
3691529, 3691515, 3691496, 1891144, 1800825, 1780669), the domain
names www.evanity.com and www.vanityshops.com, and the Debtor's
customer files ("Maurices Assets").  Pursuant to the Maurices APA,
the Debtor has agreed, subject to Court approval, to pay to
Maurices a break-up fee of $7,500 in the event it is overbid at the
auction and an alternative buyer is selected as the Successful
Bidder for the Maurices Assets.

A copy of the APAs attached to the Motion is available for free
at:

      http://bankrupt.com/misc/Vanity_Shop_430_Sales.pdf

Accordingly, the Debtor believes it is in the best interest of the
estate and creditors to implement the Bid/Sale Procedures, and,
accordingly, will be requesting the Court approve the Bid/Sale
Procedures prior to the bid deadline and auction.

The Debtor proposes to sell the Intellectual Property assets either
in whole or part through one or more sale transactions pursuant to
the terms of a purchase agreement (or agreements) to be negotiated
by and between the Debtor and proposed purchaser(s) and executed
upon completion of one or more Auctions for the Intellectual
Property.  In conjunction with the Auction(s), the Debtor proposes
to implement the Bid/Sale Procedures described below in an effort
to maximize the realizable value of the Intellectual Property for
the benefit of the Debtor's estate, creditors, and other interested
parties.

The salient terms of the Bid/Sale Procedures:

     a. Bid Deadline: Oct. 23, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. (CST)

     b. Qualified Bid: Must provide cash consideration in a minimum
amount of (i) $115,000 for the Media Options Assets, (ii) $90,000
for the Maurices Assets, and (iii) $205,000 for any offer that
includes both the Media Options Assets and the Maurices Assets

     c. Minimum Deposit: 10% of the purchase price

     d. Auction(s): The Auction(s), with respect to the Sale will
commence at the Vogel Law Firm, 218 NP Ave, Fargo, North Dakota, on
Oct. 25, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. (CST).

     e. Sale Hearing: Oct. 26, 2017 at 9:30 a.m. (CST)

     f. Sale Objection Deadline: Within 21 days from the date of
the mailing of the notice

The Debtor asks that the Order approving the sale of the
Intellectual Property provide that such sale "as is, where is,"
without any representations or warranties from the Debtor; and free
and clear of all liens, claims, and encumbrances.

The Debtor has consulted with the Office of the United States
Trustee for the District of North Dakota regarding the proposed
sale of the Intellectual Property and the potential implications
such sale has, if any, with respect to the Debtor's privacy policy
and the sale of customer data that includes Personally Identifiable
Information.  As a result thereof, the U.S. Trustee has indicated
it will suggest a consumer privacy ombudsperson ("CPO") who, the
Debtor understands, will be appointed in the near term.  The Debtor
intends to work cooperatively with the CPO on the timeline
contemplated.

The Debtor asks that any Order approving the relief requested be
effective immediately, by providing that the 14-day stay is
inapplicable.  There is no just reason for delaying the
effectiveness of the Order.

The Stalking Horse Bidders:

          MEDIA OPTIONS S.A.
          Avenida Central, San Felipe
          Panama City, Panama
          Attn: Andrew Rosener
          Telephone: (786) 231-5178
          E-mail: andrew@mediaoptions.com

                    - and -

          MAURICES, INC.
          Gary Holland
          Associate General Counsel
          Corporate & Securities
          Ascena Retail Group, Inc.
          933 MacArthur Boulevard
          Mahwah, NJ 07430
          Telephone: (551) 777-6752
          E-mail: Gary.Holland@AscenaRetail.com

     Maurices is represented by:

          Joseph T. Moldovan, Esq.
          MORRISON COHEN LLP
          909 Third Avenue
          New York, NY 10022
          Telephone: (212) 735-8603
          Cellphone: (917) 693-9682
          Facsimile: (917) 522-3103
          E-mail: jmoldovan@morrisoncohen.com

               About Vanity Shop of Grand Forks

Based in Fargo, North Dakota, Vanity Shop of Grand Forks, Inc.,
filed a Chapter 11 petition (Bankr. D. N.D. Case No. 17-30112) on
March 1, 2017, after announcing plans to close 137 Vanity stores in
27 states.  The petition was signed by James Bennett, chairman of
the Board of Directors.  In its petition, the Debtor estimated
assets of less than $100,000 and liabilities of $10 million to $50
million.

Judge Shon Hastings presides over the case.  

Caren Stanley, Esq., at Vogel Law Firm, serves as the Debtor's
bankruptcy counsel.  The Debtor hired Eide Bailly, LLP as auditor;
Bell Bank as trustee for
the ERISA Plan; and Jill Motschenbacher as accountant.

On March 10, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  The committee hired Fox
Rothschild LLP as bankruptcy counsel, BGA Management, LLC, as
financial advisor, and Brady Martz & Associates PC, as accountant.

On June 16, 2017, Hilco IP Services, LLC d/b/a Hilco Streambank,
was appointed as the Debtor's Intellectual Property Disposition
Consultant, nunc pro tunc to May 12, 2017.

On Aug. 2, 2017, Diamond B Technology Services, LLC, was appointed
as IT Consultant.


VERACRUZ INVESTMENTS: Hires Kenny and Associates as Appraiser
-------------------------------------------------------------
Veracruz Investments, LLC, and its debtor-affiliates, seek
authority from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District
of Georgia to employ Kenny and Associates, Inc., to appraise the
Debtor's warehouse and office property located at 1625 Oakbrook
Drive, Norcross, Gwinnett County, Georgia.

Kenny and Associates will be paid a flat fee of $2,500 for the
appraisal, including testimony in the Bankruptcy Court at $350 per
hour.

Doug Kenny, member of Kenny and Associates, Inc., assured the Court
that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the term is defined in
Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does not represent any
interest adverse to the Debtors and their estates.

Kenny and Associates can be reached at:

     Doug Kenny
     KENNY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
     327 Dahlonega Street, Suite 104
     Cumming, GA 30040
     Tel: (770) 664-8922

              About Veracruz Investments, LLC

Located at 1625 Oakbrook Drive Norcross, Georgia, Veracruz
Investments, LLC, is a limited liability company that provides
investment services. Veracruz Investments sought Chapter 11
protection (Bankr. N.D. Ga. Case No. 17-65621) on Sept. 5, 2017.

The petition was signed by Helio E. Bernal, operating manager. The
Debtor estimates assets and liabilities in the range of $1 million
to $10 million. The Debtor tapped David L. Bury, Jr., Esq., at
Stone & Baxter, LLP as counsel.


WALTER INVESTMENT: Barclays Hikes Ditech Facility $250 Million
--------------------------------------------------------------
Walter Investment Management Corp. previously entered into a
commitment letter with Barclays Bank PLC, pursuant to which, among
other things, Barclays agreed to increase the financing available
to the Company under that certain Amended and Restated Master
Repurchase Agreement, dated as of April 23, 2015, among Barclays,
as purchaser and agent, and Ditech Financial LLC, an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, as seller.

On Oct. 2, 2017, Ditech Financial entered into Amendment No. 7 to
the Ditech Facility with Barclays, and amendments to related
agreements, pursuant to which the financing available to the
Company under the Ditech Facility was increased by $150,000,000,
raising the committed portion of the Ditech Facility from
$100,000,000 to $250,000,000, and the termination date of the
Ditech Facility was extended to Aug. 25, 2018, provided that, on
and after May 22, 2018, the committed portion of the Ditech
Facility will equal $150,000,000.

The Company has experienced reductions in availability under its
warehouse and advance facilities, through reductions in the
Company's advance rates, changes to the terms of such facilities
and otherwise, which has negatively impacted the Company's
available liquidity and capital resources.  The funding available
pursuant to the Commitment Letter is expected to better position
the Company to ensure it has sufficient liquidity in the near-term,
though no assurance can be given that the Company will be
successful in maintaining adequate financing capacity with its
current or prospective lenders.

                         GTAAFT Facility

On Oct. 4, 2017, Green Tree Agency Advance Funding Trust I, a
Delaware statutory trust and a wholly-owned subsidiary of WIMC,
amended the terms of the GTAAFT Issuer's outstanding Series
2014-VF2 variable funding notes under the GTAAFT Issuer's existing
agency servicer advance master trust financing facility to, among
other things, (i) extend the applicable "Expected Repayment Date"
and revolving period for such variable funding notes from Oct. 4,
2017 to Oct. 3, 2018, (ii) decrease the interest rate margins in
respect thereof, (iii) decrease the maximum permitted principal
balance of the variable funding notes from $400 million in the
aggregate to $150 million in the aggregate and (iv) provide for a
supplemental fee to be paid during the period commencing on Oct. 4,
2017, and ending on the date that the Series 2014-VF2 variable
funding notes are paid or redeemed in full.

In connection with the foregoing transactions, certain existing
arrangements were amended as contemplated by an amendment to the
amended and restated series 2014-VF2 indenture supplement to the
Base Indenture, dated as of Oct. 4, 2017, made by and among the
parties to the Base Indenture, which amends that certain amended
and restated series 2014-VF2 indenture supplement, dated as of Oct.
21, 2015, among the parties to the 2014-VF2 Indenture Supplement
Amendment No. 2.

Interest on the variable funding notes is payable monthly in
arrears at a rate per annum generally equal to one-month LIBOR (or,
in certain circumstances, the higher of (i) the prime rate and (ii)
the federal funds rate plus 0.50%) plus a per annum margin.  The
Series 2014-VF2 funding notes were previously issued in four
classes: the Class A-VF2 Notes; the Class B-VF2 Notes; the Class
C-VF2 Notes; and the Class D-VF2 Notes.  Pursuant to the 2014-VF2
Indenture Supplement Amendment No. 2, effective October 4, 2017,
the applicable margin for the variable funding notes was decreased
from 1.85% to 1.55% for the Class A-VF2 Notes, from 2.97% to 2.67%
for the Class B-VF2 Notes, from 3.47% to 3.17% for the Class C-VF2
Notes and from 3.92% to 3.62% for the Class D-VF2 Notes. In
addition, the GTAAFT Issuer has agreed to pay to the holder(s) of
the Series 2014-VF2 variable funding notes, monthly in arrears
during the revolving period for the Series 2014-VF2 variable
funding notes, the Supplemental Fee in an amount equal to (on an
annualized basis) the product of (i) the difference between (a)
3.75% and (b) the average weighted daily applicable margins on all
classes of the Series 2014-VF2 variable funding notes outstanding
during the immediately preceding interest accrual period,
multiplied by (ii) the average daily outstanding variable funding
note balance during the immediately preceding interest accrual
period. Future draws under the variable funding notes are subject
to various conditions, including the accuracy of the
representations and warranties in the variable funding note
purchase agreement, as well as funding conditions under the that
certain second amended and restated indenture, dated as of Oct. 21,
2015, among the GTAAFT Issuer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as indenture
trustee, calculation agent, paying agent and securities
intermediary, Ditech Financial, as administrator and servicer, and
Barclays, as administrative agent, and the 2014-VF2 Indenture
Supplement Amendment No. 2.

Pursuant to the Base Indenture and the applicable indenture
supplements, the GTAAFT Issuer is also required to pay to the
holder(s) of the outstanding notes under the GTAAFT Facility (i) a
default supplemental fee in an amount equal to 3.00% per annum of
the aggregate note balances from and after the occurrence of an
event of default, (ii) an expected repayment date supplemental fee
in an amount equal to 1.00% per annum of the aggregate note
balances from and after the end of the occurrence of the applicable
Expected Repayment Date for such notes and (iii) the Supplemental
Fee.  Those fees, if any, are payable monthly in arrears.

If the Supplemental Fees remain unpaid on the applicable payment
date then a facility target amortization event will occur with
respect to the variable funding notes.

In addition, the revolving period for all of the term notes and all
of the variable funding notes issued under the GTAAFT Facility may
end and all or a portion of the notes may otherwise become due and
payable prior to the applicable Expected Repayment Date upon the
occurrence of an event of default and/or a target amortization
event.

As of Oct. 4, 2017, the GTAAFT Facility had outstanding (i) $300
million aggregate principal balance of Series 2016-T1 Term Notes
(which have an expected repayment date of Oct. 3, 2018), and (ii)
Series 2014 VF2 variable funding notes with maximum funding
commitments of $150 million.

                     About Walter Investment

Walter Investment Management Corp. --
http://www.walterinvestment.com/-- is an independent servicer and
originator of mortgage loans and servicer of reverse mortgage
loans.  The Company services a wide array of loans across the
credit spectrum for its own portfolio and for GSEs, government
agencies, third-party securitization trusts and other credit
owners.  Through the consumer, correspondent and wholesale lending
channels, the Company originates and purchases residential mortgage
loans that are predominantly sold to GSEs and government agencies.
The Company also operates two supplementary businesses; asset
receivables management and real estate owned property management
and disposition.  Based in Fort Washington, Pennsylvania, the
Company has approximately 4,500 employees and services a diverse
loan portfolio.

"The Company is facing certain challenges and uncertainties that
could have significant adverse effects on its business, liquidity
and financing activities," as disclosed in the Company's Form 10-Q
report for the period ended June 30, 2017.  "The Company may be
adversely impacted by the following factors, among others: failure
to maintain sufficient liquidity to operate its servicing and
lending businesses due to the inability to renew, replace or extend
its advance financing or warehouse facilities on favorable terms,
or at all; failure to comply with covenants contained in its debt
agreements or obtain any necessary waivers or amendments; failure
to resolve its obligation with respect to the remaining mandatory
clean-up calls; and failure to successfully restructure its
corporate debt."

The Company reported a net loss of $833.9 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2016, a net loss of $263.2 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2015, and a net loss of $110.3 million for the year
ended Dec. 31, 2014.  As of June 30, 2017, Walter Investment had
$15.59 billion in total assets, $15.70 billion in total liabilities
and a total stockholders' deficit of $112.98 million.

Ernst & Young LLP, in Tampa, Florida, issued a "going concern"
opinion on the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2016, noting that on July 31, 2017 the Company entered
into a Restructuring Support Agreement that provides for a
prepackaged plan of restructuring in the event the Company is
unsuccessful in otherwise restructuring its corporate debt.  The
prepackaged plan would provide court relief under the provisions of
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code.  These conditions, the auditors
said, raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern.

                           *    *    *

In July 2017, S&P Global Ratings lowered its long-term issuer
credit rating on Walter Investment Management Corp. to 'CCC-' from
'CCC'.  The outlook is negative.

In August 2017, Moody's Investors Service downgraded Walter
Investment's corporate family rating to 'Caa3' from 'Caa2'.  The
rating action follows the company's announcement that it has
entered into a restructuring support agreement with more than 50%
of senior term loan lenders.


WASHINGTON MCLAUGHLIN: Wants Plan Filing Extended by 90 Days
------------------------------------------------------------
The Washington-McLaughlin Christian School, Inc., asks the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland to extend the (a)
exclusive periods within which only the Debtors may file a Plan of
Reorganization for a period of 90 days; and (b) the 180-day
exclusivity period for obtaining acceptance of the plan for the
same length of time.

The Debtor's Chapter 11 Plan Exclusivity period presently expires
on Oct. 4, 2017.

The Debtor's case is relatively large and complex.  It involves
debt in excess of $900,000 and almost $9 million in assets.

Since the Petition Date, the Debtor has taken significant steps
toward a successful reorganization, including but not limited to:

     -- preparing and filing the Schedules and Statements;

     -- attending the Initial Debtor Interview and 341 Meeting
        of Creditors;

     -- filing an Application to Employ Counsel;

     -- amendments the Schedules and Statements;

     -- negotiating with Secured Creditors;

     -- starting to draft the Plan and Disclosure Statement;
        and

     -- working with the U.S. Trustee to ensure that all
        administrative requirements have been satisfied.

The Debtor assures the Court that it seeks the extension of the
Exclusive Periods in good faith and submits that there is no risk
of harm to the Debtor's creditors if the Court grants the requested
extension.

                  About Washington McLaughlin
                        Christian School

Washington McLaughlin Christian School filed a Chapter 11
bankruptcy petition (Bankr. D. Md. Case No. 17-17821) on June 6,
2017, listing less than $1 million in both assets and liabilities.
The Hon. Wendelin I. Lipp presides over the case.  The Debtor is
represented by Michael P. Coyle, Esq., at The Coyle Law Group.


WAYNE T. HEATH: Hires Roussos Glanzer as Counsel
------------------------------------------------
Wayne T. Heath Farms, Inc., seeks authority from the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia to employ
Roussos Glanzer & Barnhart, P.L.C., as counsel to the Debtor.

Wayne T. Heath requires Roussos Glanzer to:

   a. prepare the petition, lists, schedules and statements
      required by the Bankruptcy Code, the pleadings, motions,
      notices and orders required for the orderly administration
      of the estate, to ensure the progress of its case, and to
      consult with and advise the Debtor in the reorganization of
      its financial affairs and the liquidation of its assets;

   b. prepare for, prosecute, defend, and represent the Debtor's
      interests in all contested matters, adversary proceedings,
      and other motions and applications arising under, arising
      in, or related to its case;

   c. advise and consult concerning administration of the estate
      in its case, concerning the rights and remedies with regard
      to the Debtor's assets, concerning the claims of
      administrative, secured, priority, and unsecured creditors
      and other parties in interest;

   d. investigate the existence of other assets of the estate,
      and, if any exist, to take appropriate action to have the
      same turned over to the estate; and

   e. prepare a Disclosure Statement and Plan of Reorganization
      for the Debtor, and negotiate with all creditors and
      parties in interest who may be affected thereby; to obtain
      confirmation of a Plan of Reorganization, and perform all
      acts reasonably calculated to permit the Debtor to perform
      such acts and consummate a Plan of Reorganization.

Roussos Glanzer will be paid based upon its normal and usual hourly
billing rates.

Roussos Glanzer will be paid a retainer in the amount of $30,000.
Out of the retainer, the amount of $8,787.41 was paid for legal
expenses and $1,717, for the filing, leaving a balance on hand of
$19,495.59.

Roussos Glanzer will also be reimbursed for reasonable
out-of-pocket expenses incurred.

Robert V. Roussos, partner of Roussos Glanzer & Barnhart, PLC,
assured the Court that the firm is a "disinterested person" as the
term is defined in Section 101(14) of the Bankruptcy Code and does
not represent any interest adverse to the Debtor and its estates.

Roussos Glanzer can be reached at:

     Robert V. Roussos, Esq.
     Kelly M. Barnhart, Esq.
     ROUSSOS GLANZER & BARNHART, PLC
     580 E. Main St., Ste. 300
     Norfolk, VA 23510
     Tel: (757) 622-9005
     Fax: (757) 624-9257
     E-mail: roussos@rgblawfirm.com
             barnhart@rgblawfirm.com

              About Wayne T. Heath Farms, Inc.

Wayne T Heath Farms Inc. is a privately-held company in Townsend,
Virginia, and is engaged in the business of crop farming. The
Company's principal address is 4435 Jones Cove Drive Townsend, VA
23443, Northampton County.

Wayne T. Heath Farms, Inc., based in Townsend, VA, filed a Chapter
11 petition (Bankr. E.D. Va. Case No. 17-73469) on September 27,
2017. The Hon. Frank J. Santoro presides over the case. Robert V.
Roussos, Esq., at Roussos Glanzer & Barnhart, PLC, serves as
bankruptcy counsel.

In its petition, the Debtor estimated $1 million to $10 million in
both assets and liabilities. The petition was signed by Wayne T.
Heath, president.


WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC: Seeks Up to $8.3-Mil. in Incentive Bonuses
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Jonathan Randles, writing for The Wall Street Journal Pro
Bankruptcy, reported that Westinghouse Electric Co. is seeking
permission to award as much as $8.3 million in incentive bonuses to
senior management and other high-level employees as it continues to
navigate bankruptcy.

According to the report, the proposed bonuses, which must be
approved by a judge, were described in court papers and would be
awarded if the company achieves what its advisers describe as tough
performance goals that require "major and complex cost-reductions
in a short period of time."

Bonuses would be awarded to 10 members of Westinghouse's senior
management team and 16 other key employees who are most responsible
for steering the company through chapter 11 and who "will be
critical to the development and negotiation of a value-maximizing
transaction," the report related, citing court papers.

The court filings don't list the specific members of management who
will be eligible to receive bonuses or how much each of these
people may receive if the incentive program is approved, the report
said.  The bonus payments being proposed are different from a pool
of retention bonuses for other key Westinghouse employees that were
approved by a judge in September, the report noted.

Westinghouse is also asking to raise the annual salary of acting
President and Chief Executive Jose Emeterio Gutierrez from $627,000
to $1 million, and increase acting Chief Financial Officer Dan
Sumner's annual compensation from $234,000 to $375,000, the report
further related.  Their current salaries are below-market, the
company said, the report added.  Mr. Gutierrez was promoted to his
current position in June, two months after the company plunged into
bankruptcy, the report said.  He was previously in charge of
Westinghouse's nuclear fuel business, the report added.

                  About Westinghouse Electric

Westinghouse Electric Company LLC --
http://www.westinghousenuclear.com/-- is a U.S. based nuclear
power company founded in 1999 that provides design work and
start-up help for new nuclear power plants and makes many of the
components.  Westinghouse manufactures and supplies the commercial
fuel products needed to run the plants, and it offers training,
engineering, maintenance, and quality management services.  Almost
50% of nuclear power plants around the world and about 60% of U.S.
plants are based on Westinghouse's technology.  Westinghouse's
world headquarters are located in the Pittsburgh suburb of
Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania.

On Oct. 16, 2006, Westinghouse Electric was sold for $5.4 billion
to a group comprising of Toshiba (77% share), partners The Shaw
Group (20% share), and Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Co.
Ltd. (3% share).  After purchasing part of Shaw's stake in 2013,
Japan-based conglomerate Toshiba obtained ownership of 87% of
Westinghouse.

Amid cost overruns at U.S. nuclear reactors it was building,
Westinghouse Electric Company LLC, along with 29 affiliates, filed
voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S.
Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Case No. 17-10751) on March 29,
2017.  The petitions were signed by AlixPartners' Lisa J. Donahue,
chief transition and development officer.

The Debtors disclosed total assets of $4.32 billion and total
liabilities of $9.39 billion as of Feb. 28, 2017.

The Hon. Michael E. Wiles presides over the cases.

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP serves as counsel to the Debtors.  The
Debtors hired AlixPartners LLP as financial advisor; PJT Partners
Inc. as investment banker; Kurtzman Carson Consultants LLC as
claims and noticing agent; K&L Gates as special counsel; and KPMG
LLP as tax consultant and accounting and financial reporting
advisor.

Toshiba Nuclear Energy Holdings (UK) Ltd. is represented by Albert
Togut, Esq., Brian F. Moore, Esq., and Kyle J. Ortiz, Esq., at
Togut, Segal & Segal LLP.

On April 7, 2017, the Office of the U.S. Trustee appointed an
official committee of unsecured creditors.  Proskauer Rose LLP is
the committee's bankruptcy counsel, and Houlihan Lokey Capital,
Inc., serves as investment banker.

The Board of Directors of Westinghouse appointed a special panel
called the U.S. AP1000 Committee to oversee the company's
activities related to certain AP1000 nuclear plants located in
Georgia and South Carolina.


WILLIAM WILLIS: Sale of Marina Property to Brawner for $3.8M Okayed
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Judge Thomas J. Catliota of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
District of Maryland authorized the Agreement of Sale and Purchase
of William Arthur Willis and Mary Sue Willis, and The Sailing
Emporium, Inc., with Brawner Co., Inc., in connection with the sale
of the real property, personal property, goodwill and other
intangibles relating to the Marina operations in Rock Hall,
Maryland, outside the ordinary course of business for $3,800,000.

On Sept. 7, 2017, an Auction of the Marina Property was conducted
at which time the Debtors determined that the offer of Brawner to
purchase the Marina Property for $3,800,000 was the highest and
best offer, pursuant to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated
Sept. 11, 2017.  The Debtors selected the offer of Derecktor
Chesapeake, LLC to purchase the Marina Property for $3,650,000 as
the successful back-up offer for the Marina Property.

The sale is free and clear of all Interests of any kind or nature
whatsoever.

At Closing on the Transaction, the People's Bank will be paid its
allowed claim consisting of all unpaid principal and accrued and
outstanding interest due as of the date of Closing that is secured
by the Marina Property, plus pre-petition late charges in the
amount of $10,789, pre-petition insurance in the amount of $7,328,
pre-petition attorneys' fees in the amount of $22,767 with the
balance of the Bank's claim, including post-petition fees and
expenses, to be held by the Title Company or Sailing Emporium's
counsel pending further Order of the Court.

All personal property used, or held for use, in the operations of
the Marina with the exception of the personal property set forth in
the Order will be conveyed to the Purchaser at Closing.

The Order will be effective as a determination that, as of the
Closing, all Interests of any kind or nature whatsoever existing as
to the Marina Property prior to the Closing have been
unconditionally released, discharged and terminated, and that the
conveyances described herein have been effected.

Any contract that is not specifically included in the Brawner
Agreement or provided for in this Order will be rejected.  For
clarity, the Marine Promissory Note and Security Agreement for the
1996 Markley's Marina, Inc. custom boat (HIN# MVU35011J595) with
Branch Banking & Trust Co. ("BB&T") is rejected and the boat will
be turned over to BB&T in accordance with its contract terms or as
otherwise agreed.

Notwithstanding the foregoing and anything to the contrary in the
Order, and subject to and conditioned upon the payment of $45,000
by the Purchaser to m2 Lease Funds, LLC before or simultaneously
with Closing ("Purchaser Lift Payment") and the payment of $10,000
by Sailing Emporium to m2 before or simultaneously with Closing,
the Debtors' assumption and assignment of the m2 Lease to the
Purchaser free and clear of all Interests is approved.  There will
be no fees charged to the Purchaser or the Debtors as a result of
the assumption and assignment of the m2 Lease.

The Willises, as the owners of adjacent Parcel 13, will grant and
convey any and all riparian rights they hold to Parcel 23 and the
Marina, which documentation will be recorded in the land records.
They will execute any and all documents necessary to grant
Purchaser an easement for, among other things, the ownership,
operation, repair, replacement and/or relocation of, the existing
sewer line across Parcel 13.

At the Transaction Closing, the Debtors are  authorized and
directed to use the Proceeds to pay (or, as applicable, credit) the
following: (i) Real Estate Taxes (estimated but not to be paid) -
$94,703; (ii) Recordation Tax (estimated but not to be paid) -
$25,080; (iii) Transfer Tax (estimated but not to be paid) -
$38,000; (iv) Broker Fee - $133,000; (v) Deed and Deed Prep
(estimated) - $1,000; (vi) Premium and fees for title examination
and title insurance - TBD; (vii) Sailing Emporium Lift Payment -
$10,000; (viii) UST Fee - $10,400; (ix) Break-Up Fee due to
Derecktor per Order entered at Dkt. # 184 - $114,000; and (x) The
Peoples Bank - $2,457,560 (plus per diem contract interest until
Closing).  

Notwithstanding the provisions of Bankruptcy Rules 6004(h) and
6006(d), and consistent with Bankruptcy Code Section 363(m), the
Order will not be stayed and it will be effective and enforceable
immediately upon its entry.  Time is of the essence in closing the
transactions referenced or contemplated thereby, and the Debtors
and the Purchaser intend to close the Transaction no sooner than
five days after entry of the Order and no later than 45 days after
the Order becomes a final order.

If Brawner fails to consummate the Closing of the Transaction
contemplated in the Brawner Agreement, the Debtors are authorized
to consummate the Transaction with Derecktor pursuant to the
Derecktor Agreement filed with the Court on July 17, 2017 as
amended by the terms and conditions agreed to at the Auction,
without further order of the Court.

A copy of the Brawner Agreement attached to the Order is available
for free at:

     http://bankrupt.com/misc/William_Willis_190_Order.pdf

The Purchaser:

          BRAWNER CO., INC.
          c/o Kurt Zimmermann, CFO
          888 17th Street, NW, Suite 205
          Washington, D.C. 20006
          E-mail: kzimmermann@brawnercompany.com

Counsel for the Debtors:

          James A. Vidmar, Esq.
          Lisa Yonka Stevens, Esq.
          YUMKAS, VIDMAR, SWEENEY & MULRENIN, LLC
          10211 Wincopin Circle, Suite 500
          Columbia, MD 21044
          Telephone: (443) 569-5977
          E-mail: jvidmar@yvslaw.com
                  lstevens@yvslaw.com

                    - and -

          John D. Burns, Esq.
          THE BURNS LAW FIRM, LLC
          6303 Ivy Lane, Suite 102
          Greenbelt, MD 20770
          Telephone: (301) 441-8780
          E-mail: infor@burnsbankruptcyfirm.com

                    - and -

          Andrew Cantor
          MARCUS & MILLICHAP
          1100 Abernathy Road, N.E.
          Bldg. 500, Suite 600
          Atlanta, Georgia 30328
          Telephone: (678) 808-2700
          E-mail: Andrew.Cantor@marcusmillichap.com

William Arthur Willis sought Chapter 11 protection (Bankr. D. Md.
Case No. 16-26458) on Dec. 16, 2016.


WILLIAMS FINANCIAL: Claims Filing Deadline Set for November 27
--------------------------------------------------------------
The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas set
Nov. 27, 2017, at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central Time) as the last
date and time for any person or entity holding a claim against
Williams Financial Group Inc. and its debtor-affiliates to fill
proofs of claim against the Debtors.

The Court also set March 23, 2018, at 5:00 p.m. (prevailing Central
Time) as deadline for governmental units to file their claims
against the Debtors.

All proofs of claim must be filed to:

   The clerk of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
     Northern District of Texas
   Earle Cabell Federal Building
   1100 Commerce St., Room 1254
   Dallas, TX 75242-1496

Also, proofs of claim may be filed through the clerk's website at
http://www.txnb.uscourts.gov.

              About Williams Financial Group Inc.

Williams Financial Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries WFG Management
Services Inc., WFG Investments Inc. and WFG Advisors LP sought
protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (Bankr. N.D.
Tex. Case Nos. 17-33578 to 17-33581) on September 24, 2017.

At the time of the filing, Williams Financial Group disclosed that
it had estimated assets and liabilities of $1,000,001 to $10
million.

Judge Harlin Dewayne Hale presides over the cases.


[^] BOND PRICING: For the Week from October 2 to 6, 2017
--------------------------------------------------------
  Company                     Ticker  Coupon Bid Price   Maturity
  -------                     ------  ------ ---------   --------
Alpha Appalachia
  Holdings Inc                ANR       3.25      2.05   8/1/2015
American Eagle Energy Corp    AMZG     11.00      0.93   9/1/2019
Amyris Inc                    AMRS      9.50     63.43  4/15/2019
Amyris Inc                    AMRS      6.50     63.00  5/15/2019
Appvion Inc                   APPPAP    9.00     45.25   6/1/2020
Appvion Inc                   APPPAP    9.00     44.75   6/1/2020
Armstrong Energy Inc          ARMS     11.75     14.00 12/15/2019
Armstrong Energy Inc          ARMS     11.75     11.63 12/15/2019
Avaya Inc                     AVYA     10.50      5.50   3/1/2021
Avaya Inc                     AVYA     10.50      0.56   3/1/2021
BPZ Resources Inc             BPZR      6.50      3.02   3/1/2015
BPZ Resources Inc             BPZR      6.50      3.02   3/1/2049
Bon-Ton Department
  Stores Inc/The              BONT      8.00     37.00  6/15/2021
BreitBurn Energy
  Partners LP / BreitBurn
  Finance Corp                BBEP      7.88      6.25  4/15/2022
BreitBurn Energy
  Partners LP / BreitBurn
  Finance Corp                BBEP      8.63      6.25 10/15/2020
BreitBurn Energy
  Partners LP / BreitBurn
  Finance Corp                BBEP      8.63      6.00 10/15/2020
BreitBurn Energy
  Partners LP / BreitBurn
  Finance Corp                BBEP      8.63      6.00 10/15/2020
Buffalo Thunder
  Development Authority       BUFLO    11.00     40.00  12/9/2022
Chassix Holdings Inc          CHASSX   10.00      8.00 12/15/2018
Chassix Holdings Inc          CHASSX   10.00      8.00 12/15/2018
Chukchansi Economic
  Development Authority       CHUKCH    9.75     53.00  5/30/2020
Cinedigm Corp                 CIDM      5.50     35.00  4/15/2035
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE       9.00     60.25  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE       8.88     24.46  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE       7.75     11.00   6/1/2020
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE       9.00     57.25  3/15/2019
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE       7.75     11.00   6/1/2020
Claire's Stores Inc           CLE       9.00     60.00  3/15/2019
Cobalt International
  Energy Inc                  CIE       2.63     23.00  12/1/2019
Concho Resources Inc          CXO       5.50    102.35   4/1/2023
Concho Resources Inc          CXO       5.50    102.11  10/1/2022
Cumulus Media Holdings Inc    CMLS      7.75     33.30   5/1/2019
DFC Finance Corp              DLLR     10.50     55.89  6/15/2020
DFC Finance Corp              DLLR     10.50     52.75  6/15/2020
Denbury Resources Inc         DNR       7.25     59.63  12/1/2017
EV Energy Partners LP /
  EV Energy Finance Corp      EVEP      8.00     38.00  4/15/2019
EXCO Resources Inc            XCO       8.50     24.95  4/15/2022
EXCO Resources Inc            XCO       7.50     29.38  9/15/2018
Egalet Corp                   EGLT      5.50     50.00   4/1/2020
Emergent Capital Inc          EMGC      8.50     50.14  2/15/2019
Energy Conversion
  Devices Inc                 ENER      3.00      7.88  6/15/2013
Energy Future Holdings Corp   TXU       6.55     13.25 11/15/2034
Energy Future Holdings Corp   TXU       6.50     12.50 11/15/2024
Energy Future Holdings Corp   TXU      11.25     69.88  11/1/2017
Energy Future Holdings Corp   TXU       5.55     12.50 11/15/2014
Energy Future Holdings Corp   TXU       9.75     29.25 10/15/2019
Energy Future Holdings Corp   TXU      10.88     69.88  11/1/2017
Energy Future Holdings Corp   TXU      10.88     69.88  11/1/2017
Energy Future Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc            TXU      11.25     36.00  12/1/2018
Energy Future Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc            TXU      11.25     36.00  12/1/2018
Energy Future Intermediate
  Holding Co LLC /
  EFIH Finance Inc            TXU       9.75     35.75 10/15/2019
Fleetwood Enterprises Inc     FLTW     14.00      3.56 12/15/2011
GenOn Energy Inc              GENONE    9.50     74.38 10/15/2018
GenOn Energy Inc              GENONE    9.50     73.00 10/15/2018
GenOn Energy Inc              GENONE    9.50     74.25 10/15/2018
General Electric Co           GE        3.30     99.38 10/15/2017
Gibson Brands Inc             GIBSON    8.88     80.55   8/1/2018
Global Brokerage Inc          GLBR      2.25     45.68  6/15/2018
Gulfmark Offshore Inc         GLFM      6.38     20.40  3/15/2022
Homer City Generation LP      HOMCTY    8.14     38.75  10/1/2019
Illinois Power Generating Co  DYN       7.00     33.75  4/15/2018
Illinois Power Generating Co  DYN       6.30     35.38   4/1/2020
IronGate Energy Services LLC  IRONGT   11.00     35.00   7/1/2018
IronGate Energy Services LLC  IRONGT   11.00     35.00   7/1/2018
IronGate Energy Services LLC  IRONGT   11.00     35.00   7/1/2018
IronGate Energy Services LLC  IRONGT   11.00     35.00   7/1/2018
Jack Cooper Holdings Corp     JKCOOP    9.25     52.75   6/1/2020
Kellwood Co                   KWD       7.63     98.75 10/15/2017
Las Vegas Monorail Co         LASVMC    5.50      8.00  7/15/2019
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH       4.00      3.33  4/30/2009
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH       5.00      3.33   2/7/2009
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH       2.00      3.33   3/3/2009
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH       1.50      3.33  3/29/2013
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH       2.07      3.33  6/15/2009
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH       1.38      3.33  6/15/2009
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc  LEH       1.60      3.33  11/5/2011
Lehman Brothers Inc           LEH       7.50      1.23   8/1/2026
MF Global Holdings Ltd        MF        3.38     27.38   8/1/2018
MModal Inc                    MODL     10.75      6.13  8/15/2020
Mashantucket Western
  Pequot Tribe                MASHTU    7.35     18.00   7/1/2026
Midstates Petroleum
  Co Inc / Midstates
  Petroleum Co LLC            MPO      10.75      0.47  10/1/2020
Nine West Holdings Inc        JNY       6.13     16.50 11/15/2034
Nine West Holdings Inc        JNY       8.25     18.50  3/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc        JNY       6.88     17.83  3/15/2019
Nine West Holdings Inc        JNY       8.25     17.25  3/15/2019
Nortel Networks Capital Corp  NT        7.88      3.53  6/15/2026
OMX Timber Finance
  Investments II LLC          OMX       5.54      9.85  1/29/2020
Orexigen Therapeutics Inc     OREX      2.75     36.57  12/1/2020
Permian Holdings Inc          PRMIAN   10.50     29.13  1/15/2018
Permian Holdings Inc          PRMIAN   10.50     29.13  1/15/2018
Pitney Bowes Inc              PBI       4.75    101.12  5/15/2018
Prospect Holding Co LLC /
  Prospect Holding
  Finance Co                  PRSPCT   10.25     48.25  10/1/2018
Renco Metals Inc              RENCO    11.50     20.75   7/1/2003
Rex Energy Corp               REXX      8.88     39.00  12/1/2020
Rex Energy Corp               REXX      6.25     35.35   8/1/2022
Rolta LLC                     RLTAIN   10.75     25.00  5/16/2018
SAExploration Holdings Inc    SAEX     10.00     64.63  7/15/2019
SandRidge Energy Inc          SD        7.50      2.08  2/15/2023
SunEdison Inc                 SUNE      0.25      2.00  1/15/2020
SunEdison Inc                 SUNE      2.38      2.25  4/15/2022
SunEdison Inc                 SUNE      2.63      2.25   6/1/2023
SunEdison Inc                 SUNE      2.75      1.89   1/1/2021
SunEdison Inc                 SUNE      5.00      9.38   7/2/2018
SunEdison Inc                 SUNE      3.38      2.25   6/1/2025
TMST Inc                      THMR      8.00     19.50  5/15/2013
Talos Production LLC /
  Talos Production
  Finance Inc                 TALPRO    9.75     62.13  2/15/2018
Talos Production LLC /
  Talos Production
  Finance Inc                 TALPRO    9.75     62.13  2/15/2018
TerraVia Holdings Inc         TVIA      5.00      7.75  10/1/2019
TerraVia Holdings Inc         TVIA      6.00     43.88   2/1/2018
Toys R Us - Delaware Inc      TOY       8.75     28.64   9/1/2021
Toys R Us Inc                 TOY       7.38     31.00 10/15/2018
UCI International LLC         UCII      8.63      6.88  2/15/2019
Vanguard Operating LLC        VNR       8.38     20.75   6/1/2019
Walter Energy Inc             WLTG      8.50      0.83  4/15/2021
Walter Energy Inc             WLTG      9.88      0.83 12/15/2020
Walter Energy Inc             WLTG      9.88      0.83 12/15/2020
Walter Energy Inc             WLTG      9.88      0.83 12/15/2020
Walter Investment
  Management Corp             WAC       4.50     16.00  11/1/2019
Washington Mutual Bank /
  Debt not acquired
  by JPMorgan                 WAMU      5.55      0.70  6/16/2010
Zoetis Inc                    ZTS       1.88    100.02   2/1/2018
iHeartCommunications Inc      IHRT     10.00     55.27  1/15/2018
iHeartCommunications Inc      IHRT      6.88     53.03  6/15/2018



                            *********

Monday's edition of the TCR delivers a list of indicative prices
for bond issues that reportedly trade well below par.  Prices are
obtained by TCR editors from a variety of outside sources during
the prior week we think are reliable.  Those sources may not,
however, be complete or accurate.  The Monday Bond Pricing table
is compiled on the Friday prior to publication.  Prices reported
are not intended to reflect actual trades.  Prices for actual
trades are probably different.  Our objective is to share
information, not make markets in publicly traded securities.
Nothing in the TCR constitutes an offer or solicitation to buy or
sell any security of any kind.  It is likely that some entity
affiliated with a TCR editor holds some position in the issuers
public debt and equity securities about which we report.

Each Tuesday edition of the TCR contains a list of companies with
insolvent balance sheets whose shares trade higher than $3 per
share in public markets.  At first glance, this list may look like
the definitive compilation of stocks that are ideal to sell short.
Don't be fooled.  Assets, for example, reported at historical cost
net of depreciation may understate the true value of a firm's
assets.  A company may establish reserves on its balance sheet for
liabilities that may never materialize.  The prices at which
equity securities trade in public market are determined by more
than a balance sheet solvency test.

On Thursdays, the TCR delivers a list of recently filed
Chapter 11 cases involving less than $1,000,000 in assets and
liabilities delivered to nation's bankruptcy courts.  The list
includes links to freely downloadable images of these small-dollar
petitions in Acrobat PDF format.

Each Friday's edition of the TCR includes a review about a book of
interest to troubled company professionals.  All titles are
available at your local bookstore or through Amazon.com.  Go to
http://www.bankrupt.com/books/to order any title today.

Monthly Operating Reports are summarized in every Saturday edition
of the TCR.

The Sunday TCR delivers securitization rating news from the week
then-ending.

TCR subscribers have free access to our on-line news archive.
Point your Web browser to http://TCRresources.bankrupt.com/and use
the e-mail address to which your TCR is delivered to login.

                            *********

S U B S C R I P T I O N   I N F O R M A T I O N

Troubled Company Reporter is a daily newsletter co-published
by Bankruptcy Creditors Service, Inc., Fairless Hills,
Pennsylvania, USA, and Beard Group, Inc., Washington, D.C., USA.  
Jhonas Dampog, Marites Claro, Joy Agravante, Rousel Elaine
Tumanda, Valerie Udtuhan, Howard C. Tolentino, Carmel Paderog,
Meriam Fernandez, Joel Anthony G. Lopez, Cecil R. Villacampa,
Sheryl Joy P. Olano, Psyche A. Castillon, Ivy B. Magdadaro, Carlo
Fernandez, Christopher G. Patalinghug, and Peter A. Chapman,
Editors.

Copyright 2017.  All rights reserved.  ISSN: 1520-9474.

This material is copyrighted and any commercial use, resale or
publication in any form (including e-mail forwarding, electronic
re-mailing and photocopying) is strictly prohibited without prior
written permission of the publishers.  Information contained
herein is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but is
not guaranteed.

The TCR subscription rate is $975 for 6 months delivered via
e-mail.  Additional e-mail subscriptions for members of the same
firm for the term of the initial subscription or balance thereof
are $25 each.  For subscription information, contact Peter A.
Chapman at 215-945-7000 or Nina Novak at 202-362-8552.

                   *** End of Transmission ***